Skip to main content
Erschienen in: BMC Infectious Diseases 1/2022

Open Access 01.12.2022 | Research

Development and evaluation of a novel fast broad-range PCR and sequencing assay (FBR-PCR/S) using dual priming oligonucleotides targeting the ITS/LSU gene regions for rapid diagnosis of invasive fungal diseases: multi-year experience in a large Canadian healthcare zone

verfasst von: B. Chow, M. Groeschel, J. Carson, T. Griener, D. L. Church

Erschienen in: BMC Infectious Diseases | Ausgabe 1/2022

Abstract

Background

This study evaluated the performance of a novel fast broad range PCR and sequencing (FBR-PCR/S) assay for the improved diagnosis of invasive fungal disease (IFD) in high-risk patients in a large Canadian healthcare region.

Methods

A total of 114 clinical specimens (CS) including bronchoalveolar lavages (BALs) were prospectively tested from 107 patients over a 2-year period. Contrived BALs (n = 33) inoculated with known fungi pathogens were also tested to increase diversity. Patient characteristics, fungal stain and culture results were collected from the laboratory information system. Dual-priming oligonucleotide (DPO) primers targeted to the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) (~ 350 bp) and large subunit (LSU) (~ 550 bp) gene regions were used to perform FBR-PCR/S assays on extracted BALs/CS. The performance of the molecular test was evaluated against standard microbiological methods and clinical review for the presence of IFD.

Results

The 107 patients were predominantly male (67, 62.6%) with a mean age of 59 years (range = 0–85 years): 74 (69.2%) patients had at least one underlying comorbidity: 19 (34.5%) had confirmed and 12 (21.8%) had probable IFD. Culture recovered 66 fungal isolates from 55 BALs/CS with Candida spp. and Aspergillus spp. being most common. For BALs, the molecular assay vs. standard methods had sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV), and efficiency of 88.5% vs.100%, 100% vs. 61.1%, 100% vs. 88.5%, 61.1% vs. 100%, and 90.2% for both. For other CS, the molecular assay had similar performance to standard methods with sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV and efficiency of 66.7%, 87.0%, 66.7%, 87.0% and 81.3% for both methods. Both methods also performed similarly, regardless of whether CS stain/microscopy showed yeast/fungal elements. FBR-PCR/S assays results were reported in ~ 8 h compared to fungal cultures that took between 4 and 6 weeks.

Conclusions

Rapid molecular testing compared to standard methods have equivalent diagnostic efficiency but improves clinical utility by reporting a rapid species-level identification the same dayshift (~ 8 h).
Hinweise

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Abkürzungen
FBR-PCR/S
Fast broad range PCR and sequencing
PCR
Polymerase chain reaction
BAL
Bronchoalveolar lavage
CS
Clinical specimens
CSF
Cerebrospinal fluid
IFD
Invasive fungal diseases
CW
Calcofluor white stain
ITS
Internal transcribed spacer region
LSU
Large subunit region
DNA
Deoxyribonucleic acid
NEC
Negative extraction control
PEC
Positive extraction control
DPO
Dual priming oligonucleotides
IMA
Inhibitory mold agar
BHI
Brain heart infusion agar
BHIA
Brain heart infusion agar with antibiotics
BCYE
Buffered charcoal yeast extract agar
HIV/AIDS
Human immunodeficiency virus/acquired immunodeficiency syndrome
HSCT
Hematopoietic stem cell transplant
SOT
Solid organ tumour
PPV
Positive predictive value
NPV
Negative predictive value
PEC
Positive extraction control

Background

Invasive fungal disease (IFD) has increased significantly in the last few decades due to the expansion of patients with acquired immunosuppression [14]. IFD results in increased morbidity and mortality and higher healthcare costs [510]. Delayed diagnosis is associated with poor clinical outcomes because appropriate treatment measures are not promptly started [1, 11, 12]. However, IFD is often difficult to diagnose because clinical and radiographic findings are non-specific [4]. Traditional microbiological methods such as fungal culture also have low sensitivity ranging from 30 to 60% [13, 14], and the lack of concordance between histopathology and cytology examination and culture is well documented [1517].
Molecular methods including broad-range PCR followed by sequencing are increasingly being used for definitive identification of fungal pathogens and improved diagnosis of IFD [4, 14, 18]. The aim of this study was to identify unique primer candidates for broad-range amplification of the fungal internal transcribed spacer (ITS) and large subunit (LSU) gene regions to use in a fast PCR/sequencing assay that could be rapidly completed in a clinical laboratory. Prior studies evaluating panfungal PCR assays have relied on conventional primers targeted to one or more regions of the fungal multi-copy ribosomal RNA (rRNA) such as 18S rRNA, D1and D2 regions of 28 s rRNA, 5.8S rRNA, and internal transcribed spacers 1 and 2 (ITS1 and ITS2) with variable success [1928]. We designed a new primer pair based on the dual priming oligonucleotide (DPO) principle because of our success with this approach in previously implementing a broad-range 16S rRNA PCR/sequencing assay with robust sensitivity and improved specificity due to elimination of cross-reactivity with human material [29]. A DPO consists of two functional segments with distinct annealing properties connected by five consecutive deoxyinosine bases or a poly (I) linker; (1) a 5’ segment (18–25 bp) allows for stable positioning and annealing of the primer, and (2) a shorter segment (6–12 bp) that will only bind if there is stable annealing of the 5’ end to ensure target-specific extension [30] Diagnostic performance of our novel fungal FBR-PCR/S assay was compared to standard microbiological methods already in use in our laboratory (i.e., morphology, fungal culture with identification using matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) and PCR/sequencing using conventional ITS 1/2 universal primers). A recommended algorithm is provided for clinical laboratories to allow reporting the same day by efficient integration of technologists’ workflow for simultaneously performing bacterial and fungal broad-range PCR/cycle sequencing assays within a standard ~ 8 h dayshift.

Materials and methods

Patients and clinical specimens

Patients with and without suspected non-invasive and IFD were prospectively enrolled over a 2-year period (2016–18) from the Calgary Zone, Alberta Health Services (AHS) based on combined concern of the consulting Infectious Diseases physician for IFD, and the results of microbiological analyses of clinical specimens. Cases were categorized as having proven probable or possible IFD or no fungal disease based on consensus definitions recently published by the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer and the Mycoses Study Group Education and Research Consortium (EORTC/MSGERC) following clinical review by medical microbiologists (MG and JC) and an infectious diseases specialist (DLC) [4].
Sterile fluid and tissue specimens were enrolled by the microbiology laboratory (Clinical Section of Microbiology, Calgary Laboratory Services (CLS; now Alberta Precision Laboratories) after quality approval by a medical microbiologist (DLC/TG/MG). Study specimens were stored at − 80 to − 86 °C before analyses. Stored clinical specimens and contrived bronchoalveolar lavages (BALs) were used for pre-clinical validation of the molecular assay. Contrived BAL specimens were prepared to simulate a heavily infected sample (up to 35 ng DNA). DNA was extracted from spent fungal-negative BAL specimens inoculated with known pathogens (n = 33) obtained from our reference mycology laboratory [Provincial Laboratory Northern Alberta (PLNA), Edmonton, AB] including: Aspergillus lentulus (n = 1), A. terreus (n = 3), A. flavus (n = 3); Absidia corymbifera (n = 3); Fonsecaea pedrosoi (n = 2); Fusarium solani (n = 2), F. proliferatum (n = 1); Cladosporium carrionii (n = 2) and Cladosporium spp. (n = 1); Cunninghamella bertholletiae (n = 2) and one undetermined Cunninghamella spp.; Rhizopus aarhizus (n = 1), R. microsporus (n = 1), R. stolonifera (n = 1), and three undetermined Rhizomucor spp.; Trichosponon asahii (n = 1) and one undetermined Trichosporon spp.; and Malassezia furfur (n = 2), M. pachydermatis (n = 1).

