Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Obesity Surgery 8/2021

27.05.2021 | Original Contributions

Development and Validation of New BODY-Q Scales Measuring Expectations, Eating Behavior, Distress, Symptoms, and Work Life in 4004 Adults From 4 Countries

verfasst von: Claire E. E. de Vries, Danny Mou, Lotte Poulsen, Trisia Breitkopf, Dennis J. S. Makarawung, Marinus J. Wiezer, Ruben N. van Veen, Maarten M. Hoogbergen, Jens A. Sorensen, Ronald S. L. Liem, Simon W. Nienhuijs, Ali Tavakkoli, Andrea L. Pusic, Anne F. Klassen

Erschienen in: Obesity Surgery | Ausgabe 8/2021

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

The BODY-Q is a rigorously developed patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) for patients seeking treatment for obesity and body contouring surgery. A limitation of the uptake of the BODY-Q in weight management treatments is the absence of scales designed to measure eating-specific concerns. We aimed to develop and validate 5 new BODY-Q scales measuring weight loss expectations, eating behaviors, distress, symptoms, and work life.

Material and Methods

In phase 1 (qualitative), patient and expert input was used to develop and refine the new BODY-Q scales. In phase 2 (quantitative), the scales were field-tested in bariatric and weight management clinics in the United States (US), The Netherlands, and Denmark between June 2019 and January 2020. Data were also collected in the US and Canada in September 2019 through a crowdworking platform. Rasch measurement theory (RMT) analysis was used for item reduction and to examine reliability and validity.

Results

The new BODY-Q scales were refined through qualitative input from 17 patients and 20 experts (phase 1) and field-tested in 4004 participants (phase 2). All items showed ordered thresholds and good fit to the Rasch model. The RMT analysis provided evidence of reliability, with PSI values ≥0.72, Cronbach alpha values ≥0.83, and test-retest values ≥0.79. Better scores on 4 scales (exception expectations scale) correlated with lower BMI, with the strongest correlation between the eating-related distress scale scores and BMI (r= −0.249, P < 0.001).

Conclusion

The new BODY-Q scales can be used in research and clinical practice to assess weight loss treatments from the patient perspective.

