Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Surgery Today 6/2021

23.10.2020 | Original Article

Delorme surgery for colonic mucosal prolapse after intersphincteric resection

verfasst von: Satoshi Narihiro, Naoko Miura, Yuji Nishizawa, Hiro Hasegawa, Koji Ikeda, Koichi Teramura, Yuichiro Tsukada, Takeshi Sasaki, Masaaki Ito

Erschienen in: Surgery Today | Ausgabe 6/2021

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

Mucosal prolapse at the site of anastomosis is a long-term complication unique to ISR. It reduces the QOL of patients due to a worsened anal function and local symptoms around the anus. We herein sought to assess the surgical outcomes after Delorme surgery for these patients.

Methods

ISR was performed in 720 patients with low rectal cancer between January 2001 and March 2019 at the National Cancer Center Hospital East. Among these patients, the 33 (4.5%) who underwent initial Delorme surgery for postoperative colonic mucosal prolapse were identified from the medical records and then were analyzed retrospectively. We estimated the anal function using Wexner’s incontinence score and assessed whether local anal symptoms due to the prolapse improved postoperatively.

Results

Stoma closure was performed before Delorme surgery in 15 (45.5%) patients, and we compared the preoperative and postoperative anal function in these patients. The average Wexner’s incontinence score changed from 15.1 before to 12.9 after Delorme surgery. Local symptoms around the anus improved in all 33 (100%) patients. Recurrence of colonic mucosal prolapse occurred in 5 patients (15%), and Delorme surgery was reperformed in these cases.

