Skip to main content
Erschienen in: European Radiology 9/2022

31.03.2022 | Urogenital

Value of deep learning reconstruction at ultra-low-dose CT for evaluation of urolithiasis

verfasst von: Gumuyang Zhang, Xiaoxiao Zhang, Lili Xu, Xin Bai, Ru Jin, Min Xu, Jing Yan, Zhengyu Jin, Hao Sun

Erschienen in: European Radiology | Ausgabe 9/2022

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Objectives

To determine the diagnostic accuracy and image quality of ultra-low-dose computed tomography (ULDCT) with deep learning reconstruction (DLR) to evaluate patients with suspected urolithiasis, compared with ULDCT with hybrid iterative reconstruction (HIR) by using low-dose CT (LDCT) with HIR as the reference standard.

Methods

Patients with suspected urolithiasis were prospectively enrolled and underwent abdominopelvic LDCT, followed by ULDCT if any urinary stone was observed. Radiation exposure, stone characteristics, image noise, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and subjective image quality on a 5-point Likert scale were evaluated and compared.

Results

The average effective radiation dose of ULDCT was significantly lower than that of LDCT (1.28 ± 0.34 vs. 5.49 ± 1.00 mSv, p < 0.001). According to the reference standard (LDCT-HIR), 148 urinary stones were observed in 85.0% (51/60) of patients. ULDCT-DLR detected 143 stones with a rate of 96.6%, and ULDCT-HIR detected 142 stones with a rate of 95.9%. The urinary stones that were not observed with ULDCT-DLR or ULDCT-HIR were renal calculi smaller than 3 mm. There were no significant differences in the detection of clinically significant calculi (≥ 3 mm) or stone size estimation among ULDCT-DLR, ULDCT-HIR, and LDCT-HIR. The image quality of ULDCT-DLR was better than that of ULDCT-HIR and LDCT-HIR with lower image noise, higher SNR, and higher average subjective score.

Conclusions

ULDCT-DLR performed comparably to LDCT-HIR in urinary stone detection and size estimation with better image quality and decreased radiation exposure. ULDCT-DLR may have potential to be considered the first-line choice to evaluate urolithiasis in practice.

