Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Skeletal Radiology 2/2018

06.11.2017 | Scientific Article

Detection of femoroplasty on pre- and post-arthroscopic comparison radiographs following treatment of femoroacetabular impingement syndrome: multi-reader accuracy and agreement study

verfasst von: Steffen J. Haider, Alan H. Siegel, Kevin F. Spratt, James B. Ames, J. Allen Graham, Yvonne Y. Cheung

Erschienen in: Skeletal Radiology | Ausgabe 2/2018

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Objective

To assess diagnostic accuracy and agreement among radiologists in detecting femoroplasty on pre- and post-arthroscopic comparison frog lateral and anteroposterior (AP) pelvic radiographs after treatment of femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) syndrome.

Materials and methods

In this retrospective, cross-sectional study, 86 patients underwent hip arthroscopy (52 with and 34 without femoroplasty) for treatment of FAI syndrome. Three radiologists blinded to clinical data and chronological order of the pre- and post-arthroscopic comparison radiographs independently examined AP pelvis and frog lateral radiographs to detect femoroplasty changes. Statistical analysis outputs included diagnostic accuracy parameters and inter- and intra-observer agreement.

Results

Identification of femoroplasty in the frog lateral projection has mean sensitivity 70%, specificity 82%, inter-observer agreement κ 0.74–0.76 and intra-observer agreement κ 0.72–0.85. Using the AP pelvis projection to detect femoroplasty has mean sensitivity 32%, specificity 71%, inter-observer agreement κ 0.47–0.65, and intra-observer agreement κ, 0.56–0.84.