Graphical abstract

Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Afshin A, Forouzanfar MH, Reitsma MB, et al. Health effects of overweight and obesity in 195 countries over 25 years. N Engl J Med. Massachussetts Medical Society. 2017;377:13–27. Afshin A, Forouzanfar MH, Reitsma MB, et al. Health effects of overweight and obesity in 195 countries over 25 years. N Engl J Med. Massachussetts Medical Society. 2017;377:13–27.
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Must A, McKeown NM. The disease burden associated with overweight and obesity. Endotext. 2000 Must A, McKeown NM. The disease burden associated with overweight and obesity. Endotext. 2000
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Wang YC, McPherson K, Marsh T, et al. Health and economic burden of the projected obesity trends in the USA and the UK. Lancet. Lancet Publishing Group; 2011. p. 815–25. Wang YC, McPherson K, Marsh T, et al. Health and economic burden of the projected obesity trends in the USA and the UK. Lancet. Lancet Publishing Group; 2011. p. 815–25.
4.
Zurück zum Zitat World Health Organization Obesity and overweight, 2018. World Health Organization Obesity and overweight, 2018.
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Dietz WH, Baur LA, Hall K, et al. Management of obesity: improvement of health-care training and systems for prevention and care. Lancet. Lancet Publishing Group; 2015. p. 2521–33. Dietz WH, Baur LA, Hall K, et al. Management of obesity: improvement of health-care training and systems for prevention and care. Lancet. Lancet Publishing Group; 2015. p. 2521–33.
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Heymsfield SB, Wadden TA. Mechanisms, pathophysiology, and management of obesity. N. Engl. J. Med. Massachussetts Medical Society; 2017. p. 254–66. Heymsfield SB, Wadden TA. Mechanisms, pathophysiology, and management of obesity. N. Engl. J. Med. Massachussetts Medical Society; 2017. p. 254–66.
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Colquitt JL, Pickett K, Loveman E, et al. Surgery for weight loss in adults (Cochrane Review). Cochrane Collab. 2014;244 Colquitt JL, Pickett K, Loveman E, et al. Surgery for weight loss in adults (Cochrane Review). Cochrane Collab. 2014;244
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Schauer PR, Bhatt DL, Kirwan JP, et al. Bariatric surgery versus intensive medical therapy for diabetes - 5-year outcomes. N Engl J Med. 2017;376:641–51.CrossRef Schauer PR, Bhatt DL, Kirwan JP, et al. Bariatric surgery versus intensive medical therapy for diabetes - 5-year outcomes. N Engl J Med. 2017;376:641–51.CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Yanovski SZ, Yanovski JA. Long-term drug treatment for obesity: a systematic and clinical review. JAMA. 2014. p. 74–86. Yanovski SZ, Yanovski JA. Long-term drug treatment for obesity: a systematic and clinical review. JAMA. 2014. p. 74–86.
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Wadden TA, Volger S, Sarwer DB, et al. A two-year randomized trial of obesity treatment in primary care practice. N Engl J Med. Massachusetts Medical Society. 2011;365:1969–79.CrossRef Wadden TA, Volger S, Sarwer DB, et al. A two-year randomized trial of obesity treatment in primary care practice. N Engl J Med. Massachusetts Medical Society. 2011;365:1969–79.CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Wadden TA, Berkowitz RI, Womble LG, et al. Randomized trial of lifestyle modification and pharmacotherapy for obesity. N Engl J Med. 2005;353:2111–20.CrossRef Wadden TA, Berkowitz RI, Womble LG, et al. Randomized trial of lifestyle modification and pharmacotherapy for obesity. N Engl J Med. 2005;353:2111–20.CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Appel LJ, Clark JM, Yeh HC, et al. Comparative effectiveness of weight-loss interventions in clinical practice. N Engl J Med. Massachussetts Medical Society. 2011;365:1959–68.CrossRef Appel LJ, Clark JM, Yeh HC, et al. Comparative effectiveness of weight-loss interventions in clinical practice. N Engl J Med. Massachussetts Medical Society. 