Microbiological analyses

Clinical specimens were analyzed by standard microscopic examination and fungal culture methods. Yeast isolates were identified by microscopic examination, and matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization-time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) (Vitek MS, bioMérieux, Laval, Quebec). Molds were identified using colony morphology, microscopic examination and conventional PCR using the internal transcribed spacer or ITS gene regions (including universal ITS1 and ITS2) as previously described by White and colleagues [31]. Identification of fungal isolates provided by the PLNA reference laboratory was confirmed using the MicroSEQ™ D2 rDNA Fungal PCR and Sequencing Kit (Applied Biosystems, Thermo Fisher Scientific).

Molecular methods

a.
Controls
 
A clinical isolate of Saccharomyces cerevisiae positive for both ITS2 and LSU targets was used as the positive control for all molecular procedures (See Fig. 1—Positive Extraction control or PEC). The negative extraction control (i.e., extraction reagents only; NEC) was processed and extracted alongside all clinical and contrived specimens throughout all FBR-PCR/S assay procedures (See Fig. 1—NEC).
b.
DNA Extraction
 
Fungal isolates obtained from the reference laboratory were extracted in TE buffer using glass bead beating. Nucleic acid DNA concentration was determined by a Nanodrop spectrophotometer (Thermo-Fisher Scientific, Mississauga, ON). A total of 500 ng DNA was eluted into 100 µL of TE buffer giving a final template concentration of 5 ng/µL to give reliable detection. Contrived specimens (n = 33) consisted of 500 ng reference isolate DNA added to 400 µL of spent culture-negative BAL fluid from spent clinical specimens whose clinical analyses were complete. Clinical and contrived specimens were extracted using the QIAmp UCP Pathogen Mini Kit (Canada-QIAGEN, Toronto, CA) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Tissues had an extended Proteinase K incubation time, otherwise both tissue and fluid protocols were the same. Tissue specimens (2–4 mm3) were finely minced with a sterile scalpel, transferred to a sterile 1.5 mL microcentrifuge tube, re-suspended in 400 µL Buffer ATL and 40 µL Proteinase K, vortexed, and incubated at 56 °C in a 1000 rpm Eppendorf thermomixer for 1 h until digested. Sterile fluid specimens (at least 400 µL) were placed into a sterile 1.5 mL microcentrifuge tube, centrifuged, supernatant discarded, cell pellet re-suspended in Buffer ATL, Proteinase K, vortexed, and incubated at 56 °C in a 1000 rpm Eppendorf thermomixer for a minimum of 10 min. Purified, eluted DNA was stored at − 20 °C until use.
c.
FBR-PCR/S Assay
 
DPO primers (26, 27) targeted towards the Internal Transcribed Spacer (ITS) regions and the Large Subunit (LSU) of the nuclear ribosomal RNA (rRNA) gene complex were designed by the investigators (BC and DLC) after multisequence alignment of several hundred GenBank sequences of multiple genera to identify candidate conserved regions. DPO primers were purchased from Exiqon (Woburn, MA). All other primers were purchased from Integrated DNA Technologies (IDT, Coralville, Iowa). FBR-PCR used a forward primer [ITS3DPO_F3: 5′ CAT CGA TGA AGA RCG YA-I-I-I-I-I-I-TGCGA 3′ (I = deoxyinosine; R = A/G, Y = C/T)], and two reverse primers, for ITS detection [ITS4DPO_R5: 5′ TAT TGA TAT GCK TAA-I-I-I-I-I-G CGG GT 3′ (K = G/T), and LSU detection [LSUDPO3_R: 5′ GAC TCC TTG GTC CGT-III-II-AAG AC 3′. PCR for human-β-globin gene was performed in parallel as a control using β-glob-F [GAAGAGCCAAGGACAGGTAC] and β-glob-PC04R [CAACTTCATCCACGTTCACC] in a final concentration of 0.3 µM.
Fast-PCR was set up with the Molyzm 16S basic (Molzym, Bremen, Germany) kit reagents. The 30 µL reaction contained 7 µL of template DNA and final concentration of 0.3 µM ITS3DPO_F3 forward primer and 0.2 µM each of ITS4DPO_R5 and LSUDPO3_R reverse primer. FBR-PCR was performed on a Veriti thermocycler (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA) under the following cycling conditions: 5 min. initial denaturation at 95 °C, followed by 35 cycles of 94 °C for 10 s, 54 °C for 15 s and 72 °C for 25 s, with a final extension of 72 °C for 5 min. PCR product was electrophoresed on a 1.5% agarose gel containing SYBRsafe (Life Technologies). During the PCR reaction, the ITS3DPO_F3/ITS4DPO-R5 F/R primer pair amplify a ~ 350 bp ITS amplicon, whereas the ITS3DPO_F3/LSUDPO_3R F/R primer pair amplify the ITS region (~ 350 bp) plus ~ 500–600 bp of the LSU region. The ~ 900 bp amplicon therefore represented a combined ITS/LSU fragment. Agarose gel electrophoresis confirmed the amplification of fungal DNA: PCR products displaying a band in the expected ~ 350 bp region for ITS, and ~ 900 bp region for ITS/LSU were then purified by Exo-SAP-it (Affymetrix, Santa Clara, CA) (Fig. 1).
Assay level of detection (LoD) was determined using two well characterized isolates; Aspergillus brasiliensis (ATCC 16404) and Candida albicans (ATCC 10231). Briefly, DNA was extracted in a 1.5 mL microfuge containing ~ 0.2 g of zirconium beads (BioSpec) and 10 mM Tris-1 mM EDTA pH 8.0 buffer and subsequently boiled at 100 °C for 10 min. to inactivate the organisms. Bead beating at 5 m/s for 120 s occurred in a Beadmill 4 instrument (Fisher Scientific) before centrifugation to pellet the debris and transfer of the supernatant to a fresh tube. A Nanodrop spectrophotometer (ThermoFisher) was used to measure the DNA concentration before subsequent 1/100 dilution with nuclease-free water to make a working solution. Copy number equivalents for each organism were calculated by using the genome size information by ATCC. LoD was then determined by a twofold serial dilution series of contrived negative BAL prepared with inoculation of either known amounts of ATCC 10231 or ATCC 16404 as follows: (1) “4 N” (4 × 10^5 copies/mL), (2) “2 N” (2 × 105 copies/mL), (3) “D2” (5 × 104 copies/mL), and 4) “D8” (1.25 × 104 copies/mL). DNA was extracted from 400 μL of each contrived BAL specimen in the dilution series with the UV-irradiated Qiagen DNA mini kit (Qiagen) performed in triplicate. FBR-PCR was performed on each contrived BAL specimen as outlined above. Agarose gel electrophoresis confirmed the amplification of fungal DNA: PCR products displaying a band in the expected ~ 350 bp region for ITS, and ~ 900 bp region for ITS/LSU were then purified by Exo-SAP-it (Affymetrix, Santa Clara, CA). The dilution series established the LoD for the FBR-PCR assay for both C. albicans and A. brasiliensis as < 360 to > 175 copies/mL.
Molecular identification of the ITS and LSU rDNA product(s) was done by Sanger sequencing of the ITS and/or LSU rDNA product using BigDye Terminator v1.1 Cycle Sequencing Kit (Life Technologies) on an ABI Prism 3500XL sequencer (Life Technologies). The ITS3DPO_F3/ITS4DPO-R5 F/R primer pair was used to sequence the ITS region and the LSU-Fseq [AGTARCGGCGAGTGAAG]/ LSUDPO3_R F/R primer pair were used to sequence the LSU region. A BLAST search against the IDNS Fungal database (SmartGene IDNS, Lausanne, Switzerland) provided a definitive identification of the organism to the genus- or species-level using the identify scores outlined by the Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute, Approved Guidelines MM-18 [32].

