nach oben

Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine

Erschienen in:

04.10.2017 | Treatment of Lumbar Degenerative Pathology (HJ Kim and G Mundis, section editors)

Degenerative Scoliosis

verfasst von: Philip J. York, Han Jo Kim

Erschienen in: Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine | Ausgabe 4/2017

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose of Review

The purpose of this review is to provide an updated review of adult degenerative scoliosis (ADS). Epidemiology, classification, pathophysiology, and natural history are discussed along with a summary of commonly used outcome measures. Operative vs non-operative outcomes and new surgical techniques are discussed.

Recent Findings

The SRS-Schwab classification (2012) combines clinical and radiographic evaluation including overall global alignment. Current evidence regarding risk factors and efficacy of non-surgical modalities are discussed. Recent studies have reported surgical management to provide superior outcomes to non-operative modalities. New surgical techniques provide promising early data in regard to decreasing perioperative morbidity.

Summary

ADS is a potentially debilitating condition that occurs with asymmetric spinal degeneration. This can produce global sagittal malalignment and central and foraminal stenosis and can lead to significant impairment often necessitating surgery. The surgeon must be aware of the perioperative risks in this population and implement appropriate age-specific alignment goals to achieve the best outcome for patients.

Silva FE, Lenke LG. Adult degenerative scoliosis: evaluation and management. Neurosurg Focus. 2010;28(3):E1. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20192655.CrossRefPubMed

Phillips FM, Isaacs RE, Rodgers WB, Khajavi K, Tohmeh AG, Deviren V, et al. Adult degenerative scoliosis treated with XLIF: clinical and radiographical results of a prospective multicenter study with 24-month follow-up. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013;38(21):1853–61. Available from: http://content.wkhealth.com/linkback/openurl?sid=WKPTLP:landingpage&an=00007632-201310010-00016.CrossRef

Cho K-J, Kim Y-T, Shin S, Suk S-I. Surgical treatment of adult degenerative scoliosis. Asian Spine J. 2014;8(3):371. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24967054.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Grubb SA, Lipscomb HJ, Coonrad RW. Degenerative adult onset scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1988;13(3):241–5. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2968664 CrossRef

Schwab F, Dubey A, Gamez L, El Fegoun AB, Hwang K, Pagala M, et al. Adult scoliosis: prevalence, SF-36, and nutritional parameters in an elderly volunteer population. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005;30(9):1082–5. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15864163.CrossRef

Rao PJ, Loganathan A, Yeung V, Mobbs RJ. Outcomes of anterior lumbar interbody fusion surgery based on indication. Neurosurgery. 2015;76(1):7–24. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25255259.CrossRefPubMed

McCarthy I, Hostin R, O’Brien M, Saigal R, Ames CP. Health economic analysis of adult deformity surgery. Neurosurg Clin N Am. 2013;24(2):293–304. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23561565.CrossRefPubMed

Aebi M. The adult scoliosis. Eur Spine J. 2005;14(10):925–48. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16328223.CrossRefPubMed

Lowe T, Berven SH, Schwab FJ, Bridwell KH. The SRS classification for adult spinal deformity: building on the King/Moe and Lenke classification systems. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006;31(19 Suppl):S119–25. Available from: http://content.wkhealth.com/linkback/openurl?sid=WKPTLP:landingpage&an=00007632-200609011-00003.CrossRef

10.

Schwab F, Farcy J-P, Bridwell K, Berven S, Glassman S, Harrast J, et al. A clinical impact classification of scoliosis in the adult. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006;31(18):2109–14. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16915098.CrossRef

11.

• Schwab F, Ungar B, Blondel B, Buchowski J, Coe J, Deinlein D, et al. Scoliosis Research Society-Schwab adult spinal deformity classification. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012;37(12):1077–82. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22045006. This paper presented the most commonly used classification system for adult spinal deformity. CrossRef

12.

Vernon-Roberts B, Moore RJ, Fraser RD. The natural history of age-related disc degeneration. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007;32(25):2797–804. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18246000 CrossRef

13.

Kadow T, Sowa G, Vo N, Kang JD. Molecular basis of intervertebral disc degeneration and herniations: what are the important iranslational questions? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015;473(6):1903–12. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25024024 CrossRefPubMed

14.

Vernon-Roberts B, Moore RJ, Fraser RD. The natural history of age-related disc degeneration. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008;33(25):2767–73. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19050583 CrossRef

15.

Lee SH, Park SW, Kim YB, Nam TK, Lee YS. The fatty degeneration of lumbar paraspinal muscles on computed tomography scan according to age and disc level. Spine J. 2017;17(1):81–7. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27497888 CrossRefPubMed

16.

Benoist M. Natural history of the aging spine. Eur Spine J. 2003;12(0):S86–9. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12961079.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

17.

