Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy 2/2020

24.04.2019 | Colonoscopy

Detrimental impact of symptom-detected colorectal cancer

verfasst von: Lieve G. J. Leijssen, Anne M. Dinaux, Hiroko Kunitake, Liliana G. Bordeianou, David L. Berger

Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy | Ausgabe 2/2020

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

The incidence and mortality rates of colorectal cancer (CRC) have been steadily decreasing, largely attributable to screening colonoscopies that either remove precancerous lesions or identify CRC earlier. We aimed to assess the prognostic difference between colorectal cancers diagnosed by screening (SC), diagnostic (DC), or surveillance (SU) colonoscopies.

Methods

All 1809 surgically treated patients with primary CRC diagnosed through colonoscopy at our tertiary center (2004–2015) were extracted from a prospectively maintained database. Oncologic outcomes were compared, including multivariate Cox regression.

Results

Diagnostic patients presented with more advanced disease (15.0% vs. 53.2% (SC) and 55.3% (SU) AJCC I, P < 0.001), subsequently leading to impaired survival and higher recurrence rates (P < 0.001). After adjustment for age, ASA-score and gender, oncologic outcomes remained significantly worse after DC. Hazard ratios (HR) of overall mortality (OS) compared to DC were 0.36 for SC and 0.58 for SU (P < 0.001). Adjusted HRs of disease-free survival (DFS) were 0.43 and 0.32, respectively (P < 0.001). Worse outcomes in OS withstood adjustment for stage, tumor site and (neo)adjuvant treatment (SC: HR 0.46, P < 0.001; SU: HR 0.73, P = 0.036). The benefits of SC were particularly seen in colon cancer, stages I–II and female patients. With regard to DFS, outcomes were less profound and mainly true in early stage disease and surveillance patients.

Conclusions

This study demonstrates the enormous impact of asymptomatic screening in CRC. Patients with CRC diagnosed through screening or surveillance had a significantly better prognosis compared to patients who presented symptomatically. This emphasizes the importance of screening.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Zauber AG, Lansdorp-Vogelaar I, Knudsen AB, Wilschut J, van Ballegooijen M, Kuntz KM (2008) Evaluating test strategies for colorectal cancer screening: a decision analysis for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med 149:659–669CrossRef Zauber AG, Lansdorp-Vogelaar I, Knudsen AB, Wilschut J, van Ballegooijen M, Kuntz KM (2008) Evaluating test strategies for colorectal cancer screening: a decision analysis for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med 149:659–669CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Holme Ø, Løberg M, Kalager M, Bretthauer M, Hernán MA, Aas E, Eide TJ, Skovlund E, Schneede J, Tveit KM, Hoff G (2014) Effect of flexible sigmoidoscopy screening on colorectal cancer incidence and mortality: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA 312(6):606–615CrossRef Holme Ø, Løberg M, Kalager M, Bretthauer M, Hernán MA, Aas E, Eide TJ, Skovlund E, Schneede J, Tveit KM, Hoff G (2014) Effect of flexible sigmoidoscopy screening on colorectal cancer incidence and mortality: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA 312(6):606–615CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Noone AM, Howlader N, Krapcho M, Miller D, Brest A, Yu M, Ruhl J, Tatalovich Z, Mariotto A, Lewis DR, Chen HS, Feuer EJ, Cronin KA (eds) SEER cancer statistics review, 1975–2015. National Cancer Institute, Bethesda. http://seer.cancer.gov/csr/1975_2013/, based on November 2017 SEER data submission, posted to the SEER web site, April 2018 Noone AM, Howlader N, Krapcho M, Miller D, Brest A, Yu M, Ruhl J, Tatalovich Z, Mariotto A, Lewis DR, Chen HS, Feuer EJ, Cronin KA (eds) SEER cancer statistics review, 1975–2015. National Cancer Institute, Bethesda. http://​seer.​cancer.​gov/​csr/​1975_​2013/​, based on November 2017 SEER data submission, posted to the SEER web site, April 2018
4.
Zurück zum Zitat US Preventive Services Task Force (2016) Screening for colorectal cancer US Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. JAMA 315(23):2564–2575CrossRef US Preventive Services Task Force (2016) Screening for colorectal cancer US Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. JAMA 315(23):2564–2575CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Wolf AM, Fontham ET, Church TR, Flowers CR, Guerra CE, LaMonte SJ, Etzioni R, McKenna MT, Oeffinger KC, Shih YT, Walter LC, Andrews KS, Brawley OW, Brooks D, Fedewa SA, Manassaram-Baptiste D, Siegel RL, Wender RC, Smith RA (2018) Colorectal cancer screening for average-risk adults: 2018 guideline update from the American Cancer Society. CA Cancer J Clin 68:250–281CrossRef Wolf AM, Fontham ET, Church TR, Flowers CR, Guerra CE, LaMonte SJ, Etzioni R, McKenna MT, Oeffinger KC, Shih YT, Walter LC, Andrews KS, Brawley OW, Brooks D, Fedewa SA, Manassaram-Baptiste D, Siegel RL, Wender RC, Smith RA (2018) Colorectal cancer screening for average-risk adults: 2018 guideline update from the American Cancer Society. CA Cancer J Clin 68:250–281CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Meissner HI, Breen N, Klabunde CN, Vernon SW (2006) Patterns of colorectal cancer screening uptake among men and women in the United States. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev 15(2):389–394CrossRef Meissner HI, Breen N, Klabunde CN, Vernon SW (2006) Patterns of colorectal cancer screening uptake among men and women in the United States. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev 15(2):389–394CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Klabunde CN, Joseph DA, King JB, White A, Plescia M (2013) Vital signs: colorectal cancer screening test use—United States, 2012. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 62(44):881–888PubMedCentral Klabunde CN, Joseph DA, King JB, White A, Plescia M (2013) Vital signs: colorectal cancer screening test use—United States, 2012. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 62(44):881–888PubMedCentral
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Shapiro JA, Klabunde CN, Thompson TD, Nadel MR, Seeff LC, White A (2012) Patterns of colorectal cancer test use, including CT colonography, in the 2010 National Health Interview Survey. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev 21(6):895–904CrossRef Shapiro JA, Klabunde CN, Thompson TD, Nadel MR, Seeff LC, White A (2012) Patterns of colorectal cancer test use, including CT colonography, in the 2010 National Health Interview Survey. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev 21(6):895–904CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) (2013) Vital signs: colorectal cancer screening test use: United States, 2012. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 62(44):881–888 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) (2013) Vital signs: colorectal cancer screening test use: United States, 2012. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 62(44):881–888
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Gupta S, Halm EA, Rockey DC, Hammons M, Koch M, Carter E, Valdez L, Tong L, Ahn C, Kashner M, Argenbright K, Tiro J, Geng Z, Pruitt S, Skinner CS (2013) Comparative effectiveness of fecal immunochemical test outreach, colonoscopy outreach, and usual care for boosting colorectal cancer screening among the underserved: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Intern Med 173:1725–1732CrossRef Gupta S, Halm EA, Rockey DC, Hammons M, Koch M, Carter E, Valdez L, Tong L, Ahn C, Kashner M, Argenbright K, Tiro J, Geng Z, Pruitt S, Skinner CS (2013) Comparative effectiveness of fecal immunochemical test outreach, colonoscopy outreach, and usual care for boosting colorectal cancer screening among the underserved: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Intern Med 173:1725–1732CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Amri R, Bordeianou LG, Sylla P, Berger DL (2013) Impact of screening colonoscopy on outcomes in colon cancer surgery. JAMA Surg 148:747–754CrossRef Amri R, Bordeianou LG, Sylla P, Berger DL (2013) Impact of screening colonoscopy on outcomes in colon cancer surgery. JAMA Surg 148:747–754CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat ASGE Standards of Practice Committee, Early DS, Ben-Menachem T, Decker GA, Evans JA, Fanelli RD, Fisher DA, Fukami N, Hwang JH, Jain R, Jue TL, Khan KM, Malpas PM, Maple JT, Sharaf RS, Dominitz JA, Cash BD (2012) Appropriate use of GI endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 75:1127–1131CrossRef ASGE Standards of Practice Committee, Early DS, Ben-Menachem T, Decker GA, Evans JA, Fanelli RD, Fisher DA, Fukami N, Hwang JH, Jain R, Jue TL, Khan KM, Malpas PM, Maple JT, Sharaf RS, Dominitz JA, Cash BD (2012) Appropriate use of GI endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 75:1127–1131CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Vader JP, Froehlich F, Dubois RW, Beglinger C, Wietlisbach V, Pittet V, Ebel N, Gonvers JJ, Burnand B (1999) European panel for the appropriateness of gastrointestinal endoscopy (EPAGE): conclusion and WWW Site. Endoscopy 31:687–694CrossRef Vader JP, Froehlich F, Dubois RW, Beglinger C, Wietlisbach V, Pittet V, Ebel N, Gonvers JJ, Burnand B (1999) European panel for the appropriateness of gastrointestinal endoscopy (EPAGE): conclusion and WWW Site. Endoscopy 31:687–694CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Edge SB, Compton CC (2010) The American Joint Committee on Cancer: the 7th edition of the AJCC cancer staging manual and the future of TNM. Ann Surg Oncol 17(6):1471–1474CrossRef Edge SB, Compton CC (2010) The American Joint Committee on Cancer: the 7th edition of the AJCC cancer staging manual and the future of TNM. Ann Surg Oncol 17(6):1471–1474CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat National Comprehensive Cancer Network. Colon cancer (Version 2.2017) National Comprehensive Cancer Network. Colon cancer (Version 2.2017)
16.
Zurück zum Zitat National Comprehensive Cancer Network. Rectal cancer (Version 3.2017) National Comprehensive Cancer Network. Rectal cancer (Version 3.2017)
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Rex DK, Kahi CJ, Levin B, Smith RA, Bond JH, Brooks D et al (2006) Guidelines for colonoscopy surveillance after cancer resection: a consensus update by the American Cancer Society and the US Multi Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer. Gastroenterology 130(6):1865–1871CrossRef Rex DK, Kahi CJ, Levin B, Smith RA, Bond JH, Brooks D et al (2006) Guidelines for colonoscopy surveillance after cancer resection: a consensus update by the American Cancer Society and the US Multi Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer. Gastroenterology 130(6):1865–1871CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (2002) Screening for colorectal cancer: recommendation and rationale. Ann Intern Med 137:129–131CrossRef U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (2002) Screening for colorectal cancer: recommendation and rationale. Ann Intern Med 137:129–131CrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Nishihara R, Wu K, Lochhead P, Morikawa T, Liao X, Qian ZR, Inamura K, Kim SA, Kuchiba A, Yamauchi M, Imamura Y, Willett WC, Rosner BA, Fuchs CS, Giovannucci E, Ogino S, Chan AT (2013) Long-term colorectal-cancer incidence and mortality after lower endoscopy. N Engl J Med 369:1095–1105CrossRef Nishihara R, Wu K, Lochhead P, Morikawa T, Liao X, Qian ZR, Inamura K, Kim SA, Kuchiba A, Yamauchi M, Imamura Y, Willett WC, Rosner BA, Fuchs CS, Giovannucci