Skip to main content
Hauptrubriken
CME Facharzt-Training Webinare Zeitschriften Bücher e.Medpedia Podcast
Service
Jobbörse Info & Hilfe
Fachgebiete
Anästhesiologie Allgemeinmedizin Arbeitsmedizin Augenheilkunde Chirurgie Dermatologie Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe HNO Innere Medizin Kardiologie Neurologie Onkologie und Hämatologie Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie Pädiatrie Pathologie Psychiatrie Radiologie Rechtsmedizin Urologie Zahnmedizin
Themen
Klimawandel und Gesundheit Neues aus dem Markt COVID-19 Praxis und Beruf Seltene Erkrankungen GOÄ & EBM Panorama
Sammlungen
Kasuistiken Algorithmen & Infografiken Blickdiagnosen Arthropedia FlapFinder (für Dermatochirurgen) Videos Kongressberichterstattung Medizin für Apothekerinnen und Apotheker Für Ärztinnen und Ärzte in Weiterbildung Für Medizinstudierende

Live-Webinar: Aktuelle Leitlinien bei Herz-Kreislauf-Erkrankungen

Konkret geht es um den Diabetes-Patienten mit kardiovaskulären Erkrankungen oder Risiken, die Herzinsuffizienz sowie die kardiovaskuläre Primär- und Sekundärprävention. Sind Sie hier schon auf dem neuesten Stand? Unsere Experten beleuchten, wo und warum das bisherige Procedere geändert werden soll und was in der Praxis sinnvoll ist. Holen Sie sich Ihr Update und 2 CME-Punkte beim MMW-Webinar am 24. April von 17.30 bis 19 Uhr. 
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Current Anesthesiology Reports
Erschienen in: Current Anesthesiology Reports 2/2020

04.04.2020 | Neuromuscular Blockade (GS Murphy, Section Editor)

Detecting Residual Weakness: an Update on Quantitative Neuromuscular Monitoring

verfasst von: Vivian Hernandez-Torres, J. Ross Renew

Erschienen in: Current Anesthesiology Reports | Ausgabe 2/2020

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose of Review

The purpose of this review is to summarize the newest generation of quantitative neuromuscular monitors and the different modalities that can be used to minimize the risk of postoperative residual weakness.

Recent Findings

New guidelines and consensus statements are emerging that emphasize the importance of using quantitative monitors whenever neuromuscular blocking agents (NMBAs) are administered. Additionally, there are new technologies emerging in this area.

