Introduction
Lung cancer is the most common malignant carcinoma with a leading cause of cancer associated death worldwide. Despite advance in expounding mechanism of lung carcinogenesis and new surgical/chemotherapeutic protocols, the medium survival time of lung cancer patients remains less than 5 years [
1,
2]. Herein, there is an urgent demand to explore the underlying mechanism of lung cancer progression and novel strategies for tumor therapy.
Integrins are dimeric adhesion receptors that is associated with a series of intracellular signals [
3]. Interaction between integrins and extracellular matrix could regulate diverse cellular functions, which is strictly correlated with tumor growth and distant metastasis [
4]. The alterations in integrin expression level have been extensively reported and are recognized as crucial determinant for neoplastic progression. Compelling reports suggested that the expression of integrin αvβ3 has been detected in various tumor tissues, which strongly suggested the potential role integrin αvβ3 in tumor progression [
5]. Indeed, increasing evidence demonstrated that integrin αvβ3 correlated with diverse tumor progression. And inhibition of integrin αvβ3 signaling could strengthen antiangiogenic and antitumor effects of radiotherapy in several tumor types [
6,
7]. Also, integrin αvβ3 is capable of facilitating PI3K/AKT signaling pathway activation to promote non-small cell lung cancer cells A549 proliferation [
8]. However, the underlying mechanism of integrin αvβ3 induced tumor progression remained poorly understood and the failure of integrin αvβ3 inhibitors for lung cancer treatment in clinical trials indicated the complex mechanism of integrin αvβ3 associated tumor progression.
The pseudokinases TRIBs are functional regulators of cells proliferation and differentiation. TRIBs have been recognized as a stressor in response to cues from tumor microenvironment [
9,
10]. Increasing evidence suggested that the expression of TRIBs correlated with cisplatin resistance in lung cancer stem cells [
11]. Among TRIB family, TRIB3 have been demonstrated to promote inflammation and cancer development by interacting with intracellular signaling molecules and proteins. And the expression of TRIB3 is strictly correlated with the progression of several tumor types, including breast cancer, colorectal cancer and glioma [
12,
13]. Given the crucial role of TRIB3 in a variety of pro-tumor signals, we wondered whether TRIB3 contributed to the pathogenesis of lung cancer and correlated with the prognosis of patients.
In this study, we aimed to further explore the underlying mechanism of integrin αvβ3 induced lung cancer progression. Our findings suggested that integrin αvβ3 could facilitate the FAK/AKT signaling pathway activation in a TRIB3 dependent manner. Interrupting the interaction between TRIB3 and AKT contributed to suppression of lung cancer progression induced by integrin αvβ3. Our study further expounded the underlying mechanism of integrin αvβ3-induced lung cancer progression, which descripting novel indicator for tumor progression, and provided innovative target for lung cancer therapy.
Materials and methods
Cell lines and reagents
Human lung cancer cells A549 (established in 1972 by D.J. Giard, et al., through an explant culture of adenocarcinomic lung tissue of a 58-year-old Caucasian male, belonging to hypotriploid alveolar basal epithelial cells) and PC-9 (a human non-small cell lung cancer (adenocarcinoma) with EGFR mutation) were purchased from Cell Bank of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Shanghai, China). All cell lines were cultured in RPMI-1640 (Gibico, MA, USA) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (Gibco, MA, USA). Integrin αvβ3 positive/negative cells were isolated using fluorescence-activated cell sorting. Tumor cells were labeled with 5 μl anti-integrin αvβ3 antibody (ab190147, Abcam, Cambridge, UK) per 106 cells. Integrin αvβ3 positive/negative populations were sorted using a FACSAria machine (BD, CA, USA). FAK inhibitor Y15 and AKT inhibitor 3CAI were purchased from MCM (NJ, USA). Pep2-Ae was purchased from Solarbio (Beijing, China). Cisplatin (Cis) and paclitaxel (PTX) were purchased from Sigma (NJ, USA).
Cell proliferation analysis
Cell proliferation was determined using the CCK8 kit (Biyuntian, Beijing, China). Briefly, 1 × 103 treated A549 or PC-9 cells were seeded into 96-well culture plates. 20 μl of CCK-8 solution was added into the 96 wells in determined time points. After 37 °C incubation of 2 h, absorbance was measured at 450 nm on a microplate reader (Bio-Rad, MA, USA). Each experiment was performed for independent three times.
Colony formation assay was conducted to evaluate the tumorigenic potential of cancer cells. Briefly, A549 or PC-9 cells (200 cells per well) were seeded into the 6-well plates and cultured at 37 °C for 14 days. After that, the colonies were fixed by 4% paraformaldehyde and stained by crystal violet. Colonies were pictured and counted. Each experiment was repeated independently in triplicate.
