Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Skeletal Radiology 2/2023

01.10.2022 | Scientific Article

Ultrafast lumbar spine MRI protocol using deep learning–based reconstruction: diagnostic equivalence to a conventional protocol

verfasst von: Masahiro Fujiwara, Nobuo Kashiwagi, Chisato Matsuo, Hitoshi Watanabe, Yoshimori Kassai, Atsushi Nakamoto, Noriyuki Tomiyama

Erschienen in: Skeletal Radiology | Ausgabe 2/2023

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Objective

To evaluate the diagnostic equivalency between an ultrafast (1 min 53 s) lumbar MRI protocol using deep learning–based reconstruction and a conventional lumbar MRI protocol (12 min 31 s).

Materials and methods

This study included 58 patients who underwent lumbar MRI using both conventional and ultrafast protocols, including sagittal T1-weighted, T2-weighted, short-TI inversion recovery, and axial T2-weighted sequences. Compared with the conventional protocol, the ultrafast protocol shortened the acquisition time to approximately one-sixth. To compensate for the decreased signal-to-noise ratio caused by the acceleration, deep learning–based reconstruction was applied. Three neuroradiologists graded degenerative changes and analyzed for presence of other pathologies. For the grading of degenerative changes, interprotocol intrareader agreement was assessed using kappa statics. Interchangeability between the two protocols was also tested by calculating the individual equivalence index between the intraprotocol interreader agreement and interprotocol interreader agreement. For the detection of other pathologies, interprotocol intrareader agreement was assessed.

Results

For the grading of degenerative changes, the kappa values for interprotocol intrareader agreement of all three readers ranged from 0.707 to 0.804, indicating substantial to almost perfect agreement. Except for foraminal stenosis and disc contour on axial images, the 95% confidence interval of the individual equivalence index was < 5%, indicating the two protocols were interchangeable. For the detection of other pathologies, the interprotocol intrareader agreement rates were > 98% for each individual pathology.

