Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of Cancer Survivorship 5/2018

06.08.2018

Description, characterization, and evaluation of an online social networking community: the American Cancer Society’s Cancer Survivors Network®

verfasst von: E. A. Fallon, D. Driscoll, T.S. Smith, K. Richardson, K. Portier

Erschienen in: Journal of Cancer Survivorship | Ausgabe 5/2018

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

To describe (a) the conceptualization, purpose, and features of The American Cancer Society’s Cancer Survivors Network® (CSN; http://​csn.​cancer.​org), (b) the ongoing two-phase evaluation process of CSN, and (c) the characteristics of CSN members.

Methods

An online opt-in self-report survey of CSN members (N = 4762) was conducted and digital metrics of site use were collected.

Results

Annually, CSN attracts over 3.6 million unique users from over 200 countries/territories. Most commonly used site features are discussion boards (81.1%), the search function (63.8%), and the member resource library (50.2%). The survey sample is mostly female (69.6%), non-Hispanic white (84.1%), and self-identified as a cancer survivor (49.8%), or both cancer survivor and cancer caregiver (31.9%). A larger number of survey respondents reported head and neck cancer (12.5%), relative to cancer incidence/prevalence data.

Conclusions

The volume of CSN traffic suggests high demand among cancer survivors and caregivers for informational and/or emotional support from other cancer survivors and caregivers. CSN may be particularly beneficial for individuals with rare cancers. Furthermore, this study documents a group of individuals whose cancer experience is multifaceted (e.g., survivors became caregivers or vice versa), and for whom CSN has the capacity to provide support at multiple points during their cancer experiences.