• Hwang DW, Kim KT, Lee SH, Kim JY, Kim DH. Association of COL2A1 gene polymorphism with degenerative lumbar scoliosis. Clin Orthop Surg. 2014;6(4):379. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25436060. This study reported that there was a significant correlation with a COL2A1 gene polymorphism and the development of degenerative lumbar scoliosis, suggesting a genetic component. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

18.

Yagi M, King AB, Boachie-Adjei O. Characterization of osteopenia/osteoporosisin adult scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011;36(20):1652–7. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21304426 CrossRef

19.

Routh RH, Rumancik S, Pathak RD, Burshell AL, Nauman EA. The relationship between bone mineral density and biomechanics in patients with osteoporosis and scoliosis. Osteoporos Int. 2005;16(12):1857–63. Available from: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00198-005-1951-z CrossRefPubMed

20.

Hans D, Biot B, Schott AM, Meunier PJ. No diffuse osteoporosis in lumbar scoliosis but lower femoral bone density on the convexity. Bone. 1996;18(1):15–7. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8717531 CrossRefPubMed

21.

Pritchett JW, Bortel DT. Degenerative symptomatic lumbar scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1993;18(6):700–3. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8516697 CrossRef

22.

Grubb SA, Lipscomb HJ, Suh PB. Results of surgical treatment of painful adult scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1994;19(14):1619–27. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7939999 CrossRef

23.

Kobayashi T, Atsuta Y, Takemitsu M, Matsuno T, Takeda N. A prospective study of de novo scoliosis in a community based cohort. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006;31(2):178–82. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16418637 CrossRef

24.

Graham RB, Sugrue PA, Koski TR. Adult degenerative scoliosis. Clin spine Surg. 2016;29(3):95–107. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26945131 PubMed

25.

Bajwa NS, Toy JO, Young EY, Ahn NU. Is congenital bony stenosis of the cervical spine associated with lumbar spine stenosis? An anatomical study of 1072 human cadaveric specimens. J Neurosurg Spine. 2012;17(1):24–9. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22540170 CrossRefPubMed

26.

Fushimi K, Miyamoto K, Hioki A, Hosoe H, Takeuchi A, Shimizu K. Neurological deterioration due to missed thoracic spinal stenosis after decompressive lumbar surgery: a report of six cases of tandem thoracic and lumbar spinal stenosis. Bone Joint J. 2013;95–B(10):1388–91. Available from: http://www.bjj.boneandjoint.org.uk/cgi/doi/10.1302/0301-620X.95B10.31222 CrossRefPubMed

27.

Smith JS, Shaffrey CI, Fu K-MG, Scheer JK, Bess S, Lafage V, et al. Clinical and radiographic evaluation of the adult spinal deformity patient. Neurosurg Clin N Am. 2013;24(2):143–56. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23561553.CrossRefPubMed

28.

Schwab FJ, Smith VA, Biserni M, Gamez L, Farcy J-PC, Pagala M. Adult scoliosis: a quantitative radiographic and clinical analysis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2002;27(4):387–92. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11840105 CrossRef

29.

Maigne JY, Aivaliklis A, Pfefer F. Results of sacroiliac joint double block and value of sacroiliac pain provocation tests in 54 patients with low back pain. Spine. 1996;21:1889–92. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8875721 CrossRefPubMed

30.

Deschênes S, Charron G, Beaudoin G, Labelle H, Dubois J, Miron M-C, et al. Diagnostic imaging of spinal deformities: reducing patients radiation dose with a new slot-scanning X-ray imager. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010;35(9):989–94. Available from: http://content.wkhealth.com/linkback/openurl?sid=WKPTLP:landingpage&an=00007632-201004200-00011.CrossRef

31.

Somoskeöy S, Tunyogi-Csapó M, Bogyó C, Illés T. Accuracy and reliability of coronal and sagittal spinal curvature data based on patient-specific three-dimensional models created by the EOS 2D/3D imaging system. Spine J. 2012;12(11):1052–9. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23102842 CrossRefPubMed

32.

Lafage R, Schwab F, Challier V, Henry JK, Gum J, Smith J, et al. Defining spino-pelvic alignment thresholds: should operative goals in adult spinal deformity surgery account for age? Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2016;41(1):62–8. Available from: http://content.wkhealth.com/linkback/openurl?sid=WKPTLP:landingpage&an=00007632-201601000-00012 CrossRef

33.

Laucis NC, Hays RD, Bhattacharyya T. Scoring the SF-36 in orthopaedics: a brief guide. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2015;97(19):1628–34. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26446970 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

34.

Fairbank JC, Pynsent PB. The Oswestry Disability Index. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000;25(22):2940–52. discussion 2952. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11074683 CrossRef

35.