Conclusions

Our proposed ultrafast lumbar spine MRI protocol provided almost equivalent diagnostic results to that of the conventional protocol, except for some degenerative changes.
Literatur
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Vargas MI, Drake-Pérez M, Delattre BMA, Boto J, Lovblad KO, Boudabous S. Feasibility of a synthetic MR imaging sequence for spine imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2018;39:1756–63.CrossRef Vargas MI, Drake-Pérez M, Delattre BMA, Boto J, Lovblad KO, Boudabous S. Feasibility of a synthetic MR imaging sequence for spine imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2018;39:1756–63.CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Longo MG, Fagundes J, Huang S, et al. Simultaneous multislice-based 5-minute lumbar spine MRI protocol: initial experience in a clinical setting. J Neuroimaging. 2017;27(5):442–6.CrossRef Longo MG, Fagundes J, Huang S, et al. Simultaneous multislice-based 5-minute lumbar spine MRI protocol: initial experience in a clinical setting. J Neuroimaging. 2017;27(5):442–6.CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Qiu J, Liu J, Bi Z, et al. An investigation of 2D spine magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with compressed sensing (CS). Skeletal Radiol. 2022;51:1273–83.CrossRef Qiu J, Liu J, Bi Z, et al. An investigation of 2D spine magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with compressed sensing (CS). Skeletal Radiol. 2022;51:1273–83.CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Bash S, Johnson B, Gibbs W, Zhang T, Shankaranarayanan A, Tanenbaum LN. Deep learning image processing enables 40% faster spinal MR scans which match or exceed quality of standard of care: a prospective multicenter multireader study. Clin Neuroradiol. 2022;32(1):197–203.CrossRef Bash S, Johnson B, Gibbs W, Zhang T, Shankaranarayanan A, Tanenbaum LN. Deep learning image processing enables 40% faster spinal MR scans which match or exceed quality of standard of care: a prospective multicenter multireader study. Clin Neuroradiol. 2022;32(1):197–203.CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Kashiwagi N, Tanaka H, Yamashita Y, et al. Applicability of deep learning-based reconstruction trained by brain and knee 3T MRI to lumbar 1.5T MRI. Acta Radiol Open. 2021;10:20584601211023940. Kashiwagi N, Tanaka H, Yamashita Y, et al. Applicability of deep learning-based reconstruction trained by brain and knee 3T MRI to lumbar 1.5T MRI. Acta Radiol Open. 2021;10:20584601211023940.
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Ha JY, Baek HJ, Ryu KH, et al. One-minute ultrafast brain MRI with full basic sequences: can it be a promising way forward for pediatric neuroimaging? AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2020;215:198–205.CrossRef Ha JY, Baek HJ, Ryu KH, et al. One-minute ultrafast brain MRI with full basic sequences: can it be a promising way forward for pediatric neuroimaging? AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2020;215:198–205.CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Ryu KH, Baek HJ, Skare S, et al. Clinical experience of 1-minute brain MRI using a multicontrast EPI sequence in a different scan environment. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2020;41(3):424–9.CrossRef Ryu KH, Baek HJ, Skare S, et al. Clinical experience of 1-minute brain MRI using a multicontrast EPI sequence in a different scan environment. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2020;41(3):424–9.CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Ryu KH, Choi DS, Baek HJ, et al. Clinical feasibility of 1-min ultrafast brain MRI compared with routine brain MRI using synthetic MRI: a single center pilot study. J Neurol. 2019;266(2):431–9.CrossRef Ryu KH, Choi DS, Baek HJ, et al. Clinical feasibility of 1-min ultrafast brain MRI compared with routine brain MRI using synthetic MRI: a single center pilot study. J Neurol. 2019;266(2):431–9.CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat U-King-Im JM, Trivedi RA, Graves MJ, et al. Utility of an ultrafast magnetic resonance imaging protocol in recent and semi-recent strokes. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2005;76(7):1002–5.CrossRef U-King-Im JM, Trivedi RA, Graves MJ, et al. Utility of an ultrafast magnetic resonance imaging protocol in recent and semi-recent strokes. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2005;76(7):1002–5.CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Kidoh M, Shinoda K, Kitajima M, et al. Deep learning based noise reduction for brain MR imaging: tests on phantoms and healthy volunteers. Magn Reson Med Sci. 2020;19:195–206.CrossRef Kidoh M, Shinoda K, Kitajima M, et al. Deep learning based noise reduction for brain MR imaging: tests on phantoms and healthy volunteers. Magn Reson Med Sci. 2020;19:195–206.CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Uetani H, Nakaura T, Kitajima M, et al. A preliminary study of deep learning-based reconstruction specialized for denoising in high-frequency domain: usefulness in high-resolution three-dimensional magnetic resonance cisternography of the cerebellopontine angle. Neuroradiology. 