Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Indian Journal of Surgical Oncology 3/2022

14.02.2022 | Original Article

Versatility of 3D laproscopy for radical prostatectomy: A single tertiary cancer center experience

verfasst von: Dipin Jayaprakash, Keval Patel, Mohamed Mithi, Harish Neelamraju Lakshmi, Shahsank Pandya

Erschienen in: Indian Journal of Surgical Oncology | Ausgabe 3/2022

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Objective

The objective of this study is to compare our institutional outcomes of 3D laparoscopic when compared with open radical prostatectomy in terms of functional and oncological outcomes.

Methods

This is a retrospective study of patients who underwent radical prostatectomy during the period January 2016 to September 2019 at our institute. Out of 49 patients who underwent radical prostatectomy, 23 were done by open approach and 25 were operated by 3D laparoscopy. One patient was lost to follow-up and was excluded from the study. Data were collected from medical records, and functional evaluation was done by telephonic interview. Data analysis was done by SPSS software to calculate overall and disease-free survival.

Results

Laparoscopic arm patients had lesser blood loss, postoperative pain, hospital stay and wound-related issues although they had a longer operating time. Functional outcomes in terms of erectile dysfunction and incontinence were almost similar in both open and 3D laparoscopic approach. No statistically significant difference was observed for overall survival or disease-free survival. All shortcomings with the laparoscopic arm were improved as our experience increased with 3D laparoscopic prostatectomy. The outcomes of 3D laparoscopic radical prostatectomy were comparable to previously published data of robotic radical prostatectomy.