Crawford CH, Glassman SD, Bridwell KH, Berven SH, Carreon LY. The minimum clinically important difference in SRS-22R total score, appearance, activity and pain domains after surgical treatment of adult spinal deformity. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2015;40(6):377–81. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25774463 CrossRef

36.

Crawford CH, Glassman SD, Bridwell KH, Carreon LY. The substantial clinical benefit threshold for SRS-22R domains after surgical treatment of adult spinal deformity. Spine Deform. 2016;4(5):373–7. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27927495 CrossRefPubMed

37.

Vavken P, Ganal-Antonio AKB, Quidde J, Shen FH, Chapman JR, Samartzis D. Fundamentals of clinical outcomes assessment for spinal disorders: clinical outcome instruments and applications. Glob Spine J. 2015;5(4):329–38. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26225283 CrossRef

38.

Zanoli G. Outcome assessment in lumbar spine surgery. Acta Orthop Suppl. 2005;76(318):5–47. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16175972.PubMed

39.

Everett CR, Patel RK. A systematic literature review of nonsurgical treatment in adult scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007;32(Supplement):S130–4. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17728680.CrossRef

40.

Palazzo C, Montigny J-P, Barbot F, Bussel B, Vaugier I, Fort D, et al. Effects of bracing in adult with scoliosis: a retrospective study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2017;98(1):187–90. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27343345 CrossRefPubMed

41.

Ploumis A, Transfledt EE, Denis F. Degenerative lumbar scoliosis associated with spinal stenosis. Spine J. 2007;7(4):428–36. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17630141 CrossRefPubMed

42.

Uddin OM, Haque R, Sugrue PA, Ahmed YM, El Ahmadieh TY, Press JM, et al. Cost minimization in treatment of adult degenerative scoliosis. J Neurosurg Spine. 2015;23(6):798–806. Available from: http://thejns.org/doi/10.3171/2015.3.SPINE14560 CrossRefPubMed

43.

Simotas AC, Dorey FJ, Hansraj KK, Cammisa F. Nonoperative treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis. Clinical and outcome results and a 3-year survivorship analysis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000;25(2):197-203-4. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10685483 CrossRef

44.

Glassman SD, Carreon LY, Djurasovic M, Dimar JR, Johnson JR, Puno RM, et al. Lumbar fusion outcomes stratified by specific diagnostic indication. Spine J. 2009;9(1):13–21. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18805059.CrossRefPubMed

45.

Wang X, Sun G, Sun R, Ba C, Gong X, Liu W, et al. Bipolar sealer device reduces blood loss and transfusion requirements in posterior spinal fusion for degenerative lumbar scoliosis. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2014;29(2):1. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26889992

46.

Bradford DS, Tay BK, Hu SS. Adult scoliosis: surgical indications, operative management, complications, and outcomes. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1999;24(24):2617–29. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10635525 CrossRef

47.

Bridwell KH, Glassman S, Horton W, Shaffrey C, Schwab F, Zebala LP, et al. Does treatment (nonoperative and operative) improve the two-year quality of life in patients with adult symptomatic lumbar scoliosis: a prospective multicenter evidence-based medicine study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009;34(20):2171–8. Available from: http://content.wkhealth.com/linkback/openurl?sid=WKPTLP:landingpage&an=00007632-200909150-00018 CrossRef

48.

• Smith JS, Lafage V, Shaffrey CI, Schwab F, Lafage R, Hostin R, et al. Outcomes of operative and nonoperative treatment for adult spinal deformity. Neurosurgery. 2016;78(6):851–61. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26579966. This study reported significant improvement in all HRQOL scales at 2 years in patients treated operatively—improvements that were significantly better than non-operative cohorts on nearly every scale. CrossRefPubMed

49.

• Smith JS, Shaffrey CI, Berven S, Glassman S, Hamill C, Horton W, et al. Operative versus nonoperative treatment of leg pain in adults with scoliosis: a retrospective review of a prospective multicenter database with two-year follow-up. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009;34(16):1693–8. Available from: http://content.wkhealth.com/linkback/openurl?sid=WKPTLP:landingpage&an=00007632-200907150-00010. Patients treated operatively for adult scoliosis had significantly lower NRS leg pain scores and improved ODI scores than baseline and significantly improved compared to the non-operative cohort at 2 years . CrossRef

50.

Smith JS, Shaffrey CI, Berven S, Glassman S, Hamill C, Horton W, et al. Improvement of back pain with operative and nonoperative treatment in adults with scoliosis. Neurosurgery. 2009;65(1):86–94. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19574829 CrossRefPubMed

51.

Scheer JK, Smith JS, Clark AJ, Lafage V, Kim HJ, Rolston JD, et al. Comprehensive study of back and leg pain improvements after adult spinal deformity surgery: analysis of 421 patients with 2-year follow-up and of the impact of the surgery on treatment satisfaction. J Neurosurg Spine. 2015;22(5):540–53. Available from: http://thejns.org/doi/10.3171/2014.10.SPINE14475 CrossRefPubMed

52.