Conclusion

Delorme surgery for colonic mucosal prolapse following ISR has clinical benefits for both improving anal local symptoms and slightly improving the anal function.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Kuo LJ, Ngu JC, Huang YJ, Lin YK, Chen CC, Tong YS, et al. Anorectal complications after robotic intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer. Surg Endosc. 2017;11:4466–71.CrossRef Kuo LJ, Ngu JC, Huang YJ, Lin YK, Chen CC, Tong YS, et al. Anorectal complications after robotic intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer. Surg Endosc. 2017;11:4466–71.CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Ito M, Saito N, Nishizawa Y, Sasaki T, Tukada Y. Anal function after ISR. J Anus Rectum Colon. 2016;69:294–6. Ito M, Saito N, Nishizawa Y, Sasaki T, Tukada Y. Anal function after ISR. J Anus Rectum Colon. 2016;69:294–6.
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Chau A, Frasson M, Debove C, Maggiori L, Panis Y. Colonic prolapse after intersphincteric resection for very low rectal cancer: a report of 12 cases. Tech Coloproctol. 2016;20:701–5.CrossRef Chau A, Frasson M, Debove C, Maggiori L, Panis Y. Colonic prolapse after intersphincteric resection for very low rectal cancer: a report of 12 cases. Tech Coloproctol. 2016;20:701–5.CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Tobin SA, Scott IH. Delorme operation for rectal prolapse. Br J Surg. 1994;81:1681–4.CrossRef Tobin SA, Scott IH. Delorme operation for rectal prolapse. Br J Surg. 1994;81:1681–4.CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Jorge JM, Wexner SD. Etiology and management of fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum. 1993;36:77–97.CrossRef Jorge JM, Wexner SD. Etiology and management of fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum. 1993;36:77–97.CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Harata K, Haruki N, Mizoguchi K, Kato T, Denda Y, Fuzita K. A case of mucosal prolapse performed by delorme procedure after laparoscopic intersphincteric resection. J Jpn Surg Assoc. 2019;80:1352–9.CrossRef Harata K, Haruki N, Mizoguchi K, Kato T, Denda Y, Fuzita K. A case of mucosal prolapse performed by delorme procedure after laparoscopic intersphincteric resection. J Jpn Surg Assoc. 2019;80:1352–9.CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Kamino T, Kobayashi S, Kurume Y. A case of Delorme surgery for intestinal prolapse after ISR. Operation. 2018;72:1805–8. Kamino T, Kobayashi S, Kurume Y. A case of Delorme surgery for intestinal prolapse after ISR. Operation. 2018;72:1805–8.
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Sumikoshi Y, Takano M. Current status of anal disease treatment. J Anus Rectum Colon. 1970;23:36–40. Sumikoshi Y, Takano M. Current status of anal disease treatment. J Anus Rectum Colon. 1970;23:36–40.
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Schiessel R, Karner-Hanusch J, Herbst F, Teleky B, Wunderlich M. Intersphincteric resection for low rectal tumours. Br J Surg. 1994;81:1376–8.CrossRef Schiessel R, Karner-Hanusch J, Herbst F, Teleky B, Wunderlich M. Intersphincteric resection for low rectal tumours. Br J Surg. 1994;81:1376–8.CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Martin ST, Heneghan HM, Winter DC. Systematic review of outcomes after intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer. Br J Surg. 2012;99(5):603–12.CrossRef Martin ST, Heneghan HM, Winter DC. Systematic review of outcomes after intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer. Br J Surg. 2012;99(5):603–12.CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Martellucci J. Low anterior resection syndrome: a treatment algorithm. Dis Colon Rectum. 2016;59:79–82.CrossRef Martellucci J. Low anterior resection syndrome: a treatment algorithm. Dis Colon Rectum. 2016;59:79–82.CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Kye BH, Kim HJ, Kim G, et al. The effect of biofeedback therapy on anorectal function after the reversal of temporary stoma when administered during the temporary stoma period in rectal cancer patients with sphincter saving surgery. Medicine. 2016;95:3611.CrossRef Kye BH, Kim HJ, Kim G, et al. The effect of biofeedback therapy on anorectal function after the reversal of temporary stoma when administered during the temporary stoma period in rectal cancer patients with sphincter saving surgery. Medicine. 2016;95:3611.CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Thomas GP, Bradshaw E, Vaizey CJ. A review of sacral nerve stimulation for faecal incontinence following rectal surgery and radiotherapy. Colorectal Dis. 2015;17:939–42.CrossRef Thomas GP, Bradshaw E, Vaizey CJ. A review of sacral nerve stimulation for faecal incontinence following rectal surgery and radiotherapy. Colorectal Dis. 2015;17:939–42.CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Bretagnol F, Rullier E, Laurent C, Zerbib F, Gontier R, Saric J. Comparison of functional results and quality of life between intersphincteric resection and conventional coloanal anastomosis for low rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum. 2004;47(6):832–8.CrossRef Bretagnol F, Rullier E, Laurent C, Zerbib F, Gontier R, Saric J. Comparison of functional results and quality of life between intersphincteric resection and conventional coloanal anastomosis for low rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum. 2004;47(6):832–8.CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Barisic G, Markovic V, Popovic M, Dimitrijevic I, Gavrilovic P, Krivokapic Z. Function after intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer and its influence on quality of life. Colorectal Dis. 2011;13:638–43.CrossRef Barisic G, Markovic V, Popovic M, Dimitrijevic I, Gavrilovic P, Krivokapic Z. Function after intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer and its influence on quality of life. Colorectal Dis. 2011;13:638–43.CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Kuo LJ, Hung CS, Wu CH, Wang W, Tam KW, Liang HH, et al. Oncological and functional outcomes of intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer. J Surg Res. 2011;170:93–8.CrossRef Kuo LJ, Hung CS, Wu CH, Wang W, Tam KW, Liang HH, et al. Oncological and functional outcomes of intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer. J Surg Res. 2011;170:93–8.CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Yoshioka K, Hata Y, Matsuura S. Problems of long-term management after ISR and its countermeasures. J Jpn Surg Assoc. 