Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Japanese Journal of Radiology 6/2021

15.01.2021 | Original Article

Deep learning image reconstruction for improvement of image quality of abdominal computed tomography: comparison with hybrid iterative reconstruction

verfasst von: Yasutaka Ichikawa, Yoshinori Kanii, Akio Yamazaki, Naoki Nagasawa, Motonori Nagata, Masaki Ishida, Kakuya Kitagawa, Hajime Sakuma

Erschienen in: Japanese Journal of Radiology | Ausgabe 6/2021

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate the usefulness of the deep learning image reconstruction (DLIR) to enhance the image quality of abdominal CT, compared to iterative reconstruction technique.

Method

Pre and post-contrast abdominal CT images in 50 patients were reconstructed with 2 different algorithms: hybrid iterative reconstruction (hybrid IR: ASiR-V 50%) and DLIR (TrueFidelity). Standard deviation of attenuation in normal liver parenchyma was measured as the image noise on pre and post-contrast CT. The contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) for the aorta, and the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of the liver were calculated on post-contrast CT. The overall image quality was graded on a 5-point scale ranging from 1 (poor) to 5 (excellent).

Results

The image noise was significantly decreased by DLIR compared to hybrid-IR [hybrid IR, median 8.3 Hounsfield unit (HU) (interquartile range (IQR) 7.6–9.2 HU); DLIR, median 5.2 HU (IQR 4.6–5.8), P < 0.0001 for post-contrast CT]. The CNR and SNR were significantly improved by DLIR [CNR, median 4.5 (IQR 3.8–5.6) vs 7.3 (IQR 6.2–8.8), P < 0.0001; SNR, median 9.4 (IQR 8.3–10.1) vs 15.0 (IQR 13.2–16.4), P < 0.0001]. The overall image quality score was also higher for DLIR compared to hybrid-IR (hybrid IR 3.1 ± 0.6 vs DLIR 4.6 ± 0.5, P < 0.0001 for post-contrast CT).

