Background
B cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia (BCP-ALL) is characterized by several molecular and cytogenetic changes. One of the most frequently involved genetic alterations in BCP-ALL is the rearrangement of the mixed lineage leukemia (MLL) gene. Thereby, the t(4;11)(q21;q23)/MLL-AF4 chromosomal translocation is the second most frequent translocation in adult ALL overall [
1]. MLL-AF4-positive ALL is generally considered as high-risk leukemia associated with poor clinical outcome [
2]. Therefore, in general, multidrug chemotherapy regimens are used for remission induction and consolidation [
3‐
5]. In the case of CD20 positivity, antibody-based anti-CD-20 immunotherapy has proved to be beneficial [
6]. Subsequent allogeneic stem cell transplantation is recommended. No subtype-specific targeted therapy for MLL patients has been established yet [
2]. The exact pathogenesis of MLL-positive ALL has not yet been fully understood. However, epigenetic dysregulation and the acquisition of additional secondary genetic mutations seem to play a pivotal role in MLL-driven leukemogenesis [
7].
Epigenetic dysregulation appears to be prevalent in MLL-positive leukemia, and specific methylation patterns have been reported [
8,
9]. Infant MLL-rearranged ALL is characterized by aberrant promotor hypermethylation in CpG islands of tumor suppressor genes inducing transcriptional silencing [
10]. Thereby, key signaling pathways influencing cell cycle progression, apoptosis, DNA repair, or cell differentiation are dysregulated and have therefore been proposed to be major factors in the development of MLL-ALL.
In general, hypermethylated genes can be targeted by hypomethylating agents (HMA) such as cytosine analogs azacitidine (AZA) or decitabine (DEC). These agents inhibit the function of DNA methyltransferases (DNMT) by incorporation into the DNA and prevent the methylation of cytosine during cell division, resulting in genome-wide demethylation [
11]. Both drugs are used in the treatment of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) [
12,
13].
The efficacy of HMA on BCP-ALL has not yet been investigated in detail. So far, DEC has been studied in two small clinical trials in relapsed and refractory B-ALL patients [
14,
15]. Both studies demonstrated clinical activity and DNA demethylation. The overall response rate was higher when DEC was given in combination with a commonly used chemotherapy regimen [
14]. Additionally, combination with the histone deacetylase inhibitor Vorinostat followed by standard re-induction chemotherapy demonstrated clinical benefit in relapsed ALL patients [
15]. To date, clinical trials with AZA have not been implemented in ALL. In vitro, AZA in combination with histone deacetylase inhibitor Panobinostat was reported to induce synergistic antiproliferative effects in ALL cell lines [
16].
Here, we hypothesized that HMA exhibit antiproliferative effects depending on drug exposition sequence in MLL-positive BPC-ALL. Further, we hypothesized that HMA increases the sensitivity to concomitant cytostatic agents. In order to proof our hypotheses, cell culture and xenograft models of BCP-ALL were used. Thereby, in vivo ALL cell expansion was studied with non-invasive imaging technologies using bioluminescence and PET/CT.
Methods
Cell lines and cell culture
The human BCP-ALL cell lines SEM and RS4;11 carry the translocation t(4;11) and were purchased from DSMZ (Braunschweig, Germany). Cells were cultured as previously described [
17]. Briefly, cells were maintained as suspension cultures in Iscove’s MDM (SEM) or alpha-MEM (RS4;11) supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum (Biochrom, Berlin, Germany) and 100 μg/ml penicillin and streptomycin (Biochrom) at 37 °C in humidified air containing 5% CO
2. Cell doubling time for SEM has been described earlier to be 30 h and for RS4;11 60 h [
18,
19]. Our analysis revealed slightly longer doubling times (i.e., SEM: 33-36 h and RS4;11: 51-56 h).
Patients
Mononuclear cells of bone marrow (BM) aspirates were obtained from three newly diagnosed ALL patients (Rostock University Medical Center, Germany) and isolated by density centrifugation. Cancer hotspot mutations were analyzed with next-generation sequencing (Ion PGM System, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Schwerte, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Patient’s characteristics are summarized in Additional file
1. The study was performed in accordance to the Declaration of Helsinki and the local ethical standards of the Rostock University Medical Center.
