Skip to main content
Erschienen in:

27.01.2022 | Original Article

Development and internal validation of laboratory prognostic score to predict 14-day mortality in terminally ill patients with gastrointestinal malignancy

verfasst von: Hidemasa Nagai, Natsuko Kawai, Norihiro Yuasa

Erschienen in: Supportive Care in Cancer | Ausgabe 5/2022

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Few studies have developed an easy scoring system for the short-term survival of patients with gastrointestinal (GI) malignancy.

Methods

A total of 816 terminally ill patients with GI malignancy were admitted to our palliative care unit. They were randomly divided into the investigation (n = 490) and validation (n = 326) groups. A total of 19 laboratory blood parameters were analyzed. Receiver-operating characteristic analysis was performed for each blood factor, and the area under the curve was calculated to determine the predictive value for 14-day survival after the blood test. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to identify significant independent prognostic factors for 14-day mortality. To develop a scoring system for 14-day mortality, the laboratory prognostic score for gastrointestinal malignancy (GI-LPS) was calculated using the sum of indices of the independent prognostic factors.

Results

Multivariable analysis showed that 5 of 19 indices, namely total bilirubin ≥ 2.1 mg/dL, blood urea nitrogen ≥ 28 mg/dL, eosinophil percentage ≤ 0.5%, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio ≥ 9.2, and platelet count ≤ 194 × 103/μL, were significant independent factors of 14-day survival. GI-LPS showed acceptable accuracy for 14-day mortality in the investigation and validation groups. GI-LPS 3 (including any three factors) predicted death within 14 days, with a sensitivity of 56–58%, a specificity of 82–87%, a positive predictive value of 48–50%, and a negative predictive value of 87–90%.