2014;69:326–31. Yoshioka K, Hata Y, Matsuura S. Problems of long-term management after ISR and its countermeasures. J Jpn Surg Assoc. 2014;69:326–31.
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Konn M, Nakata I, Ono K. Rectal prolapse. Classification and causation. J Anus Rectum Colon. 1982;35:454–8. Konn M, Nakata I, Ono K. Rectal prolapse. Classification and causation. J Anus Rectum Colon. 1982;35:454–8.
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Hoore DA, Cadoni R, Penninckx F. Long-term outcome of laparoscopic ventral rectopexy for total rectal prolapse. Br J Surg. 2004;91:1500–5.CrossRef Hoore DA, Cadoni R, Penninckx F. Long-term outcome of laparoscopic ventral rectopexy for total rectal prolapse. Br J Surg. 2004;91:1500–5.CrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Iwadare J, Sumikoshi Y, Ono R, Kouda M, Yamamoto K, Azuma M, et al. Etiology and treatment of rectal prolapse. J Anus Rectum Colon. 1989;42:981–6. Iwadare J, Sumikoshi Y, Ono R, Kouda M, Yamamoto K, Azuma M, et al. Etiology and treatment of rectal prolapse. J Anus Rectum Colon. 1989;42:981–6.
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Altemeier WA, Culbertson WR, Alexander JW. One-stage perineal repair of rectal prolapse: twelve years experience. Arch Surg. 1964;89:6–16.CrossRef Altemeier WA, Culbertson WR, Alexander JW. One-stage perineal repair of rectal prolapse: twelve years experience. Arch Surg. 1964;89:6–16.CrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Yoon SG. Rectal prolapse: review according to the personal experience. J Koran Soc Coloproctol. 2011;27:107–13.CrossRef Yoon SG. Rectal prolapse: review according to the personal experience. J Koran Soc Coloproctol. 2011;27:107–13.CrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Varma M, Rafferty J, Buie WD. Practice parameters for the management of rectal prolapse. Dis Colon Rectum. 2011;54:1339–46.CrossRef Varma M, Rafferty J, Buie WD. Practice parameters for the management of rectal prolapse. Dis Colon Rectum. 2011;54:1339–46.CrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Russell MM, Read TE, Roberts PL, Hall JF, Marcello PW, Schoetz DJ, et al. Complication after rectal prolapse surgery: does approach matter? Dis Colon Rectum. 2012;55:450–8.CrossRef Russell MM, Read TE, Roberts PL, Hall JF, Marcello PW, Schoetz DJ, et al. Complication after rectal prolapse surgery: does approach matter? Dis Colon Rectum. 2012;55:450–8.CrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Fleming FJ, Kim MJ, Gunzler D, Messing S, Monson JR, Speranza JR. It’s the procedure not the patient: the operative approach is independently associated with an increasing risk of complications after rectal prolapse repair. Colorect Dis. 2012;14:362–8.CrossRef Fleming FJ, Kim MJ, Gunzler D, Messing S, Monson JR, Speranza JR. It’s the procedure not the patient: the operative approach is independently associated with an increasing risk of complications after rectal prolapse repair. Colorect Dis. 2012;14:362–8.CrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Lindsey I. Commentary: best practice in rectal prolapse. Colorectal Dis. 2010;12:512–4.CrossRef Lindsey I. Commentary: best practice in rectal prolapse. Colorectal Dis. 2010;12:512–4.CrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Tsunoda A, Yasuda N, Yokoyama N, Kamiyama G, Kusano M. Delorme’s procedure for rectal prolapse: clinical and physiological analysis. Dis Colon Rectum. 2003;46:1260–5.CrossRef Tsunoda A, Yasuda N, Yokoyama N, Kamiyama G, Kusano M. Delorme’s procedure for rectal prolapse: clinical and physiological analysis. Dis Colon Rectum. 2003;46:1260–5.CrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Saito N, Ito M, Kobayashi A, Nishizawa Y, Kojima M, Nishizawa Y, et al. Long-term outcomes after intersphincteric resection for low-lying rectal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2014;21:3608–15.CrossRef Saito N, Ito M, Kobayashi A, Nishizawa Y, Kojima M, Nishizawa Y, et al. Long-term outcomes after intersphincteric resection for low-lying rectal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2014;21:3608–15.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Delorme surgery for colonic mucosal prolapse after intersphincteric resection
verfasst von
Satoshi Narihiro
Naoko Miura
Yuji Nishizawa
Hiro Hasegawa
Koji Ikeda
Koichi Teramura
Yuichiro Tsukada
Takeshi Sasaki
Masaaki Ito
Publikationsdatum
23.10.2020
Verlag
Springer Singapore
Erschienen in
Surgery Today / Ausgabe 6/2021
Print ISSN: 0941-1291
Elektronische ISSN: 1436-2813
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-020-02167-4

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 6/2021

Surgery Today 6/2021 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

CME: 2 Punkte

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht, PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske Das Webinar S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“ beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.