Conclusions

Image noise, overall image quality, CNR and SNR for abdominal CT images are improved with DLIR compared to hybrid IR.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Shuman WP, Chan KT, Busey JM, Mitsumori LM, Choi E, Koprowicz KM, Kanal KM. Standard and reduced radiation dose liver CT images: adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction versus model-based iterative reconstruction-comparison of findings and image quality. Radiology. 2014;273(3):793–800.CrossRef Shuman WP, Chan KT, Busey JM, Mitsumori LM, Choi E, Koprowicz KM, Kanal KM. Standard and reduced radiation dose liver CT images: adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction versus model-based iterative reconstruction-comparison of findings and image quality. Radiology. 2014;273(3):793–800.CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Kataria B, Althen JN, Smedby O, Persson A, Sokjer H, Sandborg M. Assessment of image quality in abdominal CT: potential dose reduction with model-based iterative reconstruction. Eur Radiol. 2018;28(6):2464–73.CrossRef Kataria B, Althen JN, Smedby O, Persson A, Sokjer H, Sandborg M. Assessment of image quality in abdominal CT: potential dose reduction with model-based iterative reconstruction. Eur Radiol. 2018;28(6):2464–73.CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Ichikawa Y, Kitagawa K, Nagasawa N, Murashima S, Sakuma H. CT of the chest with model-based, fully iterative reconstruction: comparison with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction. BMC Med Imaging. 2013;13:27.CrossRef Ichikawa Y, Kitagawa K, Nagasawa N, Murashima S, Sakuma H. CT of the chest with model-based, fully iterative reconstruction: comparison with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction. BMC Med Imaging. 2013;13:27.CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Deak Z, Grimm JM, Treitl M, Geyer LL, Linsenmaier U, Korner M, Reiser MF, Wirth S. Filtered back projection, adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction, and a model-based iterative reconstruction in abdominal CT: an experimental clinical study. Radiology. 2013;266(1):197–206.CrossRef Deak Z, Grimm JM, Treitl M, Geyer LL, Linsenmaier U, Korner M, Reiser MF, Wirth S. Filtered back projection, adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction, and a model-based iterative reconstruction in abdominal CT: an experimental clinical study. Radiology. 2013;266(1):197–206.CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Mitsumori LM, Shuman WP, Busey JM, Kolokythas O, Koprowicz KM. Adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction versus filtered back projection in the same patient: 64 channel liver CT image quality and patient radiation dose. Eur Radiol. 2012;22(1):138–43.CrossRef Mitsumori LM, Shuman WP, Busey JM, Kolokythas O, Koprowicz KM. Adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction versus filtered back projection in the same patient: 64 channel liver CT image quality and patient radiation dose. Eur Radiol. 2012;22(1):138–43.CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Singh S, Kalra MK, Hsieh J, Licato PE, Do S, Pien HH, Blake MA. Abdominal CT: comparison of adaptive statistical iterative and filtered back projection reconstruction techniques. Radiology. 2010;257(2):373–83.CrossRef Singh S, Kalra MK, Hsieh J, Licato PE, Do S, Pien HH, Blake MA. Abdominal CT: comparison of adaptive statistical iterative and filtered back projection reconstruction techniques. Radiology. 2010;257(2):373–83.CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Silva AC, Lawder HJ, Hara A, Kujak J, Pavlicek W. Innovations in CT dose reduction strategy: application of the adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction algorithm. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010;194(1):191–9.CrossRef Silva AC, Lawder HJ, Hara A, Kujak J, Pavlicek W. Innovations in CT dose reduction strategy: application of the adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction algorithm. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010;194(1):191–9.CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Khawaja RD, Singh S, Otrakji A, Padole A, Lim R, Nimkin K, Westra S, Kalra MK, Gee MS. Dose reduction in pediatric abdominal CT: use of iterative reconstruction techniques across different CT platforms. Pediatr Radiol. 2015;45(7):1046–55.CrossRef Khawaja RD, Singh S, Otrakji A, Padole A, Lim R, Nimkin K, Westra S, Kalra MK, Gee MS. Dose reduction in pediatric abdominal CT: use of iterative reconstruction techniques across different CT platforms. Pediatr Radiol. 2015;45(7):1046–55.CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Willemink MJ, Noël PB. The evolution of image reconstruction for CT-from filtered back projection to artificial intelligence. Eur Radiol. 2019;29(5):2185–95.CrossRef Willemink MJ, Noël PB. The evolution of image reconstruction for CT-from filtered back projection to artificial intelligence. Eur Radiol. 