Skip to main content
Erschienen in: The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India 1/2018

01.02.2018 | Original Article

Decision Delivery Interval in Emergency and Urgent Caesarean Sections: Need to Reconsider the Recommendations?

verfasst von: Nalini Mishra, Ruchi Gupta, Nomita Singh

Erschienen in: The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India | Ausgabe 1/2018

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Introduction

The timeline between a decision made and delivery of the baby is termed decision delivery interval (DDI). According to current recommendations, an emergency caesarean section must be performed within 30 min of the decision. The present study was conducted with an objective to assess DDI in a busy obstetric unit in India and its impact on obstetric outcome.

Material and Method

A total of 480 women with indications of category I (emergency): Immediate threat to life of woman or foetus (n = 66), and category II (urgent): Maternal or foetal compromise but not immediately life-threatening (n = 414), were studied in the context of DDI and composite adverse perinatal outcomes including fresh stillbirth, 5-min Apgar score <7 and NICU admission.

Result

Recommended DDI of <30 min could be achieved in 30% cases of emergency CS only. Sixty-three per cent with prolapsed cord could be delivered within 30 min. The composite neonatal outcomes were not significantly increased up to DDI of 60 min for category I (emergency) (except in prolapsed cord) and up to 90 min in category II (urgent) caesarean sections.