Conclusions

3D LRP is a feasible technique with similar oncological or functional outcomes and better perioperative outcomes as compared to ORP. Being cost-effective and with comparable outcomes it is a suitable alternative to RRP in resource-limited settings.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Miyake H, Kawabata G, Gotoh A, Fujisawa M, Okada H, Arakawa S et al (2002) Comparison of surgical stress between laparoscopy and open surgery in the field of urology by measurement of humoral mediators. Int J Urol 9(6):329–333CrossRef Miyake H, Kawabata G, Gotoh A, Fujisawa M, Okada H, Arakawa S et al (2002) Comparison of surgical stress between laparoscopy and open surgery in the field of urology by measurement of humoral mediators. Int J Urol 9(6):329–333CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Hegarty NJ, Kaouk JH (2006) Radical prostatectomy: a comparison of open, laparoscopic and robot-assisted laparoscopic techniques. Can J Urol 13(Suppl 1):56–61PubMed Hegarty NJ, Kaouk JH (2006) Radical prostatectomy: a comparison of open, laparoscopic and robot-assisted laparoscopic techniques. Can J Urol 13(Suppl 1):56–61PubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Guillonneau B, Rozet F, Cathelineau X, Lay F, Barret E, Doublet JD et al (2002) Perioperative complications of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: the Montsouris 3-year experience. J Urol 167(1):51–56CrossRef Guillonneau B, Rozet F, Cathelineau X, Lay F, Barret E, Doublet JD et al (2002) Perioperative complications of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: the Montsouris 3-year experience. J Urol 167(1):51–56CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Albadine R, Hyndman ME, Chaux A, Jeong JY, Saab S, Tavora F et al (2012) Characteristics of positive surgical margins in robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy, open retropubic radical prostatectomy, and laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a comparative histopathologic study from a single academic center. Hum Pathol 43(2):254–260CrossRef Albadine R, Hyndman ME, Chaux A, Jeong JY, Saab S, Tavora F et al (2012) Characteristics of positive surgical margins in robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy, open retropubic radical prostatectomy, and laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a comparative histopathologic study from a single academic center. Hum Pathol 43(2):254–260CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Raboy A, Ferzli G, Albert P (1997) Initial experience with extraperitoneal endoscopic radical retropubic prostatectomy. Urology 50(6):849–853CrossRef Raboy A, Ferzli G, Albert P (1997) Initial experience with extraperitoneal endoscopic radical retropubic prostatectomy. Urology 50(6):849–853CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Cao L, Yang Z, Qi L, Chen M (2019) Robot-assisted and laparoscopic vs open radical prostatectomy in clinically localized prostate cancer: perioperative, functional, and oncological outcomes: A Systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore) 98(22):e15770–e15770CrossRef Cao L, Yang Z, Qi L, Chen M (2019) Robot-assisted and laparoscopic vs open radical prostatectomy in clinically localized prostate cancer: perioperative, functional, and oncological outcomes: A Systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore) 98(22):e15770–e15770CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Guillonneau B, Vallancien G (1999) Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: initial experience and preliminary assessment after 65 operations. Prostate 39(1):71–75CrossRef Guillonneau B, Vallancien G (1999) Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: initial experience and preliminary assessment after 65 operations. Prostate 39(1):71–75CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Patel VR, Sivaraman A, Coelho RF, Chauhan S, Palmer KJ, Orvieto MA et al (2011) Pentafecta: a new concept for reporting outcomes of robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 59(5):702–707CrossRef Patel VR, Sivaraman A, Coelho RF, Chauhan S, Palmer KJ, Orvieto MA et al (2011) Pentafecta: a new concept for reporting outcomes of robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 59(5):702–707CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Robertson C, Close A, Fraser C, Gurung T, Jia X, Sharma P et al (2013) Relative effectiveness of robot-assisted and standard laparoscopic prostatectomy as alternatives to open radical prostatectomy for treatment of localised prostate cancer: a systematic review and mixed treatment comparison meta-analysis. BJU Int 112(6):798–812CrossRef Robertson C, Close A, Fraser C, Gurung T, Jia X, Sharma P et al (2013) Relative effectiveness of robot-assisted and standard laparoscopic prostatectomy as alternatives to open radical prostatectomy for treatment of localised prostate cancer: a systematic review and mixed treatment comparison meta-analysis. BJU Int 112(6):798–812CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Votanopoulos K, Brunicardi FC, Thornby J, Bellows CF (2008) Impact of three-dimensional vision in laparoscopic training. World J Surg 32(1):110–118CrossRef Votanopoulos K, Brunicardi FC, Thornby J, Bellows CF (2008) Impact of three-dimensional vision in laparoscopic training. World J Surg 32(1):110–118CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Jurczok A, Zacharias M, Wagner S, Hamza A, Fornara P (2007) Prospective non-randomized evaluation of four mediators of the systemic response after extraperitoneal laparoscopic and open retropubic radical prostatectomy. BJU Int 99(6):1461–1466CrossRef Jurczok A, Zacharias M, Wagner S, Hamza A, Fornara P (2007) Prospective non-randomized evaluation of four mediators of the systemic response after extraperitoneal laparoscopic and open retropubic radical prostatectomy. BJU Int 99(6):1461–1466CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Ong WL, Evans SM, Spelman T, Kearns PA, Murphy DG, Millar JL (2016) Comparison of oncological and health-related quality of life outcomes between open and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy for localised prostate cancer - findings from the population-based Victorian Prostate Cancer Registry. BJU Int 118(4):563–569CrossRef Ong WL, Evans SM, Spelman T, Kearns PA, Murphy DG, Millar JL (2016) Comparison of oncological and health-related quality of life outcomes between open and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy for localised prostate cancer - findings from the population-based Victorian Prostate Cancer Registry. BJU Int 118(4):563–569CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Mitre AI, Chammas MF, Rocha JEA, Duarte RJ, Ebaid GX, Rocha FT. Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy: The Learning Curve of a Low Volume Surgeon. Tugcu V, Tefekli A, editors. Sci World J. 2013 2013:974276. Mitre AI, Chammas MF, Rocha JEA, Duarte RJ, Ebaid GX, Rocha FT. Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy: The Learning Curve of a Low Volume Surgeon. Tugcu V, Tefekli A, editors. Sci World J. 2013 2013:974276.
