nach oben

Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie

03.03.2023 | Original Article

Treatment of skeletal class III malocclusion using a combined clear aligner and surgery-early approach

Assessment based on the American Board of Orthodontics Objective Grading System

verfasst von: Guoli Zhou, Fei Yu, Ph.D., Ass. Prof. Hongbo Yu, Ass. Prof. Lunguo Xia, Lingjun Yuan, Prof. Bing Fang

Erschienen in: Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate whether clear aligner therapy (CAT) combined with a surgery-early approach can achieve good therapeutic effects in patients with skeletal class III malocclusion.

Methods

Thirty consecutive skeletal class III malocclusion cases treated with clear aligners combined with early surgery were selected. Treatment time, lateral cephalograms and American Board of Orthodontics Objective Grading System (ABO-OGS) scores of the treatment models were measured to evaluate the treatment efficiency, facial profile, and occlusion.

Results

The results showed that early surgery was achieved after 7.71 months of presurgical orthodontics, on average. ANB decreased by 5.57° (P < 0.001), and STissue N Vert to Pog’ decreased by 7.29 mm (P = 0.001), both reaching normal values. The posttreatment ABO-OGS scores were 26.600 on average, meeting its standards.

Conclusions

With the assistance of CAT, early surgery can be accomplished in patients with skeletal class III malocclusion, improving their facial profile and achieving functional occlusion.

Rosvall MD, Fields HW, Ziuchkovski J, Rosenstiel SF, Johnston WM (2009) Attractiveness, acceptability, and value of orthodontic appliances. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 135:276–277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2008.09.020 CrossRef

Worms FW, Isaacson RJ, Speidel TM (1976) Surgical orthodontic treatment planning: profile analysis and mandibular surgery. Angle Orthod 46(1):1–25. https://doi.org/10.1043/0003-3219(1976)046<0001:SOTPPA>2.0.CO;2 PubMed

Nagasaka H, Sugawara J, Kawamura H, Nanda R (2009) “surgery first” skeletal class III correction using the skeletal anchorage system. J Clin Orthod 43(2):97–105 PubMed

Ho CT, Denadai R, Lin HH, Lo LJ (2021) Three-dimensional computer-assisted orthognathic surgery: traditional hybrid versus full digital planning models. Ann Plast Surg 86(2S Suppl 1):S70–S77. https://doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0000000000002622 CrossRefPubMed

Choi JW, Lee JY, Yang SJ, Koh KS (2015) The reliability of a surgery-first orthognathic approach without presurgical orthodontic treatment for skeletal class III dentofacial deformity. Ann Plast Surg 74(3):333–341. https://doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0b013e318295dcce CrossRefPubMed

Hernández-Alfaro F, Guijarro-Martínez R, Peiró-Guijarro MA (2014) Surgery first in orthognathic surgery: what have we learned? A comprehensive workflow based on 45 consecutive cases. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 72(2):376–390. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2013.08.013 CrossRefPubMed

Nguyen MT, Vu TT, Nguyen QN (2021) Advanced digital 3D technology in the combined surgery-first orthognathic and clear aligner orthodontic therapy for dentofacial deformity treatment. Processes 9(9):1609. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr9091609 CrossRef

Baek SH, Ahn HW, Kwon YH, Choi JY (2010) Surgery-first approach in skeletal class III malocclusion treated with 2‑jaw surgery: evaluation of surgical movement and postoperative orthodontic treatment. J Craniofac Surg 21:332–338. https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0b013e3181cf5fd4 CrossRefPubMed

Kankam H, Madari S, Sawh-Martinez R, Bruckman KC, Steinbacher DM (2019) Comparing outcomes in orthognathic surgery using clear aligners versus conventional fixed appliances. J Craniofac Surg 30:1488–1491. https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000005572 CrossRefPubMed

10.

Brugnami F, Meuli S, Caiazzo A, Marrocco S, Scopelliti D (2021) Three-dimensional digital planning of class III decompensation with clear aligners: Hard and soft tissue augmentation with concomitant corticotomy to stretch the limits of safe orthodontic treatment. J Oral Biol Craniofac Res 11(2):297–302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobcr.2021.02.011 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

11.

Noguchi N, Tsuji M, Shigematsu M, Goto M (2007) An orthognathic simulation system integrating teeth, jaw and face data using 3D cephalometry. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 36(7):640–645. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2007.01.020 CrossRefPubMed

12.

Dowling PA, Espeland L, Krogstad O, Stenvik A, Kelly A (1999) Duration of orthodontic treatment involving orthognathic surgery. Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg 14(2):146–152 PubMed

13.

Luther F, Morris DO, Hart C (2003) Orthodontic preparation for orthognathic surgery: how long does it take and why? A retrospective study. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 41(6):401–406. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0266-4356(03)00163-3 CrossRefPubMed

14.

Wei H, Liu Z, Zang J, Wang X (2018) Surgery-first/early-orthognathic approach may yield poorer postoperative stability than conventional orthodontics-first approach: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 126(2):107–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oooo.2018.02.018 CrossRefPubMed

15.

Hoang TA, Lee KC, Chuang SK (2021) The surgery-first approach to orthognathic surgery. J Craniofac Surg 32(2):e153–e156. https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000006942 CrossRefPubMed

16.

Hernández-Alfaro F, Guijarro-Martínez R (2014) On a definition of the appropriate timing for surgical intervention in orthognathic surgery. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 43(7):846–855. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2014.02.007 CrossRefPubMed

17.

Uribe FA, Farrell B (2020) Surgery-first approach in the orthognathic patient. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am 32(1):89–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coms.2019.08.009 CrossRefPubMed

18.