E, Ogino S, Chan AT (2013) Long-term colorectal-cancer incidence and mortality after lower endoscopy. N Engl J Med 369:1095–1105CrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Lin JS, Piper MA, Perdue LA, Rutter C, Webber EM, O’Connor E, Smith N, Whitlock EP (2016) Screening for colorectal cancer: a systematic review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Evidence Synthesis No. 135. AHRQ Publication No. 14-05203-EF-1. Rockville: Agency for Healthcare Research and QualityCrossRef Lin JS, Piper MA, Perdue LA, Rutter C, Webber EM, O’Connor E, Smith N, Whitlock EP (2016) Screening for colorectal cancer: a systematic review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Evidence Synthesis No. 135. AHRQ Publication No. 14-05203-EF-1. Rockville: Agency for Healthcare Research and QualityCrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Brenner H, Chang-Claude J, Jansen L, Knebel P, Stock C, Hoffmeister M (2014) Reduced risk of colorectal cancer up to 10 years after screening, surveillance, or diagnostic colonoscopy. Gastroenterology 146:709–717CrossRef Brenner H, Chang-Claude J, Jansen L, Knebel P, Stock C, Hoffmeister M (2014) Reduced risk of colorectal cancer up to 10 years after screening, surveillance, or diagnostic colonoscopy. Gastroenterology 146:709–717CrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Friedrich K, Grüter L, Gotthardt D, Eisenback C, Stremmel W, Scholl SG, Rex DK, Sieg A (2015) Survival in patients with colorectal cancer diagnosed by screening colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 82:133–137CrossRef Friedrich K, Grüter L, Gotthardt D, Eisenback C, Stremmel W, Scholl SG, Rex DK, Sieg A (2015) Survival in patients with colorectal cancer diagnosed by screening colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 82:133–137CrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Brenner H, Jansen L, Ulrich A, Chang-Clause J, Hoffmeister M (2016) Survival of patients with symptom- and screening-detected colorectal cancer. Oncotarget 7(28):44695–44704CrossRef Brenner H, Jansen L, Ulrich A, Chang-Clause J, Hoffmeister M (2016) Survival of patients with symptom- and screening-detected colorectal cancer. Oncotarget 7(28):44695–44704CrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat White A, Thompson TD, White MC, Sabatino SA, de Moor J, Doria-Rose PV, Geiger AN, Richardson LC (2017) Cancer screening test use—United States, 2015. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 66:201–206CrossRef White A, Thompson TD, White MC, Sabatino SA, de Moor J, Doria-Rose PV, Geiger AN, Richardson LC (2017) Cancer screening test use—United States, 2015. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 66:201–206CrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Peterson EB, Ostroff JS, DuHamel KN, D’Agostino TA, Hernandez M, Canzona MR, Bylund CL (2016) Impact of provider-patient communication on cancer screening adherence: a systematic review. Prev Med 93:96–105CrossRef Peterson EB, Ostroff JS, DuHamel KN, D’Agostino TA, Hernandez M, Canzona MR, Bylund CL (2016) Impact of provider-patient communication on cancer screening adherence: a systematic review. Prev Med 93:96–105CrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Singal AG, Gupta S, Tiro JA, Skinner CS, McCallister K, Sanders JM, Bishop WP, Agrawal D, Mayorga CA, Ahn C, Loewen AC, Santini NO, Halm EA (2016) Outreach invitations for FIT and colonoscopy improve colorectal cancer screening rates: a randomized controlled trial in a safety-net health system. Cancer 122:456–463CrossRef Singal AG, Gupta S, Tiro JA, Skinner CS, McCallister K, Sanders JM, Bishop WP, Agrawal D, Mayorga CA, Ahn C, Loewen AC, Santini NO, Halm EA (2016) Outreach invitations for FIT and colonoscopy improve colorectal cancer screening rates: a randomized controlled trial in a safety-net health system. Cancer 122:456–463CrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Denberg TD, Coombes JM, Byers TE, Marcus AC, Feinberg LE, Steiner JF, Ahnen DJ (2006) Effect of a mailed brochure on appointment-keeping for screening colonoscopy: a randomized trial. Ann Intern Med 145:895–900CrossRef Denberg TD, Coombes JM, Byers TE, Marcus AC, Feinberg LE, Steiner JF, Ahnen DJ (2006) Effect of a mailed brochure on appointment-keeping for screening colonoscopy: a randomized trial. Ann Intern Med 145:895–900CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Detrimental impact of symptom-detected colorectal cancer
verfasst von
Lieve G. J. Leijssen
Anne M. Dinaux
Hiroko Kunitake
Liliana G. Bordeianou
David L. Berger
Publikationsdatum
24.04.2019
Verlag
Springer US
Schlagwort
Colonoscopy
Erschienen in
Surgical Endoscopy / Ausgabe 2/2020
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-019-06798-8

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2020

Surgical Endoscopy 2/2020 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.