Conclusions

GI-LPS showed an acceptable ability to predict 14-day survival and can provide additional information to conventional prognostic scores.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Lamont EB, Christakis NA (1999) Some elements of prognosis in terminal cancer. Oncology (Williston Park) 13(8):1165–1170 Lamont EB, Christakis NA (1999) Some elements of prognosis in terminal cancer. Oncology (Williston Park) 13(8):1165–1170
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Pirovano M, Maltoni M, Nanni O, et al. A new palliative prognostic score: a first step for the staging of terminally ill cancer patients. Italian Multicenter and Study Group on Palliative Care. J Pain Symptom Manag 1999; 17(4):231–239 Pirovano M, Maltoni M, Nanni O, et al. A new palliative prognostic score: a first step for the staging of terminally ill cancer patients. Italian Multicenter and Study Group on Palliative Care. J Pain Symptom Manag 1999; 17(4):231–239
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Maltoni M, Nanni O, Pirovano M, et al. Successful validation of the palliative prognostic score in terminally ill cancer patients. Italian Multicenter study Group on pa11iative care. J Pain Symptom Manag 1999; 17(4):240–247 Maltoni M, Nanni O, Pirovano M, et al. Successful validation of the palliative prognostic score in terminally ill cancer patients. Italian Multicenter study Group on pa11iative care. J Pain Symptom Manag 1999; 17(4):240–247
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Scarpi E, Maltoni M, Miceli R et al (2011) Survival prediction for terminally ill cancer patients: revision of the palliative prognostic score with incorporation of delirium. Oncologist 16(12):1793–1799CrossRef Scarpi E, Maltoni M, Miceli R et al (2011) Survival prediction for terminally ill cancer patients: revision of the palliative prognostic score with incorporation of delirium. Oncologist 16(12):1793–1799CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Morita T, Tsunoda J, Inoue S et al (1999) The palliative prognostic Index: a scoring system for survival prediction of terminally ill cancer patients. Support Care Cancer 7(3):128–133CrossRef Morita T, Tsunoda J, Inoue S et al (1999) The palliative prognostic Index: a scoring system for survival prediction of terminally ill cancer patients. Support Care Cancer 7(3):128–133CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Suh SY, Choi YS, Shim JY et al (2010) Construction of a new, objective prognostic score for terminally ill cancer patients: a multicenter study. Support Care Cancer 18(2):151–157CrossRef Suh SY, Choi YS, Shim JY et al (2010) Construction of a new, objective prognostic score for terminally ill cancer patients: a multicenter study. Support Care Cancer 18(2):151–157CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Hyodo I, Morita T, Adachi I et al (2010) Development of a predicting tool for survival of terminally ill cancer patients. Jpn J Clin Oncol 40(5):442–448CrossRef Hyodo I, Morita T, Adachi I et al (2010) Development of a predicting tool for survival of terminally ill cancer patients. Jpn J Clin Oncol 40(5):442–448CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Gwilliam B, Keeley V, Todd C, et al. Development of prognosis in palliative care study (PiPS) predictor models to improve prognostication in advanced cancer: prospective cohort study. BMJ 2011; 343(343):d4920. Gwilliam B, Keeley V, Todd C, et al. Development of prognosis in palliative care study (PiPS) predictor models to improve prognostication in advanced cancer: prospective cohort study. BMJ 2011; 343(343):d4920.
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Omichi M, Konoike S, Yamada Y, et al. Development of biological prognostic score versions 2 and 3 for advanced cancer patients and a prospective study on the prediction accuracy. Comparison with the palliative prognostic index. Palliat Care Res 2017; 12(1):140–148. (in Japanese with English abstract). Omichi M, Konoike S, Yamada Y, et al. Development of biological prognostic score versions 2 and 3 for advanced cancer patients and a prospective study on the prediction accuracy. Comparison with the palliative prognostic index. Palliat Care Res 2017; 12(1):140–148. (in Japanese with English abstract).
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Yasuda N, Nakashima O, Ohnaka T et al (2006) Novel clinical staging for patients with end-stage gastrointestinal carcinoma. Surg Today 36(1):25–29CrossRef Yasuda N, Nakashima O, Ohnaka T et al (2006) Novel clinical staging for patients with end-stage gastrointestinal carcinoma. Surg Today 36(1):25–29CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Katz MH (2008) Multivariate analysis: a practical guide for clinicians. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge Katz MH (2008) Multivariate analysis: a practical guide for clinicians. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Kadokura M, Okuwaki T, Imagawa N et al (2019) Utility of the prognostic prediction model at the terminal stage of hepatocellular carcinoma. Kanzo 60(7):229–236CrossRef Kadokura M, Okuwaki T, Imagawa N et al (2019) Utility of the prognostic prediction model at the terminal stage of hepatocellular carcinoma. Kanzo 60(7):229–236CrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Yamada T, Uchida E, Kan H et al (2010) Initial treatment plan based on predicting the prognosis for oncologic emergency of terminal colorectal cancer. J Abdom Emerg Med 30(6):805–808 (in Japanese with English abstract) Yamada T, Uchida E, Kan H et al (2010) Initial treatment plan based on predicting the prognosis for oncologic emergency of terminal colorectal cancer. J Abdom Emerg Med 30(6):805–808 (in Japanese with English abstract)
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Glare P, Virik K, Jones M et al (2003) A systematic review of physicians’ survival predictions in terminally ill cancer patients. BMJ 327(7408):195–198CrossRef Glare P, Virik K, Jones M et al (2003) A systematic review of physicians’ survival predictions in terminally ill cancer patients. BMJ 327(7408):195–198CrossRef
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Yamada T, Morita T, Maeda I et al (2017) A prospective, multicenter cohort study to validate a simple performance status–based survival prediction system for oncologists. Cancer 123(8):1442–1452CrossRef Yamada T, Morita T, Maeda I et al (2017) A prospective, multicenter cohort study to validate a simple performance status–based survival prediction system for oncologists. Cancer 123(8):1442–1452CrossRef
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Valent P, Gleich GJ, Reiter A et al (2012) Pathogenesis and classification of eosinophil disorders: a review of recent developments in the field. Expert Rev Hematol 5(2):157–176CrossRef Valent P, Gleich GJ, Reiter A et al (2012) Pathogenesis and classification of eosinophil disorders: a review of recent developments in the field. Expert Rev Hematol 5(2):157–176CrossRef
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Abidi K, Belayachi J, Derras Y et al (2011) Eosinopenia, an early marker of increased mortality in critically ill medical patients. Intensive Care Med 37(7):1136–1142CrossRef Abidi K, Belayachi J, Derras Y et al (2011) Eosinopenia, an early marker of increased mortality in critically ill medical patients. Intensive Care Med 37(7):1136–1142CrossRef
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Cikrikcioglu MA, Soysal P, Dikerdem D et al (2012) Absolute blood eosinophil count and 1-year mortality risk following hospitalization with acute heart failure. Eur J Emerg Med 19(4):257–263CrossRef Cikrikcioglu MA, Soysal P, Dikerdem D et al (2012) Absolute blood eosinophil count and 1-year mortality risk following hospitalization with acute heart failure. Eur J Emerg Med 19(4):257–263CrossRef
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Holland M, Alkhalil M, Chandromouli S et al (2010) Eosinopenia as a marker of mortality and length of stay in patients admitted with exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Respirology 15(1):165–167CrossRef Holland M, Alkhalil M, Chandromouli S et al (2010) Eosinopenia as a marker of mortality and length of stay in patients admitted with exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Respirology 15(1):165–167CrossRef
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Kawai N, Yuasa N (2018) Laboratory prognostic score for predicting 30-day mortality in terminally ill cancer patients. Nagoya J Med Sci 80(4):571–582PubMedPubMedCentral Kawai N, Yuasa N (2018) Laboratory prognostic score for predicting 30-day mortality in terminally ill cancer patients. Nagoya J Med Sci 80(4):571–582PubMedPubMedCentral
Metadaten
Titel
Development and internal validation of laboratory prognostic score to predict 14-day mortality in terminally ill patients with gastrointestinal malignancy
verfasst von
Hidemasa Nagai
Natsuko Kawai
Norihiro Yuasa
Publikationsdatum
27.01.2022
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Supportive Care in Cancer / Ausgabe 5/2022
Print ISSN: 0941-4355
Elektronische ISSN: 1433-7339
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-021-06746-0

