Dental fear and its possible relationship with periodontal status in Chinese adults: a preliminary study

The patients, who presented from July 2013 to November 2013 at the Outpatient Clinics of Guangdong Provincial Stomatological Hospital, University of Southern Medical, were randomly recruited as subjects to perform the questionnaires. Written informed consent for participation was obtained from all participants prior to the investigation. The present study was approved by the Ethical Committee, Guangdong Provincial Stomatological Hospital, University of Southern Medical.

Inclusion criteria for the subjects included: 1. Over 18 years old; 2. No cognitive impairments and eye diseases; 3. Able to complete the questionnaire independently. Exclusion criteria for the subjects included: 1. History of mental illness; 2. Illiteracy and noncooperation; 3. Anxiolytic, sedative or analgesic agent took 3 day before the survey.

A total of 1283 questionnaires were collected, of which 1203 were validated. Among the 1203 patients, 366 were self-reported periodontal disease. The self-reported periodontal disease was assessed according to the three items described in the literatures [15, 16]: “Do you have a loose tooth? (Yes/No)”; “Have you had periodontal disease with bone loss? (Yes/No)”; “Has your dentist/hygienist told you that you have deep pocket? (Yes/No)”. Patients who had any affirmative responses for the three questions were considered as patients with periodontal disease.

The questionnaire included 3 separated tests: Corach’s Dental Anxiety Scales (DAS), Dental Fear Survey (DFS), and the short-form Dental Anxiety Inventory (S-DAI), and was composed of 33 multiple-choice questions in total. The DAS presents four questions related to concerns about visiting the dentist [17], with the first two questions relating to general anxiety and the second two questions relating to anticipated fear of specific stimuli. A score of 13 or greater on the DAS was defined as “high dental fear”, as widely accepted previously [18]. The DAS was the most widely used dental fear scale for adults, which reported good reliability and validity. However, it failed to provide additional information regarding what the patient specifically fears. Therefore, the Dental Fear Survey (DFS) was also applied for compensation, which consisted of 20 items with five alternative answers to each, rating from high to low intensity [19, 20]. The S-DAI with 9 items, which was established by Stouthard et al. [21], was also used to assess physical reactions, thoughts and behavioral aspects of dental fear experienced by the individual [22]. The DFS and S-DAI both had good reliability and validity tested Chinese version [23, 24].

General information besides questionnaire contained dental attendances (regular or irregular), past dental visit and socio-demographic features including gender, age, education, marital status, smoking and alcohol use. Oral health behaviors were investigated by three questions: “Do you have bleeding on brushing?”; “Do you feel your teeth sensitive?”; “Do you have regular scaling?”.

T-test was used to analyze the differences of prevalence of dental fear between the patients with and without periodontal disease. Mann–Whitney U test was used to analyze the differences of the percentage of DAS evaluation between patients with and without periodontal disease. Linear regression was used to analyze the correlation between the patients’ general characteristics and dental fear. For all statistical analysis, P values were two-tailed and level of significance was set at P = 0.05.

Dental fear should be studied with regard to the situation to which it pertains, the reactions it evokes, and its duration [25]. No single scale of dental fear contains various involved aspects. This study used three scales, including DAS, DFS and S-DAI, to evaluate dental fear in different aspects. DFS reflects dental fear informatively to help clinicians understand a patient’s fear better, while DAS measures dental fear generally [26]. S-DAI focuses on psychometric grounds [21], of which nearly half of its items reflect the emotional reactions [26].

In patients with periodontal disease, the dental fear score was significantly higher than patients without periodontal disease according to DAS and DFS, but not in S-DAI. Dental attendances and oral health behaviors were related to dental fear in DAS and DFS, but not in S-DAI. The differences might be caused by the different concentration of the three scales, particularly S-DAI, which focused on psychometric grounds. Researchers drew different conclusions for the same concerned problem from different scales. Malvania et al. reported that age was not related to dental fear according to Modified Dental Anxiety Scale (MDAS) [27], whereas Armfield et al. reported that older adults had significant lower level of dental fear than youths using single item Dental Anxiety Question [28]. In the present study, combination with three scales could enhance the accuracy of the results.

