Background
Eukaryotic cells are compartmentalized to contain distinct organelles such as the nucleus. The separation of the nucleus from the cytoplasm by the nuclear envelope forms a barrier across which large macromolecules, such as proteins, need to be transported. This allows the physical separation of transcription events in the nucleus and protein translation in the cytoplasm, thereby providing the cell an additional system for the regulation of protein function [
1,
2]. The nucleocytoplasmic transport of proteins is carried out by specific transport machinery where proteins are shuttled in and out of the nucleus through the nuclear pore complexes (NPC) at the nuclear envelope [
3]. In the classical protein import, karyopherin alpha (KPNA, also known as importin alpha) recognizes the protein containing a nuclear localization signal (NLS) [
4‐
6]. The KPNA-cargo complex then binds to karyopherin beta 1 (KPNB1, also known as importin beta) that docks to the NPC and mediates the transport to the nucleus, where the cargo is released when the GTP-binding nuclear protein Ran (Ran-GTP) binds to KPNB1 [
6,
7].
Defects in nuclear import, for instance due to abnormal function of members of the nuclear transport machinery, result in incorrect localization of proteins that might subsequently lead to a diversity of diseases, including cancer [
1,
8‐
12]. For example, the tumor suppressor protein p53 has been shown to be inactivated in cancer due to a truncated form of KPNA that was incapable of transporting p53 into the nucleus, its proper location of action [
13,
14]. Currently, the strongest evidence on the role of karyopherins in cancer pathogenesis comes from studies on KPNA2. KPNA2 is upregulated in a large variety of tumor types and its elevated expression is associated with an increased degree of malignancy, tumor spread and poor patient outcome [
15,
16]. KPNA2 overexpression is already present in early lesions indicating that it is not merely a marker of advanced disease but actively participates in the pathogenesis process [
15]. This notion is supported by functional studies where enhanced KPNA2 expression leads to increased cell proliferation and migration [
15]. Other KPNAs have also been implicated in cancer. For example, KPNA4 was recently shown to promote the migration and metastatic potential of prostate cancer cells [
17]. These data illustrate that alterations in nuclear transport are important players in cancer pathogenesis.
The karyopherins in the cells are vital to proper nuclear transport but their functional roles are even more diverse. They participate in the assembly of the mitotic spindle where the duplicated chromosomes are aligned during mitosis, and thereby ensure the fidelity of cell division [
18,
19]. Karyopherins bind the spindle assembly factors (SAFs), keeping them inactive, and release them in an appropriate location near mitotic chromosomes thus preventing mislocalization of the spindle [
19]. The release of SAFs is regulated by the differential concentration of Ran-GTP between the nucleus and cytoplasm, which is maintained by guanine nucleotide exchange factors (GEFs) in the nucleus and GTPase activating proteins (GAPs) in the cytoplasm [
20]. The Ran-GTP gradient is also preserved around the chromatin after the dissociation of the nuclear envelope during mitosis [
20]. Subsequent to chromosome separation, karyopherins are also involved in the reassembly of the nuclear envelope that consists of the inner and outer nuclear membranes and associated proteins, mainly lamins and the NPC proteins [
18,
19,
21].
The human karyopherin alpha family consists of seven highly conserved members, with KPNA7 being the most recently identified, divergent and least studied member [
22,
23].
KPNA7 is mainly expressed during early embryogenesis and in oocytes in different animals [
24‐
26] and has been identified as one of the target genes for the 7q21-22 amplicon in pancreatic cancer [
27]. However, the precise function of KPNA7 in human cells remains elusive. In our previous work we pinpointed KPNA7 as a regulator of malignant properties in pancreatic cancer cells with high KPNA7 expression [
28]. Here we extend these findings to show that even low KPNA7 expression plays an important role in the proliferation of both pancreatic and breast cancer cells. Furthermore, our data demonstrate that KPNA7 has a key role in the proper formation of the mitotic spindle and in the maintenance of nuclear morphology.
Methods
Cell lines
Hs700T, MIA PaCa-2 and SU.86.86 pancreatic cancer cell lines; MCF-7, T-47D, MDA-MB-231 and MDA-MB-453 breast cancer cell lines and hTERT-HPNE normal pancreas epithelial cell line were purchased from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC, Manassas, VA, USA). The cell lines were authenticated by genotyping and were grown under recommended culture conditions. The cells were regularly tested for Mycoplasma infection.