2019;29(5):2185–95.CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Kwon H, Cho J, Oh J, Kim D, Cho J, Kim S, Lee S, Lee J. The adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction-V technique for radiation dose reduction in abdominal CT: comparison with the adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction technique. Br J Radiol. 2015;88(1054):20150463.CrossRef Kwon H, Cho J, Oh J, Kim D, Cho J, Kim S, Lee S, Lee J. The adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction-V technique for radiation dose reduction in abdominal CT: comparison with the adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction technique. Br J Radiol. 2015;88(1054):20150463.CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Pickhardt PJ, Lubner MG, Kim DH, Tang J, Ruma JA, del Rio AM, Chen GH. Abdominal CT with model-based iterative reconstruction (MBIR): initial results of a prospective trial comparing ultralow-dose with standard-dose imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012;199(6):1266–74.CrossRef Pickhardt PJ, Lubner MG, Kim DH, Tang J, Ruma JA, del Rio AM, Chen GH. Abdominal CT with model-based iterative reconstruction (MBIR): initial results of a prospective trial comparing ultralow-dose with standard-dose imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012;199(6):1266–74.CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Ehman EC, Yu L, Manduca A, Hara AK, Shiung MM, Jondal D, Lake DS, Paden RG, Blezek DJ, Bruesewitz MR, et al. Methods for clinical evaluation of noise reduction techniques in abdominopelvic CT. Radiographics. 2014;34(4):849–62.CrossRef Ehman EC, Yu L, Manduca A, Hara AK, Shiung MM, Jondal D, Lake DS, Paden RG, Blezek DJ, Bruesewitz MR, et al. Methods for clinical evaluation of noise reduction techniques in abdominopelvic CT. Radiographics. 2014;34(4):849–62.CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Jensen CT, Wagner-Bartak NA, Vu LN, Liu X, Raval B, Martinez D, Wei W, Cheng Y, Samei E, Gupta S. Detection of colorectal hepatic metastases is superior at standard radiation dose CT versus reduced dose CT. Radiology. 2019;290(2):400–9.CrossRef Jensen CT, Wagner-Bartak NA, Vu LN, Liu X, Raval B, Martinez D, Wei W, Cheng Y, Samei E, Gupta S. Detection of colorectal hepatic metastases is superior at standard radiation dose CT versus reduced dose CT. Radiology. 2019;290(2):400–9.CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Akagi M, Nakamura Y, Higaki T, Narita K, Honda Y, Zhou J, Yu Z, Akino N, Awai K (2019) Deep learning reconstruction improves image quality of abdominal ultra-high-resolution CT. Eur Radiol. Akagi M, Nakamura Y, Higaki T, Narita K, Honda Y, Zhou J, Yu Z, Akino N, Awai K (2019) Deep learning reconstruction improves image quality of abdominal ultra-high-resolution CT. Eur Radiol.
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Jensen CT, Liu X, Tamm EP, Chandler AG, Sun J, Morani AC, Javadi S, Wagner-Bartak NA. Image quality assessment of abdominal CT by use of new deep learning image reconstruction: initial experience. AJR American J Roentgenol. 2020;21:1–8. Jensen CT, Liu X, Tamm EP, Chandler AG, Sun J, Morani AC, Javadi S, Wagner-Bartak NA. Image quality assessment of abdominal CT by use of new deep learning image reconstruction: initial experience. AJR American J Roentgenol. 2020;21:1–8.
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Tatsugami F, Higaki T, Nakamura Y, Yu Z, Zhou J, Lu Y, Fujioka C, Kitagawa T, Kihara Y, Iida M, et al. Deep learning-based image restoration algorithm for coronary CT angiography. Eur Radiol. 2019;29(10):5322–9.CrossRef Tatsugami F, Higaki T, Nakamura Y, Yu Z, Zhou J, Lu Y, Fujioka C, Kitagawa T, Kihara Y, Iida M, et al. Deep learning-based image restoration algorithm for coronary CT angiography. Eur Radiol. 2019;29(10):5322–9.CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Christner JA, Braun NN, Jacobsen MC, Carter RE, Kofler JM, McCollough CH. Size-specific dose estimates for adult patients at CT of the torso. Radiology. 2012;265(3):841–7.CrossRef Christner JA, Braun NN, Jacobsen MC, Carter RE, Kofler JM, McCollough CH. Size-specific dose estimates for adult patients at CT of the torso. Radiology. 2012;265(3):841–7.CrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Brady SL, Kaufman RA. Investigation of American Association of Physicists in Medicine Report 204 size-specific dose estimates for pediatric CT implementation. Radiology. 2012;265(3):832–40.CrossRef Brady SL, Kaufman RA. Investigation of American Association of Physicists in Medicine Report 204 size-specific dose estimates for pediatric CT implementation. Radiology. 2012;265(3):832–40.CrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat The measurement, reporting, and management of radiation dose in CT: report of AAPM Task Group 23 of the Diagnostic Imaging Council CT Committee. AAPM report no. 96. College Park (MD): American Association of Physicists in Medicine. The measurement, reporting, and management of radiation dose in CT: report of AAPM Task Group 23 of the Diagnostic Imaging Council CT Committee. AAPM report no. 96. College Park (MD): American Association of Physicists in Medicine.
