Skip to main content
Erschienen in: European Spine Journal 1/2006

01.02.2006 | Original Article

Development of a German version of the Oswestry Disability Index. Part 2: sensitivity to change after spinal surgery

verfasst von: A. F. Mannion, A. Junge, D. Grob, J. Dvorak, J. C. T. Fairbank

Erschienen in: European Spine Journal | Ausgabe 1/2006

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

When functional scales are to be used as treatment outcome measures, it is essential to know how responsive they are to clinical change. This information is essential not only for clinical decision-making, but also for the determination of sample size in clinical trials. The present study examined the responsiveness of a German version of the Oswestry Disability Index version 2.1 (ODI) after surgical treatment for low back pain. Before spine surgery 63 patients completed a questionnaire booklet containing the ODI, along with a 0–10 pain visual analogue scale (VAS), the Roland Morris disability questionnaire, and Likert scales for disability, medication intake and pain frequency. Six months after surgery, 57 (90%) patients completed the same questionnaire booklet and also answered Likert-scale questions on the global result of surgery, and on improvements in pain and disability. Both the effect size for the ODI change score 6 months after surgery (0.87) and the area under the receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve for the relative improvement in ODI score in relation to global outcome 6 months after surgery (0.90) indicated that the ODI showed good responsiveness. The ROC method revealed that a minimum reduction of the baseline (pre-surgery) ODI score by 18% (equal to a mean 8-point reduction in this patient group) represented the cut-off for indicating a “good” individual outcome 6 months after surgery (sensitivity 91.4% and specificity 82.4%). The German version of the ODI is a sensitive instrument for detecting clinical change after spinal surgery. Individual improvements after surgery of at least an 18% reduction on baseline values are associated with a good outcome. This figure can be used as a reliable guide for the determination of sample size in future clinical trials of spinal surgery.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Altman DG, Bland JM (1994) Statistics notes: diagnostic tests 3: receiver operating characteristic plots. BMJ 309:188 Altman DG, Bland JM (1994) Statistics notes: diagnostic tests 3: receiver operating characteristic plots. BMJ 309:188
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Ferraz MB (2000) Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine 25:3186–3191 Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Ferraz MB (2000) Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine 25:3186–3191
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Beurskens AJ, de Vet HC, Köke AJ, van der Heijden GJ, Knipschild PG (1995) Measuring the functional status of patients with low back pain. Assessment of the quality of four disease-specific questionnaires. Spine 20:1017–1028 Beurskens AJ, de Vet HC, Köke AJ, van der Heijden GJ, Knipschild PG (1995) Measuring the functional status of patients with low back pain. Assessment of the quality of four disease-specific questionnaires. Spine 20:1017–1028
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Beurskens AJHM, de Vet HCW, Köke (1996) Responsiveness of functional status in low back pain: a comparison of different instruments. Pain 65:71–76 Beurskens AJHM, de Vet HCW, Köke (1996) Responsiveness of functional status in low back pain: a comparison of different instruments. Pain 65:71–76
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Bhandari M, Lochner H, Tornetta P 3rd (2002) Effect of continuous versus dichotomous outcome variables on study power when sample size of orthopaedic randomised trials are small. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 122:96–98 Bhandari M, Lochner H, Tornetta P 3rd (2002) Effect of continuous versus dichotomous outcome variables on study power when sample size of orthopaedic randomised trials are small. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 122:96–98
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Bombardier C (2000) Outcome Assessments in the evaluation of treatment of spinal disorders. Summary and general recommendations. Spine 25:3100–3103 Bombardier C (2000) Outcome Assessments in the evaluation of treatment of spinal disorders. Summary and general recommendations. Spine 25:3100–3103
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Boscainos PJ, Sapkas G, Stilianessi E, Prouskas K, Papadakis SA (2003) Greek versions of the Oswestry and Roland-Morris disability questionnaires. Clin Orthop 411:40–53 Boscainos PJ, Sapkas G, Stilianessi E, Prouskas K, Papadakis SA (2003) Greek versions of the Oswestry and Roland-Morris disability questionnaires. Clin Orthop 411:40–53
