nach oben

Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research

Erschienen in:

11.09.2014 | Original Article

Deriving Implementation Strategies for Outcome Monitoring Feedback from Theory, Research and Practice

verfasst von: Kim de Jong

Erschienen in: Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research | Ausgabe 3/2016

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Outcome monitoring feedback is a promising intervention to enhance outcomes of clinical practice. However, effective implementation can be tough and research suggests that feedback is not equally effective under all circumstances. In this article, feedback theory, research and experience from clinical practice is used to provide implementation strategies. Factors that moderate the effectiveness of outcome monitoring feedback, including feedback, recipient and organization characteristics are discussed. It is important to pay attention to implementation processes, such as providing sufficient training for clinicians, in order for feedback to be capable of enhancing outcomes.

Aoun, S., Pennebaker, D., & Janca, A. (2002). Outcome measurement in rural mental health care: A field trial of rooming-in models. Australian Journal of Rural Health, 10, 302–307. doi:10.1046/j.1440-1584.2002.00484.x.CrossRefPubMed

Bickman, L. (2000). Summing up program theory. New Directions for Evaluation, 2000, 103–112. doi:10.1002/ev.1186.CrossRef

Carlier, I. V. E., Meuldijk, D., Van Vliet, I. M., Van Fenema, E., Van der Wee, N. J. A., & Zitman, F. G. (2012). Routine outcome monitoring and feedback on physical or mental health status: evidence and theory. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 18, 104–110. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2753.2010.01543.x.CrossRefPubMed

Claiborn, C. D., & Goodyear, R. K. (2005). Feedback in psychotherapy. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 61, 209–217. doi:10.1002/jclp.20112.CrossRef

De Jong, K., Segaar, J., Van Ingenhoven, T., Busschbach, J. V., & Timman, R. (in preparation). Adverse effects of feedback in inpatients and day patients with personality disorders.

De Jong, K., Timman, R., Hakkaart-Van Roijen, L., Vermeulen, P., Kooiman, K., & Passchier, J. (2014). The effect of outcome monitoring feedback to clinicians and patients in short and long-term psychotherapy: A randomized controlled trial. Psychotherapy Research,. doi:10.1080/10503307.2013.871079.PubMed

De Jong, K., van Sluis, P., Nugter, M. A., Heiser, W. J., & Spinhoven, P. (2012). Understanding the differential impact of outcome monitoring: Therapist variables that moderate feedback effects in a randomized clinical trial. Psychotherapy Research, 22, 464–474. doi:10.1080/10503307.2012.673023.CrossRefPubMed

Dikkentman, E. (2009). Het effect van person-organization fit, regulatory focus en regulatory fit op de attitude van behandelaars: De implementatie van een feedback instrument. Master Thesis, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam.

Drapeau, M. (2012). The value of progress tacking in psychotherapy. Integrating Science and Practice, 2, 5–6.

Durlak, J., & DuPre, E. (2008). Implementation matters: A review of research on the influence of implementation on program outcomes and the factors affecting implementation. American Journal of Community Psychology, 41, 327–350. doi:10.1007/s10464-008-9165-0.CrossRefPubMed

Hannan, C., Lambert, M. J., Harmon, C., Nielsen, S. L., Smart, D. W., & Shimokawa, K. (2005). A lab test and algorithms for identifying clients at risk for treatment failure. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 61, 155–163. doi:10.1002/jclp.20108.CrossRefPubMed

Harmon, C. S., Hawkins, E. J., Lambert, M. J., Slade, K., & Whipple, J. L. (2005). Improving outcomes for poorly responding clients: The use of clinical support tools and feedback to clients. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 61, 175–185. doi:10.1002/jclp.20109.CrossRefPubMed

Harmon, C. S., Lambert, M. J., Smart, D. M., Hawkins, E., Nielsen, S. L., & Slade, K. (2007). Enhancing outcome for potential treatment failures: Therapist-client feedback and clinical support tools. Psychotherapy research, 17, 379–392. doi:10.1080/10503300600702331.CrossRef

Hawkins, E. J., Lambert, M. J., Vermeersch, D. A., Slade, K. L., & Tuttle, K. C. (2004). The therapeutic effects of providing patient progress information to therapists and patients. Psychotherapy Research, 14(3), 308–327. doi:10.1093/ptr/kph027.CrossRef

Herold, D. M., & Fedor, D. B. (2003). Individual differences in feedback propensities and training performance. Human Resource Management Review, 13, 675–689. doi:10.1016/j.hrmr.2003.11.008.CrossRef

Herold, D. M., Parsons, C. K., & Rensvold, R. B. (1996). Individual differences in the generation and processing of performance feedback. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 56, 5–25. doi:10.1177/0013164496056001001.CrossRef

Kluger, A. N., & De Nisi, A. (1996). The effects of feedback interventions on performance: A historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 254–284. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.119.2.254.CrossRef

Knaup, C., Koesters, M., Schoefer, D., Becker, T., & Puschner, B. (2009). Effect of feedback of treatment outcome in specialist mental healthcare: meta-analysis. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 195, 15–22. doi:10.1192/bjp.bp.108.053967.CrossRefPubMed

Lambert, M. J. (2007). Presidential address: What we have learned from a decade of research aimed at improving psychotherapy outcome in routine care. Psychotherapy Research, 17, 1–14. doi:10.1080/10503300601032506.CrossRef

Lambert, M. J., Whipple, J. L., Hawkins, E. J., Vermeersch, D. A., Nielsen, S. L., & Smart, D. W. (2003). Is it time for clinicians to routinely track patient outcome? A meta-analysis. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 10(3), 288–301. doi:10.1093/clipsy/bpg025.