Conclusion

Authors propose reconsideration of the present recommendations of DDI in categories I and II, while Crash CS (cord prolapse or catastrophic antepartum haemorrhage) should be a separate group with recommended DDI of 30 min. For the remaining cases in the present emergency CS group, the suggested DDI of 60 and, for urgent group, 90 min may be made following further studies to prevent this DDI yardstick from becoming a rod at our back.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Classification of urgency of caesarean section—a continuum of risk (Good Practice No. 11). London: RCOG Press; 2010. Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Classification of urgency of caesarean section—a continuum of risk (Good Practice No. 11). London: RCOG Press; 2010.
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Clinical negligence scheme for trusts clinical risk management standards for Acute Trusts Level 3 Assessment of Barts and the London NHS Trust 22nd and 23rd November 2010. Clinical negligence scheme for trusts clinical risk management standards for Acute Trusts Level 3 Assessment of Barts and the London NHS Trust 22nd and 23rd November 2010.
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Bloom SL, Leveno KJ, Spong CY, et al. Decision-to-incision times and maternal and infant outcomes. Obstet Gynecol. 2006;108:6–11.CrossRefPubMed Bloom SL, Leveno KJ, Spong CY, et al. Decision-to-incision times and maternal and infant outcomes. Obstet Gynecol. 2006;108:6–11.CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Cerbinskaite A, Malone S, McDermott J, et al. Emergency caesarean section: influences on the decision-to-delivery interval. J Pregnancy. Volume 2011, Article ID 640379, doi:10.1155/2011/640379. Cerbinskaite A, Malone S, McDermott J, et al. Emergency caesarean section: influences on the decision-to-delivery interval. J Pregnancy. Volume 2011, Article ID 640379, doi:10.​1155/​2011/​640379.
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Kei-Man CHOW, Shui-Lam MAK. Maternal and fetal outcomes in extremely urgent caesarean delivery in relation to the decision-to delivery interval. Hong Kong J Gynaecol Obstet Midwifery. 2015;15(1):16–22. Kei-Man CHOW, Shui-Lam MAK. Maternal and fetal outcomes in extremely urgent caesarean delivery in relation to the decision-to delivery interval. Hong Kong J Gynaecol Obstet Midwifery. 2015;15(1):16–22.
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Chukwudi OE, Okonkwo CA. Decision—delivery interval and perinatal outcome of emergency caesarean sections at a tertiary institution. Pak J Med Sci. 2014;30(5):946–50.PubMedPubMedCentral Chukwudi OE, Okonkwo CA. Decision—delivery interval and perinatal outcome of emergency caesarean sections at a tertiary institution. Pak J Med Sci. 2014;30(5):946–50.PubMedPubMedCentral
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Oppong SA, Tuuli MG, Seffah JD, et al. Is there a safe limit of delay for emergency caesarean section in ghana? results of analysis of early perinatal outcome. Ghana Med J. 2014;48(1):24–30.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Oppong SA, Tuuli MG, Seffah JD, et al. Is there a safe limit of delay for emergency caesarean section in ghana? results of analysis of early perinatal outcome. Ghana Med J. 2014;48(1):24–30.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Amankwah Y, Walker M. A prospective study of the efficiency of the “code 333” process at the Ottawa hospital. JOGC. 2011;33(3):244–51.PubMed Amankwah Y, Walker M. A prospective study of the efficiency of the “code 333” process at the Ottawa hospital. JOGC. 2011;33(3):244–51.PubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Umar UA, Gaya SA. Outcome of umbilical cord prolapse at Aminu Kano Teaching Hospital, Kano, North-Western Nigeria. Niger J Basic Clin Sci. 2015;12:20–4.CrossRef Umar UA, Gaya SA. Outcome of umbilical cord prolapse at Aminu Kano Teaching Hospital, Kano, North-Western Nigeria. Niger J Basic Clin Sci. 2015;12:20–4.CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Leung TY, Chung PW, Rogers MS, et al. Urgent caesarean delivery for fetal bradycardia. Obstet Gynecol. 2009;14:1023–8.CrossRef Leung TY, Chung PW, Rogers MS, et al. Urgent caesarean delivery for fetal bradycardia. Obstet Gynecol. 2009;14:1023–8.CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Rotich SK, Ndavi MP, Rukaria-Kaumbutho R, et al. Early perinatal outcome in cases delivered through Caesarean section following clinical diagnosis of severe foetal distress at Kenyatta National Hospital. East Afr Med J. 2006;83:250–8.CrossRefPubMed Rotich SK, Ndavi MP, Rukaria-Kaumbutho R, et al. Early perinatal outcome in cases delivered through Caesarean section following clinical diagnosis of severe foetal distress at Kenyatta National Hospital. East Afr Med J. 2006;83:250–8.CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Roy KK, Baruah J, Kumar S, et al. Cesarean section for suspected fetal distress, continuous fetal heart monitoring and decision to delivery time. Indian J Pediatr. 2008;75:1249–52.CrossRefPubMed Roy KK, Baruah J, Kumar S, et al. Cesarean section for suspected fetal distress, continuous fetal heart monitoring and decision to delivery time. Indian J Pediatr. 2008;75:1249–52.CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Bloom SL, Leveno KJ, Spong CY, et al. Decision-to-incision times and maternal and infant outcomes. Obstet Gynecol. 2006;108:6–11.CrossRefPubMed Bloom SL, Leveno KJ, Spong CY, et al. Decision-to-incision times and maternal and infant outcomes. Obstet Gynecol. 2006;108:6–11.CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Pearson GA, Kelly B, Russell R, et al. Target decision to delivery intervals for emergency caesarean section based on neonatal outcomes and three year follow-up. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2011;159(2):276–81.CrossRefPubMed Pearson GA, Kelly B, Russell R, et al. Target decision to delivery intervals for emergency caesarean section based on neonatal outcomes and three year follow-up. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2011;159(2):276–81.CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Kolas T, Hofos D, Olan P. Predictions for the decision to-delivery interval for emergency Caesarean section in Norway. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica. 2006;85:561–6.CrossRef Kolas T, Hofos D, Olan P. Predictions for the decision to-delivery interval for emergency Caesarean section in Norway. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica. 2006;85:561–6.CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Singh R, Deo S, Pradeep Y. The decision-to-delivery interval in emergency Caesarean sections and its correlation with perinatal outcome: evidence from 204 deliveries in a developing country. Trop Doct. 2012;42(2):67–9.CrossRefPubMed Singh R, Deo S, Pradeep Y. The decision-to-delivery interval in emergency Caesarean sections and its correlation with perinatal outcome: evidence from 204 deliveries in a developing country. Trop Doct. 2012;42(2):67–9.CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Decision Delivery Interval in Emergency and Urgent Caesarean Sections: Need to Reconsider the Recommendations?
verfasst von
Nalini Mishra
Ruchi Gupta
Nomita Singh
Publikationsdatum
01.02.2018
Verlag
Springer India
Erschienen in
The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India / Ausgabe 1/2018
Print ISSN: 0971-9202
Elektronische ISSN: 0975-6434
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13224-017-0991-6

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2018

The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India 1/2018 Zur Ausgabe

Update Gynäkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.