Drugs
AZA and DEC were purchased from Selleckchem (Munich, Germany). Cytarabine (AraC) and doxorubicin (Doxo) were purchased from CellPharm GmbH (Bad Vilbel, Germany). Control cells were cultured in their medium containing DMSO in the same concentration as present in the drug-treated cells. For xenograft studies, DEC was dissolved in PBS.
Inhibition experiments and drug combination studies
Cells with a density of 0.33 × 10
6/ml were incubated with serial HMA dilutions for up to 72 h. Subsequently, low-dose HMA were combined with low dose of AraC or Doxo. Cytostatics were added at the time of cell seeding either simultaneously, 24 h before, or 24 h after HMA application. The used drug concentrations can be achieved in human plasma [
20,
21]. All experiments were carried out in biological triplicates.
Study of proliferation and metabolic activity
Proliferation was assessed by counting viable cells using trypan blue dye exclusion. Metabolic activity was evaluated using WST-1 assay (Roche, Mannheim, Germany) [
22].
Analyses of cell cycle and apoptosis were performed as previously described [
22].
Methylation specific quantitative PCR (MSqPCR)
CDH13 and
LINE-1 methylation was quantified by MSqPCR (Additional files
2 and
3).
Generation of GFP- and ffluc-expressing cells
SEM and RS4;11 were stably transduced with enhanced firefly luciferase (ffluc) which was subcloned into the multicloning site of the pCDH-EF1-MCS-T2A-copGFP vector (System Biosciences, Mountain View, CA, USA) using EcoRI and BamHI [
23].
Xenograft mouse model
NOD scid gamma mice (NSG, Charles River Laboratories, Sulzfeld, Germany) were bred and housed under specific pathogen-free conditions. NSG mice (10–16 weeks old) were intravenously injected with 2.5 × 106 SEM-ffluc-GFP, RS4;11-ffluc-GFP, or de novo BCP-ALL cells.
Tumor burden was assessed by bioluminescence imaging (BLI) using NightOWL LB983 in vivo imaging system and Indigo software version 1.04 (Berthold Technologies, Bad Wildbach, Germany). Animals were intraperitoneally injected with 4.5 mg d-luciferin (Goldbiotechnology, St. Louis, USA). Mice were imaged 10 min after luciferin injection in prone and supine position for 60-s exposure time (sample size 150 × 20 mm; binning 4 × 4; emission 560 nm). BLI signals (ph/s) were calculated as the sum of both prone and supine acquisitions for each mouse.
Treatment started 7 days after tumor cell injection when BLI revealed equal engraftment of leukemia cells in all mice. Mice were treated intraperitoneally with a vehicle (isotonic saline: d7–d10), daily with 0.4 mg/kg BW DEC (d7–d10), daily with 150 mg/kg BW AraC (d7, d8), or both [
24,
25]. Each group comprised of nine mice (Additional files
4 and
5).
Drug response was evaluated weekly using flow cytometry analyses (peripheral blood (PB)) and whole body BLI (ffluc) for up to 30 days. Mice were sacrificed, and cell suspensions were prepared from spleen and BM as previously reported [
26].
Patient-derived xenograft (PDX) mice were treated as described above. Treatment response was analyzed by measuring frequency of human CD19 (clone 4G7, BD, Heidelberg, Germany) and human CD45 (clone 2D1, BD) in blood (weekly) and BM and spleen (both after euthanasia).
All experiments were approved by the review board of the federal state of Mecklenburg-Vorpommern, Germany (reference number: LALLF MV/7221.3-1.1-002/15).
18F-FDG-PET/CT imaging
18F-FDG was injected into the tail vein with 18.4 ± 2.1 MBq (distribution time 60 min). Imaging was performed for 15 min static acquisition and later analyzed (Inveon PET/CT Siemens, Knoxville, TN, USA). 18F-FDG uptake in spleen was determined by percent intensity of the injected dose per g (%ID/g). To calculate the metabolic volume of the spleen, 70% of measured %ID/gmax of the spleen was set as threshold.