2011;365:1959–68.CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Khera R, Murad MH, Chandar AK, et al. Association of pharmacological treatments for obesity with weight loss and adverse events a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA. 2016;315:2424–34.CrossRef Khera R, Murad MH, Chandar AK, et al. Association of pharmacological treatments for obesity with weight loss and adverse events a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA. 2016;315:2424–34.CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Coulman KD, Abdelrahman T, Owen-Smith A, et al. Patient-reported outcomes in bariatric surgery: a systematic review of standards of reporting. Obes Rev. 2013;14:707–20.CrossRef Coulman KD, Abdelrahman T, Owen-Smith A, et al. Patient-reported outcomes in bariatric surgery: a systematic review of standards of reporting. Obes Rev. 2013;14:707–20.CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Lindekilde N, Gladstone BP, Lübeck M, et al. The impact of bariatric surgery on quality of life: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obes Rev. 2015;16:639–51.CrossRef Lindekilde N, Gladstone BP, Lübeck M, et al. The impact of bariatric surgery on quality of life: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obes Rev. 2015;16:639–51.CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Patrick DL, Burke LB, Powers JH, et al. Patient-reported outcomes to support medical product labeling claims: FDA perspective. Value Heal. Blackwell Publishing Inc. 2007. p. S125-37. Patrick DL, Burke LB, Powers JH, et al. Patient-reported outcomes to support medical product labeling claims: FDA perspective. Value Heal. Blackwell Publishing Inc. 2007. p. S125-37.
17.
Zurück zum Zitat de Vries CEE, Kalff MC, Prinsen CAC, et al. Recommendations on the most suitable quality-of-life measurement instruments for bariatric and body contouring surgery: a systematic review. Obes Rev. 2018;1395–411. de Vries CEE, Kalff MC, Prinsen CAC, et al. Recommendations on the most suitable quality-of-life measurement instruments for bariatric and body contouring surgery: a systematic review. Obes Rev. 2018;1395–411.
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Klassen AF, Cano SJ, Alderman A, et al. The BODY-Q: a patient-reported outcome instrument for weight loss and body contouring treatments. Plast Reconstr Surg - Glob Open. 2016;4:e679.CrossRef Klassen AF, Cano SJ, Alderman A, et al. The BODY-Q: a patient-reported outcome instrument for weight loss and body contouring treatments. Plast Reconstr Surg - Glob Open. 2016;4:e679.CrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Klassen AF, Cano SJ, Scott A, et al. Assessing outcomes in body contouring. Clin Plast Surg. 2014;645–54. Klassen AF, Cano SJ, Scott A, et al. Assessing outcomes in body contouring. Clin Plast Surg. 2014;645–54.
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Poulsen L, Pusic A, Robson S, et al. The BODY-Q Stretch Marks Scale: a development and validation study. Aesthetic Surg J. Oxford Academic. 2018;38:990–7.CrossRef Poulsen L, Pusic A, Robson S, et al. The BODY-Q Stretch Marks Scale: a development and validation study. Aesthetic Surg J. Oxford Academic. 2018;38:990–7.CrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Klassen AF, Kaur M, Poulsen L, et al. Development of the BODY-Q chest module evaluating outcomes following chest contouring surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018;142:1600–8.CrossRef Klassen AF, Kaur M, Poulsen L, et al. Development of the BODY-Q chest module evaluating outcomes following chest contouring surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018;142:1600–8.CrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Riff KWYW, Tsangaris E, Goodacre T, et al. International multiphase mixed methods study protocol to develop a cross-cultural patient-reported outcome instrument for children and young adults with cleft lip and/or palate (CLEFT-Q). BMJ Open. 2017;7:1–9. Riff KWYW, Tsangaris E, Goodacre T, et al. International multiphase mixed methods study protocol to develop a cross-cultural patient-reported outcome instrument for children and young adults with cleft lip and/or palate (CLEFT-Q). BMJ Open. 2017;7:1–9.
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Klassen AF, Cano SJ, Scott A, et al. Satisfaction and quality-of-life issues in body contouring surgery patients: a qualitative study. Obes Surg. 2012;22:1527–34.CrossRef Klassen AF, Cano SJ, Scott A, et al. Satisfaction and quality-of-life issues in body contouring surgery patients: a qualitative study. Obes Surg. 2012;22:1527–34.CrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Wild D, Grove A, Martin M, et al. Principles of good practice for the translation and cultural adaptation process for patient-reported outcomes (PRO) measures: report of the ISPOR Task Force for Translation and Cultural Adaptation. Value Heal. Blackwell Publishing Inc. 2005;8:94–104.CrossRef Wild D, Grove A, Martin M, et al. Principles of good practice for the translation and cultural adaptation process for patient-reported outcomes (PRO) measures: report of the ISPOR Task Force for Translation and Cultural Adaptation. Value Heal. Blackwell Publishing Inc. 2005;8:94–104.CrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Organization WHO. Process of translation and adaptation of instruments. Organization WHO. Process of translation and adaptation of instruments.
