Skip to main content
Erschienen in: International Journal of Colorectal Disease 4/2017

16.11.2016 | Original Article

Delay of surgery after stent placement for resectable malignant colorectal obstruction is associated with higher risk of recurrence

verfasst von: Malene Broholm, Martin Kobborg, Erik Frostberg, Maja Jeppesen, Ismail Gögenür

Erschienen in: International Journal of Colorectal Disease | Ausgabe 4/2017

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Self-expanding metal stents can be used as bridge to elective surgery for acute malignant colonic obstruction. However, the impact on long-term oncological outcome and the optimal timing of surgery are still unknown.

Method

This was a retrospective multicenter study performed at four colorectal centers. Patients undergoing stent placement as bridge to surgery, between January 2010 and December 2013, were included in the study. Primary outcomes were survival and recurrence rates along with location of the metastases. Additionally, we recorded time from stent placement to elective surgery. Secondary outcomes were postoperative complication rates. Complications were classified according to the Clavien-Dindo classification score. A logistic regression model was used to describe impact of delayed stent removal on risk of recurrence.

Results

This study included 112 patients, with a median follow-up of 43 months. Survival rate was 70%. We found a recurrence rate of 37%, primarily local recurrences (17%). Procedure-related complications at the stent placement were seen in 18%, and complications after subsequent elective surgery were seen in 39%. A significantly higher risk of recurrence with increased time from stent placement to elective surgery (OR 5.1 [1.6–15.8], p = 0.005) was found.

