Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Techniques in Coloproctology 4/2009

01.12.2009 | Original Article

Defecographic pelvic floor abnormalities in constipated patients: does mode of delivery matter?

verfasst von: Sthela Murad-Regadas, Thais V. Peterson, Rodrigo A. Pinto, F. Sergio P. Regadas, Dana R. Sands, Steven D. Wexner

Erschienen in: Techniques in Coloproctology | Ausgabe 4/2009

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

The aim of this study was to demonstrate the distribution of defecographic pelvic floor abnormalities in constipated female patients and to correlate these dysfunctions with the mode of delivery.

Methods

Two hundred and fifty-five female patients who underwent defecography for constipation from 2001 to 2008 were reviewed and pelvic floor abnormalities were assessed. The patients were divided into three groups: group I had 50 nulliparous women, mean age 40.2 (±15.3), group II had 165 vaginally parous women, mean age 57 (±13.3), and group III had 40 patients delivered by cesarean section, mean age 50.6 (±11.9).

Results

Significant rectocele was identified in group I (36%), group II (35.8%), and group III (20%) without any statistically significant differences among the groups (p > 0.05). Intussusception was identified in group I (48%), group II (70.3%), and in group III (67.5%; p = 0.014). Intussusception associated with significant rectocele was more common in vaginally parous patients (p = 0.043). Abnormalities on puborectalis relaxation associated or not associated with rectocele were similar among the groups (p = 0.47). Vaginally parous patients had more abnormal exams as compared to other patients (p = 0.005). Significant rectocele was identified in (39%) patients with age ≥50 years and in (26.3%) patients with age <50 years (p = 0.03).