Statistical analysis
Results within each experiment were described using mean and standard deviation. Significance between strains was calculated using Student’s
t test (Microsoft excel software, version 2010, München, Germany). A
p value < 0.05 was considered to be significant. Bliss independence model is widely used to determine effects of the drug combinations. Drug combination effects were obtained by the difference (Δ) between the observed (
O) and the expected (
E) inhibition of combined treatment.
E is calculated as follows:
E = (
A +
B) − (
A*
B), where
A and
B are the relative inhibition of single agent
A and
B. Δ > 0 indicating synergistic, and Δ < 0 antagonistic effects [
27]. For the calculation, mean values of the metabolic activity or mean values of proliferation from three independent experiments were used.
Discussion
DNA hypermethylation is frequently observed in many neoplasms and is therefore a promising therapeutic target. Furthermore, it has been demonstrated that MLL-positive BCP-ALL displays a hypermethylated CpG promotor pattern providing a rationale for the evaluation of HMA approaches [
10].
The aim of the current study was to evaluate the biological effect of HMA in MLL-positive BCP-ALL. Thereby, efficacy of drugs was analyzed in monoapplication and combination with conventional cytostatic drugs. Our results show that HMA decreased cell proliferation and viability of BCP-ALL. The combination of HMA with conventional cytostatic drugs revealed heterogeneous responses.
Two MLL-positive BCP-ALL cell lines (SEM and RS4;11) with different cell doubling times were selected as cell line-based models as they represent an ALL subtype-specific CpG island hypermethylation profile [
10].
In SEM cells, a significant decrease of proliferation and metabolism after HMA exposure was demonstrated being associated with induction of cell cycle arrest and apoptosis. Interestingly, SEM cells were more sensitive to DEC compared to AZA exposure. In RS4;11 cells, no HMA induced significant biological effects. This could be explained on the one hand by the longer cell doubling time of RS4;11 compared to SEM cells because incorporation of HMA into the DNA occurred during DNA synthesis. On the other hand, the sensitivity of AZA and DEC can be explained by the fast decomposition of the compounds [
30]. Stresemann et al. demonstrated that chemical stability of these compounds is dependent on pH value and temperature. At 37 °C, the half-life was 7 h for AZA and 21 h for DEC [
30]. In addition, Leonard et al. investigated prolonged DEC exposure times on AML cells. The strongest antiproliferative effects were observed with repeated applications [
31]. Thus, enhanced anti-proliferative effects in BCP-ALL cells in vitro might be stronger considering the half-life of AZA and DEC by using repeated HMA applications.
It is known that dosing regimen is critical for HMA. For AZA, several clinical trials have been reported with different time schedules and dosage [
32‐
34]. We cannot exclude that repeated application or higher concentration of AZA affects methylation levels on LINE-1 and CDH13.
Longer incubation time and additional application of HMA might be required to sensitize RS4;11 cells and have to be evaluated in the future.
Effects of HMA on viability of B- and T-ALL cells were investigated in several previous studies [
35‐
39]. Stumpel et al. analyzed the in vitro sensitivity of SEM and RS4;11 cells to different HMA. The authors showed that both cell lines were likewise DEC sensitive with IC50 values below 1 μM [
38]. These observations are in line with our results. Shi et al. investigated HMA in T-ALL and reported increasing apoptosis rates, when DEC and a deacetylase inhibitor were combined [
35].