2021;63:63–71.CrossRef Uetani H, Nakaura T, Kitajima M, et al. A preliminary study of deep learning-based reconstruction specialized for denoising in high-frequency domain: usefulness in high-resolution three-dimensional magnetic resonance cisternography of the cerebellopontine angle. Neuroradiology. 2021;63:63–71.CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Ueda T, Ohno Y, Yamamoto K, et al. Compressed sensing and deep learning reconstruction for women’s pelvic MRI denoising: utility for improving image quality and examination time in routine clinical practice. Eur J Radiol. 2021;134:109430.CrossRef Ueda T, Ohno Y, Yamamoto K, et al. Compressed sensing and deep learning reconstruction for women’s pelvic MRI denoising: utility for improving image quality and examination time in routine clinical practice. Eur J Radiol. 2021;134:109430.CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Alaia EF, Benedick A, Obuchowski NA, et al. Comparison of a fast 5-min knee MRI protocol with a standard knee MRI protocol: a multi-institutional multi-reader study. Skeletal Radiol. 2018;47:107–16.CrossRef Alaia EF, Benedick A, Obuchowski NA, et al. Comparison of a fast 5-min knee MRI protocol with a standard knee MRI protocol: a multi-institutional multi-reader study. Skeletal Radiol. 2018;47:107–16.CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Zanchi F, Richard R, Hussami M, Monier A, Knebel JF, Omoumi P. MRI of non-specific low back pain and/or lumbar radiculopathy: do we need T1 when using a sagittal T2-weighted Dixon sequence? Eur Radiol. 2020;30:2583–93.CrossRef Zanchi F, Richard R, Hussami M, Monier A, Knebel JF, Omoumi P. MRI of non-specific low back pain and/or lumbar radiculopathy: do we need T1 when using a sagittal T2-weighted Dixon sequence? Eur Radiol. 2020;30:2583–93.CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Lee GY, Lee JW, Choi HS, Oh KJ, Kang HS. A new grading system of lumbar central canal stenosis on MRI: an easy and reliable method. Skelet Rad. 2011;40:1033–9.CrossRef Lee GY, Lee JW, Choi HS, Oh KJ, Kang HS. A new grading system of lumbar central canal stenosis on MRI: an easy and reliable method. Skelet Rad. 2011;40:1033–9.CrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Lee S, Lee JW, Yeom JS, et al. A practical MRI grading system for lumbar foraminal stenosis. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010;194:1095–8.CrossRef Lee S, Lee JW, Yeom JS, et al. A practical MRI grading system for lumbar foraminal stenosis. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010;194:1095–8.CrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Macki M, Hernandez-Hermann M, Bydon M, Gokaslan A, McGovern K, Bydon A. Spontaneous regression of sequestrated lumbar disc herniations: literature review. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2014;120:136–41.CrossRef Macki M, Hernandez-Hermann M, Bydon M, Gokaslan A, McGovern K, Bydon A. Spontaneous regression of sequestrated lumbar disc herniations: literature review. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2014;120:136–41.CrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Fardon DF, Williams AL, Dohring EJ, Murtagh FR, Gabriel Rothman SL, Sze GK. Lumbar disc nomenclature: version 2.0: recommendations of the combined task forces of the North American Spine Society, the American Society of Spine Radiology and the American Society of Neuroradiology. Spine J. 2014;14(11):2525–45.CrossRef Fardon DF, Williams AL, Dohring EJ, Murtagh FR, Gabriel Rothman SL, Sze GK. Lumbar disc nomenclature: version 2.0: recommendations of the combined task forces of the North American Spine Society, the American Society of Spine Radiology and the American Society of Neuroradiology. Spine J. 2014;14(11):2525–45.CrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Kim SJ, Lee TH, Lim SM. Prevalence of disc degeneration in asymptomatic Korean subjects. Part 1: lumbar spine. J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2013;53:31–8.CrossRef Kim SJ, Lee TH, Lim SM. Prevalence of disc degeneration in asymptomatic Korean subjects. Part 1: lumbar spine. J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2013;53:31–8.CrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Modic MT, Ross JS. Lumbar degenerative disk disease. Radiology. 2007;245:43–61.CrossRef Modic MT, Ross JS. Lumbar degenerative disk disease. Radiology. 