Data analysis

Data were entered into a Microsoft Excel spreadsheet (MS Office 2016) and analyzed according to standard descriptive statistics. A 2 X 2 contingency table was used to calculate the sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values were calculated against internationally recognized diagnostic criteria for the presence of IFD [4]. FBR-PCR/S performance was calculated against standard methods (i.e., fungal culture on all samples followed by identification of yeasts by morphology/MALDI-TOF MS and molds by morphology/conventional PCR targeted to the ITS1 and ITS 2 gene regions. Invalid FBR-PCR/S results were defined as a weakly positive electrophoresis band in either of the ITS/LSU fungal targets with no quality sequence subsequently obtained. In patients with confirmed, probable or possible IFD the following performance criteria were assigned for the FBR-PCR/S assay: (1) a true positive result agreed with that of standard methods, (2) a false-negative or false-positive result was considered discordant with standard methods, and in patients with no evidence of IFD, a true negative result agreed with standard methods. Resolution of discordant results occurred by repeat FBR-PCR/S testing, repeat PCR testing using conventional PCR targeted to the ITS1 and ITS 2 gene regions, and clinical review.

Results

Patient characteristics and specimens

A total of 107 enrolled patients were predominantly male (67, 62.6%), had a mean age of 59 years (range = 0–85 years) with no significant age difference according to gender. Comorbidities in five patients were unknown due to missing data. Most patients (74/107, 69.2%) had at least one underlying comorbidity that predisposed them to IFD including diabetes mellitus (18/74, 24.3%), solid-organ malignancy/tumour (18/74, 24.3%), immunosuppressive therapy for non-malignant conditions (13/74, 17.6%), hematologic malignancy (12/74, 16.2%), hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) (5/74, 6.7%), HIV/AIDs (4/74, 5.4%), and end-stage renal disease (2/74, 2.7%). A total of 54/74 (73%) had clinical evidence for IFD including 19 patients (17.8%) with confirmed IFD, 12 (11.2%) with probable IFD, and 27 (%) with possible IFD. True positive molecular tests were found in a third of patients (15/54, 27.8%) with confirmed or probable IFD.
A total of 114 clinical specimens were tested from these patients including 39 (34.2%) BALs and 75 (65.8%) other types of sterile fluids and tissues; 7 patients had ≥ 2 specimens tested (Table 1). BALs and other pulmonary specimens (lung/bronchial/pleural aspirates or fluids) (n = 51, 44.7%) were the most tested sterile fluids. A wide range of different tissue types were tested representing the disseminated nature of IFD. A total of 55 (48.2%) specimens had yeast/fungi recovered by standard methods. Twenty (17.5%) specimens only had bacterial cultures done because yeast/fungal culture was not initially ordered—most of these specimens (n = 16, 80%) had negative Gram and CW stains and bacterial cultures, but 1 BAL and 2 abdominal fluid specimens grew Candida albicans (despite negative CW), 1 abdominal fluid showed yeast in the Gram stain and grew C. albicans, and 1 sinus aspirate grew Aspergillus fumigatus.
Table 1
Clinical specimens tested in validation of broad range fungal PCR/sequencing assay
Fungal culturea
Bronchoalveolar lavages (BALs)
Lung/Bronchial/Pleural
Cerebrospinal fluids (CSFs)
Other sterile fluidsb
Other sterile tissuesc
Total
Positive
34
3
2
9
7
55
Negative
5
6
3
9
16
39
Not Ordered
0
3
9
7
1
20
Total
39 (34.2%)
12 (10.5%)
14 (12.3%)
25 (22%)
24 (21%)
114
aSpecimens where fungal culture was not ordered but bacterial cultures grew yeast/fungi were counted as positive
bNo fungal culture was done on a CSF that tested negative for Cryptococcal antigen. Includes peritoneal/dialysates (n = 6), synovial/spine disc (n = 5), abdominal (n = 5), sinus/nose aspirate (n = 4), liver abscess (n = 3), brain/subdural (n = 1) and periorbital (n = 1)
cIncludes heart (n = 6), brain (2), shoulder/hip membrane (n = 4), spine/vertebra (n = 2), bone foot/mandible (n = 2), mediastinal lymph node (n = 2), skin biopsy (n = 2), neck (n = 1), cheek (n = 1), parotid gland (n = 1)

Fungi identified from contrived and clinical specimens

The FBR-PCR/S assay accurately identified 32/33 (97%) of the yeast/fungi inoculated into the contrived BAL specimens except for one specimen containing A. terreus (See Methods). Another sixty-six fungal isolates were recovered from fifty-five clinical specimens. Candida spp. (n = 36, 54.5%) [C. albicans (n = 18), C. dublinensis (n = 4), C. glabrata (n = 5), C. kefyr (n = 3), C. krusei (n = 2), C. parapsilosis (n = 1) and C. tropicalis (n = 2)] and Aspergillus spp. (n = 14, 16.7%) [A. flavus (n = 2), A, fumigatus (n = 7), A. terreus (n = 1), A. niger (n = 1), and 3 other Aspergillus spp.] was the most identified species. Other fungal species identified included Alternaria spp. (n = 1), Coccidioides immitis (n = 2), Cryptococcus neoformans (n = 1), Exophilia dermatiditis (n = 1), Fonsecaea spp. (n = 1), Fusarium merismoides (n = 1), Histoplasma capsulatum (n = 1), Penicillium spp. (n = 2), Pseudallescheria boydii complex (n = 2), Trichophyton rubrum (n = 1) and Rhizopus oryzae (n = 3). One BAL sample was also PCR positive for Pneumocystis jirovecii using specific PCR primers.