Implications for Cancer Survivors

CSN is a free, internet-based social networking site available to all cancer survivors and caregivers, worldwide. Evaluation of the site is ongoing and will be used to inform improvements to usability, reach, recruitment, retention, and potential health impact(s) of this valuable resource.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Hewitt M, Herdman R, Holland J. Meeting psychosocial needs of women with breast cancer. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2004. Hewitt M, Herdman R, Holland J. Meeting psychosocial needs of women with breast cancer. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2004.
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Puts MT, Papoutsis A, Springall E, Tourangeau AE. A systematic review of unmet needs of newly diagnosed older cancer patients undergoing active cancer treatment. Support Care Cancer. 2012;20(7):1377–94.CrossRefPubMed Puts MT, Papoutsis A, Springall E, Tourangeau AE. A systematic review of unmet needs of newly diagnosed older cancer patients undergoing active cancer treatment. Support Care Cancer. 2012;20(7):1377–94.CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat From Cancer Patient to Cancer Survivor: Lost in Transition. 2006, Washington, DC: National Academies Press. 534 pages. From Cancer Patient to Cancer Survivor: Lost in Transition. 2006, Washington, DC: National Academies Press. 534 pages.
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Hanly P, Céilleachair AÓ, Skally M, O’Leary E, Kapur K, Fitzpatrick P, et al. How much does it cost to care for survivors of colorectal cancer? Caregiver’s time, travel and out-of-pocket costs. Support Care Cancer. 2013;21(9):2583–92.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Hanly P, Céilleachair AÓ, Skally M, O’Leary E, Kapur K, Fitzpatrick P, et al. How much does it cost to care for survivors of colorectal cancer? Caregiver’s time, travel and out-of-pocket costs. Support Care Cancer. 2013;21(9):2583–92.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Weaver KE, Forsythe LP, Reeve BB, Alfano CM, Rodriguez JL, Sabatino SA, et al. Mental and physical health-related quality of life among U.S. cancer survivors: population estimates from the 2010 National Health Interview Survey. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev, 2012. 21(11):2108–17.CrossRef Weaver KE, Forsythe LP, Reeve BB, Alfano CM, Rodriguez JL, Sabatino SA, et al. Mental and physical health-related quality of life among U.S. cancer survivors: population estimates from the 2010 National Health Interview Survey. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev, 2012. 21(11):2108–17.CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Mayer DK, Nasso SF, Earp JA. Defining cancer survivors, their needs, and perspectives on survivorship health care in the USA. Lancet Oncol. 2017;18(1):e11–8.CrossRefPubMed Mayer DK, Nasso SF, Earp JA. Defining cancer survivors, their needs, and perspectives on survivorship health care in the USA. Lancet Oncol. 2017;18(1):e11–8.CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Miller KD, Siegel RL, Lin CC, Mariotto AB, Kramer JL, Rowland JH, et al. Cancer treatment and survivorship statistics, 2016. CA Cancer J Clin. 2016;66(4):271–89.CrossRefPubMed Miller KD, Siegel RL, Lin CC, Mariotto AB, Kramer JL, Rowland JH, et al. Cancer treatment and survivorship statistics, 2016. CA Cancer J Clin. 2016;66(4):271–89.CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Northouse L, Williams AL, Given B, McCorkle R. Psychosocial care for family caregivers of patients with cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30(11):1227–34.CrossRefPubMed Northouse L, Williams AL, Given B, McCorkle R. Psychosocial care for family caregivers of patients with cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30(11):1227–34.CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Lambert SD, Harrison JD, Smith E, Bonevski B, Carey M, Lawsin C, et al. The unmet needs of partners and caregivers of adults diagnosed with cancer: a systematic review. BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2012;2(3):224–30.CrossRefPubMed Lambert SD, Harrison JD, Smith E, Bonevski B, Carey M, Lawsin C, et al. The unmet needs of partners and caregivers of adults diagnosed with cancer: a systematic review. BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2012;2(3):224–30.CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Porter LS, Dionne-Odom JN. Supporting cancer family caregivers: how can frontline oncology clinicians help? Cancer. 2017;123(17):3212–5.CrossRefPubMed Porter LS, Dionne-Odom JN. Supporting cancer family caregivers: how can frontline oncology clinicians help? Cancer. 2017;123(17):3212–5.CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Luszczynska A, Pawlowska I, Cieslak R, Knoll N, Scholz U. Social support and quality of life among lung cancer patients: a systematic review. Psychooncology. 2013;22(10):2160–8.PubMed Luszczynska A, Pawlowska I, Cieslak R, Knoll N, Scholz U. Social support and quality of life among lung cancer patients: a systematic review. Psychooncology. 2013;22(10):2160–8.PubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Nausheen B, Gidron Y, Peveler R, Moss-Morris R. Social support and cancer progression: a systematic review. J Psychosom Res. 2009;67(5):403–15.CrossRefPubMed Nausheen B, Gidron Y, Peveler R, Moss-Morris R. Social support and cancer progression: a systematic review. J Psychosom Res. 2009;67(5):403–15.CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Usta YY. Importance of social support in cancer patients. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2012;13(8):3569–72.CrossRefPubMed Usta YY. Importance of social support in cancer patients. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2012;13(8):3569–72.CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Gonzalez-Saenz de Tejada M, et al. Association between social support, functional status, and change in health-related quality of life and changes in anxiety and depression in colorectal cancer patients. Psychooncology. 2017;26(9):1263–9.CrossRefPubMed Gonzalez-Saenz de Tejada M, et al. Association between social support, functional status, and change in health-related quality of life and changes in anxiety and depression in colorectal cancer patients. Psychooncology. 2017;26(9):1263–9.CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Hoey LM, Ieropoli SC, White VM, Jefford M. Systematic review of peer-support programs for people with cancer. Patient Educ Couns. 2008;70(3):315–37.CrossRefPubMed Hoey LM, Ieropoli SC, White VM, Jefford M. Systematic review of peer-support programs for people with cancer. Patient Educ Couns. 2008;70(3):315–37.CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Gottlieb BH, Wachala ED. Cancer support groups: a critical review of empirical studies. Psychooncology. 2007;16(5):379–400.CrossRefPubMed Gottlieb BH, Wachala ED. Cancer support groups: a critical review of empirical studies. Psychooncology. 2007;16(5):379–400.CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Mead S, MacNeil C. Peer support: what makes it unique? Int J Psychosoc Rehabil. 2006;10(2):29–37. Mead S, MacNeil C. Peer support: what makes it unique? Int J Psychosoc Rehabil. 2006;10(2):29–37.
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Hartzler A, Pratt W. Managing the personal side of health: how patient expertise differs from the expertise of clinicians. J Med Internet Res. 2011;13(3):e62.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Hartzler A, Pratt W. Managing the personal side of health: how patient expertise differs from the expertise of clinicians. J Med Internet Res. 2011;13(3):e62.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Bouma G, Admiraal JM, de Vries EGE, Schröder CP, Walenkamp AME, Reyners AKL. Internet-based support programs to alleviate psychosocial and physical symptoms in cancer patients: a literature analysis. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2015;95(1):26–37.CrossRefPubMed Bouma G, Admiraal JM, de Vries EGE, Schröder CP, Walenkamp AME, Reyners AKL. Internet-based support programs to alleviate psychosocial and physical symptoms in cancer patients: a literature analysis. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2015;95(1):26–37.CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Capurro D, Cole K, Echavarría MI, Joe J, Neogi T, Turner AM. The use of social networking sites for public health practice and research: a systematic review. J Med Internet Res. 2014;16(3):e79.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Capurro D, Cole K, Echavarría MI, Joe J, Neogi T, Turner AM. The use of social networking sites for public health practice and research: a systematic review. J Med Internet Res. 2014;16(3):e79.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Eysenbach G, Powell J, Englesakis M, Rizo C, Stern A. Health related virtual communities and electronic support groups: systematic review of the effects of online peer to peer interactions. Bmj. 2004;328(7449):1166.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Eysenbach G, Powell J, Englesakis M, Rizo C, Stern A. Health related virtual communities and electronic support groups: systematic review of the effects of online peer to peer interactions. Bmj. 2004;328(7449):1166.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Griffiths KM, Calear AL, Banfield M. Systematic review on Internet Support Groups (ISGs) and depression (1): do ISGs reduce depressive symptoms? J Med Internet Res. 2009;11(3):e40.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Griffiths KM, Calear AL, Banfield M. Systematic review on Internet Support Groups (ISGs) and depression (1): do ISGs reduce depressive symptoms? J Med Internet Res. 2009;11(3):e40.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Hong Y, Pena-Purcell NC, Ory MG. Outcomes of online support and resources for cancer survivors: a systematic literature review. Patient Educ Couns. 2012;86(3):288–96.CrossRefPubMed Hong Y, Pena-Purcell NC, Ory MG. Outcomes of online support and resources for cancer survivors: a systematic literature review. Patient Educ Couns. 2012;86(3):288–96.CrossRefPubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat McCaughan E, et al. Online support groups for women with breast cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;3:Cd011652.PubMed McCaughan E, et al. Online support groups for women with breast cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;3:Cd011652.PubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Zhang S, O’Carroll Bantum E, Owen J, Bakken S, Elhadad N. Online cancer communities as informatics intervention for social support: conceptualization, characterization, and impact. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2017;24(2):451–59. Zhang S, O’Carroll Bantum E, Owen J, Bakken S, Elhadad N. Online cancer communities as informatics intervention for social support: conceptualization, characterization, and impact. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2017;24(2):451–59.