Gene expression analysis
Total RNA was extracted using RNeasy Mini kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). Quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) was performed using the Roche LightCycler 2.0 instrument (Roche, Mannheim, Germany) with LightCycler® TaqMan® Master reaction mix (Roche). Universal Probe Library (Roche) probes and associated primers (Sigma Aldrich, St Louis, MO, USA) and Roche’s Reference Gene Assay for HPRT was utilized for normalization. All primer and probe sequences are listed in Additional file
1: Table S1.
Gene silencing
Four specific small interfering RNAs (siRNAs) against the
KPNA7 gene were designed using the siRNA Selection Program of the Whitehead Institute, Cambridge, MA, USA and the siRNAs were obtained from Dharmacon (Lafayette, CO, USA). A pool containing an equal concentration of each of the four siRNAs was prepared. SMAD5 SMARTpool siRNA was acquired from Dharmacon. An siRNA targeting the firefly luciferase (LUC) gene (Sigma Aldrich) was used as a control in all transfections. Transfections were performed either on 24-well or 6-well plates using 10 nM siRNA and Interferin reagent (Polyplus-Transfection, San Marcos, CA, USA) as described previously [
27]. The efficacy of the gene silencing was verified in each experiment using qRT-PCR. The number of cells plated per experiment are listed in Additional file
1: Table S2.
Cell growth and cell cycle analysis
For cell proliferation assays, the cells were seeded (for cell numbers see Additional file
1: Table S2) on a 24-well plate and transfected with KPNA7 or LUC siRNAs as described above. The cells were counted at 72 h or 96 h after transfection using a Coulter Z2 Coulter Counter (Beckman Coulter, San Diego, CA, USA). In cell cycle studies, the cells were seeded (for cell numbers see Additional file
1: Table S2) on 6-well plates, transfected with KPNA7 or LUC siRNAs and analyzed 96 h after transfection. The cells were collected by trypsinization and suspended to 500 μL hypotonic staining buffer (0.1 mg/mL sodium citrate tribasic dehydrate, 0.03% Triton X-100, 50 μg/mL propidium iodide, 2 μg/mL RNase A) and the amount of propidium iodide incorporated was determined using flow cytometry (BD Accuri Cytometers, Ann Arbor, MI, USA). The cell cycle distributions were determined using the ModFit LT software (Verity Software House Inc., Topsham, ME, USA). All experiments were performed in six replicates and repeated at least twice.
Immunofluorescence assays
Immunofluorescence (IF) was used to assess the localization of γ-tubulin, different nuclear envelope proteins and formation of stress fibers. The cells were plated on coverslips on 24-well plates (for cell number see Additional file
1: Table S2) and the IF stainings were performed as previously described [
29]. The following antibodies and dilutions were used: anti-lamin A/C 1:200 (ab8984, Abcam, Cambridge, UK), anti-lamin B1 1:500 (ab16048, Abcam), anti-NUP153 1:1000 (ab24700, Abcam), anti-γ-tubulin 1:500 (ab179503, Abcam), anti-phospho Myosin Light Chain 2 1:200 (#3674S, Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA, USA), Alexa Fluor 568 Phalloidin 1:200 (Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR, USA) and Alexa Fluor secondary antibodies 1:200 (Molecular Probes). The samples were mounted in ProLong Antifade Gold reagent with DAPI (Molecular probes). The fluorescently labeled cells were photographed using the Zeiss Apotome or the Zeiss LSM 780 laser scanning confocal microscope (Zeiss, Oberkoche, Germany).
Quantification of the IF data
A total of 50 mitotic cells from γ-tubulin stained, siRNA treated cells were scored using the Zeiss Apotome (40X objective) and classified either as normal or abnormal based on the number of centrosomes and the structure of the mitotic spindle. The appearance of the nuclei was visually inspected from lamin A/C images obtained using the confocal microscope and a 40X objective. The nuclei were categorized as normal or aberrant and their number was determined from a minimum of six images. ImageJ software (US National Institute of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA) was used for the quantitation of the nuclear size and shape as well as nuclear aspects ratios in 50 randomly selected nuclei from samples stained with lamin A/C. In the case of NUP153 staining, ImageJ was used for the quantitation of the number of spots per nucleus.