Neu im Fachgebiet Onkologie

Welche Krebserkrankungen bei Zöliakie häufiger auftreten

Eine große Kohortenstudie hat den Zusammenhang zwischen Zöliakie und gastrointestinalen Krebserkrankungen und inflammatorischen Krankheiten untersucht. Neben gastrointestinalen Tumoren ist auch ein nicht solider Krebs häufiger.

Adjuvanter PD-L1-Hemmer verhindert Rezidive bei Hochrisiko-Urothelkarzinom

Sind Menschen mit muskelinvasivem Urothelkarzinom für die neoadjuvante platinbasierte Therapie nicht geeignet oder sprechen sie darauf nicht gut an, ist Pembrolizumab eine adjuvante Alternative: Die krankheitsfreie Lebenszeit wird dadurch mehr als verdoppelt.

Duale Checkpointhemmung gegen Melanome verlängert langfristig das Leben

Im Vergleich zu den Überlebenschancen vor der Einführung von Immuncheckpointhemmern (ICI) ist der Fortschritt durch eine ICI-Kombination mit unterschiedlichen Tagets bei fortgeschrittenem Melanom erstaunlich. Das belegen die finalen Ergebnisse der CheckMate-067-Studie und geben Betroffenen "Hoffnung auf Heilung".

Knochenmarktransplantat als Chance für ältere AML-Patienten

Lange Zeit ist die Transplantation von hämatopoetischen Stammzellen nur bei jüngeren Patienten mit akuter myeloischer Leukämie praktiziert worden. Inzwischen profitieren auch Ältere davon. Ergebnisse einer Studie unterstützen dieses Vorgehen.

Update Onkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.