The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12902-015-0040-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
This is an investigator initiated trial. Medtronic provided the study devices and accessories. Eli Lilly and Sanofi Aventis provided financial support, but had no role in writing or publication of this manuscript. All authors declare that they have no competing interests.
MD and SK conceived and designed the design. CAJB, ES, PHG, FJS, MHHK participated in the study design. CAJB mainly drafted the initial manuscript and SK, ES, PHG, FJS and MHHK provided advice on the manuscript. All authors read and approved the manuscript.
Hypoglycemia is the main side effect of intensified insulin therapy in type 1 diabetes and recognized as a limitation in achieving glycemic targets. Patients with impaired awareness of hypoglycemia have a threefold to sixfold increased risk of severe hypoglycemia. Real-time continuous glucose monitoring may help patients with type 1 diabetes to achieve better glycemic control with less hypoglycemic episodes. Accordingly, one may hypothesize that particularly type 1 diabetes mellitus patients with impaired awareness of hypoglycemia will profit most from this technology with improvements in their quality of life. However, this has not yet been established. This trial aims to study the effect of real-time continuous glucose monitoring on glycemia and quality of life specifically in type 1 diabetes mellitus patients with established impaired awareness of hypoglycemia.
This is a two-center, randomized, cross-over trial with a 12-week wash-out period in between intervention periods. A total of 52 type 1 diabetes mellitus patients with impaired awareness of hypoglycemia according to Gold et al. criteria will be randomized to receive real-time continuous glucose monitoring or blinded continuous glucose monitoring for 16 weeks. After a wash-out period, patients will cross over to the other intervention. The primary outcome measure is time spent in euglycemia. Secondary outcomes include (diabetes-specific) markers of quality of life and other glycemic variables.
It remains unclear whether patients with type 1 diabetes and impaired awareness of hypoglycemia benefit from real-time continuous glucose monitoring in real-life. This study will provide insight into the potential benefits of real-time continuous glucose monitoring in this patient population.
Additional file 1: Table S1. Overview of visits, telephone consultations and outcome assessments. (XLS 34 kb)12902_2015_40_MOESM1_ESM.xls
The Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group. The effect of intensive treatment of diabetes on the development and progression of long-term complications in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. The Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group. N Engl J Med. 1993;329:977–86. CrossRef
Workgroup on Hypoglycemia ADA. Defining and reporting hypoglycemia in diabetes: a report from the American Diabetes Association Workgroup on Hypoglycemia. Diabetes Care. 2005;28:1245–9. CrossRef
Feltbower RG, Bodansky HJ, Patterson CC, Parslow RC, Stephenson CR, Reynolds C, et al. Acute complications and drug misuse are important causes of death for children and young adults with type 1 diabetes: results from the Yorkshire Register of diabetes in children and young adults. Diabetes Care. 2008;31:922–6. CrossRefPubMed
Geelhoed-Duijvestijn PH, Box F, Diamant M, Otoide-Vree M, Niel Van J. Real time continuous glucose monitoring: how does it work in real life? Br J Diab Vasc Dis. 2011;11:145–9. CrossRef
Davey RJ, Jones TW, Fournier PA. Effect of short-term use of a continuous glucose monitoring system with a real-time glucose display and a low glucose alarm on incidence and duration of hypoglycemia in a home setting in type 1 diabetes mellitus. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2010;4:1457–64. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Little SA, Leelarathna L, Walkinshaw E, Tan HK, Chapple O, Lubina-Solomon A, et al. Recovery of Hypoglycemia Awareness in Long-standing Type 1 Diabetes: A Multicenter 2 x 2 Factorial Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Insulin Pump With Multiple Daily Injections and Continuous With Conventional Glucose Self-monitoring (HypoCOMPaSS). Diabetes Care. 2014;37:2114–22. CrossRefPubMed
American Diabetes Association. Diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care. 2012;35(1):S64–71. CrossRef
Guidelines ADA. Standards of medical care in diabetes--2012. Diabetes Care. 2012;2012(35 Suppl 1):S11–63.
Linde L, Sorensen J, Ostergaard M, Horslev-Petersen K, Hetland ML. Health-related quality of life: validity, reliability, and responsiveness of SF-36, 15D, EQ-5D [corrected] RAQoL, and HAQ in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol. 2008;35:1528–37. PubMed
Consensus statement: Report and recommendations of the San Antonio conference on diabetic neuropathy. American Diabetes Association American Academy of Neurology. Diabetes Care 1988, 11: 592–597.
Diabetes Research in Children Network (DirecNet) Study Group. Youth and parent satisfaction with clinical use of the GlucoWatch G2 Biographer in the management of pediatric type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2005;28:1929–35. CrossRef
- Design and rationale of the IN CONTROL trial: the effects of real-time continuous glucose monitoring on glycemia and quality of life in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus and impaired awareness of hypoglycemia
Cornelis A.J. van Beers
Susanne J. Kleijer
Erik H. Serné
Petronella H. Geelhoed-Duijvestijn
Frank J. Snoek
Mark H.H. Kramer
- BioMed Central
Neu im Fachgebiet Innere Medizin
Meistgelesene Bücher aus der Inneren Medizin
Mail Icon II