Skip to main content
Erschienen in:

06.01.2020 | Assisted Reproduction Technologies

Decisional authority of gamete donors over embryos created with their gametes

verfasst von: Guido Pennings

Erschienen in: Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics | Ausgabe 2/2020

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

In the ongoing discussion on the rights and obligations of gamete donors, scant attention has been paid to the decisional authority of gamete donors over the disposition of the embryos created with their gametes. This paper analyses four different positions: three cases relate to the disposition options for surplus or unused embryos by the first recipients, and one case relates to the use of the embryos stored by the first recipients for procreation.
We conclude that the gamete donor causally contributes to the creation of the embryos and thus becomes indirectly responsible. To avoid that donors would become accomplices to an activity to which they morally object, a qualified generic consent mentioning types of research should be obtained. No consent from the donor is required for the destruction of the embryos.
The cancellation of the agreement by anonymous or identifiable gamete donors should not be possible for embryos in storage for reproduction by the recipients. The interests in not becoming a genetic parent against one’s wishes do not outweigh the damage done to recipients who would no longer be able to use their embryos. Known donors, on the contrary, should be able to withdraw their consent up to the moment of transfer of the embryos based on the greater harm caused to them as a consequence of attributional parenthood. They should also be able to veto transfer of the embryos to other people than the original recipients.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Cook H, Briton-Jones C, Hill D. Low utilization of extra embryos in donor oocyte in vitro fertilization cycles: an ethical dilemma to donor management. J Assist Reprod Gen. 2013;30:1031–4.CrossRef Cook H, Briton-Jones C, Hill D. Low utilization of extra embryos in donor oocyte in vitro fertilization cycles: an ethical dilemma to donor management. J Assist Reprod Gen. 2013;30:1031–4.CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Knopman JM, Talebian S, Berkeley AS, Grifo JA, Noyes N, Licciardi FL. Fate of cryopreserved donor embryos. Fertil Steril. 2010;94:1689–92.CrossRef Knopman JM, Talebian S, Berkeley AS, Grifo JA, Noyes N, Licciardi FL. Fate of cryopreserved donor embryos. Fertil Steril. 2010;94:1689–92.CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Schaefer GO, Sinaii N, Grady C. Informing egg donors of the potential for embryonic research: a survey of consent forms from U.S. in vitro fertilization clinics. Fertil Steril. 2012;97:427–33.CrossRef Schaefer GO, Sinaii N, Grady C. Informing egg donors of the potential for embryonic research: a survey of consent forms from U.S. in vitro fertilization clinics. Fertil Steril. 2012;97:427–33.CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Wilkerson A,Wongsatittham K, Johnston J. The NIH Stem cell registry: an absence of gamete donor consent. Cell Stem Cell 2013;12:147–148.CrossRef Wilkerson A,Wongsatittham K, Johnston J. The NIH Stem cell registry: an absence of gamete donor consent. Cell Stem Cell 2013;12:147–148.CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Kalfoglou AL, Geller G. A follow-up study with oocyte donors exploring their experiences, knowledge, and attitudes about the use of their oocytes and the outcome of the donation. Fertil Steril. 2000;74:660–7.CrossRef Kalfoglou AL, Geller G. A follow-up study with oocyte donors exploring their experiences, knowledge, and attitudes about the use of their oocytes and the outcome of the donation. Fertil Steril. 2000;74:660–7.CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Zweifel JE, Christianson M, Jaeger AS, Fost N, Olive D, Lindheim SR. Oocyte donors’ perspectives regarding embryo disposition options: grandfathering embryos for stem cell research? Fertil Steril. 2006;86(suppl. 2):S510–1.CrossRef Zweifel JE, Christianson M, Jaeger AS, Fost N, Olive D, Lindheim SR. Oocyte donors’ perspectives regarding embryo disposition options: grandfathering embryos for stem cell research? Fertil Steril. 2006;86(suppl. 2):S510–1.CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Klitzman R, Sauer MV. Payment of egg donors in stem cell research in the USA. Reprod BioMed Online. 2009;18:603–8.CrossRef Klitzman R, Sauer MV. Payment of egg donors in stem cell research in the USA. Reprod BioMed Online. 2009;18:603–8.CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Adsuar N, Zweifel JE, Pritts EA, Davidson MA, Olive DL, Lindheim SR. Assessment of wishes regarding disposition of oocytes and embryo management among ovum donors in an anonymous egg donation program. Fertil Steril. 2005;84:1513–6.CrossRef Adsuar N, Zweifel JE, Pritts EA, Davidson MA, Olive DL, Lindheim SR. Assessment of wishes regarding disposition of oocytes and embryo management among ovum donors in an anonymous egg donation program. Fertil Steril. 2005;84:1513–6.CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat National Research Council. Final report of the National Academies’ Human Embryonic Stem Cell Research Advisory Committee and 2010 Amendments to the National Academies’ Guidelines for human embryonic stem cell research, Washington: National Academies Press, 2010. National Research Council. Final report of the National Academies’ Human Embryonic Stem Cell Research Advisory Committee and 2010 Amendments to the National Academies’ Guidelines for human embryonic stem cell research, Washington: National Academies Press, 2010.
12.
Zurück zum Zitat NordForsk. Legislation on biotechnology in the Nordic countries - an overview 2018. Oslo: NordForsk, 2018. NordForsk. Legislation on biotechnology in the Nordic countries - an overview 2018. Oslo: NordForsk, 2018.
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Siegel AW. Gamete donor consent and human embryonic stem cell research. Kennedy Inst Ethic J. 2015;25:149–68.CrossRef Siegel AW. Gamete donor consent and human embryonic stem cell research. Kennedy Inst Ethic J. 2015;25:149–68.CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Nelson E. Consent to embryo donation for human embryonic stem cell research. Health Law Rev. 2008;16:5–26. Nelson E. Consent to embryo donation for human embryonic stem cell research. Health Law Rev. 2008;16:5–26.
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Rothenberg KH, Ulrich MR. NIH guidelines on human embryonic stem cell research in context: clarity or confusion? World Stem Cell Report. 2010:89–98. Rothenberg KH, Ulrich MR. NIH guidelines on human embryonic stem cell research in context: clarity or confusion? World Stem Cell Report. 2010:89–98.
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Mackenney J. Should gamete donors be allowed to withdraw consent from embryo research? Asian Bioethics Rev. 2009;1:89–107. Mackenney J. Should gamete donors be allowed to withdraw consent from embryo research? Asian Bioethics Rev. 2009;1:89–107.
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Hart HLA, Honoré T. Causation in the law. Oxford: Clarendon Press; 1985.CrossRef Hart HLA, Honoré T. Causation in the law. Oxford: Clarendon Press; 1985.CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Kadish SH. Complicity, cause and blame: a study in the interpretation of doctrine. Calif Law Rev. 1985;73:323–410.CrossRef Kadish SH. Complicity, cause and blame: a study in the interpretation of doctrine. Calif Law Rev. 1985;73:323–410.CrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Bazargan-Forward S. Accountability and intervening agency: an asymmetry between upstream and downstream actors. Utilitas. 2017;29:110–24.CrossRef Bazargan-Forward S. Accountability and intervening agency: an asymmetry between upstream and downstream actors. Utilitas. 2017;29:110–24.CrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Moore MS. The metaphysics of causal intervention. Calif Law Rev. 2000;88:827–77.CrossRef Moore MS. The metaphysics of causal intervention. Calif Law Rev. 2000;88:827–77.CrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Lo B, Parham L, Cedars M, Fisher S, Gates E, Giudice L, et al. NIH guidelines for stem cell research and gamete donors. Science. 2010;327:962–3.CrossRef Lo B, Parham L, Cedars M, Fisher S, Gates E, Giudice L, et al. NIH guidelines for stem cell research and gamete donors. Science. 2010;327:962–3.CrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Mykitiuk R, Nelson E, Nisker J. (SOGC) clinical practice guideline: informed consent to donate embryos for research purposes. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2008;30:824–9.CrossRef Mykitiuk R, Nelson E, Nisker J. (SOGC) clinical practice guideline: informed consent to donate embryos for research purposes. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2008;30:824–9.CrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Provoost V, Pennings G, De Sutter P, Dhont M. The frozen embryo and its non-responding parents. Fertil Steril. 2011;95:1980–4.e1.CrossRef Provoost V, Pennings G, De Sutter P, Dhont M. The frozen embryo and its non-responding parents. Fertil Steril. 2011;95:1980–4.e1.CrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Pennings G, Segers S, Debrock S, Heindryckx B, Kontozova-Deutsch V, Punjabi U, et al. Human embryo research in Belgium: an overview. Fertil Steril. 2017;108:96–107.CrossRef Pennings G, Segers S, Debrock S, Heindryckx B, Kontozova-Deutsch V, Punjabi U, et al. Human embryo research in Belgium: an overview. Fertil Steril. 2017;108:96–107.CrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Caulfield T, Ogbogu U, Isasi RM. Informed consent in embryonic stem cell research: are we following basic principles? Can Med Ass J. 2007;176:1722–5.CrossRef Caulfield T, Ogbogu U, Isasi RM. Informed consent in embryonic stem cell research: are we following basic principles? Can Med Ass J. 2007;176:1722–5.CrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Pennings G. Genetic databases and the future of donor anonymity. Hum Reprod. 2019;34:786–90.CrossRef Pennings G. Genetic databases and the future of donor anonymity. Hum Reprod. 2019;34:786–90.CrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Ethics Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Informed consent and the use of gametes and embryos for research: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril. 2014;101:332–5.CrossRef Ethics Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Informed consent and the use of gametes and embryos for research: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril. 2014;101:332–5.CrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Sehnert B, Chetkowski RJ. Secondary donation of frozen embryos is more common after pregnancy initiation with donated eggs than after in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer and gamete intrafallopian transfer. Fertil Steril. 1998;69:350–2.CrossRef Sehnert B, Chetkowski RJ. Secondary donation of frozen embryos is more common after pregnancy initiation with donated eggs than after in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer and gamete intrafallopian transfer. Fertil Steril. 1998;69:350–2.CrossRef