Conclusion

Delay of elective surgery after stent placement may have a negative influence on long-term oncologic outcomes.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Chen HS, Sheen-Chen SM (2000) Obstruction and perforation in colorectal adenocarcinoma: an analysis of prognosis and current trends. Surgery 127:370–376CrossRefPubMed Chen HS, Sheen-Chen SM (2000) Obstruction and perforation in colorectal adenocarcinoma: an analysis of prognosis and current trends. Surgery 127:370–376CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Deans GT, Krukowski ZH, Irwin ST (1994) Malignant obstruction of the left colon. Br J Surg. 81:1270–1276CrossRefPubMed Deans GT, Krukowski ZH, Irwin ST (1994) Malignant obstruction of the left colon. Br J Surg. 81:1270–1276CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Stower MJ, Hardcastle JD (1985) The results of 1115 patients with colorectal cancer treated over an 8-year period in a single hospital. Eur J Surg Oncol 11:119–123PubMed Stower MJ, Hardcastle JD (1985) The results of 1115 patients with colorectal cancer treated over an 8-year period in a single hospital. Eur J Surg Oncol 11:119–123PubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Liu Z, Kang L, Li C et al (2014) Meta-analysis of complications of colonic stenting versus emergency surgery for acute left-sided malignant colonic obstruction. SLEPT 24:73–79 Liu Z, Kang L, Li C et al (2014) Meta-analysis of complications of colonic stenting versus emergency surgery for acute left-sided malignant colonic obstruction. SLEPT 24:73–79
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Sabbagh C, Browet F, Diouf M et al (2013) Is stenting as “a bridge to surgery” an oncologically safe strategy for the management of acute, left-sided, malignant, colonic obstruction? A comparative study with a propensity score analysis. Ann Surg 258:107–115CrossRefPubMed Sabbagh C, Browet F, Diouf M et al (2013) Is stenting as “a bridge to surgery” an oncologically safe strategy for the management of acute, left-sided, malignant, colonic obstruction? A comparative study with a propensity score analysis. Ann Surg 258:107–115CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Gorissen KJ, Tuynman JB, Fryer E et al (2013) Local recurrence after stenting for obstructing left-sided colonic cancer. Br J Surg. 100:1805–1809CrossRefPubMed Gorissen KJ, Tuynman JB, Fryer E et al (2013) Local recurrence after stenting for obstructing left-sided colonic cancer. Br J Surg. 100:1805–1809CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M et al (2007) The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Lancet 370:1453–1457CrossRef von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M et al (2007) The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Lancet 370:1453–1457CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Baron TH, Harewood GC (2003) Enteral self-expandable stents. Gastrointest Endosc 58:421–433CrossRefPubMed Baron TH, Harewood GC (2003) Enteral self-expandable stents. Gastrointest Endosc 58:421–433CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Baron TH (2007) Minimizing endoscopic complications: endoluminal stents. Gastrointest Endosc Clin North Am 17:83–104CrossRef Baron TH (2007) Minimizing endoscopic complications: endoluminal stents. Gastrointest Endosc Clin North Am 17:83–104CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Fernandez-Esparrach G, Bordas JM, Giraldez MD et al (2010) Severe complications limit long-term clinical success of self-expanding metal stents in patients with obstructive colorectal cancer. Am J Gastroenterol 105:1087–1093CrossRefPubMed Fernandez-Esparrach G, Bordas JM, Giraldez MD et al (2010) Severe complications limit long-term clinical success of self-expanding metal stents in patients with obstructive colorectal cancer. Am J Gastroenterol 105:1087–1093CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Knight AL, Trompetas V, Saunders MP et al (2012) Does stenting of left-sided colorectal cancer as a “bridge to surgery” adversely affect oncological outcomes? A comparison with non-obstructing elective left-sided colonic resections. Int J Color Dis 27:1509–1514CrossRef Knight AL, Trompetas V, Saunders MP et al (2012) Does stenting of left-sided colorectal cancer as a “bridge to surgery” adversely affect oncological outcomes? A comparison with non-obstructing elective left-sided colonic resections. Int J Color Dis 27:1509–1514CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Choi JM, Lee C, Han YM et al (2014) Long-term oncologic outcomes of endoscopic stenting as a bridge to surgery for malignant colonic obstruction: comparison with emergency surgery. Surg Endosc 28:2649–2655CrossRefPubMed Choi JM, Lee C, Han YM et al (2014) Long-term oncologic outcomes of endoscopic stenting as a bridge to surgery for malignant colonic obstruction: comparison with emergency surgery. Surg Endosc 28:2649–2655CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Pirlet IA, Slim K, Kwiatkowski F et al (2011) Emergency preoperative stenting versus surgery for acute left-sided malignant colonic obstruction: a multicenter randomized controlled trial. Surg Endosc 25:1814–1821CrossRefPubMed Pirlet IA, Slim K, Kwiatkowski F et al (2011) Emergency preoperative stenting versus surgery for acute left-sided malignant colonic obstruction: a multicenter randomized controlled trial. Surg Endosc 25:1814–1821CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Ye GY, Cui Z, Chen L et al (2012) Colonic stenting vs emergent surgery for acute left-sided malignant colonic obstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Gastroenterol 18:5608–5615CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Ye GY, Cui Z, Chen L et al (2012) Colonic stenting vs emergent surgery for acute left-sided malignant colonic obstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Gastroenterol 18:5608–5615CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Tan CJ, Dasari BV, Gardiner K (2012) Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials of self-expanding metallic stents as a bridge to surgery versus emergency surgery for malignant left-sided large bowel obstruction. Br J Surg. 99:469–476CrossRefPubMed Tan CJ, Dasari BV, Gardiner K (2012) Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials of self-expanding metallic stents as a bridge to surgery versus emergency surgery for malignant left-sided large bowel obstruction. Br J Surg. 99:469–476CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Sloothaak DA, van den Berg MW, Dijkgraaf MG et al (2014) Oncological outcome of malignant colonic obstruction in the Dutch Stent-In 2 trial. Br J Surg. 101:1751–1757CrossRefPubMed Sloothaak DA, van den Berg MW, Dijkgraaf MG et al (2014) Oncological outcome of malignant colonic obstruction in the Dutch Stent-In 2 trial. Br J Surg. 101:1751–1757CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Kim HJ, Choi GS, Park JS et al (2013) Higher rate of perineural invasion in stent-laparoscopic approach in comparison to emergent open resection for obstructing left-sided colon cancer. Int J Color Dis 28:407–414CrossRef Kim HJ, Choi GS, Park JS et al (2013) Higher rate of perineural invasion in stent-laparoscopic approach in comparison to emergent open resection for obstructing left-sided colon cancer. Int J Color Dis 28:407–414CrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Fryer E, Gorissen KJ, Wang LM et al (2015) Spectrum of histopathological changes encountered in stented colorectal carcinomas. Histopathology 66:480–484CrossRefPubMed Fryer E, Gorissen KJ, Wang LM et al (2015) Spectrum of histopathological changes encountered in stented colorectal carcinomas. Histopathology 66:480–484CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Sabbagh C, Chatelain D, Trouillet N et al (2013) Does use of a metallic colon stent as a bridge to surgery modify the pathology data in patients with colonic obstruction? A case-matched study. Surg Endosc 27:3622–3631CrossRefPubMed Sabbagh C, Chatelain D, Trouillet N et al (2013) Does use of a metallic colon stent as a bridge to surgery modify the pathology data in patients with colonic obstruction? A case-matched study. Surg Endosc 27:3622–3631CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Maruthachalam K, Lash GE, Shenton BK et al (2007) Tumour cell dissemination following endoscopic stent insertion. Br J Surg 94:1151–1154CrossRefPubMed Maruthachalam K, Lash GE, Shenton BK et al (2007) Tumour cell dissemination following endoscopic stent insertion. Br J Surg 94:1151–1154CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Delay of surgery after stent placement for resectable malignant colorectal obstruction is associated with higher risk of recurrence
verfasst von
Malene Broholm
Martin Kobborg
Erik Frostberg
Maja Jeppesen
Ismail Gögenür
Publikationsdatum
16.11.2016
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
International Journal of Colorectal Disease / Ausgabe 4/2017
Print ISSN: 0179-1958
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-1262
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-016-2705-4

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2017

International Journal of Colorectal Disease 4/2017 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

CME: 2 Punkte

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht, PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske Das Webinar S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“ beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.