Key Points

• Ultra-low-dose computed tomography (ULDCT) has been investigated for diagnosis of urolithiasis, but stone evaluation may be adversely impacted by compromised image quality.
• This study evaluated the value of novel deep learning reconstruction (DLR) at ULDCT by comparing the stone evaluation and image quality of ULDCT-DLR to the reference standard of low-dose CT (LDCT) with hybrid iterative reconstruction (HIR).
• ULDCT-DLR performed comparably to LDCT-HIR in urinary stone detection and size estimation with better image quality and reduced radiation exposure.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Raheem OA, Khandwala YS, Sur RL, Ghani KR, Denstedt JD (2017) Burden of urolithiasis: trends in prevalence, treatments, and costs. Eur Urol Focus 3:18–26CrossRef Raheem OA, Khandwala YS, Sur RL, Ghani KR, Denstedt JD (2017) Burden of urolithiasis: trends in prevalence, treatments, and costs. Eur Urol Focus 3:18–26CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Türk C, Petřík A, Sarica K et al (2016) EAU guidelines on diagnosis and conservative management of urolithiasis. Eur Urol 69:468–474CrossRef Türk C, Petřík A, Sarica K et al (2016) EAU guidelines on diagnosis and conservative management of urolithiasis. Eur Urol 69:468–474CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Tzelves L, Türk C, Skolarikos A (2021) European Association of Urology Urolithiasis Guidelines: where are we going? Eur Urol Focus 7:34–38CrossRef Tzelves L, Türk C, Skolarikos A (2021) European Association of Urology Urolithiasis Guidelines: where are we going? Eur Urol Focus 7:34–38CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Lipkin M, Ackerman A (2016) Imaging for urolithiasis: standards, trends, and radiation exposure. Curr Opin Urol 26:56–62CrossRef Lipkin M, Ackerman A (2016) Imaging for urolithiasis: standards, trends, and radiation exposure. Curr Opin Urol 26:56–62CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Sahadev R, Maxon V, Srinivasan A (2018) Approaches to eliminate radiation exposure in the management of pediatric urolithiasis. Curr Urol Rep 19:77CrossRef Sahadev R, Maxon V, Srinivasan A (2018) Approaches to eliminate radiation exposure in the management of pediatric urolithiasis. Curr Urol Rep 19:77CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Zhang GM, Shi B, Sun H et al (2017) High-pitch low-dose abdominopelvic CT with tin-filtration technique for detecting urinary stones. Abdom Radiol (NY) 42:2127–2134CrossRef Zhang GM, Shi B, Sun H et al (2017) High-pitch low-dose abdominopelvic CT with tin-filtration technique for detecting urinary stones. Abdom Radiol (NY) 42:2127–2134CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Leyendecker P, Faucher V, Labani A et al (2019) Prospective evaluation of ultra-low-dose contrast-enhanced 100-kV abdominal computed tomography with tin filter: effect on radiation dose reduction and image quality with a third-generation dual-source CT system. Eur Radiol 29:2107–2116CrossRef Leyendecker P, Faucher V, Labani A et al (2019) Prospective evaluation of ultra-low-dose contrast-enhanced 100-kV abdominal computed tomography with tin filter: effect on radiation dose reduction and image quality with a third-generation dual-source CT system. Eur Radiol 29:2107–2116CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Mozaffary A, Trabzonlu TA, Kim D, Yaghmai V (2019) Comparison of Tin filter-based spectral shaping CT and low-dose protocol for detection of urinary calculi. AJR Am J Roentgenol 212:808–814CrossRef Mozaffary A, Trabzonlu TA, Kim D, Yaghmai V (2019) Comparison of Tin filter-based spectral shaping CT and low-dose protocol for detection of urinary calculi. AJR Am J Roentgenol 212:808–814CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Fontarensky M, Alfidja A, Perignon R et al (2015) Reduced radiation dose with model-based iterative reconstruction versus standard dose with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction in abdominal CT for diagnosis of acute renal colic. Radiology 276:156–166CrossRef Fontarensky M, Alfidja A, Perignon R et al (2015) Reduced radiation dose with model-based iterative reconstruction versus standard dose with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction in abdominal CT for diagnosis of acute renal colic. Radiology 276:156–166CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Rob S, Bryant T, Wilson I, Somani BK (2017) Ultra-low-dose, low-dose, and standard-dose CT of the kidney, ureters, and bladder: is there a difference? Results from a systematic review of the literature. Clin Radiol 72:11–15CrossRef Rob S, Bryant T, Wilson I, Somani BK (2017) Ultra-low-dose, low-dose, and standard-dose CT of the kidney, ureters, and bladder: is there a difference? Results from a systematic review of the literature. Clin Radiol 72:11–15CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Rodger F, Roditi G, Aboumarzouk OM (2018) Diagnostic accuracy of low and ultra-low dose CT for identification of urinary tract stones: a systematic review. Urol Int 100:375–385CrossRef Rodger F, Roditi G, Aboumarzouk OM (2018) Diagnostic accuracy of low and ultra-low dose CT for identification of urinary tract stones: a systematic review. Urol Int 100:375–385CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Mileto A, Guimaraes LS, McCollough CH, Fletcher JG, Yu L (2019) State of the art in abdominal CT: the limits of iterative reconstruction algorithms. Radiology 293:491–503CrossRef Mileto A, Guimaraes LS, McCollough CH, Fletcher JG, Yu L (2019) State of the art in abdominal CT: the limits of iterative reconstruction algorithms. Radiology 293:491–503CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Laurent G, Villani N, Hossu G et al (2019) Full model-based iterative reconstruction (MBIR) in abdominal CT increases objective image quality, but decreases subjective acceptance. Eur Radiol 29:4016–4025CrossRef Laurent G, Villani N, Hossu G et al (2019) Full model-based iterative reconstruction (MBIR) in abdominal CT increases objective image quality, but decreases subjective acceptance. Eur Radiol 29:4016–4025CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Yasaka