Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of Robotic Surgery 4/2022

09.09.2021 | Original Article

Robotic mesh-supported pectopexy for pelvic organ prolapse: expanding the options of pelvic floor repair

verfasst von: Dimitrios Bolovis, Wolfgang Hitzl, Cosima Brucker

Erschienen in: Journal of Robotic Surgery | Ausgabe 4/2022

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Pelvic organ prolapse affects 30–50% of the female population. For definitive treatment surgery is unavoidable. Sacrocolpopexy has been the gold standard for anatomical correction of pelvic organ prolapse since the 1990s. Recently, pectopexy has been introduced as a new surgical procedure to correct apical prolapse. We have translated the laparoscopic pectopexy into a robotic procedure. The charts of the first 30 consecutive patients who underwent robotic pectopexy at the department for robotic and pelvic floor surgery were reviewed. All patients were analyzed for estimated blood loss, operation time, as well as complications. Treatment success was evaluated after 3–6 months using a composite endpoint including anatomical and subjective components. Of the 30 patients analyzed, 18 underwent hysteropectopexy (n = 18), 6 patients underwent vaginopectopexy and 6 patients underwent cervicopectopexy. Additional procedures were performed in 14 patients, and this influenced operation time and intraoperative blood loss. No intraoperative complications were noted and no conversions were necessary. Treatment success according to the primary composite endpoint was achieved in 30 (100%) patients. Furthermore, neither de novo urgency nor obstructive bowel symptoms were noted in any of the patients treated with robotic pectopexy. Similar to SCP, pectopexy is designed for prolapse repair. The robotic technique for pectopexy capitalizes on the advantages of robotic surgery as compared to conventional laparoscopy since it allows for anatomical preparation and simplification of applying sutures and mesh material, reducing operating time and minimizing surgical trauma. The technique is safe, and anatomical outcomes are excellent.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Hendrix SL, Clark A, Nygaard I, Aragaki A, Barnabei V, McTiernan A (2002) Pelvic organ prolapse in the women’s health initiative: gravity and gravidity. Am J Obstet Gynecol 186:1160–1166CrossRef Hendrix SL, Clark A, Nygaard I, Aragaki A, Barnabei V, McTiernan A (2002) Pelvic organ prolapse in the women’s health initiative: gravity and gravidity. Am J Obstet Gynecol 186:1160–1166CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Wu JM, Hundley AF, Fulton RG, Myers ER (2009) Forecasting the prevalence of pelvic floor disorders in U.S. women 2010–2050. Obstet Gynecol 114:1278–1283CrossRef Wu JM, Hundley AF, Fulton RG, Myers ER (2009) Forecasting the prevalence of pelvic floor disorders in U.S. women 2010–2050. Obstet Gynecol 114:1278–1283CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Fialkow MF, Newton KM, Lentz GM, Weiss NS (2008) Lifetime risk of surgical management for pelvic organ prolapse or urinary incontinence. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 19:437–443CrossRef Fialkow MF, Newton KM, Lentz GM, Weiss NS (2008) Lifetime risk of surgical management for pelvic organ prolapse or urinary incontinence. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 19:437–443CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Smith FJ, Holman CD, Moorin RE, Tsokos N (2010) Lifetime risk undergoing surgery for pelvic organ prolapse. Obstet Gynecol 116:1096–1100CrossRef Smith FJ, Holman CD, Moorin RE, Tsokos N (2010) Lifetime risk undergoing surgery for pelvic organ prolapse. Obstet Gynecol 116:1096–1100CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Nezhat CH, Nezhat F, Nezhat C (1994) Laparoscopic sacral colpopexy for vaginal vault prolapse. Obstet Gynecol 84:885–888PubMed Nezhat CH, Nezhat F, Nezhat C (1994) Laparoscopic sacral colpopexy for vaginal vault prolapse. Obstet Gynecol 84:885–888PubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Di Marco DS, Chow GK, Gettman MT, Elliott DS (2004) Robotic-assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for treatment of vaginal vault prolapse. Urology 63:373–376CrossRef Di Marco DS, Chow GK, Gettman MT, Elliott DS (2004) Robotic-assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for treatment of vaginal vault prolapse. Urology 63:373–376CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Elliot DS, Krambeck AE, Chow GK (2006) Long-term results of robotic assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for the treatment of high grade vaginal vault prolapse. J Urol 176:655–659CrossRef Elliot DS, Krambeck AE, Chow GK (2006) Long-term results of robotic assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for the treatment of high grade vaginal vault prolapse. J Urol 176:655–659CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Daneshgari F, Kefer JC, Moore C, Kaouk J (2007) Robotic abdominal sacrocolpopexy/sacrouteropexy repair of advanced female pelvic organ prolapse (POP): utilizing POP-quantification-based staging and outcome. BJU Int 100:875–879CrossRef Daneshgari F, Kefer JC, Moore C, Kaouk J (2007) Robotic abdominal sacrocolpopexy/sacrouteropexy repair of advanced female pelvic organ prolapse (POP): utilizing POP-quantification-based staging and outcome. BJU Int 100:875–879CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Kramer BA, Whelan CM, Powell TM, Schwartz BF (2009) Robot-assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy as management