Background
Worldwide, there has been a shift from institutional models of care (i.e., long-term care) to supporting older adults in their own homes. The consequence of the shift is that an increasing number of frail, medically-complex older adults are reliant on support from service such as home care which is defined as receiving nursing or professional services (e.g., physical or occupational therapy) for 60 days or more within a person’s home [
1]. Because they are more medically complex, people receiving home care experience a higher incidence of negative events such as falls and fractures than the average population [
2], further increasing their risk of functional dependence, institutionalization and mortality. The incidence of hip fracture for people receiving home care is high, at 24.4 per 1000 person-years [
3] compared to 5.7 per 1000 person-years in the average population [
4]. Fractures pose a significant burden to the health, quality of life, and mortality of older adults receiving home care services [
3]. After a hip fracture, 25% of people require institutionalization [
5], and over 20% will die [
6]. Hip fractures also carry a significant economic burden; the costs associated with fractures in home care in Canada are $274 million [
7]. Home care clients at risk for fractures must be identified and strategies must be implemented to prevent the loss of mobility and independence, and increased risk of death.
Fracture risk is commonly identified through risk assessment tools, such as the FRAX [
8]. However, current fracture assessment tools may not be valid or generalizable for some medically complex home care recipients. First, current risk assessment tools do not capture potential risk factors that may be more relevant for assessing risk among the home care population (e.g., cognitive impairment, multi-morbidity and falls risk). Fracture risk outputs may not provide accurate estimates for home care recipients with multiple comorbidities. Current assessment tools rely on data often unavailable in routine home care assessments, such as bone mineral density, adding to the assessment burden of this sector. Finally, imminent fracture risk (i.e., within the next year) must be the target for fracture risk assessment with the vulnerable home care population. As many as 17% of home care clients die within one year from admission [
2]. Risk estimates with a longer prediction timeframe will underestimate imminent fracture risk and lack the urgency for prevention strategies to be implemented.
The Resident Assessment Instrument – Home Care (RAI-HC) [
9] is a comprehensive, standardized tool implemented as part of routine clinical practice across several Canadian provinces. The RAI-HC is completed upon admission into a long-stay home care programs and includes person-level data elements and outcome scores [
9]. Outputs from the RAI-HC can be used to guide practice and identify home care recipients at risk for negative events or outcomes, such as fractures. The RAI-HC is routinely collected for all long-stay home care recipients in Canada and internationally meaning that fracture risk identification could be automatically incorporated into daily practice without additional documentation burden. Our objectives were to develop and validate a scale that predicts one-year incident hip fracture using the home care resident assessment instrument (RAI-HC). Our team has previously developed a Fracture Risk Scale for long-term care using a similar assessment system (MDS 2.0) [
10]. However, given the observed difference in fracture incidence [
11] and population characteristics [
12] between home and long-term care, we considered it important to develop a tool specific to the unique attributes of home care recipients. Further, there continues to be large care gap for people identified at high fracture risk [
13] despite bone mineral density often being available in primary care.
Discussion
Home care recipients have a high risk of imminent hip fracture in the next year, which can result in pain, immobility, institutionalization, and death. We developed a Fracture Risk Scale for home care (FRS-HC) which predicts one-year incident hip fracture. Our results demonstrate that the FRS-HC can both discriminate and predict home care recipients at risk for hip fracture over a one-year time period. The FRS-HC score is calculated using routinely collected home care assessment data, includes clinically relevant information for medically complex home care recipients (e.g., falls, cognitive impairment, co-morbidities) and does not require additional information to be collected (e.g., bone mineral density) improving its clinical applicability and usefulness.
The FRS-HC predicts hip fracture within the next year, an important target for the vulnerable home care population. Indeed, fracture prevention strategies should be targeted to those at imminent risk for fracture including frail, older adults with a history of previous fractures and falls like the home care population [
21]. Several currently available fracture risk assessment tools can determine imminent fracture risk. For example, QFracture [
18] can calculate risk for any year between one and ten, while the Garvan fracture risk assessment tool [
22] calculates risk for five and ten years. FRAX currently only calculates 10-year fracture risk, though it includes consideration for the competing risk of death as age increases [
23]. As such, 10-year fracture risk as calculated by FRAX decreases with age because of the increasing likelihood of death. However, as age increases risk for fracture in the next year may be underestimated which could decrease the urgency for prevention strategies to be implemented [
24]. The benefit of the FRS-HC is that it calculates fracture risk in the next year with data from routinely collected home care assessments thereby limiting additional documentation for an often overburdened sector.