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Graham AL, Papandonatos GD, Zhao K. The failure to increase social support: it just might be time to stop intervening (and start rigorously observing). Transl Behav Med. 2017;7(4):816–20.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Graham AL, Papandonatos GD, Zhao K. The failure to increase social support: it just might be time to stop intervening (and start rigorously observing). Transl Behav Med. 2017;7(4):816–20.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Owen JE, O’Carroll Bantum E, Pagano IS, Stanton A. Randomized trial of a social networking intervention for cancer-related distress. Ann Behav Med. 2017;51:661–72.CrossRefPubMed Owen JE, O’Carroll Bantum E, Pagano IS, Stanton A. Randomized trial of a social networking intervention for cancer-related distress. Ann Behav Med. 2017;51:661–72.CrossRefPubMed
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Framework for program evaluation in public health. MMWR Recomm Rep. 1999;48(Rr-11):1–40. Framework for program evaluation in public health. MMWR Recomm Rep. 1999;48(Rr-11):1–40.
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Glasgow RE, Vogt TM, Boles SM. Evaluating the public health impact of health promotion interventions: the RE-AIM framework. Am J Public Health. 1999;89(9):1322–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Glasgow RE, Vogt TM, Boles SM. Evaluating the public health impact of health promotion interventions: the RE-AIM framework. Am J Public Health. 1999;89(9):1322–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Yalom I, Molyn L. The Theory and Practice of Group Psychotherapy. 5th edition ed. New York: Basic Books; 2005. Yalom I, Molyn L. The Theory and Practice of Group Psychotherapy. 5th edition ed. New York: Basic Books; 2005.
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Portier K, Greer GE, Rokach L, Ofek N, Wang Y, Biyani P, et al. Understanding topics and sentiment in an online cancer survivor community. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2013;2013(47):195–8.CrossRefPubMed Portier K, Greer GE, Rokach L, Ofek N, Wang Y, Biyani P, et al. Understanding topics and sentiment in an online cancer survivor community. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2013;2013(47):195–8.CrossRefPubMed
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Westmaas JL, McDonald B, Portier K. Topic modeling of smoking- and cessation-related posts to the American Cancer Society’s Cancer Survivor Network (CSN): implications for cessation treatment for cancer survivors who smoke. Nicotine Tob Res. 2017;19:952–9.CrossRefPubMed Westmaas JL, McDonald B, Portier K. Topic modeling of smoking- and cessation-related posts to the American Cancer Society’s Cancer Survivor Network (CSN): implications for cessation treatment for cancer survivors who smoke. Nicotine Tob Res. 2017;19:952–9.CrossRefPubMed
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Zhao K, Yen J, Greer G, Qiu B, Mitra P, Portier K. Finding influential users of online health communities: a new metric based on sentiment influence. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2014;21(e2):e212–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Zhao K, Yen J, Greer G, Qiu B, Mitra P, Portier K. Finding influential users of online health communities: a new metric based on sentiment influence. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2014;21(e2):e212–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Ware JE Jr, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care. 1992;30(6):473–83.CrossRefPubMed Ware JE Jr, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care. 1992;30(6):473–83.CrossRefPubMed
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System Survey Questionnaire, United States Department of health and Human Services, Editor. 2007: Atlanta: United States. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System Survey Questionnaire, United States Department of health and Human Services, Editor. 2007: Atlanta: United States.
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Carron-Arthur B, Ali K, Cunningham JA, Griffiths KM. From help-seekers to influential users: a systematic review of participation styles in online health communities. J Med Internet Res. 2015;17(12):e271.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Carron-Arthur B, Ali K, Cunningham JA, Griffiths KM. From help-seekers to influential users: a systematic review of participation styles in online health communities. J Med Internet Res. 2015;17(12):e271.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Wang YC, Kraut RE, Levine JM. Eliciting and receiving online support: using computer-aided content analysis to examine the dynamics of online social support. J Med Internet Res. 2015;17(4):e99.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Wang YC, Kraut RE, Levine JM. Eliciting and receiving online support: using computer-aided content analysis to examine the dynamics of online social support. J Med Internet Res. 2015;17(4):e99.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
38.
Zurück zum Zitat Petric G, Atanasova S, Kamin T. Ill literates or illiterates? Investigating the eHealth literacy of users of online health communities. J Med Internet Res. 2017;19(10):e331.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Petric G, Atanasova S, Kamin T. Ill literates or illiterates? Investigating the eHealth literacy of users of online health communities. J Med Internet Res. 2017;19(10):e331.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