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Davidson M, Keating JL (2002) A comparison of five low back disability questionnaires: reliability and responsiveness. Phys Ther 82:8–24 Davidson M, Keating JL (2002) A comparison of five low back disability questionnaires: reliability and responsiveness. Phys Ther 82:8–24
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Davis TT, Delamarter RB, Sra P, Goldstein TB (2004) The IDET procedure for chronic discogenic low back pain. Spine 29:752–756 Davis TT, Delamarter RB, Sra P, Goldstein TB (2004) The IDET procedure for chronic discogenic low back pain. Spine 29:752–756
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Deyi BA, Kosinski AS, Snapinn SM (1998) Power considerations when a continuous outcome variable is dichotomised. J Biopharm Stat 8:337–352 Deyi BA, Kosinski AS, Snapinn SM (1998) Power considerations when a continuous outcome variable is dichotomised. J Biopharm Stat 8:337–352
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Deyo RA, Battie M, Beurskens AJHM, Bombardier C, Croft P, Koes B, Malmivaara A, Roland M, Von Korff M, Waddell G (1998) Outcome measures for low back pain research. A proposal for standardized use. Spine 23:2003–2013 Deyo RA, Battie M, Beurskens AJHM, Bombardier C, Croft P, Koes B, Malmivaara A, Roland M, Von Korff M, Waddell G (1998) Outcome measures for low back pain research. A proposal for standardized use. Spine 23:2003–2013
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Deyo RA, Centor RM (1986) Assessing the responsiveness of functional scales to clinical change: an analogy to diagnostic test performance. J Chronic Dis 39:897–906 Deyo RA, Centor RM (1986) Assessing the responsiveness of functional scales to clinical change: an analogy to diagnostic test performance. J Chronic Dis 39:897–906
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Deyo RA, Diehr P, Patrick DL (1991) Reproducibility and responsiveness of health status measures. Statistics and strategies for evaluation. Control Clin Trials 12(Suppl):142–158 Deyo RA, Diehr P, Patrick DL (1991) Reproducibility and responsiveness of health status measures. Statistics and strategies for evaluation. Control Clin Trials 12(Suppl):142–158
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Exner V, Keel P (2000) Erfassung der Behinderung bei Patienten mit chronischen Rückenschmerzen. Schmerz 14:392–400 Exner V, Keel P (2000) Erfassung der Behinderung bei Patienten mit chronischen Rückenschmerzen. Schmerz 14:392–400
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Fairbank JC, Couper J, Davies JB, O’Brien JP (1980) The Oswestry low back pain questionnaire. Physiotherapy 66:271–273 Fairbank JC, Couper J, Davies JB, O’Brien JP (1980) The Oswestry low back pain questionnaire. Physiotherapy 66:271–273
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Fairbank JC, Pynsent PB (2000) The Oswestry disability index. Spine 25:2940–2952 Fairbank JC, Pynsent PB (2000) The Oswestry disability index. Spine 25:2940–2952
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Fritz JM, Irrgang JJ (2001) A comparison of a modified Oswestry low back pain disability questionnaire and the Quebec back pain disability scale. Phys Ther 81:776–788 Fritz JM, Irrgang JJ (2001) A comparison of a modified Oswestry low back pain disability questionnaire and the Quebec back pain disability scale. Phys Ther 81:776–788
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Goldsmith C, Boers M, Bombardier C, Tugwell P (1993) Criteria for clinically important changes in outcomes: development, scoring and evaluation of rheumatoid arthritis patient and trial profiles. OMERACT Committee. J Rheumatol 20:561–565 Goldsmith C, Boers M, Bombardier C, Tugwell P (1993) Criteria for clinically important changes in outcomes: development, scoring and evaluation of rheumatoid arthritis patient and trial profiles. OMERACT Committee. J Rheumatol 20:561–565
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Grotle M, Brox JI, Vollestad NK (2003) Cross-cultural adaptation of the Norwegian versions of the Roland-Morris disability questionnaire and the Oswestry disablity index. J Rehabil Med 35:241–247 Grotle M, Brox JI, Vollestad NK (2003) Cross-cultural adaptation of the Norwegian versions of the Roland-Morris disability questionnaire and the Oswestry disablity index. J Rehabil Med 35:241–247
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Guillemin F, Bombardier C, Beaton D (1993) Cross-cultural adaptation of health-related quality of life measures: literature review and proposed guidelines. J Clin Epidemiol 46:1417–1432 Guillemin F, Bombardier C, Beaton D (1993) Cross-cultural adaptation of health-related quality of life measures: literature review and proposed guidelines. J Clin Epidemiol 46:1417–1432
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Hagg A, Fritzell P, Oden A, Nordwall A (2002) Simplifying outcome measurement: evaluation of instruments for measuring outcome after fusion surgery for chronic low back pain. Spine 27:1213–1222 Hagg A, Fritzell P, Oden A, Nordwall A (2002) Simplifying outcome measurement: evaluation of instruments for measuring outcome after fusion surgery for chronic low back pain. Spine 27:1213–1222
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Hagg O, Fritzell P, Nordwall A (2003) The clinical importance of changes in outcome scores after treatment for chronic low back pain. Eur Spine J 12:12–20 Hagg O, Fritzell P, Nordwall A (2003) The clinical importance of changes in outcome scores after treatment for chronic low back pain. Eur Spine J 12:12–20
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Hopkins WG (2000) Measures of reliability in sports medicine and science. Sports Med 30:1–15 Hopkins WG (2000) Measures of reliability in sports medicine and science. Sports Med 30:1–15
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Kirschner, Guyatt A (1985) A methodological framework for assessing health indices. J Chronic Dis 38:27–36 Kirschner, Guyatt A (1985) A methodological framework for assessing health indices. J Chronic Dis 38:27–36
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Mannion AF, Junge A, Fairbank JCT, Dvorak J, Grob D (2005) Development of a German version of the Oswestry Disability Index. Part 1: cross-cultural adaptation, reability, and validity. Eur Spine J. DOI 10.1007/s00586-004-0815-0 Mannion AF, Junge A, Fairbank JCT, Dvorak J, Grob D (2005) Development of a German version of the Oswestry Disability Index. Part 1: cross-cultural adaptation, reability, and validity. Eur Spine J. DOI 10.1007/s00586-004-0815-0
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Meade T, Browne W, Mellows S et al. (1986) Comparison of chiropractic and outpatient management of low back pain: a feasibility study. J Epidemiol Commun Health 40:12–17 Meade T, Browne W, Mellows S et al. (1986) Comparison of chiropractic and outpatient management of low back pain: a feasibility study. J Epidemiol Commun Health 40:12–17
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Roland M, Fairbank J (2000) The Roland-Morris disability questionnaire and the Oswestry disability questionnaire. Spine 25:3115–3124 Roland M, Fairbank J (2000) The Roland-Morris disability questionnaire and the Oswestry disability questionnaire. Spine 25:3115–3124
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Roland M, Morris R (1983) A study of the natural history of back pain. Part 1: Development of a reliable and sensitive measure of disability in low-back pain. Spine 8:141–144 Roland M, Morris R (1983) A study of the natural history of back pain. Part 1: Development of a reliable and sensitive measure of disability in low-back pain. Spine 8:141–144
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Stratford PW, Binkley J, Solomon P, Gill C, FInch E (1994) Assessing change over time in patients with low back pain. Phys Ther 74:528–533 Stratford PW, Binkley J, Solomon P, Gill C, FInch E (1994) Assessing change over time in patients with low back pain. Phys Ther 74:528–533
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Stratford PW, Spadoni G, Kennedy D, Westaway MD, Alcock GK (2002) Seven points to consider when investigating a measure‘s ability to detect change. Physiother Can Winter 2002:16–24 Stratford PW, Spadoni G, Kennedy D, Westaway MD, Alcock GK (2002) Seven points to consider when investigating a measure‘s ability to detect change. Physiother Can Winter 2002:16–24
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Vickers AJ (2001) The use of percentage change from baseline as an outcome in a controlled trial is statistically inefficient: a simulation study. BMC Med Res Methodo 1(1):1–6 (Epub: www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2288/1471/1476 Vickers AJ (2001) The use of percentage change from baseline as an outcome in a controlled trial is statistically inefficient: a simulation study. BMC Med Res Methodo 1(1):1–6 (Epub: www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2288/1471/1476
Metadaten
Titel
Development of a German version of the Oswestry Disability Index. Part 2: sensitivity to change after spinal surgery
verfasst von
A. F. Mannion
A. Junge
D. Grob
J. Dvorak
J. C. T. Fairbank
Publikationsdatum
01.02.2006
Erschienen in
European Spine Journal / Ausgabe 1/2006
Print ISSN: 0940-6719
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-0932
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-004-0816-z

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2006

European Spine Journal 1/2006 Zur Ausgabe

Announcements

January 2006

Arthropedia

Grundlagenwissen der Arthroskopie und Gelenkchirurgie. Erweitert durch Fallbeispiele, Videos und Abbildungen. 
» Jetzt entdecken

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.