K, Furuta T, Kubo T et al (2017) Full and hybrid iterative reconstruction to reduce artifacts in abdominal CT for patients scanned without arm elevation. Acta Radiol 58:1085–1093CrossRef Yasaka K, Furuta T, Kubo T et al (2017) Full and hybrid iterative reconstruction to reduce artifacts in abdominal CT for patients scanned without arm elevation. Acta Radiol 58:1085–1093CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Greffier J, Frandon J, Larbi A, Beregi JP, Pereira F (2020) CT iterative reconstruction algorithms: a task-based image quality assessment. Eur Radiol 30:487–500CrossRef Greffier J, Frandon J, Larbi A, Beregi JP, Pereira F (2020) CT iterative reconstruction algorithms: a task-based image quality assessment. Eur Radiol 30:487–500CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Nakamoto A, Kim T, Hori M et al (2015) Clinical evaluation of image quality and radiation dose reduction in upper abdominal computed tomography using model-based iterative reconstruction; comparison with filtered back projection and adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction. Eur J Radiol 84:1715–1723CrossRef Nakamoto A, Kim T, Hori M et al (2015) Clinical evaluation of image quality and radiation dose reduction in upper abdominal computed tomography using model-based iterative reconstruction; comparison with filtered back projection and adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction. Eur J Radiol 84:1715–1723CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Ott JG, Becce F, Monnin P, Schmidt S, Bochud FO, Verdun FR (2014) Update on the non-prewhitening model observer in computed tomography for the assessment of the adaptive statistical and model-based iterative reconstruction algorithms. Phys Med Biol 59:4047–4064CrossRef Ott JG, Becce F, Monnin P, Schmidt S, Bochud FO, Verdun FR (2014) Update on the non-prewhitening model observer in computed tomography for the assessment of the adaptive statistical and model-based iterative reconstruction algorithms. Phys Med Biol 59:4047–4064CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Willemink MJ, Noël PB (2019) The evolution of image reconstruction for CT-from filtered back projection to artificial intelligence. Eur Radiol 29:2185–2195CrossRef Willemink MJ, Noël PB (2019) The evolution of image reconstruction for CT-from filtered back projection to artificial intelligence. Eur Radiol 29:2185–2195CrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Nakamura Y, Higaki T, Tatsugami F et al (2019) Deep learning-based CT image reconstruction: initial evaluation targeting hypovascular hepatic metastases. Radiol Artif Intell 1:e180011CrossRef Nakamura Y, Higaki T, Tatsugami F et al (2019) Deep learning-based CT image reconstruction: initial evaluation targeting hypovascular hepatic metastases. Radiol Artif Intell 1:e180011CrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Akagi M, Nakamura Y, Higaki T et al (2019) Deep learning reconstruction improves image quality of abdominal ultra-high-resolution CT. Eur Radiol 29:6163–6171CrossRef Akagi M, Nakamura Y, Higaki T et al (2019) Deep learning reconstruction improves image quality of abdominal ultra-high-resolution CT. Eur Radiol 29:6163–6171CrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Tatsugami F, Higaki T, Nakamura Y et al (2019) Deep learning-based image restoration algorithm for coronary CT angiography. Eur Radiol 29:5322–5329CrossRef Tatsugami F, Higaki T, Nakamura Y et al (2019) Deep learning-based image restoration algorithm for coronary CT angiography. Eur Radiol 29:5322–5329CrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Greffier J, Hamard A, Pereira F et al (2020) Image quality and dose reduction opportunity of deep learning image reconstruction algorithm for CT: a phantom study. Eur Radiol 30:3951–3959CrossRef Greffier J, Hamard A, Pereira F et al (2020) Image quality and dose reduction opportunity of deep learning image reconstruction algorithm for CT: a phantom study. Eur Radiol 30:3951–3959CrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Brady SL, Trout AT, Somasundaram E, Anton CG, Li Y, Dillman JR (2021) Improving image quality and reducing radiation dose for pediatric CT by using deep learning reconstruction. Radiology 298:180–188CrossRef Brady SL, Trout AT, Somasundaram E, Anton CG, Li Y, Dillman JR (2021) Improving image quality and reducing radiation dose for pediatric CT by using deep learning reconstruction. Radiology 298:180–188CrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Nakamura Y, Narita K, Higaki T, Akagi M, Honda Y, Awai K (2021) Diagnostic value of deep learning reconstruction for radiation dose reduction at abdominal ultra-high-resolution CT. Eur Radiol 31:4700–4709CrossRef Nakamura Y, Narita K, Higaki T, Akagi M, Honda Y, Awai K (2021) Diagnostic value of deep learning reconstruction for radiation dose reduction at abdominal ultra-high-resolution CT. Eur Radiol 31:4700–4709CrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Singh R, Digumarthy SR, Muse VV et al (2020) Image quality and lesion detection on deep learning reconstruction and iterative reconstruction of submillisievert chest and abdominal CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 214:566–573CrossRef Singh R, Digumarthy SR, Muse VV et al (2020) Image quality and lesion detection on deep learning reconstruction and iterative reconstruction of submillisievert chest and abdominal CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 214:566–573CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Value of deep learning reconstruction at ultra-low-dose CT for evaluation of urolithiasis
verfasst von
Gumuyang Zhang
Xiaoxiao Zhang
Lili Xu
Xin Bai
Ru Jin
Min Xu
Jing Yan
Zhengyu Jin
Hao Sun
Publikationsdatum
31.03.2022
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
European Radiology / Ausgabe 9/2022
Print ISSN: 0938-7994
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-1084
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-022-08739-x

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 9/2022

European Radiology 9/2022 Zur Ausgabe

Update Radiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.