Summary

Residual neuromuscular blockade remains a common occurrence in the postoperative period. Even small degrees of residual muscle weakness can produce significant postoperative complications. Qualitative (subjective) assessment is an unacceptable technique to exclude residual neuromuscular blockade because fade is difficult to detect when train-of-four ratios are between 0.4 and 0.9. For that reason, using objective quantitative monitors is essential to confirm adequate recovery in all patients receiving NMBAs and ensure patient safety.
Literatur
1.
Lieutaud T, Billard V, Khalaf H, Debaene B. Muscle relaxation and increasing doses of propofol improve intubating conditions. Can J Anaesth. 2003;50(2):121–6.PubMedCrossRef
2.
Blobner M, Frick CG, Stäuble RB, Feussner H, Schaller SJ, Unterbuchner C, et al. Neuromuscular blockade improves surgical conditions (NISCO). Surg Endosc. 2015;29(3):627–36.PubMedCrossRef
3.
Griffith H, Johnson G. The use of curare in general anesthesia. Anesthesiology. 1942;3(4):418–20.CrossRef
4.
Mencke T, Echternach M, Kleinschmidt S, Lux P, Barth V, Plinkert PK, et al. Laryngeal morbidity and quality of tracheal intubation: a randomized controlled trial. Anesthesiology. 2003;98(5):1049–56.PubMedCrossRef
5.
Bruintjes MH, van Helden EV, Braat AE, Dahan A, Scheffer GJ, van Laarhoven CJ, et al. Deep neuromuscular block to optimize surgical space conditions during laparoscopic surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Anaesth. 2017;118(6):834–42.PubMedCrossRef
6.
Madsen MV, Staehr-Rye AK, Gatke MR, Claudius C. Neuromuscular blockade for optimising surgical conditions during abdominal and gynaecological surgery: a systematic review. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2015;59(1):1–16.PubMedCrossRef
7.
Murphy GS, Brull SJ. Residual neuromuscular block: lessons unlearned. Part I: definitions, incidence, and adverse physiologic effects of residual neuromuscular block. Anesth Analg 2010;111(1):120–128.
8.
Hayes AH, Mirakhur RK, Breslin DS, Reid JE, McCourt KC. Postoperative residual block after intermediate-acting neuromuscular blocking drugs. Anaesthesia. 2001;56(4):312–8.PubMedCrossRef
9.
Debaene B, Plaud B, Dilly MP, Donati F. Residual paralysis in the PACU after a single intubating dose of nondepolarizing muscle relaxant with an intermediate duration of action. Anesthesiology. 2003;98(5):1042–8.PubMedCrossRef
10.
Eriksson LI, Sundman E, Olsson R, Nilsson L, Witt H, Ekberg O, et al. Functional assessment of the pharynx at rest and during swallowing in partially paralyzed humans: simultaneous videomanometry and mechanomyography of awake human volunteers. Anesthesiology. 1997;87(5):1035–43.PubMedCrossRef
11.
Herbstreit F, Peters J, Eikermann M. Impaired upper airway integrity by residual neuromuscular blockade: increased airway collapsibility and blunted genioglossus muscle activity in response to negative pharyngeal pressure. Anesthesiology. 2009;110(6):1253–60.PubMedCrossRef
12.
Eriksson LI. Reduced hypoxic chemosensitivity in partially paralysed man. A new property of muscle relaxants? Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1996;40(5):520–3.PubMedCrossRef
13.
•• Naguib M, Brull SJ, Kopman AF, Hunter JM, Fulesdi B, Arkes HR, et al. Consensus statement on perioperative use of neuromuscular monitoring. Anesth Analg. 2018;127(1):71–80 A recent consensus statement from the US on indications for and proper use of neuromuscular monitors. PubMedCrossRef
14.
•• Checketts MR, Alladi R, Ferguson K, Gemmell L, Handy JM, Klein AA, et al. Recommendations for standards of monitoring during anaesthesia and recovery 2015: Association of Anaesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland. Anaesthesia. 2016;71(1):85–93 A recent consensus from Great Britain and Ireland providing guidance on the minimum standards for physiological monitoring of any patient undergoing anesthesia or sedation. PubMedCrossRef
15.
Viby-Mogensen J, Jensen NH, Engbaek J, Ording H, Skovgaard LT, Chraemmer-Jorgensen B. Tactile and visual evaluation of the response to train-of-four nerve stimulation. Anesthesiology. 1985;63(4):440–3.PubMedCrossRef
16.
Brull SJ, Silverman DG. Visual and tactile assessment of neuromuscular fade. Anesth Analg. 1993;77(2):352–5.PubMedCrossRef
17.
Brull SJ, Silverman DG. Real time versus slow-motion train-of-four monitoring: a theory to explain the inaccuracy of visual assessment. Anesth Analg. 1995;80(3):548–51.PubMed
18.
Capron F, Fortier LP, Racine S, Donati F. Tactile fade detection with hand or wrist stimulation using train-of-four, double-burst stimulation, 50-hertz tetanus, 100-hertz tetanus, and acceleromyography. Anesth Analg. 2006;102(5):1578–84.PubMedCrossRef
19.
Claudius C, Skovgaard LT, Viby-Mogensen J. Acceleromyography and mechanomyography for establishing potency of neuromuscular blocking agents: a randomized-controlled trial. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2009;53(4):449–54.PubMedCrossRef
20.
21.
22.
Dubois V, Fostier G, Dutrieux M, Jamart J, Collet S, de Dorlodot C, et al. Philips Intellivue NMT module: precision and performance improvements to meet the clinical requirements of neuromuscular block management. J Clin Monit Comput. 2019.
23.
Claudius C, Skovgaard LT, Viby-Mogensen J. Is the performance of acceleromyography improved with preload and normalization? A comparison with mechanomyography. Anesthesiology. 2009;110(6):1261–70.PubMedCrossRef
24.
25.
Kopman AF, Kopman DJ. An analysis of the TOF-watch algorithm for modifying the displayed train-of-four ratio. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2006;50(10):1313–4.PubMedCrossRef
26.
Murphy GS, Szokol JW, Avram MJ, Greenberg SB, Shear TD, Deshur M, et al. Comparison of the TOFscan and the TOF-watch SX during recovery of neuromuscular function. Anesthesiology. 2018;129(5):880–8.PubMedCrossRef
27.
Colegrave N, Billard V, Motamed C, Bourgain JL. Comparison of the TOF-Scan acceleromyograph to TOF-watch SX: influence of calibration. Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med. 2016;35(3):223–7.PubMedCrossRef
28.
29.
30.
Hyman EC, Brull SJ. Clarification: current status of neuromuscular reversal and monitoring. Challenges and Opportunities Anesthesiology. 2017;127(4):730.PubMed
31.
32.
33.
Bowdle A, Bussey L, Michaelsen K, Jelacic S, Nair B. Togashi K, et al. Anaesthesia: A comparison of a prototype electromyograph vs. a mechanomyograph and an acceleromyograph for assessment of neuromuscular blockade; 2019.
34.
35.
Stewart PA, Freelander N, Liang S, Heller G, Phillips S. Comparison of electromyography and kinemyography during recovery from non-depolarising neuromuscular blockade. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2014;42(3):378–84.PubMedCrossRef
36.
Murphy GS. Neuromuscular monitoring in the perioperative period. Anesth Analg. 2018;126(2):464–8.PubMedCrossRef
37.
Dutu M, Ivascu R, Tudorache O, Morlova D, Stanca A, Negoita S, et al. Neuromuscular monitoring: an update. Rom J Anaesth Intensive Care. 2018;25(1):55–60.PubMedPubMedCentral
38.
39.
Rodiera J, Serradell A, Alvarez-Gomez JA, Aliaga L. The cuff method: a pilot study of a new method of monitoring neuromuscular function. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2005;49(10):1552–8.PubMedCrossRef
40.
Veiga Ruiz G, Garcia Cayuela J, Orozco Montes J, Parreno Caparros M, Garcia Rojo B, Aguayo Albasini JL. Monitoring intraoperative neuromuscular blockade and blood pressure with one device (TOF-Cuff): a comparative study with mechanomyography and invasive blood pressure. Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim. 2017;64(10):560–7.PubMedCrossRef
41.
Kazuma S, Wakasugi K, Hagiwara H, Yamakage M. Comparative study of TOF-cuff, a new neuromuscular blockade monitor, and TOF-Watch, an acceleromyography. Anesth Analg. 2019;129(1):e16–e9.PubMedCrossRef
42.
Krijtenburg P, Honing G, Martini C, Olofsen E, van Elst HJ, Scheffer GJ, et al. Comparison of the TOF-cuff((R)) monitor with electromyography and acceleromyography during recovery from neuromuscular block. Br J Anaesth. 2019;122(2):e22–e4.PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Detecting Residual Weakness: an Update on Quantitative Neuromuscular Monitoring
verfasst von
Vivian Hernandez-Torres
J. Ross Renew
Publikationsdatum
04.04.2020
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Current Anesthesiology Reports / Ausgabe 2/2020
Elektronische ISSN: 2167-6275
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40140-020-00391-9