Li G, Passias P, Kozanek M, Fu E, Wang S, Xia Q, et al. Adult scoliosis in patients over sixty-five years of age: outcomes of operative versus nonoperative treatment at a minimum two-year follow-up. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009;34(20):2165–70. Available from: http://content.wkhealth.com/linkback/openurl?sid=WKPTLP:landingpage&an=00007632-200909150-00017 CrossRef

53.

• Ledonio CGT, Polly DW, Crawford CH, Duval S, Smith JS, Buchowski JM, et al. Adult degenerative scoliosis surgical outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Spine Deform. 2013;1(4):248–58. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27927355. This meta-analysis reported that all studies included found improvements in ODI scores and VAS scores in patients treated surgically. Patients with worse baseline pain scores showed the greatest benefit in terms of pain improvement . CrossRefPubMed

54.

Smith JS, Shaffrey CI, Lafage V, Schwab F, Scheer JK, Protopsaltis T, et al. Comparison of best versus worst clinical outcomes for adult spinal deformity surgery: a retrospective review of a prospectively collected, multicenter database with 2-year follow-up. J Neurosurg Spine. 2015;23(3):349–59. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26047345 CrossRefPubMed

55.

Cho K-J, Suk S-I, Park S-R, Kim J-H, Kim S-S, Lee T-J, et al. Short fusion versus long fusion for degenerative lumbar scoliosis. Eur Spine J. 2008;17(5):650–6. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18270753 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

56.

Gupta MC. Degenerative scoliosis. Options for surgical management. Orthop Clin North Am. 2003;34(2):269–79. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12914267 CrossRefPubMed

57.

Li F, Chen Q, Chen W, Xu K, Wu Q, Chen G. Posterolateral lumbar fusion versus transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of degenerative lumbar scoliosis. J Clin Neurosci. 2013;20(9):1241–5. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23827174 CrossRefPubMed

58.

Anand N, Baron EM, Khandehroo B, Kahwaty S. Long-term 2- to 5-year clinical and functional outcomes of minimally invasive surgery for adult scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013;38(18):1566–75. Available from: http://content.wkhealth.com/linkback/openurl?sid=WKPTLP:landingpage&an=00007632-201308150-00007 CrossRef

59.

Kwon B, Kim DH. Lateral lumbar interbody fusion. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2016;24(2):96–105. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26803545 CrossRefPubMed

Titel: Degenerative Scoliosis
verfasst von: Philip J. York
Han Jo Kim
Publikationsdatum: 04.10.2017
Verlag: Springer US
Erschienen in: Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine / Ausgabe 4/2017
Elektronische ISSN: 1935-9748
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12178-017-9445-0

Arthropedia

Grundlagenwissen der Arthroskopie und Gelenkchirurgie. Erweitert durch Fallbeispiele, Videos und Abbildungen.
» Jetzt entdecken

Neu im Fachgebiet Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

18.04.2024 | Wirbelsäulenmetastase | Nachrichten

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Live-Webinar: Aktuelle Leitlinien bei Herz-Kreislauf-Erkrankungen

Springer Medizin

Degenerative Scoliosis

Abstract

Purpose of Review

Recent Findings

Summary

Arthropedia

Neu im Fachgebiet Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Stereotaktische Radiatio schlägt konventionelle Bestrahlung

Vorsicht mit hohen NSAR-Dosen bei ankylosierender Spondylitis!

Brustkrebs in der Vorgeschichte macht Gelenkersatz komplikationsträchtiger

Zwei neue Alternativen zu TNF-Inhibitoren bei axSpA

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Live-Webinar: Aktuelle Leitlinien bei Herz-Kreislauf-Erkrankungen

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Purpose of Review

Recent Findings

Summary

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2017

Applying the Glenoid Track Concept in the Management of Patients with Anterior Shoulder Instability

Management of Glenoid Bone Loss with Anterior Shoulder Instability: Indications and Outcomes

Understanding the Hill-Sachs Lesion in Its Role in Patients with Recurrent Anterior Shoulder Instability

Outpatient Total Joint Arthroplasty

Correction to: adjacent level disease-background and update based on disc replacement data

Interbody Fusion Techniques in the Surgical Management of Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis

Arthropedia

Neu im Fachgebiet Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Stereotaktische Radiatio schlägt konventionelle Bestrahlung

Vorsicht mit hohen NSAR-Dosen bei ankylosierender Spondylitis!

Brustkrebs in der Vorgeschichte macht Gelenkersatz komplikationsträchtiger

Zwei neue Alternativen zu TNF-Inhibitoren bei axSpA

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie