Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy 7/2017

04.11.2016

Developing a robotic colorectal cancer surgery program: understanding institutional and individual learning curves

verfasst von: Hamza Guend, Maria Widmar, Sunil Patel, Garrett M. Nash, Philip B. Paty, José G. Guillem, Larissa K. Temple, Julio Garcia-Aguilar, Martin R. Weiser

Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy | Ausgabe 7/2017

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Importance

Robotic colorectal resection continues to gain in popularity. However, limited data are available regarding how surgeons gain competency and institutions develop programs.

Objective

To determine the number of cases required for establishing a robotic colorectal cancer surgery program.

Design

Retrospective review.

Setting

Cancer center.

Patients

We reviewed 418 robotic-assisted resections for colorectal adenocarcinoma from January 1, 2009, to December 31, 2014, by surgeons at a single institution. The individual surgeon’s and institutional learning curve were examined. The earliest adopter, Surgeon 1, had the highest volume. Surgeons 2–4 were later adopters. Surgeon 5 joined the group with robotic experience.

Interventions

A cumulative summation technique (CUSUM) was used to construct learning curves and define the number of cases required for the initial learning phase. Perioperative variables were analyzed across learning phases.

Main outcome measure

Case numbers for each stage of the learning curve.

Results

The earliest adopter, Surgeon 1, performed 203 cases. CUSUM analysis of surgeons’ experience defined three learning phases, the first requiring 74 cases. Later adopters required 23–30 cases for their initial learning phase. For Surgeon 1, operative time decreased from 250 to 213.6 min from phase 1–3 (P = 0.008), with no significant changes in intraoperative complication or leak rate. For Surgeons 2–4, operative time decreased from 418 to 361.9 min across the two phases (P = 0.004). Their intraoperative complication rate decreased from 7.8 to 0 % (P = 0.03); the leak rate was not significantly different (9.1 vs. 1.5 %, P = 0.07), though it may be underpowered given the small number of events.

Conclusions

Our data suggest that establishing a robotic colorectal cancer surgery program requires approximately 75 cases. Once a program is well established, the learning curve is shorter and surgeons require fewer cases (25–30) to reach proficiency. These data suggest that the institutional learning curve extends beyond a single surgeon’s learning experience.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Weber PA, Merola S, Wasielewki A, Ballantyne GH (2002) Telerobotic-assisted laparoscopic right and sigmoid colectomies for benign disease. Dis Colon Rectum 45(12):1689–1694CrossRefPubMed Weber PA, Merola S, Wasielewki A, Ballantyne GH (2002) Telerobotic-assisted laparoscopic right and sigmoid colectomies for benign disease. Dis Colon Rectum 45(12):1689–1694CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Pigazzi A, Elllenhorn JD, Ballantyne GH, Paz IB (2006) Robotic-assisted laparoscopic low anterior resection with total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Surg Endosc 20(10):1521–1525CrossRefPubMed Pigazzi A, Elllenhorn JD, Ballantyne GH, Paz IB (2006) Robotic-assisted laparoscopic low anterior resection with total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Surg Endosc 20(10):1521–1525CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Pai A, Melich G, Marecik SJ, Park JJ, Prasad LM (2015) Current status of robotic surgery for rectal cancer: a bird’s eye view. J Minim Access Surg 11(1):29–34CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Pai A, Melich G, Marecik SJ, Park JJ, Prasad LM (2015) Current status of robotic surgery for rectal cancer: a bird’s eye view. J Minim Access Surg 11(1):29–34CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Wexner SD, Bergamaschi R, Lacy A et al (2009) The current status of robotic pelvic surgery: results of a multinational interdisciplinary consensus conference. Surg Endosc 23(2):438–443CrossRefPubMed Wexner SD, Bergamaschi R, Lacy A et al (2009) The current status of robotic pelvic surgery: results of a multinational interdisciplinary consensus conference. Surg Endosc 23(2):438–443CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Barrie J, Jayne DG, Wright J, Murray CJ, Collinson FJ, Pavitt SH (2014) Attaining surgical competency and its implications in surgical clinical trial design: a systemic review of the learning curve in laparoscopic and robot-assisted laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery. Ann Surg Oncol 21(3):829–840CrossRefPubMed Barrie J, Jayne DG, Wright J, Murray CJ, Collinson FJ, Pavitt SH (2014) Attaining surgical competency and its implications in surgical clinical trial design: a systemic review of the learning curve in laparoscopic and robot-assisted laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery. Ann Surg Oncol 21(3):829–840CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Hellan M, Stein H, Pigazzi A (2009) Totally robotic low anterior resection with total mesorectal excision and splenic flexure mobilization. Surg Endosc 23(2):447–451CrossRefPubMed Hellan M, Stein H, Pigazzi A (2009) Totally robotic low anterior resection with total mesorectal excision and splenic flexure mobilization. Surg Endosc 23(2):447–451CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Park YA, Kim JM, Kim SA et al (2010) Totally robotic surgery for rectal cancer: from splenic flexure to pelvic floor in one step. Surg Endosc 24(3):715–720CrossRefPubMed Park YA, Kim JM, Kim SA et al (2010) Totally robotic surgery for rectal cancer: from splenic flexure to pelvic floor in one step. Surg Endosc 24(3):715–720CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Kim SH, Kwak JM (2013) Robotic total mesorectal excision: operative technique and review of the literature. Tech Coloproctol 17(1):S47–S53CrossRefPubMed Kim SH, Kwak JM (2013) Robotic total mesorectal excision: operative technique and review of the literature. Tech Coloproctol 17(1):S47–S53CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Peterson CY, Weiser MR (2014) Robotic colorectal surgery. J Gastrointest Surg 18(2):398–403CrossRefPubMed Peterson CY, Weiser MR (2014) Robotic colorectal surgery. J Gastrointest Surg 18(2):398–403CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Bokhari MB, Patel CB, Ramos-Valadez DI, Raqupathi M, Haas EM (2011) Learning curve for robotic-assisted laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Surg Endosc 25(3):855–860CrossRefPubMed Bokhari MB, Patel CB, Ramos-Valadez DI, Raqupathi M, Haas EM (2011) Learning curve for robotic-assisted laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Surg Endosc 25(3):855–860CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Yap CH, Colson ME, Watters DA (2007) Cumulative sum techniques for surgeons: a brief review. ANZ J Surg 77(7):583–586CrossRefPubMed Yap CH, Colson ME, Watters DA (2007) Cumulative sum techniques for surgeons: a brief review. ANZ J Surg 77(7):583–586CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Bolsin S, Colson M (2000) The use of the Cusum technique in the assessment of trainee competence in new procedures. Int J Qual Health Care 12(5):433–438CrossRefPubMed Bolsin S, Colson M (2000) The use of the Cusum technique in the assessment of trainee competence in new procedures. Int J Qual Health Care 12(5):433–438CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Pigazzi A, Luca F, Patriti A et al (2010) Multicentric study on robotic tumor-specific mesorectal excision for the treatment of rectal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 17(6):1614–1620CrossRefPubMed Pigazzi A, Luca F, Patriti A et al (2010) Multicentric study on robotic tumor-specific mesorectal excision for the treatment of rectal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 17(6):1614–1620CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat D’Annibale A, Peraazza G, Monsellato I et al (2013) Total mesorectal excision: a comparison of oncological and functional outcomes between robotic and laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer. Surg Endosc 27(6):1887–1895CrossRefPubMed D’Annibale A, Peraazza G, Monsellato I et al (2013) Total mesorectal excision: a comparison of oncological and functional outcomes between robotic and laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer. Surg Endosc 27(6):1887–1895CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Tam MS, Kaoutzanis C, Mullard AJ et al (2016) A population-based study comparing laparoscopic and robotic outcomes in colorectal surgery. Surg Endosc 30(2):455–463 Tam MS, Kaoutzanis C, Mullard AJ et al (2016) A population-based study comparing laparoscopic and robotic outcomes in colorectal surgery. Surg Endosc 30(2):455–463