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2020

Current Anesthesiology Reports 2/2020 Zur Ausgabe

Preoperative Evaluation (BJ Sweitzer, Section Editor)

Recommendations for Preoperative Assessment and Shared Decision-Making in Cardiac Surgery

Neuromuscular Blockade (GS Murphy, Section Editor)

Residual Neuromuscular Blockade and Postoperative Pulmonary Complications: What Does the Recent Evidence Demonstrate?

Neuromuscular Blockade (GS Murphy, Section Editor)

Clinical Practice Guideline for the Management of Neuromuscular Blockade: What Are the Recommendations in the USA and Other Countries?

Neuromuscular Blockade (GS Murphy, Section Editor)

Evaluation of the Efficacy and Safety of Neostigmine in Reversing Neuromuscular Blockade

Regional Anesthesia (P Kukreja, Section Editor)

Local Anesthetic Systemic Toxicity (LAST) – a Review and Update

Blood Management (KA Tanaka, Section Editor)

Preoperative Anemia Management: What’s New in 2020?

Neu im Fachgebiet AINS

23.04.2024 | Appendizitis | Nachrichten

Hinter dieser Appendizitis steckte ein Erreger

23.04.2024 | Leitsymptom Rückenschmerzen | Nachrichten

Ärztliche Empathie hilft gegen Rückenschmerzen

23.04.2024 | Operationsvorbereitung | Nachrichten

Mehr Schaden als Nutzen durch präoperatives Aussetzen von GLP-1-Agonisten?

18.04.2024 | Wirbelsäulenmetastase | Nachrichten

Stereotaktische Radiatio schlägt konventionelle Bestrahlung
weitere anzeigen

Update AINS

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

hier abonnieren