Conclusions

Radiologists are only moderately sensitive, though more specific, in femoroplasty detection in the frog lateral projection. The AP pelvis projection yields lower sensitivity and specificity. Both projections have moderate inter- and intra-observer agreement.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Griffin DR, Dickenson EJ, O’Donnell J, Agricola R, Awan T, Beck M, et al. The Warwick Agreement on femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAI syndrome): an international consensus statement. Br J Sports Med. 2016;50:1169–76.CrossRefPubMed Griffin DR, Dickenson EJ, O’Donnell J, Agricola R, Awan T, Beck M, et al. The Warwick Agreement on femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAI syndrome): an international consensus statement. Br J Sports Med. 2016;50:1169–76.CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Ito K, Minka MA, Leunig M, Werlen S, Ganz R. Femoroacetabular impingement and the cam-effect: a MRI-based quantitative anatomical study of the femoral head-neck offset. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2001;83:171–6.CrossRefPubMed Ito K, Minka MA, Leunig M, Werlen S, Ganz R. Femoroacetabular impingement and the cam-effect: a MRI-based quantitative anatomical study of the femoral head-neck offset. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2001;83:171–6.CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Reiman MP, Thorborg K, Hölmich P. Femoroacetabular impingement surgery is on the rise: but what is the next step? J Orthop Sport Phys Ther. 2016;46:406–8.CrossRef Reiman MP, Thorborg K, Hölmich P. Femoroacetabular impingement surgery is on the rise: but what is the next step? J Orthop Sport Phys Ther. 2016;46:406–8.CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Steppacher SD, Anwander H, Zurmühle CA, Tannast M, Siebenrock KA. Eighty percent of patients with surgical hip dislocation for femoroacetabular impingement have a good clinical result without osteoarthritis progression at 10??Years. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015;473:1333–41.CrossRefPubMed Steppacher SD, Anwander H, Zurmühle CA, Tannast M, Siebenrock KA. Eighty percent of patients with surgical hip dislocation for femoroacetabular impingement have a good clinical result without osteoarthritis progression at 10??Years. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015;473:1333–41.CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat de Sa D, Urquhart N, Philippon M, Ye J-E, Simunovic N, Ayeni OR. Alpha angle correction in femoroacetabular impingement. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2014;22:812–21.CrossRefPubMed de Sa D, Urquhart N, Philippon M, Ye J-E, Simunovic N, Ayeni OR. Alpha angle correction in femoroacetabular impingement. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2014;22:812–21.CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Sardana V, Philippon MJ, de Sa D, Bedi A, Ye L, Simunovic N, et al. Revision hip arthroscopy indications and outcomes: a systematic review. Arthroscopy. 2015;31:2047–55.CrossRefPubMed Sardana V, Philippon MJ, de Sa D, Bedi A, Ye L, Simunovic N, et al. Revision hip arthroscopy indications and outcomes: a systematic review. Arthroscopy. 2015;31:2047–55.CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Nötzli HP, Wyss TF, Stoecklin CH, Schmid MR, Treiber K, Hodler J. The contour of the femoral head-neck junction as a predictor for the risk of anterior impingement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2002;84:556–60.CrossRefPubMed Nötzli HP, Wyss TF, Stoecklin CH, Schmid MR, Treiber K, Hodler J. The contour of the femoral head-neck junction as a predictor for the risk of anterior impingement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2002;84:556–60.CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Hetaimish BM, Khan M, Crouch S, Simunovic N, Bedi A, Mohtadi N, et al. Consistency of reported outcomes after arthroscopic management of femoroacetabular impingement. Arthroscopy. 2013;29:780–7.CrossRefPubMed Hetaimish BM, Khan M, Crouch S, Simunovic N, Bedi A, Mohtadi N, et al. Consistency of reported outcomes after arthroscopic management of femoroacetabular impingement. Arthroscopy. 2013;29:780–7.CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Dzaja I, Martin K, Kay J, Memon M, Duong A, Simunovic N, et al. Radiographic outcomes reporting after arthroscopic management of femoroacetabular impingement: a systematic review. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2016;9:411–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Dzaja I, Martin K, Kay J, Memon M, Duong A, Simunovic N, et al. Radiographic outcomes reporting after arthroscopic management of femoroacetabular impingement: a systematic review. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2016;9:411–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Kottner J, Audig L, Brorson S, Donner A, Gajewski BJ. Guidelines for reporting reliability and agreement studies (GRRAS) were proposed. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64:96–106. Kottner J, Audig L, Brorson S, Donner A, Gajewski BJ. Guidelines for reporting reliability and agreement studies (GRRAS) were proposed. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64:96–106.
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Bossuyt PM, Reitsma JB, Bruns DE, Gatsonis CA, Paul P, Irwig L, et al. STARD 2015: an updated list of essential items for. Res Methods Reporting. 2015;5527:1–9. Bossuyt PM, Reitsma JB, Bruns DE, Gatsonis CA, Paul P, Irwig L, et al. STARD 2015: an updated list of essential items for. Res Methods Reporting. 2015;5527:1–9.
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Ilizaliturri VM. Complications of arthroscopic femoroacetabular impingement treatment: a review. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009;467:760–8.CrossRefPubMed Ilizaliturri VM. Complications of arthroscopic femoroacetabular impingement treatment: a review. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009;467:760–8.CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Ross JR, Larson CM, Adeoyo O, Kelly BT, Bedi A. Residual deformity is the most common reason for revision hip arthroscopy: a three-dimensional CT study. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2014;1388–1395. Ross JR, Larson CM, Adeoyo O, Kelly BT, Bedi A. Residual deformity is the most common reason for revision hip arthroscopy: a three-dimensional CT study. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2014;1388–1395.