Further, we investigated the sensitivity of BCP-ALL cells in regard to different HMA and chemotherapeutic drug exposition sequences. Drug doses for combination studies were chosen at low concentrations. We postulated that the order influences the extent of the observed effects. Our results indicate that the combination of low-dose HMA with low-dose conventional cytostatic drugs induced in part significantly stronger antiproliferative effects compared to single drug exposure. However, effects differed between cell lines and cytostatic drugs. Pronounced effects were observed in the simultaneous application approach. To our knowledge, we investigated for the first time biological effects on MLL-positive BCP-ALL cells in regard to sequence of drug exposure including HMA. In previous studies, it has been shown that HMA influenced chemosensitivity of ALL cells differently [
36,
40]. Lu et al. investigated HMA effects on a panel of T-ALL cells [
36]. They demonstrated synergistic as well as antagonistic effects when cells were exposed sequentially with DEC followed by application of prednisolone, etoposide, or AraC. Interestingly, in the same study, most pronounced effects were observed on RS4;11 cells. Strong synergistic effects were induced after pretreatment of DEC followed by AraC exposure [
36]. Again, drug concentrations might explain differences to our results. Another preclinical study on BCP-ALL cells demonstrated that DEC pretreatment followed by prednisolone enhanced the cytotoxicity compared to DEC alone [
40]. However, the authors did not investigate other sequences.
So far, DEC-induced effects on MLL-positive BCP-ALL xenograft models have not been investigated. Here, we validated the efficacy of DEC treatment by using non-invasive imaging techniques. Orthotopic ALL xenograft models have been successfully established to evaluate leukemic proliferation in vivo and offer a powerful tool for preclinical investigations [
23,
41]. Engraftment of leukemic cells using BLI is easily detectable and allows a non-invasive longitudinal determination of leukemia burden [
42].
Interestingly, a significant inhibition of leukemic cell proliferation was observed in both xenograft models (SEM, RS4;11). DEC therapy responses were detectable early using BLI, preceding changes in leukemic blast frequency in PB.
In contrast and to our surprise, in vivo RS4;11 results were not in line with in vitro results as leukemic proliferation was also diminished in DEC-treated RS4;11 xenograft mice. The difference between in vitro and in vivo results regarding DEC susceptibility of RS4;11 cells might be explained by different application schemes. While DEC was applied only once in vitro, mice were treated daily for 4 days. Repeated DEC applications might be required due to the rapid and irreversible decomposition of this compound and the longer cell doubling time of RS4;11 compared to SEM cells. To test this hypothesis, we calculated the doubling times of cells in SEM-ffluc and RS4;11-ffluc xenografts based on bioluminescence data from days 7, 10, and 14 in saline-treated mice. Of interest, RS4;11 cells exhibited a lower cell doubling time (ranging from 19 to 45 h) in mice than in cell culture (ranging from 51 to 64 h). The proliferation of SEM cells in xenografts was in accordance to our in vitro proliferation data. This might explain the differences between our in vitro and in vivo observations.
Unexpectedly, in vivo concomitant treatment of DEC and AraC did not enhance the antiproliferative effect compared to DEC monotherapy. However, these observations were not consistent with our in vitro results. The combinatorial effect of HMA with Doxo was not studied on BCP-ALL xenografts because NSG mice did not tolerate Doxo dose as published by Ma el al [
43]. In our Doxo dose finding study, all Doxo-treated mice loss weight, died during therapy, or were killed by euthanasia due to their bad general state (data not shown).
Further, we demonstrated that DEC also inhibited leukemia cell proliferation in PDX mice. The best therapeutic response was observed in PDX mice of patient #152. Responses in DEC-treated xenografts of #122 and #159 were lower. This could be due to the presence of additional unfavorable gene mutations such as
KRAS and
JAK3 [
44].
In a previous study in AML and MDS patients, DEC leveled out
TP53 mutations associated adverse survival to rates similar to intermediate-risk patients [
45]. However, not all patients with TP53 mutations were invariably sensitive to DEC and resistant clones emerged [
45].
In addition, we studied the impact on
18F-FDG uptake using small animal PET/CT in a BCP ALL xenograft model.
18F-FDG PET/CT is increasingly used for diagnosis, staging, and evaluation of therapeutic response of several types of cancer including lymphoma [
46‐
48]. So far, it has not been implemented in the assessment of leukemia. Case reports have demonstrated the potential of
18F-FDG-PET/CT in the follow-up of leukemic BM infiltration [
49‐
51].
Here, we have shown that 18F-FDG-PET/CT is technically feasible and uptake correlates with leukemia expansion. All observations were consistent with BLI data. Our results indicate that 18F-FDG-PET/CT might be an applicable method for non-invasive detection of ALL cell metabolism in vivo.