Conclusion

There was no specific correlation between distribution of pelvic floor disorders and mode of delivery in this study. Patients of age greater than 50 years had a higher incidence of significant rectocele.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Allen RE, Hosker GL, Smith AR, Warrell DW (1990) Pelvic floor damage and childbirth: a neurophysiological study. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 97:770–779PubMed Allen RE, Hosker GL, Smith AR, Warrell DW (1990) Pelvic floor damage and childbirth: a neurophysiological study. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 97:770–779PubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Meyer S, Schreyer A, De Grandi P, Hohlfeld P (1998) The effects of birth on urinary continence mechanisms and other pelvic-floor characteristics. Obstet Gynecol 92:613–618CrossRefPubMed Meyer S, Schreyer A, De Grandi P, Hohlfeld P (1998) The effects of birth on urinary continence mechanisms and other pelvic-floor characteristics. Obstet Gynecol 92:613–618CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Peschers UM, Schaer GN, DeLancey JO, Schuessler B (1997) Levator ani function before and after childbirth. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 104:1004–1008PubMed Peschers UM, Schaer GN, DeLancey JO, Schuessler B (1997) Levator ani function before and after childbirth. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 104:1004–1008PubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Chaliha C, Digesu A, Hutchings A, Soligo M, Khullar V (2004) Caesarean section is protective against stress urinary incontinence: an analysis of women with multiple deliveries. BJOG 111:754–755CrossRefPubMed Chaliha C, Digesu A, Hutchings A, Soligo M, Khullar V (2004) Caesarean section is protective against stress urinary incontinence: an analysis of women with multiple deliveries. BJOG 111:754–755CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Bernman L, Aversa J, Abir F, Longo WE (2005) Management of disorders of the posterior pelvic floor. Yale Biol Med 78:209–218 Bernman L, Aversa J, Abir F, Longo WE (2005) Management of disorders of the posterior pelvic floor. Yale Biol Med 78:209–218
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Ganeshan A, Anderson EM, Upponi S et al (2008) Imaging of obstructed defecation. Clin Radiol 63:18–26CrossRefPubMed Ganeshan A, Anderson EM, Upponi S et al (2008) Imaging of obstructed defecation. Clin Radiol 63:18–26CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Thompson W, Longstreth G, Drossman D, Heaton K, Irvine E, Muller-Lissner S (1999) Functional bowel disorders and functional abdominal pain. Gut 45(Suppl 2):II43–II47PubMedCrossRef Thompson W, Longstreth G, Drossman D, Heaton K, Irvine E, Muller-Lissner S (1999) Functional bowel disorders and functional abdominal pain. Gut 45(Suppl 2):II43–II47PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Mahieu P, Pringot L, Bodart P (1984) Defecography: description of a new procedure and results in normal patients. Gastrointest Radiol 9:247–251CrossRefPubMed Mahieu P, Pringot L, Bodart P (1984) Defecography: description of a new procedure and results in normal patients. Gastrointest Radiol 9:247–251CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Mahieu P, Pringot J, Bodart P (1984) Defecography: contribution to the diagnosis of defecation disorders. Gastrointest Radiol 9:253–261CrossRefPubMed Mahieu P, Pringot J, Bodart P (1984) Defecography: contribution to the diagnosis of defecation disorders. Gastrointest Radiol 9:253–261CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Stewart WF, Liberman JN, Sandler RS et al (1999) Epidemiology of constipation (EPOC) study in the United States: relation of clinical subtypes to sociodemographic features. Am J Gastroenterol 94:3530–3540CrossRefPubMed Stewart WF, Liberman JN, Sandler RS et al (1999) Epidemiology of constipation (EPOC) study in the United States: relation of clinical subtypes to sociodemographic features. Am J Gastroenterol 94:3530–3540CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Watson SJ, Loder PB, Halligan S, Bartram CI, Kamm MA, Phillips RK (1996) Transperineal repair of symptomatic rectocele with Marlex mesh: a clinical, physiological and radiologic assessment of treatment. J Am Coll Surg 183:257–261PubMed Watson SJ, Loder PB, Halligan S, Bartram CI, Kamm MA, Phillips RK (1996) Transperineal repair of symptomatic rectocele with Marlex mesh: a clinical, physiological and radiologic assessment of treatment. J Am Coll Surg 183:257–261PubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Gagliardi G, Pescatori M, Altomare DF et al (2008) Results, outcome predictors, and complications after stapled transanal rectal resection for obstructed defecation. Dis Colon Rectum 51:186–195CrossRefPubMed Gagliardi G, Pescatori M, Altomare DF et al (2008) Results, outcome predictors, and complications after stapled transanal rectal resection for obstructed defecation. Dis Colon Rectum 51:186–195CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat O’Connor JJ (2002) Dynamic imaging of pelvic floor with transperineal sonography. Tech Coloproctol. 6:59 (author reply) O’Connor JJ (2002) Dynamic imaging of pelvic floor with transperineal sonography. Tech Coloproctol. 6:59 (author reply)
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Piloni V (2001) Dynamic imaging of pelvic floor with transperineal sonography. Tech Coloproctol 5:103–105CrossRefPubMed Piloni V (2001) Dynamic imaging of pelvic floor with transperineal sonography. Tech Coloproctol 5:103–105CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Karasick S, Spettell CM (1997) The role of parity and hysterectomy on the development of pelvic floor abnormalities revealed by defecography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 169:1555–1558PubMed Karasick S, Spettell CM (1997) The role of parity and hysterectomy on the development of pelvic floor abnormalities revealed by defecography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 169:1555–1558PubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Brubaker L (1996) Rectocele. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 8:876–879PubMed Brubaker L (1996) Rectocele. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 8:876–879PubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Olsen AL, Smith VJ, Bergstrom JO, Colling JC, Clark AL (1997) Epidemiology of surgically managed pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence. Obstet Gynecol 89:501–506CrossRefPubMed Olsen AL, Smith VJ, Bergstrom JO, Colling JC, Clark AL (1997) Epidemiology of surgically managed pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence. Obstet Gynecol 89:501–506CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Shorvon PJ, McHugh S, Diamant NE, Somers S, Stevenson GW (1989) Defecography in normal volunteers: results and implications. Gut 30:1737–1749CrossRefPubMed Shorvon PJ, McHugh S, Diamant NE, Somers S, Stevenson GW (1989) Defecography in normal volunteers: results and implications. Gut 30:1737–1749CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Arumungan PJ, Parel B, Rieck G et al (2004) Are obstetric risk factors and bowel symptoms associated with defaecographic and manometric abnormalities in women awaiting hysterectomy? J Obstet Gynaecol 24:274–278CrossRef Arumungan PJ, Parel B, Rieck G et al (2004) Are obstetric risk factors and bowel symptoms associated with defaecographic and manometric abnormalities in women awaiting hysterectomy? J Obstet Gynaecol 24:274–278CrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Agachan F, Pfeifer J, Wexner SD (1996) Defecography and proctography. Results of 744 patients. Dis Colon Rectum 39:899–905CrossRefPubMed Agachan F, Pfeifer J, Wexner SD (1996) Defecography and proctography. Results of 744 patients. Dis Colon Rectum 39:899–905CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Murad-Regadas SM, Regadas FSP, Rodrigues LV, Silva FR, Soares FA, Escalante RD (2008) A novel three-dimensional dynamic anorectal ultrasonography technique (echodefecography) to assess obstructed defecation, a comparison with defecography. Surg Endosc 22:974–979CrossRefPubMed Murad-Regadas SM, Regadas FSP, Rodrigues LV, Silva FR, Soares FA, Escalante RD (2008) A novel three-dimensional dynamic anorectal ultrasonography technique (echodefecography) to assess obstructed defecation, a comparison with defecography. Surg Endosc 22:974–979CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Mellgren A, Bremmer S, Johansson C (1994) Defecography: results of investigations in 2,816 patients. Dis Colon Rectum 37:1133–1141CrossRefPubMed Mellgren A, Bremmer S, Johansson C (1994) Defecography: results of investigations in 2,816 patients. Dis Colon Rectum 37:1133–1141CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Defecographic pelvic floor abnormalities in constipated patients: does mode of delivery matter?
verfasst von
Sthela Murad-Regadas
Thais V. Peterson
Rodrigo A. Pinto
F. Sergio P. Regadas
Dana R. Sands
Steven D. Wexner
Publikationsdatum
01.12.2009
Verlag
Springer Milan
Erschienen in
Techniques in Coloproctology / Ausgabe 4/2009
Print ISSN: 1123-6337
Elektronische ISSN: 1128-045X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-009-0533-z

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2009

Techniques in Coloproctology 4/2009 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.