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, et al. Research electronic data capture (REDCap)-a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform. NIH Public Access. 2009;42:377–81.CrossRef Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, et al. Research electronic data capture (REDCap)-a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform. NIH Public Access. 2009;42:377–81.CrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Rasch G. Studies in mathematical psychology: 1. Probabilistic models for some intelligence and attainment tests. Danmarks Pædagogiske Institut: Copenhagen; 1960. Rasch G. Studies in mathematical psychology: 1. Probabilistic models for some intelligence and attainment tests. Danmarks Pædagogiske Institut: Copenhagen; 1960.
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Rabin R, De Charro F. EQ-5D: A measure of health status from the EuroQol group. Ann Med. Royal Society of Medicine Press Ltd; 2001. p. 337–43. Rabin R, De Charro F. EQ-5D: A measure of health status from the EuroQol group. Ann Med. Royal Society of Medicine Press Ltd; 2001. p. 337–43.
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Bradley KD, Peabody MR, Akers KS, et al. Rating scales in survey research: using the Rasch model to illustrate the middle category measurement flaw. Surv Pract. 2015;8:1–12.CrossRef Bradley KD, Peabody MR, Akers KS, et al. Rating scales in survey research: using the Rasch model to illustrate the middle category measurement flaw. Surv Pract. 2015;8:1–12.CrossRef
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Khadka J, Gothwal VK, McAlinden C, et al. The importance of rating scales in measuring patient-reported outcomes. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2012;10:80.CrossRef Khadka J, Gothwal VK, McAlinden C, et al. The importance of rating scales in measuring patient-reported outcomes. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2012;10:80.CrossRef
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Cohn I, Raman J, Sui Z. Patient motivations and expectations prior to bariatric surgery: a qualitative systematic review. Obes Rev. 2019;1608–18. Cohn I, Raman J, Sui Z. Patient motivations and expectations prior to bariatric surgery: a qualitative systematic review. Obes Rev. 2019;1608–18.
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Poulsen L, Klassen A, Jhanwar S, et al. Patient expectations of bariatric and body contouring surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg - Glob Open. 2016;4:e694.CrossRef Poulsen L, Klassen A, Jhanwar S, et al. Patient expectations of bariatric and body contouring surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg - Glob Open. 2016;4:e694.CrossRef
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Parretti HM, Hughes CA, Jones LL. “The rollercoaster of follow-up care” after bariatric surgery: a rapid review and qualitative synthesis. Obes Rev. 2019;20:88–107.CrossRef Parretti HM, Hughes CA, Jones LL. “The rollercoaster of follow-up care” after bariatric surgery: a rapid review and qualitative synthesis. Obes Rev. 2019;20:88–107.CrossRef
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Mou D, Sisodia RC, Castillo-Angeles M, et al. The surgeon’s perceived value of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). Ann Surg. 2020:1–6. Mou D, Sisodia RC, Castillo-Angeles M, et al. The surgeon’s perceived value of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). Ann Surg. 2020:1–6.
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Coulman KD, MacKichan F, Blazeby JM, Owen-Smith A. Patient experiences of outcomes of bariatric surgery: a systematic review and qualitative synthesis. Obes Rev. 2017;547–59. Coulman KD, MacKichan F, Blazeby JM, Owen-Smith A. Patient experiences of outcomes of bariatric surgery: a systematic review and qualitative synthesis. Obes Rev. 2017;547–59.
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Natvik E, Gjengedal E, Råheim M. Totally changed, yet still the same: patients’ lived experiences 5 years beyond bariatric surgery. Qual Health Res. 2013;23:1202–14.CrossRef Natvik E, Gjengedal E, Råheim M. Totally changed, yet still the same: patients’ lived experiences 5 years beyond bariatric surgery. Qual Health Res. 2013;23:1202–14.CrossRef
38.
Zurück zum Zitat Engström M, Forsberg A. Wishing for deburdening through a sustainable control after bariatric surgery. Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being. 2011;6 Engström M, Forsberg A. Wishing for deburdening through a sustainable control after bariatric surgery. Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being. 2011;6