39.
40.
Zurück zum Zitat Thome N, Garcia N, Clark K. Psychosocial needs of head and neck cancer patients and the role of the clinical social worker. Cancer Treat Res. 2018;174:237–48.CrossRefPubMed Thome N, Garcia N, Clark K. Psychosocial needs of head and neck cancer patients and the role of the clinical social worker. Cancer Treat Res. 2018;174:237–48.CrossRefPubMed
41.
Zurück zum Zitat Buga S, Banerjee C, Salman J, Cangin M, Zachariah F, Freeman B. Supportive care for the head and neck cancer patient. Cancer Treat Res. 2018;174:249–70.CrossRefPubMed Buga S, Banerjee C, Salman J, Cangin M, Zachariah F, Freeman B. Supportive care for the head and neck cancer patient. Cancer Treat Res. 2018;174:249–70.CrossRefPubMed
42.
Zurück zum Zitat Cohen EE, LaMonte S, Erb NL, Beckman KL, Sadeghi N, Hutcheson KA, et al. American cancer society head and neck cancer survivorship care guideline. CA Cancer J Clin. 2016;66(3):203–39.CrossRefPubMed Cohen EE, LaMonte S, Erb NL, Beckman KL, Sadeghi N, Hutcheson KA, et al. American cancer society head and neck cancer survivorship care guideline. CA Cancer J Clin. 2016;66(3):203–39.CrossRefPubMed
43.
Zurück zum Zitat Smith JD, Shuman AG, Riba MB. Psychosocial issues in patients with head and neck cancer: an updated review with a focus on clinical interventions. Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2017;19(9):56.CrossRefPubMed Smith JD, Shuman AG, Riba MB. Psychosocial issues in patients with head and neck cancer: an updated review with a focus on clinical interventions. Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2017;19(9):56.CrossRefPubMed
44.
Zurück zum Zitat Rhoten BA, Murphy B, Ridner SH. Body image in patients with head and neck cancer: a review of the literature. Oral Oncol. 2013;49(8):753–60.CrossRefPubMed Rhoten BA, Murphy B, Ridner SH. Body image in patients with head and neck cancer: a review of the literature. Oral Oncol. 2013;49(8):753–60.CrossRefPubMed
45.
Zurück zum Zitat Brown CH, Curran G, Palinkas LA, Aarons GA, Wells KB, Jones L, et al. An overview of research and evaluation designs for dissemination and implementation. Annu Rev Public Health. 2017;38:1–22.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Brown CH, Curran G, Palinkas LA, Aarons GA, Wells KB, Jones L, et al. An overview of research and evaluation designs for dissemination and implementation. Annu Rev Public Health. 2017;38:1–22.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
47.
Zurück zum Zitat Hekler EB, Michie S, Pavel M, Rivera DE, Collins LM, Jimison HB, et al. Advancing models and theories for digital behavior change interventions. Am J Prev Med. 2016;51(5):825–32.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Hekler EB, Michie S, Pavel M, Rivera DE, Collins LM, Jimison HB, et al. Advancing models and theories for digital behavior change interventions. Am J Prev Med. 2016;51(5):825–32.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
48.
Zurück zum Zitat Mohr DC, Schueller SM, Montague E, Burns MN, Rashidi P. The behavioral intervention technology model: an integrated conceptual and technological framework for eHealth and mHealth interventions. J Med Internet Res. 2014;16(6):e146.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Mohr DC, Schueller SM, Montague E, Burns MN, Rashidi P. The behavioral intervention technology model: an integrated conceptual and technological framework for eHealth and mHealth interventions. J Med Internet Res. 2014;16(6):e146.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
49.
Zurück zum Zitat Wilbur J, Kolanowski AM, Collins LM. Utilizing MOST frameworks and SMART designs for intervention research. Nurs Outlook. 2016;64(4):287–9.CrossRefPubMed Wilbur J, Kolanowski AM, Collins LM. Utilizing MOST frameworks and SMART designs for intervention research. Nurs Outlook. 2016;64(4):287–9.CrossRefPubMed
50.
Zurück zum Zitat Hekler EB, Klasnja P, Riley WT, Buman MP, Huberty J, Rivera DE, et al. Agile science: creating useful products for behavior change in the real world. Transl Behav Med. 2016;6(2):317–28.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Hekler EB, Klasnja P, Riley WT, Buman MP, Huberty J, Rivera DE, et al. Agile science: creating useful products for behavior change in the real world. Transl Behav Med. 2016;6(2):317–28.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
51.
Zurück zum Zitat Patrick K, Hekler EB, Estrin D, Mohr DC, Riper H, Crane D, et al. The pace of technologic change: implications for digital health behavior intervention research. Am J Prev Med. 2016;51(5):816–24.CrossRefPubMed Patrick K, Hekler EB, Estrin D, Mohr DC, Riper H, Crane D, et al. The pace of technologic change: implications for digital health behavior intervention research. Am J Prev Med. 2016;51(5):816–24.CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Description, characterization, and evaluation of an online social networking community: the American Cancer Society’s Cancer Survivors Network®
verfasst von
E. A. Fallon
D. Driscoll
T.S. Smith
K. Richardson
K. Portier
Publikationsdatum
06.08.2018
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Journal of Cancer Survivorship / Ausgabe 5/2018
Print ISSN: 1932-2259
Elektronische ISSN: 1932-2267
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11764-018-0706-8

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2018

Journal of Cancer Survivorship 5/2018 Zur Ausgabe

Update Onkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.