Western blotting
Cell lysates were separated in a 7% (for NUP153) or 10% (for lamins) SDS-PAGE gel. The proteins were transferred onto polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) membrane (Roche) using a tank blotter (NUP153 western) or Trans-Blot SD semi-dry transfer cell (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA, USA). The membrane was blocked with Blocking Reagent (Roche) in tris-buffered saline (TBS, 50 mM Tris-HCl, 150 mM NaCl, pH 7.5) for 1 h at RT. After blocking, the membrane was probed with primary antibody diluted in 3% BSA in 0.05% TBS-Tween-20 (TBST) overnight at 4 °C and subsequently with HRP-conjugated IgG secondary antibody (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA, USA) 1:8000 in 0.05% TBST for 1 h at RT. The protein bands were detected with Pierce™ ECL Plus Western Blotting Substrate (ThermoFischer Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). The following antibodies and dilutions were used: anti-lamin A/C 1:500 (ab2811, Abcam), anti-lamin B1 1:1000 (ab16048, Abcam), anti-NUP153 1:1000 (ab24700, Abcam) and anti-β-Tubulin 1:20,000 (T7816, Sigma-Aldrich).
Statistical analyses
The Mann-Whitney test was used to statistically compare the means of the siKPNA7 and siLUC control groups.
Discussion
The complex network of proteins comprising the nuclear transport machinery is a critical player in maintaining the proper function of eukaryotic cells. In addition to nuclear transport, these proteins also contribute to other key cellular processes, such as the regulation of cell division [
18,
19]. Changes in the functions of the transport proteins, e.g. due to altered expression levels, may thus lead to a variety of cellular defects, with cancer being an ultimate example [
9].
In an earlier study, we showed that KPNA7 is an important regulator of pancreatic cancer cell growth in cell lines harboring amplification and high-level overexpression of the gene [
28]. Moreover, lower levels of KPNA7 expression was detected in cancer cells without amplification whereas no or very low level expression expression was found in normal adult tissues with the exception of ovary and trachea [
28], indicating re-activation of the gene in cancer cells. This led us to question whether low level KPNA7 expression also confers a growth benefit to cancer cells. The present study demonstrates that KPNA7 knock-down consistently decreased cell growth in all cell lines regardless of the endogenous expression level, although the most drastic effect was indeed seen in Hs700T cells with the highest KPNA7 expression. Furthermore, our data demonstrate that KPNA7 depletion results in a genuine growth arrest, as the knock-down cells exhibited minimal or no proliferation between 72 h and 96 h post-transfection. These results suggest that even a low amount of KPNA7 yields a growth advantage to cancer cells. In addition, the growth inhibition phenotype was detected both in pancreatic and breast cancer cell lines, indicating that the role of KPNA7 is not limited to pancreatic cancer. A similar growth regulatory function has been previously established for KPNA2, which is the closest relative of KPNA7 and is known to promote cell proliferation in many malignancies [
16,
32‐
34]. KPNA7 inhibition also led to alterations in the cell cycle, most notably manifesting as decreased fraction of proliferating S-phase cells, thereby partly explaining the growth defects. This finding is in accordance with our previous data that highlighted proteins participating in cell cycle regulation as KPNA7 cargo candidates [
35]. It is thus plausible that the growth inhibiting effects of KPNA7 silencing are caused by diminished transport of cell cycle regulators to the nucleus.
The growth-promoting role and the expression pattern of KPNA7 makes it an interesting target for the development of cancer therapies. Inhibitors against KPNB1 and Exportin-1, a nuclear export factor of the karyopherin superfamily, have been tested in different cancers in clinical trials [
36]. However, their development has been hindered by toxicities [
36], probably due to their ubiquitous expression and essential function in healthy tissues. The targeting of KPNA7 would avoid this problem as its expression is in the current light mainly limited to cancer. On the other hand, the high conservation of the KPNA family members might provide an obstacle for drug development by creating unspecific effects. As Kelley et al. reported, KPNA7 is the most divergent member of the family [
23] and might hence represent the most suitable drug target among the KPNAs. In addition, recent computational analysis implicated KPNA7 as a potential biomarker for pancreatic cancer [
37].