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Baetens P, Devroey P, Camus M, Van Steirteghem A, Ponjaert-Kristoffersen I. Counselling couples and donors for oocyte donation: the decision to use either known or anonymous oocytes. Hum Reprod. 2000;15:476–84.CrossRef Baetens P, Devroey P, Camus M, Van Steirteghem A, Ponjaert-Kristoffersen I. Counselling couples and donors for oocyte donation: the decision to use either known or anonymous oocytes. Hum Reprod. 2000;15:476–84.CrossRef
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Laruelle C, Place I, Demeestere I, Englert Y, Delbaere A. Anonymity and secrecy options of recipient couples and donors, and ethnic origin influence in three types of oocyte donation. Hum Reprod. 2011;26:382–90.CrossRef Laruelle C, Place I, Demeestere I, Englert Y, Delbaere A. Anonymity and secrecy options of recipient couples and donors, and ethnic origin influence in three types of oocyte donation. Hum Reprod. 2011;26:382–90.CrossRef
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Provoost V, Pennings G, De Suttter P, Gerris J, Van De Velde A, De Lissnyder E, et al. Infertility patients’ beliefs about their embryos and their disposition preferences. Hum Reprod. 2009;24:896–905.CrossRef Provoost V, Pennings G, De Suttter P, Gerris J, Van De Velde A, De Lissnyder E, et al. Infertility patients’ beliefs about their embryos and their disposition preferences. Hum Reprod. 2009;24:896–905.CrossRef
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Burrell R. The first years of the Finnish act on assisted fertility treatments – observations from the viewpoint of a supervisory authority. Med Law. 2012;31:473–89.PubMed Burrell R. The first years of the Finnish act on assisted fertility treatments – observations from the viewpoint of a supervisory authority. Med Law. 2012;31:473–89.PubMed
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Frith L, Blyth E. The point of no return: up to what point should we be allowed to withdraw consent to the storage and use of embryos and gametes? Bioethics. 2019;33:637–43.CrossRef Frith L, Blyth E. The point of no return: up to what point should we be allowed to withdraw consent to the storage and use of embryos and gametes? Bioethics. 2019;33:637–43.CrossRef
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Herrera MB. Arizona gamete donor law: a call for recognizing women’s asymmetrical property interest in pre-embryo disposition. Hastings Women’s Law J. 2019;30:118–42. Herrera MB. Arizona gamete donor law: a call for recognizing women’s asymmetrical property interest in pre-embryo disposition. Hastings Women’s Law J. 2019;30:118–42.
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Draper H. Gametes, consent and points of no return. Hum Fertil. 2007;10:105–9.CrossRef Draper H. Gametes, consent and points of no return. Hum Fertil. 2007;10:105–9.CrossRef
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Fuscaldo G. Gamete donation: when does consent become irrevocable? Hum Reprod. 2000;15:515–9.CrossRef Fuscaldo G. Gamete donation: when does consent become irrevocable? Hum Reprod. 2000;15:515–9.CrossRef
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Pennings G, Provoost V. The attitude of female students towards sperm donation by their partners. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2019;36:1431–9.CrossRef Pennings G, Provoost V. The attitude of female students towards sperm donation by their partners. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2019;36:1431–9.CrossRef
38.
Zurück zum Zitat Cohen IG. The right not to be a genetic parent? Southern Calif L R. 2008;81:1115–96. Cohen IG. The right not to be a genetic parent? Southern Calif L R. 2008;81:1115–96.
39.
Zurück zum Zitat Morris A, Nott S. Rights and responsibilities: contested parenthood. J Social Welfare Fam L. 2009;31:3–16.CrossRef Morris A, Nott S. Rights and responsibilities: contested parenthood. J Social Welfare Fam L. 2009;31:3–16.CrossRef
40.
Zurück zum Zitat Waldman E. The parent trap: uncovering the myth of “coerced parenthood” in frozen embryo disputes. Am Univ Int Law Rev. 2004;53:1021–62. Waldman E. The parent trap: uncovering the myth of “coerced parenthood” in frozen embryo disputes. Am Univ Int Law Rev. 2004;53:1021–62.
41.
Zurück zum Zitat Goodenote E. Evans v. United Kingdom. Cornell Int Law J. 2007;40:571–88. Goodenote E. Evans v. United Kingdom. Cornell Int Law J. 2007;40:571–88.
Metadaten
Titel
Decisional authority of gamete donors over embryos created with their gametes
verfasst von
Guido Pennings
Publikationsdatum
06.01.2020
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics / Ausgabe 2/2020
Print ISSN: 1058-0468
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-7330
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-019-01678-5