Resolution of discrepant results

Discordant results were initially observed in 30 clinical specimens including 16 BALs and 14 other types of clinical specimens. Tables 2, 3 details the resolution of discrepant results. Of the 30 discordant results, 19 (63.3%) specimens [BALs (n = 10) and other clinical specimens (n = 9)] were resolved in favour of the molecular assay results (Table 2), while 11(36.7%) specimens [BALs (n = 6) and other clinical specimens (n = 5)] were resolved in favour of standard methods (Table 3). BALs were prone to contamination from patient’s airway colonization with Candida spp. and/or Aspergillus spp., which gave initial discrepant results, but most were resolved in favour of the FBR-PCR/S result after repeat testing and clinical review (Table 2).
Table 2
Discrepant clinical specimens resolved in favour of molecular assay (true positive or negative by PCR/sequencing)
Specimen No.
Specimen typea
Stain results
Standard methodsb
Initial molecular results
Sequence results
Results of resolution (repeat PCR and clinical review)
1
BAL LUL
CW = fungal elements
C. albicans, A. fumigatus, A. flavus
ITS/LSU targets POS, β-globin POS
ITS = C. albicans
LSU = C. albicans
True positive PCR
Fungal culture contaminated
2
BAL LLL
Gram stain = Hvy WBCs + mixed bacteria; CW = NEG
Aspergillus spp.
ITS/LSU targets NEG, β-globin POS
N/A
True negative PCR
No pulmonary disease
Fungal culture contaminated
3
BAL RLL
Gram stain – Hvy WBCs; CW = NEG
Aspergillus spp., Penicillium spp.
ITS/LSU targets NEG, β-globin POS
N/A
True negative PCR
No pulmonary disease
Fungal culture contaminated
4
BAL RUL
Gram stain − Hvy WBCs; CW = NEG
A. fumigatus
ITS/LSU targets NEG, β-globin POS
N/A
True negative PCR
No pulmonary disease
Fungal culture contaminated
5
BAL LLL
Gram stain = Hvy WBCs; CW = Hvy yeast seen
A. fumigatus, dermatiaceous fungus
ITS/LSU targets POS, β-globin POS
ITS = Exophiala dermatitidis
LSU = Exophiala dermatitidis
True positive PCR
Other BAL samples grew A. fumigatus, E. jeanselmi
Interstitial pneumonia
6
BAL RLL
Gram stain = 
Hvy WBCs + mixed bacteria; CW = NEG
A. fumigatus
ITS/LSU targets POS (weak), β-globin POS
ITS = A. fumigatus
LSU = A. fumigatus
True positive PCR
Clinical diagnosis of pulmonary Aspergillosis
7
BAL LUL
Gram stain = Sct. WBCs + mixed bacteria; CW = NEG
C. albicans + oropharyngeal flora
ITS/LSU targets NEG, β-globin POS
N/A
True negative PCR
Pneumocystis jirovecii PCR POS
8
BAL RLL
Gram stain = Hvy WBCs; CW = Hvy yeast seen
C. albicans, yeast not C. albicans
ITS/LSU targets POS, β-globin POS
Mixed sequence:
ITS = C. albicans and C. glabrata
LSU = C. albicans and C. glabrata
True positive PCR
Consistent with oropharyngeal colonization and overgrowth of Candida spp.
9
BAL RLL
Gram stain = Hvy WBCs + mixed bacteria; CW = NEG
A. niger,
A. fumigatus
ITS/LSU targets POS, β-globin POS
ITS = A. niger
LSU = A. niger
True positive PCR
Other BAL samples grew both Aspergillus spp.
Clinical diagnosis of airway colonization
10
BAL RLL
Gram stain = 
Hvy WBCs + mixed bacteria; CW = NEG
C. albicans,
A. fumigatus
ITS/LSU targets POS, β-globin POS
ITS = C. albicans
LSU = C. albicans
True positive PCR
Clinical diagnosis of metapneumovirus/enterovirus infection
C. albicans consistent with airway colonization; A. fumigatus contaminant
11c
Brain tissue
Gram stain − Hvy WBCs; CW = NEG
No growth after 4 weeks
ITS POS
LSU NEG
β-globin POS
ITS: Rhizopus oryzae
LSU: No data
True positive PCR
Pathology sections positive for broad aseptate hyphae
Clinical diagnosis of rhinocerebral mucormycosis
12c
Cheek tissue
CW = fungal elements
No growth after 6 weeks
ITS POS
LSU POS
β-globin POS
ITS: Rhizopus oryzae
LSU: Rhizopus oryzae
True positive PCR
Pathology PAS and GMS section stains showed broad aseptate hyphae
Clinical diagnosis of rhinocerebral mucormycosis
13c
Parotid gland tissue
CW = no fungal elements
C. albicans
ITS POS
LSU POS
β-globin POS
ITS: Rhizopus oryzae
LSU: Rhizopus oryzae
True positive PCR
Clinical diagnosis of rhinocerebral mucormycosis
14
Sinus tract fluid
Gram stain = Hvy WBCs with mixed bacteria including yeast
C. albicans
ITS POS
LSU POS
β-globin POS
ITS: C. glabrata
LSU: C. glabrata
True positive PCR
MALDI-TOF MS confirmed C. glabrata and isolate had elevated fluconazole MIC. Fungal culture initially mis-identified
15d
Abdominal abscess tissue/fluid
Gram stain = Hvy WBCs + mixed bacteria; CW = NEG
No growth after 6 weeks
ITS POS
LSU POS
β-globin POS
ITS: C. albicans
LSU: C. albicans
True positive PCR
Clinical diagnosis of intra-abdominal abscess
16
Shoulder tissue
(intermedullary)
Gram stain − = Hvy WBCs; CW = NEG
Alternaria spp.
ITS NEG
LSU NEG
β-globin POS
N/A
True negative PCR
Clinical diagnosis of Cutibacterium acnes joint infection
Fungal culture contaminated
17
R hip tissue
Gram stain = No WBCs; CW = NEG
Environmental fungus isolated (not further identified at reference laboratory)
ITS weak band
LSU weak band
β-globin POS
ITS: poor sequence
LSU: poor sequence
True negative PCR
No evidence of IFD
Fungal culture contaminated
18e
Liver aspirate
Gram stain = no WBCS; CW = NEG
No growth after 4 weeks
ITS POS
LSU POS
β-globin POS
ITS: Rhizomucor pusillus
LSU: Rhizomucor pusillus
True positive PCR
Pathology sections positive for broad aseptate hyphae
Clinical diagnosis of hepatosplenic mucormycosis
19f
Lung tissue/fluid
Gram stain = Few WBCs; CW = NEG
No growth after 6 weeks
ITS POS
LSU POS
β-globin POS
ITS: Histoplasma capsulatum
LSU: No data
True positive PCR
Pathology of lung tissue showed necrotizing granulomas with yeast morphologically consistent
Clinical diagnosis of Histoplasmosis
aBAL samples were collected by pulmonary medicine or critical care specialists according to the Calgary Zone regional protocol. All other clinical samples were collected in the operating room or by interventional radiology under ultrasound guidance
bStandard methods: All isolates were recovered from fungal culture. Yeasts were identified by morphology and Vitek MS while molds were identified by morphology and conventional PCR targeted to the ITS1 and 2 gene regions
cSpecimens 11–13 were from a previously reported case of rhinocerebral Mucomycosis due to Rhizopus oryzae [35] allowed optimal treatment and management
dSpecimen 15, FBR-PCR/S results allowed appropriate management of this patient’s intra-abdominal abscesses and institution of anti-fungal therapy with cessation of broad-spectrum antibacterial agents
eSpecimen 18 FBR-PCR/S diagnosed hepatosplenic Mucormycosis due to Rhizomucor pusillus, which enabled immediate appropriate anti-fungal management and drainage
fSpecimen 19 FBR-PCR/S testing allowed for rapid confirmation of Histoplasmosis, which was also consistent with histopathology sections showing yeast with broad-based budding on Grocott’s and PAS stains
Table 3
Discrepant Clinical Specimens Resolved in Favour of Standard Methods (False Positive or Negative by PCR/Sequencing)a
Specimen No.
Specimen typea
Stain results
Standard methodsb
Initial molecular results
Sequence results
Results of clinical review
1
BAL LUL
CW = fungal elements
Negative
ITS/LSU targets POS, β-globin POS
ITS = Oxyporus corticola
LSU = Oxyporus corticola
Repeat testing using conventional ITS primers showed A. terreus
False positive PCR
No pulmonary disease
2
BAL RLL
CW = no fungal elements
C. albicans, A. flavus
ITS/LSU targets NEG, β-globin POS (weak)
N/A
False negative PCR
No pulmonary disease. Repeat testing gave same results. Likely sample deficiency
3
BAL LLL
Gram stain − Hvy WBCs; CW = NEG
C. dublinensis, A fumigatus
ITS/LSU targets POS; β-globin POS
Sequencing indeterminate as mixed sequences could not be resolved for accurate identification
Indeterminate PCR
Mixed sequences
Clinical diagnosis of Aspergillosis
4
BAL LUL
Gram stain − Hvy WBCs; CW = NEG
C. glabrata, A. terreus
ITS/LSU targets POS; β-globin POS
ITS = C. glabrata
LSU = C. glabrata
False negative PCR
Clinical diagnosis of invasive Aspergillosis with cavitary lung lesion
5
BAL
Gram stain and CW = NEG
C. glabrata
ITS POS (weak)/LSU target NEG, β-globin POS
ITS (short sequence) = Fusarium merismoides, a plant pathogen
False positive PCR
Clinical diagnosis of primary lung adenocarcinoma
6
BAL RML
Gram stain = Hvy WBCs; CW = NEG
C. albicans
ITS/LSU targets NEG, β-globin POS
N/A
False negative PCR
Clinical diagnosis of aspiration pneumonia. C. albicans consistent with airway colonization
7
CSF
Gram stain = few yeast
Cryptococcus neoformans
ITS NEG
LSU NEG
β-globin POS (weak)
N/A
False-negative PCR
Repeat PCR/Sequencing Negative
Likely sample deficiency given weak β-globin band
8
Bone(mandible)
Gram stain = few bacteria; CW = NEG
C. albicans
ITS NEG
LSU NEG
β-globin POS (weak)
N/A
False negative PCR
Repeat PCR/Sequencing Negative
Likely sample deficiency given weak β-globin band
9
Peritoneal fluid
Gram stain − Hvy WBCs; CW = NEG
A. flavus
ITS NEG
LSU NEG
β-globin POS
N/A
False negative PCR
Repeat PCR/Sequencing ITS POS/LSU POS with Aspergillus spp. split identification
10
Dialysate fluid
Gram stain = Hvy WBCs; CW not done
C. tropicalis
ITS NEG
LSU NEG
β-globin POS
N/A
False negative PCR
Repeat PCR/Sequencing Negative
Fungal culture of other samples grew same organism
11
Lung tissue
Gram stain = Hvy WBCs; CW = NEG
Coccidiodes immitis
ITS NEG
LSU NEG
β-globin POS
N/A
False negative PCR
Clinical diagnosis of pulmonary Coccidioidomycosis
aBAL samples were collected by pulmonary medicine or critical care specialists according to the Calgary Zone regional protocol. All other clinical samples were collected in the operating room or by interventional radiology under ultrasound guidance
bStandard methods: All isolates were recovered from fungal culture. Yeasts were identified by morphology and Vitek MS while molds were identified by morphology and conventional PCR targeted to the ITS1 and ITS 2 gene regions
FBR-PCR/S analysis made a critical difference to patient management and clinical outcome in 4 unusual cases where fungal cultures were negative (Table 2).

Molecular assay performance

The performance of the molecular assay compared to standard methods is shown in Table 4 for BALs, and Table 5 for other clinical non-BAL specimens. The molecular assay and standard methods had similar diagnostic efficiency for both BAL (90.2%) and non-BAL specimens although both approaches had lower diagnostic efficacy (81.3%) for non-BALs.
Table 4
Performance of molecular assay and standard methods for bronchoalveolar lavage specimens (Clinical and Contrived)a
 
Standard methodsb
Positive
Negative
Total
FBR-PCR/S Assayc
Positive
54
0
54
Negative
7
11
18
Total
61
11
72
cSensitivity (88.5%, 54/61), specificity (100%, 11/11), PPV (100%, 54/54), NPV (61.1%, 11/18) and efficiency 90.2% (65/72)
 
FBR-PCR/S Assay
Positive
Negative
Total
Standard methodsd
Positive
54
7
61
Negative
0
11
11
Total
54
18
72
dSensitivity (100%, 54/54), specificity (61.1%, 11/18), PPV (88.5%, 54/61), NPV (100%, 11/11) and efficiency 90.2% (65/72)
aIncludes 39 clinical specimens and 33 contrived specimens inoculated with a variety of fungal isolates identified by the reference lab. The molecular assay detected and accurately identified all fungal isolates in contrived BALs. PPV positive predictive value, NPV negative predictive value
bStandard methods: All isolates were recovered from fungal culture. Yeasts were identified by morphology and Vitek MS while molds were identified by morphology and conventional PCR targeted to the ITS1 and ITS2 gene regions
Table 5
Performance of molecular assay and standard methods for other types of clinical specimens (non-BALs)a
 
Standard Methodsb
Positive
Negative
Total
FBR-PCR/S Assayc
Positive
14
7
21
Negative
7
47
54
TOTAL
21
54
75
 
FBR-PCR/S Assay
Positive
Negative
TOTAL
Fungal culturec
Positive
14
7
21
Negative
7a
47
54
Total
21
54
75
cBoth methods had sensitivity (66.7%, 14/21), specificity (87.0%, 47/54), PPV (66.7%, 14/21), NPV (87.0%, 47/54) and efficiency 81.3% (61/75)
aIncludes all non-BAL clinical specimens tested. Molecular assay results were resolved by clinical review and repeat testing. 7 specimens that were FBR-PCR/S (+)/fungal culture (−) were resolved after clinical review to be true positive molecular tests and false negative cultures. See Tables 2 and 3
bStandard methods: All isolates were recovered from fungal culture. Yeasts were identified by morphology and Vitek MS while molds were identified by morphology and conventional PCR targeted to the ITS1 and ITS2 gene regions
Both diagnostic approaches also had similar performance in clinical specimens that showed fungal elements on microscopic examination after CW staining (Table 6). Although a negative CW stain and microscopic examination has excellent specificity and NPV, it has poor sensitivity and PPV for fungal infection. Microscopy negative BALs and other clinical specimens were negative by standard methods and FBR-PCR/S. Clinical specimens positive by microscopy (n = 10, 8.8%) demonstrated variable culture and/or PCR positivity; 6 specimens were positive by both methods, 2 were only positive by culture, and 2 were only positive by PCR. Another fifty-six (49.1%) specimens were microscopy negative but grew a variety of yeast/fungi and demonstrated variable culture and/or PCR positivity; 37 were positive by both methods, 14 were only positive by culture and 5 were only positive by PCR.
Table 6
Performance of molecular assay and standard methods compared to microscopy for clinical specimens including contrived BALsa
 
CW Stain/Microscopy
Positive
Negative
Total
FBR-PCR/S Assayb
Positive
8
42
50
Negative
2
62
64
Total
10
104
114
bSensitivity (80%, 8/10), specificity (59.6%, 62/104), PPV(16%, 8/50), NPV (96.9%, 62/64) and efficiency 61.4% (70/114)
 
CW Stain/Microscopy
Positive
Negative
Total
Standard methodsc
Positive
8
51
59
Negative
2
53
55
Total
10
104
114
cSensitivity (80%, 8/10), specificity (59.6%, 62/104), PPV (13.6%, 8/59), NPV (93.4%, 53/55) and efficiency 53.5% (61/114)
aIncludes the results of all BALs and clinical specimens enrolled in the study
cStandard methods: All isolates were recovered from fungal culture. Yeasts were identified by morphology and Vitek MS while molds were identified by morphology and conventional PCR targeted to ITS1 and ITS2 gene regions

Implementation of the molecular assay

Figure 2 shows an algorithm for the FBR-PCR/S procedure workflow and the time required for each assay step to report results in ~ 8 h or within the technologist’s dayshift; divided between specimen processing/extraction and fast PCR amplification/gel interpretation (~ 4.5 h) and fast cycle sequencing and interpretation (~ 3.5 h) (Fig. 2). Due to the longer sequence length provided by the LSU primers (> 550 bp) this would be the preferred single target for initial detection followed by ITS (~ 350 bp). To ensure an optimal pre-test probability and the quality and quantity of specimen available, FBR-PCR/S tests are ordered by the Infectious Diseases service in consultation with a medical microbiologist.