Immunofluorescent analysis of γ-tubulin revealed an abnormal number of centrosomes and mitotic spindle poles in a notable fraction of the siKPNA7-treated cells, with chromatin being pulled by three or more mitotic spindles towards as many centrosomes. Mislocalization of the GEF Ran guanine nucleotide exchange factor (RCC1), which has a key role in maintaining the appropriate Ran-GTP gradient, is also known to result in multipolar spindles [
20]. RCC1 has an NLS and it has been shown to be transported into the nucleus by the KPNA3 and KPNB1 complex [
20]. Our previous study pinpointed the GEF Ran-binding protein 10 (RANBP10) as well as multiple other microtubule-associated proteins as putative KPNA7 cargos [
35] and thus their diminished transport to the nucleus in KPNA7 silenced cells may contribute to aberrant spindle formation. However, KPNA7 itself has been shown to localize to the spindle structures in murine cells [
25], suggesting that it may also directly influence spindle formation. Moreover, KPNB1 was demonstrated to regulate the formation of the spindle via its importin alpha binding (IAB) domain, further supporting the possible role of karyopherins in the regulation of spindle formation [
38].
KPNA7 depletion also induced distinct changes in the nuclear morphology in both Hs700T pancreatic and T-47D breast cancer cells. The nuclear lobulation does not seem to be fatal for the cells, but may explain the growth arrest observed. Changes in nuclear shape are usually attributed to different lamin proteins, i.e. intermediate filaments that form the nuclear lamina scaffold adjacent to the inner nuclear membrane [
39]. For example, mutations in lamin proteins have been linked to many diseases known as laminopathies, which are associated with altered nuclear structure and shape [
40]. Lobulated nuclei, similar to those in KPNA7 depleted Hs700T cells, are seen in the Hutchinson–Gilford progeria syndrome (HGPS), which is caused by mutations in lamin A [
41]. However, reduction in total amount of lamin B1 has been reported in HGPS [
40] whereas we observed an increase in lamin B1 protein. Together these data indicate that the mechanisms behind the lobulation of nuclei are diverse and different alterations in lamin proteins contribute to this phenomenon.
Lamins A and C confer stiffness to the nuclei, stabilizing the nucleus against stress, whereas B-type lamins lend elasticity [
42,
43]. The increased amount of lamin B1 in KPNA7 silenced Hs700T cells is thus likely to render the nuclear lamina more elastic. This point is supported by the increased nuclear area, the changed YZ aspect ratio of the nuclei, and the cross-sectional views of the lamin protein stainings, all suggesting that the Hs700T nuclei are flattened after the siKPNA7 treatment. In T-47D cells, no increase in lamin B1 was detected but lamin A/C amount was decreased. This might have a similar impact on nuclear rigidity as lamin B1 increase, since lamin A/C depleted cells show reduced nuclear stiffness [
43,
44]. The nuclei of the T-47D cells are relatively flat to begin with, as evidenced by high YZ aspect ratios, possibly explaining why KPNA7 silencing did not induce similar flattening of the nuclei as seen in Hs700T but instead resulted in elongated, elliptical nuclear shape.
Loss of lamin B1 levels have been associated with cellular senescence, a potent tumor-suppressive mechanism that leads to an irreversible cell cycle exit, and the lamin B1 loss has also been suggested as a senescence-associated biomarker [
45,
46]. For example, in WI-38 human lung embryonic fibroblast cells, silencing of lamin B1 induced premature senescence and, vice versa, the overexpression delayed the onset of senescence [
47]. However, in other studies upregulation of lamin B1 has been linked with induction of senescence [
47]. The current conclusion thus seems to be that the change in lamin B1 levels is not fully responsible for the senescence phenotype [
46,
48]. This notion is in concert with our previous data [
28] showing that the siKPNA7-treated Hs700T cells, despite the altered lamin B1 amount demonstrated here, do not exhibit senescence-like characteristics.
It is interesting that the majority (80%) of the siKPNA7-treated cells exhibited changes in nuclear morphology, whereas only 20% of the mitotic cells presented with aberrant multipolar spindles. Based on these observations one could conclude that the main impact of KPNA7 depletion is on lamins and nuclear morphology. Nuclear lamins have been shown to play a role in the formation of the mitotic spindle matrix [
49], and hence the observed aberrant mitosis may be related to abnormal spindle formation due to the improper function of the lamins. However, our study does not provide solid evidence on the chronological sequence of events between the mitotic defects and altered nuclear morphology, or whether these phenomena are indeed mechanistically connected.