The average score of DAS was 10.38 with 23.4% high dental fear among 1203 Chinese patients, which was higher than other countries. It was 9.0 on DAS with 16.7% high dental fear prevalence in Norway population [29], while 8.4 with 13% high dental fear in British and 18.1% high dental fear in Australian [18, 30].

In the present study, the prevalence of dental fear was significantly higher in women than men, which was consistent with literatures [31‐34]. Possible reasons might be related to higher occurrences of anxiety and phobia in female, or even heritability [35, 36].

The present study indicated that age was another factor affecting dental fear as previous [6, 33]. Maggirias et al. reported that younger adults were apt to dental fear [37]. A general clinical impression was that the elders were more tolerant to pain. Moreover, the high anxiety level in young patients could be due to the insufficient experience of the applying instruments, such as needle, handpiece or any other fear invoking equipment.

The patients who had regular dental attendances showed lower level of dental fear in the present study. In previous studies, patients without regular dental care were related to high level of dental fear [8, 29]. Moreover, Bernson et al. reported that dental anxiety was related with dental attendances [8].

Periodontal status was an important factor affecting dental fear [11, 12]. Patients with periodontal disease were apt to express high general anxiety. Stress, depression and anxiety were not yet confirmed as definite risk factors of periodontal disease, but considered as potential factors affecting the occurrence, development and prognosis of periodontal disease [35, 38, 39]. Many emerging evidences indicated that periodontal disease was associated with poor mental health. Saletu et al. suggested that anxious emotion should be considered as a relevant pathogenic factor for periodontitis [40]. Additionally, the endogenous aetiologies of dental fear were considered as general anxiety and depressive disorders, especially multiple phobias and depressive personality [41‐43].

The present study exhibited correlations between oral health behaviors and dental fear among 1203 patients. Patients without regular scaling expressed significantly higher dental fear [6, 7, 32]. Individuals, who have high dental fear, would delay treatment, and it might lead to more extensive development of disease, which ultimately required more invasive and potentially painful treatment, and these experience might contribute to the increase of dental fear: this is the idea of a ‘vicious cycle’ [5]. The level of dental fear in patients with periodontal disease was higher, and the oral health behaviors including ‘scaling’ , ‘teeth hypersensitive’ and ‘bleeding on brushing’ were related to dental fear in the present study. As a result, the periodontal status would be exacerbated because of high level of dental fear, then resulting in poor oral health status, and the vicious cycle established. Hence, the patients with periodontal disease or poor oral health should be noticed by clinicians to the level of dental fear.

In the present study, self-reported measures were used to identify periodontal disease. Epidemiological studies based on large population were usually conducted by surveys rather than clinical examination for their easy performance, low cost and simple rating systems. Gilbert et al. suggested that loose tooth was significant associated with attachment loss [16]. Moreover, tooth mobility was considered as a valid measure for positive relationship with severe periodontal disease [15]. “Have you had periodontal disease with bone loss?” and “Has your dentist/hygienist told you that you have deep pocket?” had been proved sufficient validity [15]. The three questions mentioned above were used in the present study. Additionally, good validity was shown in other self-reported questions. For example, Eke et al. [44] reported good sensitivity and specificity of the combination of demographic measures and responses effects using 5 self-reported questions for predicting periodontitis.

However, self-reported measures may cause inaccuracy for its patient-base evaluation, which is the limitation of the present study. Therefore, it is necessary to perform clinical examination to diagnosis periodontal disease for further investigation of the relationship between dental fear and periodontal status.

According to DFS evaluation, the five highest fear items were ‘drilling with the handpiece’ , ‘overall fear of dental treatment’ , ‘injecting the anesthetic’ , ‘hearing drill’ and ‘seeing drill’. We found that ‘drilling with the handpiece’ was the most important concern of invoking dental fear. Most negative items were related to tooth drilling, giving that it had long been listed as one of the most fear provoking items in dental office [45, 46]. Oosterink et al. reported that ‘dentist drilling your tooth or molar’ was the seventh most fear-provoking stimuli of 67 potentially stimuli [47]. Another important high fear-provoking item was ‘inject the anesthetic’ as previous [18, 31]. Dental phobia was considered as a specific phobia subtype independently in blood-injection-injury (BII) cluster [48]. Under such condition, patients who feared oral injections were at high level of dental fear and it could led to miss or delay dental appointments [49].