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Secin FP, Savage C, Abbou C, de La Taille A, Salomon L, Rassweiler J, et al. The learning curve for laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: an international multicenter study. J Urol. 2010/10/16. 2010 Dec;184(6):2291–6. Secin FP, Savage C, Abbou C, de La Taille A, Salomon L, Rassweiler J, et al. The learning curve for laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: an international multicenter study. J Urol. 2010/10/16. 2010 Dec;184(6):2291–6.
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Forsmark A, Gehrman J, Angenete E, Bjartell A, Bjorholt I, Carlsson S et al (2018) Health Economic Analysis of Open and Robot-assisted Laparoscopic Surgery for Prostate Cancer Within the Prospective Multicentre LAPPRO Trial. Eur Urol 74(6):816–824CrossRef Forsmark A, Gehrman J, Angenete E, Bjartell A, Bjorholt I, Carlsson S et al (2018) Health Economic Analysis of Open and Robot-assisted Laparoscopic Surgery for Prostate Cancer Within the Prospective Multicentre LAPPRO Trial. Eur Urol 74(6):816–824CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Wallerstedt A, Tyritzis SI, Thorsteinsdottir T, Carlsson S, Stranne J, Gustafsson O et al (2015) Short-term Results after Robot-assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy Compared to Open Radical Prostatectomy. Eur Urol 67(4):660–670CrossRef Wallerstedt A, Tyritzis SI, Thorsteinsdottir T, Carlsson S, Stranne J, Gustafsson O et al (2015) Short-term Results after Robot-assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy Compared to Open Radical Prostatectomy. Eur Urol 67(4):660–670CrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Haglind E, Carlsson S, Stranne J, Wallerstedt A, Wilderang U, Thorsteinsdottir T et al (2015) Urinary Incontinence and Erectile Dysfunction After Robotic Versus Open Radical Prostatectomy: A Prospective, Controlled. Nonrandomised Trial Eur Urol 68(2):216–225CrossRef Haglind E, Carlsson S, Stranne J, Wallerstedt A, Wilderang U, Thorsteinsdottir T et al (2015) Urinary Incontinence and Erectile Dysfunction After Robotic Versus Open Radical Prostatectomy: A Prospective, Controlled. Nonrandomised Trial Eur Urol 68(2):216–225CrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Yaxley JW, Coughlin GD, Chambers SK, Occhipinti S, Samaratunga H, Zajdlewicz L et al (2016) Robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy versus open radical retropubic prostatectomy: early outcomes from a randomised controlled phase 3 study. Lancet 388(10049):1057–1066CrossRef Yaxley JW, Coughlin GD, Chambers SK, Occhipinti S, Samaratunga H, Zajdlewicz L et al (2016) Robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy versus open radical retropubic prostatectomy: early outcomes from a randomised controlled phase 3 study. Lancet 388(10049):1057–1066CrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Guazzoni G, Cestari A, Naspro R, Riva M, Centemero A, Zanoni M et al (2006) Intra- and peri-operative outcomes comparing radical retropubic and laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: results from a prospective, randomised, single-surgeon study. Eur Urol 50(1):98–104CrossRef Guazzoni G, Cestari A, Naspro R, Riva M, Centemero A, Zanoni M et al (2006) Intra- and peri-operative outcomes comparing radical retropubic and laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: results from a prospective, randomised, single-surgeon study. Eur Urol 50(1):98–104CrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Coughlin GD, Yaxley JW, Chambers SK, Occhipinti S, Samaratunga H, Zajdlewicz L et al (2018) Robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy versus open radical retropubic prostatectomy: 24-month outcomes from a randomised controlled study. Lancet Oncol 19(8):1051–1060CrossRef Coughlin GD, Yaxley JW, Chambers SK, Occhipinti S, Samaratunga H, Zajdlewicz L et al (2018) Robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy versus open radical retropubic prostatectomy: 24-month outcomes from a randomised controlled study. Lancet Oncol 19(8):1051–1060CrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Sooriakumaran P, Pini G, Nyberg T, Derogar M, Carlsson S, Stranne J et al (2018) Erectile Function and Oncologic Outcomes Following Open Retropubic and Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Results from the LAParoscopic Prostatectomy Robot Open Trial. Eur Urol 73(4):618–627CrossRef Sooriakumaran P, Pini G, Nyberg T, Derogar M, Carlsson S, Stranne J et al (2018) Erectile Function and Oncologic Outcomes Following Open Retropubic and Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Results from the LAParoscopic Prostatectomy Robot Open Trial. Eur Urol 73(4):618–627CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Versatility of 3D laproscopy for radical prostatectomy: A single tertiary cancer center experience
verfasst von
Dipin Jayaprakash
Keval Patel
Mohamed Mithi
Harish Neelamraju Lakshmi
Shahsank Pandya
Publikationsdatum
14.02.2022
Verlag
Springer India
Erschienen in
Indian Journal of Surgical Oncology / Ausgabe 3/2022
Print ISSN: 0975-7651
Elektronische ISSN: 0976-6952
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13193-022-01518-6

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2022

Indian Journal of Surgical Oncology 3/2022 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.