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Yoo BE, Cho JS, Shin JW et al (2015) Robotic versus laparoscopic intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer: comparison of the operative, oncological, and functional outcomes. Ann Surg Oncol 22(4):1219–1225CrossRefPubMed Yoo BE, Cho JS, Shin JW et al (2015) Robotic versus laparoscopic intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer: comparison of the operative, oncological, and functional outcomes. Ann Surg Oncol 22(4):1219–1225CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Baik SH, Kwon HY, Kim JS et al (2009) Robotic versus laparoscopic low anterior resection for rectal cancer: short-term outcome of a prospective comparative study. Ann Surg Oncol 16(6):1480–1487CrossRefPubMed Baik SH, Kwon HY, Kim JS et al (2009) Robotic versus laparoscopic low anterior resection for rectal cancer: short-term outcome of a prospective comparative study. Ann Surg Oncol 16(6):1480–1487CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Park JS, Choi GS, Lim KH, Jang YS, Jun SH (2011) S052: a comparison of robot-assisted, laparoscopic and open surgery in the treatment of rectal cancer. Surg Endosc 25(1):240–248CrossRefPubMed Park JS, Choi GS, Lim KH, Jang YS, Jun SH (2011) S052: a comparison of robot-assisted, laparoscopic and open surgery in the treatment of rectal cancer. Surg Endosc 25(1):240–248CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Jimenez-Rodriguez RM, Diaz-Pavon JM, de la Portilla de Juan F, Prendes-Sillero E, Dussort HC, Padillo J (2013) Learning curve for robotic-assisted laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery. Int J Colorectal Dis 28(6):815–821 Jimenez-Rodriguez RM, Diaz-Pavon JM, de la Portilla de Juan F, Prendes-Sillero E, Dussort HC, Padillo J (2013) Learning curve for robotic-assisted laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery. Int J Colorectal Dis 28(6):815–821
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Sng KK, Hara M, Shin JW, Yoo BE, Yang KS, Kim SH (2013) The multiphasic learning curve for robot-assisted rectal surgery. Surg Endosc 27(9):3297–3307CrossRefPubMed Sng KK, Hara M, Shin JW, Yoo BE, Yang KS, Kim SH (2013) The multiphasic learning curve for robot-assisted rectal surgery. Surg Endosc 27(9):3297–3307CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Melich G, Hong YK, Kim J et al (2015) Simultaneous development of laparoscopy and robotics provides acceptable perioperative outcomes and shows robotics to have a faster learning curve and to be overall faster in rectal cancer surgery: analysis of novice MIS surgeon learning curves. Surg Endosc 29(3):558–568CrossRefPubMed Melich G, Hong YK, Kim J et al (2015) Simultaneous development of laparoscopy and robotics provides acceptable perioperative outcomes and shows robotics to have a faster learning curve and to be overall faster in rectal cancer surgery: analysis of novice MIS surgeon learning curves. Surg Endosc 29(3):558–568CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Kim HJ, Choi GS, Park JS, Park SY (2014) Multidimensional analysis of the learning curve for robotic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: lessons from a single surgeon’s experience. Dis Colon Rectum 57(9):1066–1074CrossRefPubMed Kim HJ, Choi GS, Park JS, Park SY (2014) Multidimensional analysis of the learning curve for robotic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: lessons from a single surgeon’s experience. Dis Colon Rectum 57(9):1066–1074CrossRefPubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Park EJ, Kim CW, Cho MS et al (2014) Is the learning curve of robotic low anterior resection shorter then laparoscopic low anterior resection for rectal cancer?: a comparative analysis of clinicopathologic outcomes between robotic and laparoscopic surgeries. Medicine 93(25):e109CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Park EJ, Kim CW, Cho MS et al (2014) Is the learning curve of robotic low anterior resection shorter then laparoscopic low anterior resection for rectal cancer?: a comparative analysis of clinicopathologic outcomes between robotic and laparoscopic surgeries. Medicine 93(25):e109CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Lebeau T, Roupret M, Ferhi K et al (2012) The role of a well-trained team on the early learning curve of robot-assisted laparoscopic procedures: the example of radical prostatectomy. Int J Med Robot 8(1):67–72CrossRefPubMed Lebeau T, Roupret M, Ferhi K et al (2012) The role of a well-trained team on the early learning curve of robot-assisted laparoscopic procedures: the example of radical prostatectomy. Int J Med Robot 8(1):67–72CrossRefPubMed
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Li JC, Lo AW, Hon SS, Ng SS, Lee JF, Leung KL (2012) Institution learning curve of laparoscopic colectomy—a multi-dimensional analysis. Int J Colorectal Dis 27(4):527–533CrossRefPubMed Li JC, Lo AW, Hon SS, Ng SS, Lee JF, Leung KL (2012) Institution learning curve of laparoscopic colectomy—a multi-dimensional analysis. Int J Colorectal Dis 27(4):527–533CrossRefPubMed
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Mak TW, Lee JF, Futaba K, Hon SS, Ngo DK, Ng SS (2014) Robotic surgery for rectal cancer: a systemic review of current practice. World J Gastrointest Oncol 6(6):184–193PubMedPubMedCentral Mak TW, Lee JF, Futaba K, Hon SS, Ngo DK, Ng SS (2014) Robotic surgery for rectal cancer: a systemic review of current practice. World J Gastrointest Oncol 6(6):184–193PubMedPubMedCentral
Metadaten
Titel
Developing a robotic colorectal cancer surgery program: understanding institutional and individual learning curves
verfasst von
Hamza Guend
Maria Widmar
Sunil Patel
Garrett M. Nash
Philip B. Paty
José G. Guillem
Larissa K. Temple
Julio Garcia-Aguilar
Martin R. Weiser
Publikationsdatum
04.11.2016
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Surgical Endoscopy / Ausgabe 7/2017
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-016-5292-0

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 7/2017

Surgical Endoscopy 7/2017 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

CME: 2 Punkte

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht, PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske Das Webinar S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“ beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.