Neu im Fachgebiet Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe

Osteoporose-Indizes offenbar wenig sinnvoll bei jüngeren Frauen

In einer US-Studie war keiner von drei getesteten Osteoporose-Indizes verlässlich genug, um bei postmenopausalen Frauen unter 65 Jahren ein klinisch relevantes Frakturrisiko zu erkennen.

Einleitung bei Zwillingsgeburt mit Sectiorisiko assoziiert

Einleitung ja oder nein? Besonders bei Schwangerschaften mit Zwillingen ist diese Entscheidung relevant. Wird die Geburt eingeleitet, steigt das Risiko für eine Sectio deutlich. Das hat nun eine Studie aus der Schweiz ergeben.

Junge Brustkrebspatientinnen zum Durchhalten motivieren

Patientinnen, die in jungen Jahren an Hormonrezeptor-positivem Brustkrebs erkranken, neigen dazu, die adjuvante endokrine Therapie auszusetzen oder abzubrechen. Die schlechte Therapiepersistenz scheint die Rückkehr des Tumors zu begünstigen.

Krebsscreeningprogramme erreichen Menschen mit kognitiver Beeinträchtigung schlechter

Daten aus den Niederlanden zeigen, dass Krebsfrüherkennungsmaßnahmen für Menschen mit Störungen der Intelligenzentwicklung häufig nicht zugänglich sind. Wie kann diese Lücke geschlossen werden?

Update Gynäkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.