Naran S, Steinbacher DM, Taylor JA (2018) Current concepts in orthognathic surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 141(6):925e–936e. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000004438 CrossRefPubMed

19.

Zinser MJ, Mischkowski RA, Sailer HF, Zöller JE (2012) Computer-assisted orthognathic surgery: feasibility study using multiple CAD/CAM surgical splints. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 113(5):673–687. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oooo.2011.11.009 CrossRefPubMed

20.

Stamm T, Andriyuk E, Kleinheinz J, Jung S, Dirksen D, Middelberg C (2022) In vivo accuracy of a new digital planning system in terms of jaw relation, extent of surgical movements and the hierarchy of stability in orthognathic surgery. J Pers Med 12(5):843. https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm12050843 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

21.

Amodeo G, Meuli S, Carboni A, Brugnami F, Marrocco S, Orsini R, Scopelliti D (2020) Surgery first and Invisalign system: combined digital approach. J Craniofac Surg 31(6):1681–1686. https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000006392 CrossRefPubMed

22.

Pagani R, Signorino F, Poli PP, Manzini P, Panisi I (2016) The use of Invisalign® system in the management of the orthodontic treatment before and after class III surgical approach. Case Rep Dent 2016:9231219. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/9231219 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

23.

Casko JS, Vaden JL, Kokich VG, Damone J, James RD, Cangialosi TJ, Riolo ML, Owens SE Jr, Bills ED (1998) Objective grading system for dental casts and panoramic radiographs. American Board of Orthodontics. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 114(5):589–599. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0889-5406(98)70179-9 CrossRefPubMed

24.

Patterson BD, Foley PF, Ueno H, Mason SA, Schneider PP, Kim KB (2021) Class II malocclusion correction with Invisalign: Is it possible? Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 159(1):e41–e48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2020.08.016 CrossRefPubMed

25.

Papadimitriou A, Mousoulea S, Gkantidis N, Kloukos D (2018) Clinical effectiveness of Invisalign® orthodontic treatment: a systematic review. Prog Orthod 19(1):37. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40510-018-0235-z CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

26.

Lombardo L, Arreghini A, Ramina F, Huanca Ghislanzoni LT, Siciliani G (2017) Predictability of orthodontic movement with orthodontic aligners: a retrospective study. Prog Orthod 18(1):35. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40510-017-0190-0 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

27.

Houle JP, Piedade L, Todescan R Jr, Pinheiro FH (2017) The predictability of transverse changes with Invisalign. Angle Orthod 87(1):19–24. https://doi.org/10.2319/122115-875.1 CrossRefPubMed

28.

Lione R, Paoloni V, Bartolommei L, Gazzani F, Meuli S, Pavoni C, Cozza P (2021) Maxillary arch development with Invisalign system. Angle Orthod 91(4):433–440. https://doi.org/10.2319/080520-687.1 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

29.

Kravitz ND, Kusnoto B, BeGole E, Obrez A, Agran B (2009) How well does Invisalign work? A prospective clinical study evaluating the efficacy of tooth movement with Invisalign. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 135(1):27–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.05.018 CrossRefPubMed

30.

Simon M, Keilig L, Schwarze J, Jung BA, Bourauel C (2014) Treatment outcome and efficacy of an aligner technique—regarding incisor torque, premolar derotation and molar distalization. BMC Oral Health 14:68. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6831-14-68 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

31.

Shotell MD (2020) The proliferation of clear aligner orthodontics: workflows, materials, and designs. Compend Contin Educ Dent 41(6):340–341 PubMed

Titel: Treatment of skeletal class III malocclusion using a combined clear aligner and surgery-early approach
Assessment based on the American Board of Orthodontics Objective Grading System
verfasst von: Guoli Zhou
Fei Yu, Ph.D.
Ass. Prof. Hongbo Yu
Ass. Prof. Lunguo Xia
Lingjun Yuan
Prof. Bing Fang
Publikationsdatum: 03.03.2023
Verlag: Springer Medizin
Erschienen in: Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie
Print ISSN: 1434-5293
Elektronische ISSN: 1615-6714
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00056-023-00458-2

Neu im Fachgebiet Zahnmedizin

26.05.2023 | GOÄ | Nachrichten

Newsletter bestellen

Hauptrubriken

Service

Fachgebiete

Themen

Sammlungen

Springer Medizin

Treatment of skeletal class III malocclusion using a combined clear aligner and surgery-early approach

Assessment based on the American Board of Orthodontics Objective Grading System

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Neu im Fachgebiet Zahnmedizin

Ärzte-Honorar in der gesetzlichen Unfallversicherung steigt um fünf Prozent

Formal rechtmäßiger Regress kann gleichwohl rechtsmissbräuchlich sein

MHB startet Studiengang Zahnmedizin

Ärztestatistik 2022: Ruhestandswelle rollt auf Ärzteschaft zu

Newsletter

Hauptrubriken Chevron down icon Chevron up icon

Service Chevron down icon Chevron up icon

Fachgebiete Chevron down icon Chevron up icon

Themen Chevron down icon Chevron up icon

Sammlungen Chevron down icon Chevron up icon

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Neu im Fachgebiet Zahnmedizin

Ärzte-Honorar in der gesetzlichen Unfallversicherung steigt um fünf Prozent

Formal rechtmäßiger Regress kann gleichwohl rechtsmissbräuchlich sein

MHB startet Studiengang Zahnmedizin

Ärztestatistik 2022: Ruhestandswelle rollt auf Ärzteschaft zu

Newsletter

Hauptrubriken

Service

Fachgebiete

Themen

Sammlungen