Discussion

Our study is the first to evaluate the diagnostic performance of a novel broad-range panfungal PCR/sequencing assay using DPO primers and fast protocols in a non-selected patient population with and without confirmed, probable of possible IFD in a large Canadian health region. This approach allows equivalent or improved diagnostic performance compared to previous reports from other studies that evaluated panfungal PCR assays in both selected and non-selected patient populations and clinical specimens [1928]. Our FBR-PCR/S assay has increased specificity compared other panfungal PCR assays and provides a rapid same day diagnosis of IFD. Our molecular assay had an excellent performance compared to culture in microscopy positive specimens, and an equivalent performance in microscopy negative specimens. IFD were diagnosed by FBR-PCR/S analysis of microscopy negative specimens indicating a role for this diagnostic approach for non-selected patients without overt immunosuppression. Rampini and colleagues (2016/Switzerland) [20] have also demonstrated similar efficacy of their fungal ITS PCR compared to conventional methods for diagnosing fungal infections in non-immunocompromised patients. They evaluated 251 clinical specimens using both the fungal ITS PCR compared to fungal culture and demonstrated a high concordance of 89.6% and equivalent analytical performance with a sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV of 87.7%, 90.3%, 76% and 95.5% respectively [20].
Previous reports of FBR-PCR/S evaluations in non-selected clinical cases have been limited, and primarily reported from large laboratories in Europe of the United States [19, 22, 24, 33]. Lass-Florl and colleagues (2013/Austria) [19] evaluated an ITS fungal PCR in 206 tissues and sterile fluid samples (n = 190 patients) with negative microscopy and found a sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV of 57.1%, 97%, 80% and 91.7%. Valero and colleagues (2016/Spain) [24] developed a fungal PCR using two ITS primers and 4 probes targeted to specific fungal pathogen groups, which showed comparable sensitivity (83.3%) and specificity (100%) to our assay. Zeller and colleagues (2017/Austria) [21] evaluated an ITS fungal PCR in 105 tissues and sterile fluids (n = 98 patients) and found a sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV of 87.7%, 90.3%, 76% and 95.5% respectively. Gomez and colleagues (2017/USA) [23] used a dual target (i.e., ITS 2 and D2 region of 28S) to evaluate 117 tissues and sterile fluids from 117 patients with confirmed IFD compared to 116 clinical samples from 108 patients with suspected IFD. Performance of their fungal PCR assay was better in the targeted IFD group [sensitivity (96.6%) and specificity (98.25%)] than in patients suspected of IFD [sensitivity (62.8%) and specificity (71.3%)] [22]. Ala-Houhala and colleagues (2017/Finland) [22] used a dual target ITS fungal PCR to test 37 tissue and sterile fluid specimens from 279 patients and found a sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV of 60.5%, 91.7%, 54.2% and 93.4% respectively. Stempak and colleagues (2019/USA) [33] also showed that fungal PCR testing had equivalent performance on analyses of 65 sterile fluid and tissue samples selected based on having all reference methods done (i.e., stains, DNA probes, culture, histopathology). However, several studies discourage the routine use of panfungal PCR testing, particularly on BALs, because no IFD cases were found that were not diagnoses by the reference methods, and due to environmental contamination the results may be difficult to interpret [25, 28, 33, 34].
Our molecular assay workflow allows same day reporting of panfungal PCR results allowing for rapid diagnosis and prompt implementation of appropriate management. Use of our panfungal assay improved clinical management and outcomes for several critically ill patients whose prior work-up by standard methods had been repeatedly negative or was delayed due to the extended incubation required of fungal culture isolate recovery. Clinical laboratories may also provide a similarly rapid 16S broad-range PCT/sequencing result (~ 8 h) by implementing molecular assays based on DPO primers for both bacteria and fungal pathogens with our recommended integrated workflow.
Our study had several limitations including the small number of specimens across the various types and sources enrolled. Because Candida spp. and Aspergillus spp. are the most commonly isolated fungi from BAL and non-BAL specimens in clinical microbiology laboratories worldwide, we used contrived BAL specimens to broaden the evaluation of the FBR-PCR/S assay. Due to the inherently high rate of contamination by fungal commensals present in clinical samples, interpretation of both standard methods compared to panfungal PCR results may be challenging without clinical review as shown by the initial rate of discordant results in this study. BALs or other pulmonary samples were most contaminated by commensal fungi in the patient’s airway, particularly Candida spp., Penicillium spp. and Aspergillus spp., which occurs during collection. But as previously reported [25, 28, 34], this problem is not unique to our study. Panfungal PCR alone may also not be optimal for diagnosing polymicrobial fungal infections because mixed sequencing results may not be interpretable. A more detailed clinical assessment by chart review would have allowed a more accurate clinical assessment for the presence of IFD.

Conclusions

Rapid panfungal FBR-PCR/S testing has equivalent diagnostic efficiency compared to standard methods with improved specificity, but our novel assay improves clinical utility by reporting a rapid species-level identification the same dayshift (~ 8 h).

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Calgary Laboratory Services (now Alberta Precision Laboratories) for a peer-reviewed research grant to perform this work. The Provincial Laboratory Northern Alberta provided fungal isolates for this study.

Declarations

The study was approved, and a waiver of informed consent was granted by the Conjoint Health Ethics Research Board (CHREB), Alberta Health Services, and the University of Calgary (Ethics ID: E-23969). All methods were carried out in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations.
Not applicable.

