Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of Neuro-Oncology 2/2016

30.03.2016 | Clinical Study

Defining the cutoff value of MGMT gene promoter methylation and its predictive capacity in glioblastoma

verfasst von: Giovanni Brigliadori, Flavia Foca, Monia Dall’Agata, Claudia Rengucci, Elisabetta Melegari, Serenella Cerasoli, Dino Amadori, Daniele Calistri, Marina Faedi

Erschienen in: Journal of Neuro-Oncology | Ausgabe 2/2016

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Despite advances in the treatment of glioblastoma (GBM), median survival is 12–15 months. O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) gene promoter methylation status is acknowledged as a predictive marker for temozolomide (TMZ) treatment. When MGMT promoter values fall into a “methylated” range, a better response to chemotherapy is expected. However, a cutoff that discriminates between “methylated” and “unmethylated” status has yet to be defined. We aimed to identify the best cutoff value and to find out whether variability in methylation profiles influences the predictive capacity of MGMT promoter methylation. Data from 105 GBM patients treated between 2008 and 2013 were analyzed. MGMT promoter methylation status was determined by analyzing 10 CpG islands by pyrosequencing. Patients were treated with radiotherapy followed by TMZ. MGMT promoter methylation status was classified into unmethylated 0–9 %, methylated 10–29 % and methylated 30–100 %. Statistical analysis showed that an assumed methylation cutoff of 9 % led to an overestimation of responders. All patients in the 10–29 % methylation group relapsed before the 18-month evaluation. Patients with a methylation status ≥30 % showed a median overall survival of 25.2 months compared to 15.2 months in all other patients, confirming this value as the best methylation cutoff. Despite wide variability among individual profiles, single CpG island analysis did not reveal any correlation between single CpG island methylation values and relapse or death. Specific CpG island methylation status did not influence the predictive value of MGMT. The predictive role of MGMT promoter methylation was maintained only with a cutoff value ≥30 %.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Moskowitz SI, Jin T, Prayson RA (2006) Role of MIB1 in predicting survival in patients with glioblastomas. J Neurooncol 76:193–200CrossRefPubMed Moskowitz SI, Jin T, Prayson RA (2006) Role of MIB1 in predicting survival in patients with glioblastomas. J Neurooncol 76:193–200CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Shinojima N, Kochi M, Hamada J et al (2004) The influence of sex and the presence of giant cells on postoperative long-term survival in adult patients with supratentorial glioblastoma multiforme. J Neurosurg 101:219–226CrossRefPubMed Shinojima N, Kochi M, Hamada J et al (2004) The influence of sex and the presence of giant cells on postoperative long-term survival in adult patients with supratentorial glioblastoma multiforme. J Neurosurg 101:219–226CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Stewart LA (2002) Chemotherapy in adult high-grade glioma: a systematic review and meta-analysis of individual patient data from 12 randomised trials. Lancet 359:1011–1018CrossRefPubMed Stewart LA (2002) Chemotherapy in adult high-grade glioma: a systematic review and meta-analysis of individual patient data from 12 randomised trials. Lancet 359:1011–1018CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Hegi ME, Diserens AC, Gorlia T et al (2005) MGMT gene silencing and benefit from temozolomide in glioblastoma. N Engl J Med 352:997–1003CrossRefPubMed Hegi ME, Diserens AC, Gorlia T et al (2005) MGMT gene silencing and benefit from temozolomide in glioblastoma. N Engl J Med 352:997–1003CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Stummer W, Pichlmeier U, Meinel T et al (2006) Fluorescence-guided surgery with 5-aminolevulinic acid for resection of malignant glioma: a randomized controlled multicentre phase III trial. Lancet Oncol 7:392–401CrossRefPubMed Stummer W, Pichlmeier U, Meinel T et al (2006) Fluorescence-guided surgery with 5-aminolevulinic acid for resection of malignant glioma: a randomized controlled multicentre phase III trial. Lancet Oncol 7:392–401CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Stupp R, Mason WP, Van den Bent MJ et al (2005) Radiotherapy plus concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide for glioblastoma. N Engl J Med 352:987–996CrossRefPubMed Stupp R, Mason WP, Van den Bent MJ et al (2005) Radiotherapy plus concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide for glioblastoma. N Engl J Med 352:987–996CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Esteller M, Hamilton SR, Burger PC et al (1999) Inactivation of the DNA repair gene O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase by promoter hypermethylation is a common event in primary human neoplasia. Cancer Res 59:793–797PubMed Esteller M, Hamilton SR, Burger PC et al (1999) Inactivation of the DNA repair gene O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase by promoter hypermethylation is a common event in primary human neoplasia. Cancer Res 59:793–797PubMed
13.