Lutz, W., Boehnke, J. R., Köck, K., & Bitterman, A. (2011). Diagnostik und psychometrische Verlaufsrückmeldungen im Rahmen eines Modellprojektes zur Qualitätssicherung in der ambulanten Psychotherapie. Zeitschrift fur Klinische Psychologie und Psychotherapie, 40, 283–297. doi:10.1026/1616-3443/a000125.CrossRef

Lutz, W., Lambert, M. J., Harmon, S., Tschitsaz, A., Schurch, E., & Stulz, N. (2006). The probability of treatment success, failure and duration- what can be learned from empirical data to support decision making in clinical practice? Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy, 13, 223–232. doi:10.1002/cpp.496.CrossRef

Maslach, C., Schaufeli, W. B., & Leiter, M. P. (2001). Job burnout. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 397–422. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.397.CrossRefPubMed

Mezulis, A. H., Abramson, L. Y., Hyde, J. S., & Hankin, B. L. (2004). Is there a universal positivity bias in attributions? A meta-analytic review of individual, developmental, and cultural differences in the self-serving attributional bias. Psychological Bulletin, 130, 711–747. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.130.5.711.CrossRefPubMed

Riemer, M., & Bickman, L. (2011). Using program theory to link social psychology and program evaluation. In M. M. Mark, S. I. Donaldson, & B. Campbell (Eds.), Social psychology and evaluation. New York: Guilford.

Riemer, M., Rosof-Williams, J., & Bickman, L. (2005). Theories related to changing clinician practice. Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Clinics of North America, 14, 241–254. doi:10.1016/j.chc.2004.05.002.CrossRefPubMed

Sapyta, J., Riemer, M., & Bickman, L. (2005). Feedback to clinicians: Theory, research and practice. Journal of Clinical Psychology. In Session, 61, 145–153. doi:10.1002/jclp.20107.CrossRefPubMed

Shimokawa, K., Lambert, M. J., & Smart, D. W. (2010). Enhancing treatment outcome of patients at risk of treatment failure: Meta-analytic and mega-analytic review of a psychotherapy quality assurance system. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 78, 298–311. doi:10.1037/a0019247.CrossRefPubMed

Simon, W., Lambert, M. J., Harris, M. W., Busath, G., & Vazquez, A. (2012). Providing patient progress information and clinical support tools to therapists: Effects on patients at risk of treatment failure. Psychotherapy Research, 22, 638–647. doi:10.1080/10503307.2012.698918.CrossRefPubMed

Slade, K., Lambert, M. J., Harmon, S., Smart, D. W., & Bailey, R. (2008). Improving psychotherapy outcome: The use of immediate electronic feedback and revised clinical support tools. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy, 15, 287–303. doi:10.1002/cpp.594.CrossRef

Sng, A. A. H., Newnham, E. A., & Page, A. C. (in preparation). Does presentation style matter: Exploring therapists’ perceptions of the utility of feedback graphs depicting progress in psychotherapy.

Walter, G., Cleary, M., & Rey, J. M. (1998). Attitudes of mental health personnel towards rating outcome. Journal of Quality in Clinical Practice, 18, 109–115.PubMed

Weiner, B. (1985). An attributional theory of achievement motivation and emotion. Psychological Review, 92, 548–573. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.92.4.548.CrossRefPubMed

Willis, A., Deane, F. P., & Coombs, T. (2009). Improving clinicians’ attitudes toward providing feedback on routine outcome assessments. International Journal of Mental Health Nursing, 18, 211–215. doi:10.1111/j.1447-0349.2009.00596.x.CrossRefPubMed

Youn, S. J., Kraus, D. R., & Castonguay, L. G. (2012). The treatment outcome package: Facilitating practice and clinically relevant research. Psychotherapy, 49, 115–122. doi:10.1037/a0027932.CrossRefPubMed

Titel: Deriving Implementation Strategies for Outcome Monitoring Feedback from Theory, Research and Practice
verfasst von: Kim de Jong
Publikationsdatum: 11.09.2014
Verlag: Springer US
Erschienen in: Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research / Ausgabe 3/2016
Print ISSN: 0894-587X
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-3289
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-014-0589-6

Neu im Fachgebiet Psychiatrie

18.04.2024 | Arterielle Hypertonie | Nachrichten

Update Psychiatrie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Live-Webinar: Aktuelle Leitlinien bei Herz-Kreislauf-Erkrankungen

Springer Medizin

Deriving Implementation Strategies for Outcome Monitoring Feedback from Theory, Research and Practice

Abstract

Neu im Fachgebiet Psychiatrie

Antihypertensiva schützen auch alte Menschen noch vor Demenz

Delir kann Demenz begünstigen

Zunahme von Geschlechtsinkongruenz und -dysphorie registriert

Vitiligo: Prävalenz steigt und viele Erkrankte werden spät behandelt

Update Psychiatrie

Live-Webinar: Aktuelle Leitlinien bei Herz-Kreislauf-Erkrankungen

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2016

Introduction to the Special Section on Implementing Feedback from Outcome Measures in Child and Adult Mental Health Services

Leading Horses to Water: Lessons from a Decade of Helping Psychological Therapy Services Use Routine Outcome Measurement to Improve Practice

Implementing a Measurement Feedback System: A Tale of Two Sites

Capabilities and Characteristics of Digital Measurement Feedback Systems: Results from a Comprehensive Review

Achieving Precision Mental Health through Effective Assessment, Monitoring, and Feedback Processes

Development and Piloting of a Classroom-Focused Measurement Feedback System

Neu im Fachgebiet Psychiatrie

Antihypertensiva schützen auch alte Menschen noch vor Demenz

Delir kann Demenz begünstigen

Zunahme von Geschlechtsinkongruenz und -dysphorie registriert

Vitiligo: Prävalenz steigt und viele Erkrankte werden spät behandelt

Update Psychiatrie