Competing interests

None of the authors have a conflict of interest.
Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://​creativecommons.​org/​licenses/​by/​4.​0/​. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://​creativecommons.​org/​publicdomain/​zero/​1.​0/​) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Ford ES, Duke ER, Cheng GS, Yoke LM, Liu C, Hill JA, Pergam SA, Pipavath SNJ, Walter RB, Mielcarek M, et al. Outcomes of hematopoietic cell transplantation in patients with mixed response to pretransplantation treatment of confirmed or suspected invasive fungal infection. Transplant Cell Ther. 2021;27:684.CrossRefPubMed Ford ES, Duke ER, Cheng GS, Yoke LM, Liu C, Hill JA, Pergam SA, Pipavath SNJ, Walter RB, Mielcarek M, et al. Outcomes of hematopoietic cell transplantation in patients with mixed response to pretransplantation treatment of confirmed or suspected invasive fungal infection. Transplant Cell Ther. 2021;27:684.CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Tey A, Shaw B, Cardamone L, Shepherd S, Paul E, Rogers B, Shortt J. Risk factors for invasive fungal infection in 5-azacytidine treated patients with acute myeloid leukemia and myelodysplastic syndrome. Eur J Haematol. 2021;107:181.CrossRefPubMed Tey A, Shaw B, Cardamone L, Shepherd S, Paul E, Rogers B, Shortt J. Risk factors for invasive fungal infection in 5-azacytidine treated patients with acute myeloid leukemia and myelodysplastic syndrome. Eur J Haematol. 2021;107:181.CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Rinaldi M, Bartoletti M, Ferrarese A, Franceschini E, Campoli C, Coladonato S, Pascale R, Tedeschi S, Gatti M, Cricca M, et al. Breakthrough invasive fungal infection after liver transplantation in patients on targeted antifungal prophylaxis: a prospective multicentre study. Transpl Infect Dis. 2021;23:e13608.PubMedPubMedCentral Rinaldi M, Bartoletti M, Ferrarese A, Franceschini E, Campoli C, Coladonato S, Pascale R, Tedeschi S, Gatti M, Cricca M, et al. Breakthrough invasive fungal infection after liver transplantation in patients on targeted antifungal prophylaxis: a prospective multicentre study. Transpl Infect Dis. 2021;23:e13608.PubMedPubMedCentral
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Donnelly JP, Chen SC, Kauffman CA, Steinbach WJ, Baddley JW, Verweij PE, Clancy CJ, Wingard JR, Lockhart SR, Groll AH, et al. Revision and update of the consensus definitions of invasive fungal disease from the European organization for research and treatment of cancer and the mycoses study group education and research consortium. Clin Infect Dis. 2020;71(6):1367–76.CrossRefPubMed Donnelly JP, Chen SC, Kauffman CA, Steinbach WJ, Baddley JW, Verweij PE, Clancy CJ, Wingard JR, Lockhart SR, Groll AH, et al. Revision and update of the consensus definitions of invasive fungal disease from the European organization for research and treatment of cancer and the mycoses study group education and research consortium. Clin Infect Dis. 2020;71(6):1367–76.CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Li Y, Gao Y, Niu X, Wu Y, Du Y, Yang Y, Qi R, Chen H, Gao X, Song B, et al. A 5-year review of invasive fungal infection at an academic medical center. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2020;10:553648.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Li Y, Gao Y, Niu X, Wu Y, Du Y, Yang Y, Qi R, Chen H, Gao X, Song B, et al. A 5-year review of invasive fungal infection at an academic medical center. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2020;10:553648.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Hosseini-Moghaddam SM, Ouedraogo A, Naylor KL, Bota SE, Husain S, Nash DM, Paterson JM. Incidence and outcomes of invasive fungal infection among solid organ transplant recipients: a population-based cohort study. Transpl Infect Dis. 2020;22(2):e13250.CrossRefPubMed Hosseini-Moghaddam SM, Ouedraogo A, Naylor KL, Bota SE, Husain S, Nash DM, Paterson JM. Incidence and outcomes of invasive fungal infection among solid organ transplant recipients: a population-based cohort study. Transpl Infect Dis. 2020;22(2):e13250.CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Ferrarese A, Cattelan A, Cillo U, Gringeri E, Russo FP, Germani G, Gambato M, Burra P, Senzolo M. Invasive fungal infection before and after liver transplantation. World J Gastroenterol. 2020;26(47):7485–96.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Ferrarese A, Cattelan A, Cillo U, Gringeri E, Russo FP, Germani G, Gambato M, Burra P, Senzolo M. Invasive fungal infection before and after liver transplantation. World J Gastroenterol. 2020;26(47):7485–96.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Kobayashi R, Hori D, Sano H, Suzuki D, Kishimoto K, Kobayashi K. Risk factors for invasive fungal infection in children and adolescents with hematologic and malignant diseases: a 10-year analysis in a single institute in Japan. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2018;37(12):1282–5.CrossRefPubMed Kobayashi R, Hori D, Sano H, Suzuki D, Kishimoto K, Kobayashi K. Risk factors for invasive fungal infection in children and adolescents with hematologic and malignant diseases: a 10-year analysis in a single institute in Japan. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2018;37(12):1282–5.CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Corzo-Leon DE, Satlin MJ, Soave R, Shore TB, Schuetz AN, Jacobs SE, Walsh TJ. Epidemiology and outcomes of invasive fungal infections in allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients in the era of antifungal prophylaxis: a single-centre study with focus on emerging pathogens. Mycoses. 2015;58(6):325–36.CrossRefPubMed Corzo-Leon DE, Satlin MJ, Soave R, Shore TB, Schuetz AN, Jacobs SE, Walsh TJ. Epidemiology and outcomes of invasive fungal infections in allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients in the era of antifungal prophylaxis: a single-centre study with focus on emerging pathogens. Mycoses. 2015;58(6):325–36.CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Neofytos D, Horn D, Anaissie E, Steinbach W, Olyaei A, Fishman J, Pfaller M, Chang C, Webster K, Marr K. Epidemiology and outcome of invasive fungal infection in adult hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients: analysis of Multicenter Prospective Antifungal Therapy (PATH) Alliance registry. Clin Infect Dis. 2009;48(3):265–73.CrossRefPubMed Neofytos D, Horn D, Anaissie E, Steinbach W, Olyaei A, Fishman J, Pfaller M, Chang C, Webster K, Marr K. Epidemiology and outcome of invasive fungal infection in adult hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients: analysis of Multicenter Prospective Antifungal Therapy (PATH) Alliance registry. Clin Infect Dis. 2009;48(3):265–73.CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Farmakiotis D, Kyvernitakis A, Tarrand JJ, Kontoyiannis DP. Early initiation of appropriate treatment is associated with increased survival in cancer patients with Candida glabrata fungaemia: a potential benefit from infectious disease consultation. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2015;21(1):79–86.CrossRefPubMed Farmakiotis D, Kyvernitakis A, Tarrand JJ, Kontoyiannis DP. Early initiation of appropriate treatment is associated with increased survival in cancer patients with Candida glabrata fungaemia: a potential benefit from infectious disease consultation. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2015;21(1):79–86.CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Garey KW, Rege M, Pai MP, Mingo DE, Suda KJ, Turpin RS, Bearden DT. Time to initiation of fluconazole therapy impacts mortality in patients with candidemia: a multi-institutional study. Clin Infect Dis. 2006;43(1):25–31.CrossRefPubMed Garey KW, Rege M, Pai MP, Mingo DE, Suda KJ, Turpin RS, Bearden DT. Time to initiation of fluconazole therapy impacts mortality in patients with candidemia: a multi-institutional study. Clin Infect Dis. 2006;43(1):25–31.CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Ambasta A, Carson J, Church DL. The use of biomarkers and molecular methods for the earlier diagnosis of invasive aspergillosis in immunocompromised patients. Med Mycol. 2015;53(6):531–57.CrossRefPubMed Ambasta A, Carson J, Church DL. The use of biomarkers and molecular methods for the earlier diagnosis of invasive aspergillosis in immunocompromised patients. Med Mycol. 2015;53(6):531–57.CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Arvanitis M, Anagnostou T, Fuchs BB, Caliendo AM, Mylonakis E. Molecular and nonmolecular diagnostic methods for invasive fungal infections. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2014;27(3):490–526.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Arvanitis M, Anagnostou T, Fuchs BB, Caliendo AM, Mylonakis E. Molecular and nonmolecular diagnostic methods for invasive fungal infections. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2014;27(3):490–526.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Tarrand JJ, Lichterfeld M, Warraich I, Luna M, Han XY, May GS, Kontoyiannis DP. Diagnosis of invasive septate mold infections. A correlation of microbiological culture and histologic or cytologic examination. Am J Clin Pathol. 2003;119(6):854–8.CrossRefPubMed Tarrand JJ, Lichterfeld M, Warraich I, Luna M, Han XY, May GS, Kontoyiannis DP. Diagnosis of invasive septate mold infections. A correlation of microbiological culture and histologic or cytologic examination. Am J Clin Pathol. 2003;119(6):854–8.CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Lee S, Yun NR, Kim KH, Jeon JH, Kim EC, Chung DH, Park WB, Oh MD. Discrepancy between histology and culture in filamentous fungal infections. Med Mycol. 2010;48(6):886–8.CrossRefPubMed Lee S, Yun NR, Kim KH, Jeon JH, Kim EC, Chung DH, Park WB, Oh MD. Discrepancy between histology and culture in filamentous fungal infections. Med Mycol. 2010;48(6):886–8.CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Sangoi AR, Rogers WM, Longacre TA, Montoya JG, Baron EJ, Banaei N. Challenges and pitfalls of morphologic identification of fungal infections in histologic and cytologic specimens: a ten-year retrospective review at a single institution. Am J Clin Pathol. 2009;131(3):364–75.CrossRefPubMed Sangoi AR, Rogers WM, Longacre TA, Montoya JG, Baron EJ, Banaei N. Challenges and pitfalls of morphologic identification of fungal infections in histologic and cytologic specimens: a ten-year retrospective review at a single institution. Am J Clin Pathol. 2009;131(3):364–75.CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat McCarthy MW, Walsh TJ. PCR methodology and applications for the detection of human fungal pathogens. Expert Rev Mol Diagn. 