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Lattanzio L, Borgognone M, Mocellini C et al (2014) MGMT promoter methylation and glioblastoma: a comparison of analytical methods and of tumor specimens. Int J Biol Markers 30(2):e208–e216 Lattanzio L, Borgognone M, Mocellini C et al (2014) MGMT promoter methylation and glioblastoma: a comparison of analytical methods and of tumor specimens. Int J Biol Markers 30(2):e208–e216
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Håvik AB, Brandal P, Honne H et al (2012) MGMT promoter methylation in gliomas-assessment by pyrosequencing and quantitative methylation-specific PCR. J Transl Med 10:36CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Håvik AB, Brandal P, Honne H et al (2012) MGMT promoter methylation in gliomas-assessment by pyrosequencing and quantitative methylation-specific PCR. J Transl Med 10:36CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Preusser M, Berghoff AS, Manzl C et al (2014) Clinical neuropathology practice news 1–2014: pyrosequencing meets clinical and analytical performance criteria for routine testing of MGMT promoter methylation status in glioblastoma. Clin Neuropathol 33:6–14CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Preusser M, Berghoff AS, Manzl C et al (2014) Clinical neuropathology practice news 1–2014: pyrosequencing meets clinical and analytical performance criteria for routine testing of MGMT promoter methylation status in glioblastoma. Clin Neuropathol 33:6–14CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Malley DS, Hamoudi RA, Kocialkowski S et al (2011) A distinct region of the MGMT CpG island critical for transcriptional regulation is preferentially methylated in glioblastoma cells and xenografts. Acta Neuropathol 121:651–661. doi:10.1007/s00401-011-0803-5 CrossRefPubMed Malley DS, Hamoudi RA, Kocialkowski S et al (2011) A distinct region of the MGMT CpG island critical for transcriptional regulation is preferentially methylated in glioblastoma cells and xenografts. Acta Neuropathol 121:651–661. doi:10.​1007/​s00401-011-0803-5 CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Wen YP, Macdonald RD, Reardon AD et al (2010) Updated response assessment criteria for high-grade gliomas: response assessment in neuro oncology working group. J Clin Oncol 28:1963–1972CrossRefPubMed Wen YP, Macdonald RD, Reardon AD et al (2010) Updated response assessment criteria for high-grade gliomas: response assessment in neuro oncology working group. J Clin Oncol 28:1963–1972CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Xie H, Tubbs R, Yang B (2015) Detection of MGMT promoter methylation in glioblastoma using pyrosequencing. Int J Clin Exp Pathol 8:636–642PubMedPubMedCentral Xie H, Tubbs R, Yang B (2015) Detection of MGMT promoter methylation in glioblastoma using pyrosequencing. Int J Clin Exp Pathol 8:636–642PubMedPubMedCentral
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Quillien V, Lavenu A, Karayan-Tapon L et al (2012) Comparative assessment of 5 methods (methylation-specific polymerase chain reaction, methylight, pyrosequencing, methylation-sensitive high-resolution melting, and immunohistochemistry) to analyze O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltranferase in a series of 100 glioblastoma patients. Cancer 118:4201–4211. doi:10.1002/cncr.27392 CrossRefPubMed Quillien V, Lavenu A, Karayan-Tapon L et al (2012) Comparative assessment of 5 methods (methylation-specific polymerase chain reaction, methylight, pyrosequencing, methylation-sensitive high-resolution melting, and immunohistochemistry) to analyze O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltranferase in a series of 100 glioblastoma patients. Cancer 118:4201–4211. doi:10.​1002/​cncr.​27392 CrossRefPubMed
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Bady P, Sciuscio D, Diserens AC et al (2012) MGMT methylation analysis of glioblastoma on the infinium methylation BeadChip identifies two distinct CpG regions associated with gene silencing and outcome, yielding a prediction model for comparisons across datasets, tumor grades, and CIMP-status. Acta Neuropathol 124:547–560. doi:10.1007/s00401-012-1016-2 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Bady P, Sciuscio D, Diserens AC et al (2012) MGMT methylation analysis of glioblastoma on the infinium methylation BeadChip identifies two distinct CpG regions associated with gene silencing and outcome, yielding a prediction model for comparisons across datasets, tumor grades, and CIMP-status. Acta Neuropathol 124:547–560. doi:10.​1007/​s00401-012-1016-2 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadaten
Titel
Defining the cutoff value of MGMT gene promoter methylation and its predictive capacity in glioblastoma
verfasst von
Giovanni Brigliadori
Flavia Foca
Monia Dall’Agata
Claudia Rengucci
Elisabetta Melegari
Serenella Cerasoli
Dino Amadori
Daniele Calistri
Marina Faedi
Publikationsdatum
30.03.2016
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Journal of Neuro-Oncology / Ausgabe 2/2016
Print ISSN: 0167-594X
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-7373
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-016-2116-y

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2016

Journal of Neuro-Oncology 2/2016 Zur Ausgabe

Leitlinien kompakt für die Neurologie

Mit medbee Pocketcards sicher entscheiden.

Seit 2022 gehört die medbee GmbH zum Springer Medizin Verlag

Update Neurologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.