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Racine D, Becce F, Viry A, Monnin P, Thomsen B, Verdun FR, Rotzinger DC. Task-based characterization of a deep learning image reconstruction and comparison with filtered back-projection and a partial model-based iterative reconstruction in abdominal CT: A phantom study. Phys Med. 2020;76:28–37.CrossRef Racine D, Becce F, Viry A, Monnin P, Thomsen B, Verdun FR, Rotzinger DC. Task-based characterization of a deep learning image reconstruction and comparison with filtered back-projection and a partial model-based iterative reconstruction in abdominal CT: A phantom study. Phys Med. 2020;76:28–37.CrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Solomon J, Lyu P, Marin D, Samei E: Noise and spatial resolution properties of a commercially available deep learning-based CT reconstruction algorithm. Med Phys 2020. Solomon J, Lyu P, Marin D, Samei E: Noise and spatial resolution properties of a commercially available deep learning-based CT reconstruction algorithm. Med Phys 2020.
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Greffier J, Hamard A, Pereira F, Barrau C, Pasquier H, Beregi JP, Frandon J. Image quality and dose reduction opportunity of deep learning image reconstruction algorithm for CT: a phantom study. Eur Radiol. 2020;30(7):3951–9.CrossRef Greffier J, Hamard A, Pereira F, Barrau C, Pasquier H, Beregi JP, Frandon J. Image quality and dose reduction opportunity of deep learning image reconstruction algorithm for CT: a phantom study. Eur Radiol. 2020;30(7):3951–9.CrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Benz DC, Benetos G, Rampidis G, von Felten E, Bakula A, Sustar A, Kudura K, Messerli M, Fuchs TA, Gebhard C et al. (2020) Validation of deep-learning image reconstruction for coronary computed tomography angiography: Impact on noise, image quality and diagnostic accuracy. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. Benz DC, Benetos G, Rampidis G, von Felten E, Bakula A, Sustar A, Kudura K, Messerli M, Fuchs TA, Gebhard C et al. (2020) Validation of deep-learning image reconstruction for coronary computed tomography angiography: Impact on noise, image quality and diagnostic accuracy. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr.
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Kim I, Kang H, Yoon HJ, Chung BM, Shin NY (2020) Deep learning-based image reconstruction for brain CT: improved image quality compared with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction-Veo (ASIR-V). Neuroradiology. Kim I, Kang H, Yoon HJ, Chung BM, Shin NY (2020) Deep learning-based image reconstruction for brain CT: improved image quality compared with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction-Veo (ASIR-V). Neuroradiology.
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Park C, Choo KS, Jung Y, Jeong HS, Hwang JY, Yun MS (2020) CT iterative vs deep learning reconstruction: comparison of noise and sharpness. Eur Radiol. Park C, Choo KS, Jung Y, Jeong HS, Hwang JY, Yun MS (2020) CT iterative vs deep learning reconstruction: comparison of noise and sharpness. Eur Radiol.
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Pooler BD, Lubner MG, Kim DH, Chen OT, Li K, Chen GH, Pickhardt PJ. Prospective evaluation of reduced dose computed tomography for the detection of low-contrast liver lesions: direct comparison with concurrent standard dose imaging. Eur Radiol. 2017;27(5):2055–66.CrossRef Pooler BD, Lubner MG, Kim DH, Chen OT, Li K, Chen GH, Pickhardt PJ. Prospective evaluation of reduced dose computed tomography for the detection of low-contrast liver lesions: direct comparison with concurrent standard dose imaging. Eur Radiol. 2017;27(5):2055–66.CrossRef
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Mileto A, Guimaraes LS, McCollough CH, Fletcher JG, Yu L. State of the art in abdominal CT: the limits of iterative reconstruction algorithms. Radiology. 2019;293(3):491–503.CrossRef Mileto A, Guimaraes LS, McCollough CH, Fletcher JG, Yu L. State of the art in abdominal CT: the limits of iterative reconstruction algorithms. Radiology. 2019;293(3):491–503.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Deep learning image reconstruction for improvement of image quality of abdominal computed tomography: comparison with hybrid iterative reconstruction
verfasst von
Yasutaka Ichikawa
Yoshinori Kanii
Akio Yamazaki
Naoki Nagasawa
Motonori Nagata
Masaki Ishida
Kakuya Kitagawa
Hajime Sakuma
Publikationsdatum
15.01.2021
Verlag
Springer Singapore
Erschienen in
Japanese Journal of Radiology / Ausgabe 6/2021
Print ISSN: 1867-1071
Elektronische ISSN: 1867-108X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11604-021-01089-6

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 6/2021

Japanese Journal of Radiology 6/2021 Zur Ausgabe

Update Radiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.