2007;245:43–61.CrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977;33:159–74.CrossRef Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977;33:159–74.CrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Obuchowski NA, Subhas N, Schoenhagen P. Testing for interchangeability of imaging tests. Acad Radiol. 2014;21:1483–9.CrossRef Obuchowski NA, Subhas N, Schoenhagen P. Testing for interchangeability of imaging tests. Acad Radiol. 2014;21:1483–9.CrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Mishro PK, Agrawal S, Panda R, Abraham A. A survey on state-of-the-art denoising techniques for brain magnetic resonance images. IEEE Rev Biomed Eng. 2022;15:184–99.CrossRef Mishro PK, Agrawal S, Panda R, Abraham A. A survey on state-of-the-art denoising techniques for brain magnetic resonance images. IEEE Rev Biomed Eng. 2022;15:184–99.CrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Terae S, Miyasaka K, Kudoh K, et al. Wavelet compression on detection of brain lesions with magnetic resonance imaging. J Digit Imaging. 2000;13:178–90.CrossRef Terae S, Miyasaka K, Kudoh K, et al. Wavelet compression on detection of brain lesions with magnetic resonance imaging. J Digit Imaging. 2000;13:178–90.CrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Park HJ, Kim SS, Lee SY, et al. Clinical correlation of a new MR imaging method for assessing lumbar foraminal stenosis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2012;33(5):818–22.CrossRef Park HJ, Kim SS, Lee SY, et al. Clinical correlation of a new MR imaging method for assessing lumbar foraminal stenosis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2012;33(5):818–22.CrossRef
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Doktor K, Jensen TS, Christensen HW, et al. Degenerative findings in lumbar spine MRI: an inter-rater reliability study involving three raters. Chiropr Man Therap. 2020;28(1):8.CrossRef Doktor K, Jensen TS, Christensen HW, et al. Degenerative findings in lumbar spine MRI: an inter-rater reliability study involving three raters. Chiropr Man Therap. 2020;28(1):8.CrossRef
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Brant-Zawadzki MN, Jensen MC, Obuchowski N, Ross JS, Modic MT. Interobserver and intraobserver variability in interpretation of lumbar disc abnormalities. A comparison of two nomenclatures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1995;20(11):1257–63 (discussion 1264).CrossRef Brant-Zawadzki MN, Jensen MC, Obuchowski N, Ross JS, Modic MT. Interobserver and intraobserver variability in interpretation of lumbar disc abnormalities. A comparison of two nomenclatures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1995;20(11):1257–63 (discussion 1264).CrossRef
32.
Zurück zum Zitat van Rijn JC, Klemetsö N, Reitsma JB, et al. Observer variation in MRI evaluation of patients suspected of lumbar disk herniation. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2005;184(1):299–303.CrossRef van Rijn JC, Klemetsö N, Reitsma JB, et al. Observer variation in MRI evaluation of patients suspected of lumbar disk herniation. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2005;184(1):299–303.CrossRef
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Hajiahmadi S, Shayganfar A, Askari M, Ebrahimian S. Interobserver and intraobserver variability in magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of patients with suspected disc herniation. Heliyon. 2020;6(11):e05201.CrossRef Hajiahmadi S, Shayganfar A, Askari M, Ebrahimian S. Interobserver and intraobserver variability in magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of patients with suspected disc herniation. Heliyon. 2020;6(11):e05201.CrossRef
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Jensen MC, Brant-Zawadzki MN, Obuchowski N, Modic MT, Malkasian D, Ross JS. Magnetic resonance imaging of the lumbar spine in people without back pain. N Engl J Med. 1994;331(2):69–73.CrossRef Jensen MC, Brant-Zawadzki MN, Obuchowski N, Modic MT, Malkasian D, Ross JS. Magnetic resonance imaging of the lumbar spine in people without back pain. N Engl J Med. 1994;331(2):69–73.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Ultrafast lumbar spine MRI protocol using deep learning–based reconstruction: diagnostic equivalence to a conventional protocol
verfasst von
Masahiro Fujiwara
Nobuo Kashiwagi
Chisato Matsuo
Hitoshi Watanabe
Yoshimori Kassai
Atsushi Nakamoto
Noriyuki Tomiyama
Publikationsdatum
01.10.2022
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Skeletal Radiology / Ausgabe 2/2023
Print ISSN: 0364-2348
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-2161
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-022-04192-5

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2023

Skeletal Radiology 2/2023 Zur Ausgabe

Update Radiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.