39.
Zurück zum Zitat Coulman KD, MacKichan F, Blazeby JM, et al. Patients’ experiences of life after bariatric surgery and follow-up care: a qualitative study. BMJ Open. BMJ Publishing Group. 2020;10:e035013.CrossRef Coulman KD, MacKichan F, Blazeby JM, et al. Patients’ experiences of life after bariatric surgery and follow-up care: a qualitative study. BMJ Open. BMJ Publishing Group. 2020;10:e035013.CrossRef
40.
Zurück zum Zitat Ogden J, Avenell S, Ellis G. Negotiating control: patients’ experiences of unsuccessful weight-loss surgery. Psychol Health. 2011;26:949–64.CrossRef Ogden J, Avenell S, Ellis G. Negotiating control: patients’ experiences of unsuccessful weight-loss surgery. Psychol Health. 2011;26:949–64.CrossRef
41.
Zurück zum Zitat Warholm C, Øien AM, Raheim M. The ambivalence of losing weight after bariatric surgery. Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being. 2014;9:22876.CrossRef Warholm C, Øien AM, Raheim M. The ambivalence of losing weight after bariatric surgery. Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being. 2014;9:22876.CrossRef
42.
Zurück zum Zitat Wee CC, Davis RB, Jones DB, et al. Sex, race, and the quality of life factors most important to patients’ well-being among those seeking bariatric surgery. Obes Surg. 2016;26:1308–16.CrossRef Wee CC, Davis RB, Jones DB, et al. Sex, race, and the quality of life factors most important to patients’ well-being among those seeking bariatric surgery. Obes Surg. 2016;26:1308–16.CrossRef
43.
Zurück zum Zitat Mancini A, Borel AL, Coumes S, et al. Bariatric surgery improves the employment rate in people with obesity: 2-year analysis. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2018;14:1700–4.CrossRef Mancini A, Borel AL, Coumes S, et al. Bariatric surgery improves the employment rate in people with obesity: 2-year analysis. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2018;14:1700–4.CrossRef
44.
Zurück zum Zitat Kantarovich K, Wnuk S, Cassin S, et al. Employment outcomes 2 years after bariatric surgery: relationship to quality of life and psychosocial predictors. Obes Surg. 2019;29:2854–61.CrossRef Kantarovich K, Wnuk S, Cassin S, et al. Employment outcomes 2 years after bariatric surgery: relationship to quality of life and psychosocial predictors. Obes Surg. 2019;29:2854–61.CrossRef
45.
Zurück zum Zitat Sockalingam S, Wnuk S, Kantarovich K, et al. Employment outcomes one year after bariatric surgery: the role of patient and psychosocial factors. Obes Surg. Springer New York LLC2015;25:514–22. Sockalingam S, Wnuk S, Kantarovich K, et al. Employment outcomes one year after bariatric surgery: the role of patient and psychosocial factors. Obes Surg. Springer New York LLC2015;25:514–22.
46.
Zurück zum Zitat Courtney MJ, Mahawar K, Burnell P, et al. Occupational outcomes of obesity surgery—do the employed return to work, and do the unemployed find work? Obes Surg. 2018;28:963–9.CrossRef Courtney MJ, Mahawar K, Burnell P, et al. Occupational outcomes of obesity surgery—do the employed return to work, and do the unemployed find work? Obes Surg. 2018;28:963–9.CrossRef
47.
Zurück zum Zitat Sharples AJ, Cheruvu CVN. Systematic review and meta-analysis of occupational outcomes after bariatric surgery. Obes Surg. 2017;27:774–81.CrossRef Sharples AJ, Cheruvu CVN. Systematic review and meta-analysis of occupational outcomes after bariatric surgery. Obes Surg. 2017;27:774–81.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Development and Validation of New BODY-Q Scales Measuring Expectations, Eating Behavior, Distress, Symptoms, and Work Life in 4004 Adults From 4 Countries
verfasst von
Claire E. E. de Vries
Danny Mou
Lotte Poulsen
Trisia Breitkopf
Dennis J. S. Makarawung
Marinus J. Wiezer
Ruben N. van Veen
Maarten M. Hoogbergen
Jens A. Sorensen
Ronald S. L. Liem
Simon W. Nienhuijs
Ali Tavakkoli
Andrea L. Pusic
Anne F. Klassen
Publikationsdatum
27.05.2021
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Obesity Surgery / Ausgabe 8/2021
Print ISSN: 0960-8923
Elektronische ISSN: 1708-0428
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-021-05462-2

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 8/2021

Obesity Surgery 8/2021 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

CME: 2 Punkte

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht, PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske Das Webinar S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“ beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.