2016;16(9):1025–36.CrossRefPubMed McCarthy MW, Walsh TJ. PCR methodology and applications for the detection of human fungal pathogens. Expert Rev Mol Diagn. 2016;16(9):1025–36.CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Lass-Florl C, Mutschlechner W, Aigner M, Grif K, Marth C, Girschikofsky M, Grander W, Greil R, Russ G, Cerkl P, et al. Utility of PCR in diagnosis of invasive fungal infections: real-life data from a multicenter study. J Clin Microbiol. 2013;51(3):863–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Lass-Florl C, Mutschlechner W, Aigner M, Grif K, Marth C, Girschikofsky M, Grander W, Greil R, Russ G, Cerkl P, et al. Utility of PCR in diagnosis of invasive fungal infections: real-life data from a multicenter study. J Clin Microbiol. 2013;51(3):863–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Rampini SK, Zbinden A, Speck RF, Bloemberg GV. Similar efficacy of broad-range ITS PCR and conventional fungal culture for diagnosing fungal infections in non-immunocompromised patients. BMC Microbiol. 2016;16(1):132.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Rampini SK, Zbinden A, Speck RF, Bloemberg GV. Similar efficacy of broad-range ITS PCR and conventional fungal culture for diagnosing fungal infections in non-immunocompromised patients. BMC Microbiol. 2016;16(1):132.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Zeller I, Schabereiter-Gurtner C, Mihalits V, Selitsch B, Barousch W, Hirschl AM, Makristathis A, Willinger B. Detection of fungal pathogens by a new broad range real-time PCR assay targeting the fungal ITS2 region. J Med Microbiol. 2017;66(10):1383–92.CrossRefPubMed Zeller I, Schabereiter-Gurtner C, Mihalits V, Selitsch B, Barousch W, Hirschl AM, Makristathis A, Willinger B. Detection of fungal pathogens by a new broad range real-time PCR assay targeting the fungal ITS2 region. J Med Microbiol. 2017;66(10):1383–92.CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Ala-Houhala M, Koukila-Kahkola P, Antikainen J, Valve J, Kirveskari J, Anttila VJ. Clinical use of fungal PCR from deep tissue samples in the diagnosis of invasive fungal diseases: a retrospective observational study. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2018;24(3):301–5.CrossRefPubMed Ala-Houhala M, Koukila-Kahkola P, Antikainen J, Valve J, Kirveskari J, Anttila VJ. Clinical use of fungal PCR from deep tissue samples in the diagnosis of invasive fungal diseases: a retrospective observational study. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2018;24(3):301–5.CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Gomez CA, Budvytiene I, Zemek AJ, Banaei N. Performance of targeted fungal sequencing for culture-independent diagnosis of invasive fungal disease. Clin Infect Dis. 2017;65(12):2035–41.CrossRefPubMed Gomez CA, Budvytiene I, Zemek AJ, Banaei N. Performance of targeted fungal sequencing for culture-independent diagnosis of invasive fungal disease. Clin Infect Dis. 2017;65(12):2035–41.CrossRefPubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Valero C, de la Cruz-Villar L, Zaragoza O, Buitrago MJ. New panfungal real-time PCR assay for diagnosis of invasive fungal infections. J Clin Microbiol. 2016;54(12):2910–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Valero C, de la Cruz-Villar L, Zaragoza O, Buitrago MJ. New panfungal real-time PCR assay for diagnosis of invasive fungal infections. J Clin Microbiol. 2016;54(12):2910–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Trubiano JA, Dennison AM, Morrissey CO, Chua KY, Halliday CL, Chen SC, Spelman D. Clinical utility of panfungal polymerase chain reaction for the diagnosis of invasive fungal disease: a single center experience. Med Mycol. 2016;54(2):138–46.CrossRefPubMed Trubiano JA, Dennison AM, Morrissey CO, Chua KY, Halliday CL, Chen SC, Spelman D. Clinical utility of panfungal polymerase chain reaction for the diagnosis of invasive fungal disease: a single center experience. Med Mycol. 2016;54(2):138–46.CrossRefPubMed
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Trabelsi H, Neji S, Hadrich I, Khemakhem N, Sellami H, Makni F, Ayadi A. Contribution of the internal transcribed spacer regions to the detection and identification of human fungal pathogens. Curr Res Transl Med. 2019;67(3):100–6.CrossRefPubMed Trabelsi H, Neji S, Hadrich I, Khemakhem N, Sellami H, Makni F, Ayadi A. Contribution of the internal transcribed spacer regions to the detection and identification of human fungal pathogens. Curr Res Transl Med. 2019;67(3):100–6.CrossRefPubMed
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Wehrle-Wieland E, Affolter K, Goldenberger D, Tschudin Sutter S, Halter J, Passweg J, Tamm M, Khanna N, Stolz D. Diagnosis of invasive mold diseases in patients with hematological malignancies using Aspergillus, Mucorales, and panfungal PCR in BAL. Transpl Infect Dis. 2018;20(5):e12953.CrossRefPubMed Wehrle-Wieland E, Affolter K, Goldenberger D, Tschudin Sutter S, Halter J, Passweg J, Tamm M, Khanna N, Stolz D. Diagnosis of invasive mold diseases in patients with hematological malignancies using Aspergillus, Mucorales, and panfungal PCR in BAL. Transpl Infect Dis. 2018;20(5):e12953.CrossRefPubMed
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Ricna D, Lengerova M, Bezdicek M, Kocmanova I, Drgona L, Weinbergerova B, Mayer J, Racil Z. Detection and identification of fungi in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid from immunocompromised patients using panfungal PCR. Folia Microbiol (Praha). 2019;64(3):421–8.CrossRef Ricna D, Lengerova M, Bezdicek M, Kocmanova I, Drgona L, Weinbergerova B, Mayer J, Racil Z. Detection and identification of fungi in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid from immunocompromised patients using panfungal PCR. Folia Microbiol (Praha). 2019;64(3):421–8.CrossRef
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Miller RJ, Chow B, Pillai D, Church D. Development and evaluation of a novel fast broad-range 16S ribosomal DNA PCR and sequencing assay for diagnosis of bacterial infective endocarditis: multi-year experience in a large Canadian healthcare zone and a literature review. BMC Infect Dis. 2016;16:146.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Miller RJ, Chow B, Pillai D, Church D. Development and evaluation of a novel fast broad-range 16S ribosomal DNA PCR and sequencing assay for diagnosis of bacterial infective endocarditis: multi-year experience in a large Canadian healthcare zone and a literature review. BMC Infect Dis. 2016;16:146.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Kommedal O, Simmon K, Karaca D, Langeland N, Wiker HG. Dual priming oligonucleotides for broad-range amplification of the bacterial 16S rRNA gene directly from human clinical specimens. J Clin Microbiol. 2012;50(4):1289–94.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Kommedal O, Simmon K, Karaca D, Langeland N, Wiker HG. Dual priming oligonucleotides for broad-range amplification of the bacterial 16S rRNA gene directly from human clinical specimens. J Clin Microbiol. 2012;50(4):1289–94.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
31.
Zurück zum Zitat White TJ, Bruns S, Lee S, Taylor J. Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal genes for phylogenetics. In: Innis MA, Gelfand J, Sninsky J, White TJ, editors. PCR Protocols: a guide to methods and Pplications. San Diego: Academic Press; 1990. p. 315–24. White TJ, Bruns S, Lee S, Taylor J. Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal genes for phylogenetics. In: Innis MA, Gelfand J, Sninsky J, White TJ, editors. PCR Protocols: a guide to methods and Pplications. San Diego: Academic Press; 1990. p. 315–24.
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Clinical Laboratory standards Institute (CLSI). Interpretive criteria for identification of bacteria and fungi by DNA target sequencing. Approved Guideline MM-18. Wayne, PA USA:CLSi;2018. Clinical Laboratory standards Institute (CLSI). Interpretive criteria for identification of bacteria and fungi by DNA target sequencing. Approved Guideline MM-18. Wayne, PA USA:CLSi;2018.
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Stempak LM, Vogel SA, Richter SS, Wyllie R, Procop GW. routine broad-range fungal polymerase chain reaction with DNA sequencing in patients with suspected mycoses does not add value and is not cost-effective. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2019;143(5):634–8.CrossRefPubMed Stempak LM, Vogel SA, Richter SS, Wyllie R, Procop GW. routine broad-range fungal polymerase chain reaction with DNA sequencing in patients with suspected mycoses does not add value and is not cost-effective. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2019;143(5):634–8.CrossRefPubMed
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Garnham K, Halliday CL, Kok J, Jayawardena M, Ahuja V, Green W, Chen SC. Knowledge at what cost? An audit of the utility of panfungal PCR performed on bronchoalveolar lavage fluid specimens at a tertiary mycology laboratory. Pathology. 2020;52(5):584–8.CrossRefPubMed Garnham K, Halliday CL, Kok J, Jayawardena M, Ahuja V, Green W, Chen SC. Knowledge at what cost? An audit of the utility of panfungal PCR performed on bronchoalveolar lavage fluid specimens at a tertiary mycology laboratory. Pathology. 2020;52(5):584–8.CrossRefPubMed
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Manji FLJ, Meatherall BL, Church D, Missaghi B. Severe facial necrosis in a type 1 diabetic patient secondary to mucormycosis masquerading as an internal maxillary artery occlusion: a case report. BMC Infect Dis. 2019;19(1):184.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Manji FLJ, Meatherall BL, Church D, Missaghi B. Severe facial necrosis in a type 1 diabetic patient secondary to mucormycosis masquerading as an internal maxillary artery occlusion: a case report. BMC Infect Dis. 2019;19(1):184.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadaten
Titel
Development and evaluation of a novel fast broad-range PCR and sequencing assay (FBR-PCR/S) using dual priming oligonucleotides targeting the ITS/LSU gene regions for rapid diagnosis of invasive fungal diseases: multi-year experience in a large Canadian healthcare zone
verfasst von
B. Chow
M. Groeschel
J. Carson
T. Griener
D. L. Church
Publikationsdatum
01.12.2022
Verlag
BioMed Central
Erschienen in
BMC Infectious Diseases / Ausgabe 1/2022
Elektronische ISSN: 1471-2334
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-022-07356-9

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2022

BMC Infectious Diseases 1/2022 Zur Ausgabe

Leitlinien kompakt für die Innere Medizin

Mit medbee Pocketcards sicher entscheiden.

Seit 2022 gehört die medbee GmbH zum Springer Medizin Verlag

Update Innere Medizin

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.