Transwell analysis
Transwell analysis was conducted to evaluate cell migration of cancer cells. A549 or PC-9 cells (1 × 105 cells) were seeded in the upper transwell chamber (8 μm, Corning, CA, USA). The bottom chamber was filled with 0.5 ml medium containing 20% FBS. After 24 h, cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde, and then stained with 0.05% crystal violet. The cells numbers were count. Each experiment was repeated independently in triplicate.
Western blotting
Western blotting was performed to examine the protein level of targeted signaling molecule. The protein lysates from A549 and PC-9 cells were separated by SDS-PAGE and then transferred to polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) membranes (Millipore, MA, USA). The membrane was incubated with the primary antibodies against to anti-p-FAK (ab81298, 1:1000, Abcam, Cambridge, UK), anti-t-FAK (ab40794, 1:1000, Abcam, Cambridge, UK), anti-p-AKT (ab38449, 1:1000, Abcam, Cambridge, UK), anti-t-AKT (ab8805, 1:1000, Abcam, Cambridge, UK), anti-FOXO1 (ab179450, 1:1000, Abcam, Cambridge, UK), anti-SOX2 (ab92494, 1:1000, Abcam, Cambridge, UK), anti-TRIB3 (ab75846, 1:1000, Abcam, Cambridge, UK) and anti-β-actin (ab8226, 1:1000, Abcam, Cambridge, UK), followed by incubation with an HRP-conjugated secondary antibody (1:1000, Abcam, Cambridge, UK).
Co-immunoprecipitation (co-IP)
Sorted tumor cells were lysed with coimmunoprecipitation buffer (25 mM Tri-cl (pH 7.4), 150 mM NaCl, 0.5% NP-40, 2.5 mM MgCl, 0.5 mM EDTA, 5% Glycerol). Samples were then incubated with IP antibodies overnight at 4 °C. After that, samples were incubated with Protein A/G Plus-Agarose (Thermo, MA, USA) for 2 h at 4 °C. AKT-TRIB3 interaction complexes were separated from the beads by boiling and subjected to SDS-PAGE, detected using immunoblotting.
Cytotoxicity analysis
The cytotoxicity of A549 or PC-9 cells to chemotherapy or inhibitor was analyzed using the FITC-Annexin V/ PE-PI apoptosis detection kit (BD, NJ, USA). Briefly, agents treated tumor cells were resuspended and stained with FITC-Annexin V and PE-PI staining solution for 15 min. Then cells apoptosis was detected by flow cytometry on a C6 flow cytometer (BD, NJ, USA). Each experiment was repeated for three independent times.
RNA interference
For small interfering RNA (siRNA) inhibition of TRIB3, human TRIB3 siRNA (5′-GCGGUUGGAGUUGGAUGACAACUUA-3′ and 5′-GCGUGAUCUCAAGCUGUGUCGCUUU-3′) were obtained from Qingke Co (Beijing, China). A549 and PC-9 cells were transfected with siRNA at a concentration of 20 μmol/ ml using lipofectamine RNAiMAX (Thermo, MA, USA). The TRIB3 silence efficiency was determined using quantified polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) or western blotting.
Animal protocols
Female NOD-SCID mice (6 ~ 8 weeks) were purchased from Huafukang (Beijing, China). All mice were housed in a specific pathogen-free facility. All animal experiments were performed according to the guidelines approved by the Institute Ethics Committee of Tianjin Medical University General Hospital. To explore the anticancer effects of chemotherapy combining molecule inhibitor, subcutaneous lung cancer model was established. 106 A549 cells (50 μl PBS) were subcutaneously injected into NOD-SCID mice. After two weeks, mice were treated with PBS, PTX (5 mg/kg), Cis (5 mg/kg) and Pep2-Ae (10 mg/kg) by tail vein injection every two days. The tumor volumes were of mice were recorded every day (n = 6). Survival was recorded on a daily basis (n = 6). The calculation formula of tumor volume: tumor volume = length × width 2/2. For tumorigenesis analysis, 105 A549 cells (50 μl PBS) or PC-3 cells (50 μl PBS) were subcutaneously injected into NOD-SCID mice. After 30 days, the tumor-bearing mice were counted. Each experiment was repeated independently in triplicate.
Statistical analysis
The TCGA data were downloaded from
http://ualcan.path.uab.edu/index.html and
https://www.cbioportal.org/. Each experiment was performed for at least three independent times. Results were presented as the mean ± SEM and the statistical significance was analyzed using GraphPad 6.0 software (La Jolla, CA, USA). Statistical significance between groups was calculated by Student’s t test for two groups or by one-way ANOVA for more than two groups. The survival rates were determined by Kaplan–Meier survival analysis, *
p < 0.05; **
p < 0.01; ns, no significant difference.
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.