for pelvic organ prolapse. J Endourol 23:655–658CrossRef Kramer BA, Whelan CM, Powell TM, Schwartz BF (2009) Robot-assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy as management for pelvic organ prolapse. J Endourol 23:655–658CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Banerjee C, Noé KG (2011) Laparoscopic pectopexy: a new technique of prolapse surgery for obese patients. Arch Gynecol Obstet 284:631–635CrossRef Banerjee C, Noé KG (2011) Laparoscopic pectopexy: a new technique of prolapse surgery for obese patients. Arch Gynecol Obstet 284:631–635CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Kale A, Biler A, Terzi H, Taner U, Kale E (2017) Laparoscopic pectopexy: initial experience of single center with a new technique for apical prolapse surgery. Int Braz J Urol 43:903–909CrossRef Kale A, Biler A, Terzi H, Taner U, Kale E (2017) Laparoscopic pectopexy: initial experience of single center with a new technique for apical prolapse surgery. Int Braz J Urol 43:903–909CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Yu EH, Jung HE, Noh HK, Joo JK (2020) Initial experience of laparoscopic pectopexy for apical prolapse in South Korea. J Menopausal Med 26:165–168CrossRef Yu EH, Jung HE, Noh HK, Joo JK (2020) Initial experience of laparoscopic pectopexy for apical prolapse in South Korea. J Menopausal Med 26:165–168CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Barber MD, Maher C (2013) Epidemiology and outcome assessment of pelvic organ prolapse. Int Urogynecol J 24(11):1783–1790CrossRef Barber MD, Maher C (2013) Epidemiology and outcome assessment of pelvic organ prolapse. Int Urogynecol J 24(11):1783–1790CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Hill T, Lewicki P (2006) Statistics: methods and applications. StatSoft, Tulsa Hill T, Lewicki P (2006) Statistics: methods and applications. StatSoft, Tulsa
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Noé KG, Schiermeier S, Alkatout I, Anapolski M (2015) Laparoscopic pectopexy: a prospective, randomized, comparative clinical trial of standard laparoscopic sacral colpocervicopexy with the new laparoscopic pectopexy - postoperative results and intermediate-term follow-up in a pilot study. J Endourol 29:210–215CrossRef Noé KG, Schiermeier S, Alkatout I, Anapolski M (2015) Laparoscopic pectopexy: a prospective, randomized, comparative clinical trial of standard laparoscopic sacral colpocervicopexy with the new laparoscopic pectopexy - postoperative results and intermediate-term follow-up in a pilot study. J Endourol 29:210–215CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Lagares-Garcia J, O’Connell A, Firilas A, Robinson CC, Dumas BP, Hagen ME (2016) The influence of body mass index on clinical short-term outcomes in robotic colorectal surgery. Int J Med Robot Comp Assist Surg 12:680–685CrossRef Lagares-Garcia J, O’Connell A, Firilas A, Robinson CC, Dumas BP, Hagen ME (2016) The influence of body mass index on clinical short-term outcomes in robotic colorectal surgery. Int J Med Robot Comp Assist Surg 12:680–685CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Planque H, Martin-Francoise S, Lequesne J, Le Brun JF (2018) Robotic surgery in endometrial cancer: feasibility in obese patients. Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol 46:625–631PubMed Planque H, Martin-Francoise S, Lequesne J, Le Brun JF (2018) Robotic surgery in endometrial cancer: feasibility in obese patients. Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol 46:625–631PubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Menzella D, Thubert T, Joubert M, Lauratet B, Kouchner P, Lefranc JP (2013) Influence of body mass index on the outcomes of robotic-assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy: a comparative retrospective study. Progress en Urologie 23(17):1482–1488CrossRef Menzella D, Thubert T, Joubert M, Lauratet B, Kouchner P, Lefranc JP (2013) Influence of body mass index on the outcomes of robotic-assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy: a comparative retrospective study. Progress en Urologie 23(17):1482–1488CrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Siedhoff MT, Carey ET, Findley AD, Riggins LE, Garrett JM, Steege JF (2012) Effect of extreme obesity on outcomes in laparoscopic hysterectomy. J Min Invasive Gynecol 19(6):701–707CrossRef Siedhoff MT, Carey ET, Findley AD, Riggins LE, Garrett JM, Steege JF (2012) Effect of extreme obesity on outcomes in laparoscopic hysterectomy. J Min Invasive Gynecol 19(6):701–707CrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Juliato CRT, Santos-Junior LC, de Castro EB, Dertkigil SS, Brito LGO (2019) Vaginal axis after abdominal sacrocolpopexy versus vaginal sacrospinous fixation–a randomized trial. Neurourol Urodyn 38:1142–1151CrossRef Juliato CRT, Santos-Junior LC, de Castro EB, Dertkigil SS, Brito LGO (2019) Vaginal axis after abdominal sacrocolpopexy versus vaginal sacrospinous fixation–a randomized trial. Neurourol Urodyn 38:1142–1151CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Robotic mesh-supported pectopexy for pelvic organ prolapse: expanding the options of pelvic floor repair
verfasst von
Dimitrios Bolovis
Wolfgang Hitzl
Cosima Brucker
Publikationsdatum
09.09.2021
Verlag
Springer London
Erschienen in
Journal of Robotic Surgery / Ausgabe 4/2022
Print ISSN: 1863-2483
Elektronische ISSN: 1863-2491
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-021-01303-7

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2022

Journal of Robotic Surgery 4/2022 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.