The c-statistic of the FRS-HC is slightly lower than that of previously reported fracture risk assessment tools in other populations [
25,
26]. However, caution must be taken when comparing c-statistics across studies. The c-statistic will vary depending on the characteristics of the cohort (e.g., age range) and length of follow-up [
27,
28]. Further, the c-statistic does not increase with the addition of risk factors with strong predictive values but low prevalence which may be clinically relevant and aid in determining intervention thresholds [
29]. Though it may be tempting to classify all home care recipients at high risk and implement widespread fracture prevention measures, this approach is not realistic in the home care sector. Prevention resources such as staff to support exercise and nutritional counselling are often limited and expensive in the home care sector. Further, home care recipients at low risk for fracture may receive minimal benefit from preventive strategies while unnecessarily consuming resources. Indeed, prevention is more cost-effective in high risk groups [
30]. Targeting home care recipients who are truly at high risk will help with management of scarce resources for a sector with growing demands as the aging population increases. Though the c-statistic of the FRS-HC may be lower than previously developed fracture risk assessment algorithms we cannot compare across studies and regardless it will assist in allocating scare resource judiciously.
Our next step will be to develop a clinical assessment protocol (CAP) associated with the FRS-HC to link treatment and further investigation recommendations with the identified fracture risk. The CAP will classify home care recipients as low or high risk based on their FRS-HC score, and will provide evidence-based recommendations associated with their risk level. The FRS-HC identifies eight risk levels, with approximately 45% of the home care population in the lowest three risk categories [
1‐
3] and fewer residents in the highest risk category (level 8). The lower distribution of home care recipients into higher risk categories is important as a large proportion of individuals identified as high risk can quickly overwhelm an overburdened sector, contribute to alarm fatigue, and cause many false positive identifications. Evidence-based care planning recommendations for the Fracture Risk CAP will be based on Canadian and international fracture prevention guidelines, and could include vitamin D and calcium supplementation, exercise, and pharmacological therapies [
31]. The CAP will assist clinicians in identifying home care recipients at high fracture risk and recommended interventions to decrease that risk. Ultimately, the FRS-HC and associated CAP will reduce the risk of hip fracture, and healthcare costs, and improve quality of life. Given the substantial relationship between falls and fractures [
32], integration of the current Falls CAP [
33] and recently developed 1stFall algorithm [
34], which predicts falls for home care recipients who have not previously fallen, will need to be explored. For example, it would be of value to examine the overlap between the rates that the FRS-HC and 1stFall scales each identify people at high risk, and between recommendations in the current Falls CAP and fracture prevention recommendations.
Our study has several limitations and strengths. We were limited to the inclusion of independent variables available in the RAI-HC, and we may not have captured all relevant fracture risk factors (e.g., body mass index). Further, we were only able to capture clinical vertebral fractures which likely represents 30% of all vertebral fractures during the one-year follow-up. Thus, our estimate for incidence of vertebral fractures is likely underestimated. We did not consider bone active medications in the analysis. We chose to develop the FRS-HC using routinely collected data to facilitate ease of implementation in the home care setting, and data on medications is not immediately available to the clinicians who would use the tool. Also, similar analyses done in a large cohort of community dwelling men revealed that exclusion of individuals on bisphosphonates did not alter the findings [
35]. A strength of our study is the large number of data from home care recipients that was available for developing the scale. We also included a comprehensive list of independent variables in our analyses, confirmed by an expert panel. We used linked hospital data to confirm incident hip fractures. Decision tree analysis allowed us to develop a scale with an empirically sound, visual representation of the contributing factors to hip fractures for home care recipients. Further, since decision tree analysis has no parametric assumptions, it clusters risk factors, it has a better ability to account for outliers compared with regression analysis, and it often has higher utility in identifying high risk individuals [
18,
19]. The FRS-HC uses items available in the RAI-HC and in the newer version of the assessment (interRAI HC). The RAI-HC and interRAI HC are used across several Canadian provinces and internationally, improving the usability and impact of our scale. Finally, the FRS-HC uses existing items from the RAI-HC, will automatically generate a fracture risk score based on routinely collected information, and will thereby decrease work duplication required to complete non-integrated tools such as FRAX.
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.