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Gupta A, Redmond JM, Stake CE, Finch NA, Dunne KF, Domb BG. Does the femoral cam lesion regrow after osteoplasty for femoroacetabular impingement? Am J Sports Med. 2014;42:2149–55.CrossRefPubMed Gupta A, Redmond JM, Stake CE, Finch NA, Dunne KF, Domb BG. Does the femoral cam lesion regrow after osteoplasty for femoroacetabular impingement? Am J Sports Med. 2014;42:2149–55.CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Ross JR, Bedi A, Stone RM, Sibilsky Enselman E, Leunig M, Kelly BT, et al. Intraoperative fluoroscopic imaging to treat cam deformities: correlation with 3-dimensional computed tomography. Am J Sports Med. 2014;42:1370–6.CrossRefPubMed Ross JR, Bedi A, Stone RM, Sibilsky Enselman E, Leunig M, Kelly BT, et al. Intraoperative fluoroscopic imaging to treat cam deformities: correlation with 3-dimensional computed tomography. Am J Sports Med. 2014;42:1370–6.CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Bedi A, Zaltz I, De La Torre K, Kelly BT. Radiographic comparison of surgical hip dislocation and hip arthroscopy for treatment of cam deformity in femoroacetabular impingement. Am J Sports Med. 2011;39(Suppl):20S–8S.CrossRefPubMed Bedi A, Zaltz I, De La Torre K, Kelly BT. Radiographic comparison of surgical hip dislocation and hip arthroscopy for treatment of cam deformity in femoroacetabular impingement. Am J Sports Med. 2011;39(Suppl):20S–8S.CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Jackson TJ, Stake CE, Trenga AP, Morgan J, Domb BG. Arthroscopic technique for treatment of femoroacetabular impingement. Arthrosc Tech. 2013;2:e55–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Jackson TJ, Stake CE, Trenga AP, Morgan J, Domb BG. Arthroscopic technique for treatment of femoroacetabular impingement. Arthrosc Tech. 2013;2:e55–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
18.
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Rakhra KS, Sheikh AM, Allen D, Beaulé PE. Comparison of MRI alpha angle measurement planes in femoroacetabular impingement. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009;467:660–5.CrossRefPubMed Rakhra KS, Sheikh AM, Allen D, Beaulé PE. Comparison of MRI alpha angle measurement planes in femoroacetabular impingement. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009;467:660–5.CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Nepple JJ, Martel JM, Kim YJ, Zaltz I, Clohisy JC. Do plain radiographs correlate with CT for imaging of cam-type femoroacetabular impingement? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012;470:3313–20.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Nepple JJ, Martel JM, Kim YJ, Zaltz I, Clohisy JC. Do plain radiographs correlate with CT for imaging of cam-type femoroacetabular impingement? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012;470:3313–20.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Pfirrmann CW. A, Mengiardi B, Dora C, Kalberer F, Zanetti M, Hodler J. Cam and pincer femoroacetabular impingement: characteristic MR arthrographic findings in 50 patients. Radiology. 2006;240:778–85. Pfirrmann CW. A, Mengiardi B, Dora C, Kalberer F, Zanetti M, Hodler J. Cam and pincer femoroacetabular impingement: characteristic MR arthrographic findings in 50 patients. Radiology. 2006;240:778–85.
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Audenaert EA, Baelde N, Huysse W, Vigneron L, Pattyn C. Development of a three-dimensional detection method of cam deformities in femoroacetabular impingement. Skelet Radiol. 2011;40:921–7.CrossRef Audenaert EA, Baelde N, Huysse W, Vigneron L, Pattyn C. Development of a three-dimensional detection method of cam deformities in femoroacetabular impingement. Skelet Radiol. 2011;40:921–7.CrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Mardones R, Lara J, Donndorff A, Barnes S, Stuart MJ, Glick J, et al. Surgical correction of “cam-type” femoroacetabular impingement: a cadaveric comparison of open versus arthroscopic debridement. Arthroscopy. 2009;25:175–82.CrossRefPubMed Mardones R, Lara J, Donndorff A, Barnes S, Stuart MJ, Glick J, et al. Surgical correction of “cam-type” femoroacetabular impingement: a cadaveric comparison of open versus arthroscopic debridement. Arthroscopy. 2009;25:175–82.CrossRefPubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Hellman MD, Mascarenhas R, Gupta A, Fillingham Y, Haughom BD, Salata MJ, et al. The false-profile view may be used to identify cam morphology. Arthroscopy. 2015:1–5. Hellman MD, Mascarenhas R, Gupta A, Fillingham Y, Haughom BD, Salata MJ, et al. The false-profile view may be used to identify cam morphology. Arthroscopy. 2015:1–5.
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Domayer SE, Ziebarth K, Chan J, Bixby S, Mamisch TC, Kim YJ. Femoroacetabular cam-type impingement: diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of radiographic views compared to radial MRI. Eur J Radiol. 2011;80:805–10.CrossRefPubMed Domayer SE, Ziebarth K, Chan J, Bixby S, Mamisch TC, Kim YJ. Femoroacetabular cam-type impingement: diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of radiographic views compared to radial MRI. Eur J Radiol. 2011;80:805–10.CrossRefPubMed
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Meyer DC, Beck M, Ellis T, Ganz R, Leunig M. Comparison of six radiographic projections to assess femoral head/neck asphericity. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2006;PAP:181–5. Meyer DC, Beck M, Ellis T, Ganz R, Leunig M. Comparison of six radiographic projections to assess femoral head/neck asphericity. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2006;PAP:181–5.
27.
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Stähelin L, Stähelin T, Jolles BM, Herzog RF. Arthroscopic offset restoration in femoroacetabular cam impingement: accuracy and early clinical outcome. Arthroscopy. 2008;24:51–7.CrossRefPubMed Stähelin L, Stähelin T, Jolles BM, Herzog RF. Arthroscopic offset restoration in femoroacetabular cam impingement: accuracy and early clinical outcome. Arthroscopy. 2008;24:51–7.CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Detection of femoroplasty on pre- and post-arthroscopic comparison radiographs following treatment of femoroacetabular impingement syndrome: multi-reader accuracy and agreement study
verfasst von
Steffen J. Haider
Alan H. Siegel
Kevin F. Spratt
James B. Ames
J. Allen Graham
Yvonne Y. Cheung
Publikationsdatum
06.11.2017
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Skeletal Radiology / Ausgabe 2/2018
Print ISSN: 0364-2348
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-2161
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-017-2789-0

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2018

Skeletal Radiology 2/2018 Zur Ausgabe

Browser's Notes

Browser’s notes

Update Radiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.