Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine 4/2020

03.01.2020 | Research Article

Development of a new phantom simulating extracellular space of tumor cell growth and cell edema for diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging

verfasst von: Ryoji Mikayama, Hidetake Yabuuchi, Ryoji Matsumoto, Koji Kobayashi, Yasuo Yamashita, Mitsuhiro Kimura, Takeshi Kamitani, Koji Sagiyama, Yuzo Yamasaki

Erschienen in: Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine | Ausgabe 4/2020

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Objective

A phantom for diffusion-weighted imaging is required to standardize quantitative evaluation. The objectives were to develop a phantom simulating various cell densities and to evaluate repeatability.

Materials and methods

The acrylic fine particles with three different diameters were used to simulate human cells. Four-degree cell density components were developed by adjusting the volume of 10-μm particles (5, 20, 35, and 50% volume, respectively). Two-degree components to simulate cell edema were also developed by adjusting the diameter without changing number (17% and 40% volume, respectively). Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient was used to find a significant correlation between apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and particle density. Coefficient of variation (CV) for ADC was calculated for each component for 6 months. A p value < 0.05 represented a statistically significance.

Results

Each component (particle ratio of 5, 17, 20, 35, 40, and 50% volume, respectively) presented ADC values of 1.42, 1.30, 1.30, 1.12, 1.09, and 0.89 (× 10−3 mm2/s), respectively. A negative correlation (r =  − 0.986, p < 0.05) was observed between ADC values and particle ratio. CV for ADC was less than 5%.

Discussion

A phantom simulating the diffusion restriction correlating with cell density and size could be developed.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Schaefer PW, Grant PE, Gonzalez RG (2000) Diffusion-weighted MR imaging of the brain. Radiology 217:331–345CrossRef Schaefer PW, Grant PE, Gonzalez RG (2000) Diffusion-weighted MR imaging of the brain. Radiology 217:331–345CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Tien RD, Felsberg GJ, Friedman H, Brown M, MacFall J (1994) MR imaging of high-grade cerebral gliomas: value of diffusion weighted echo planar pulse sequences. AJR 162:671–677CrossRef Tien RD, Felsberg GJ, Friedman H, Brown M, MacFall J (1994) MR imaging of high-grade cerebral gliomas: value of diffusion weighted echo planar pulse sequences. AJR 162:671–677CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Okamoto K, Ito J, Ishikawa K, Sakai K, Tokiguchi S (2000) Diffusion-weighted echo-planar MR imaging in differentiation diagnosis of brain tumors and tumor-like conditions. Eur Radiol 10:1342–1350CrossRef Okamoto K, Ito J, Ishikawa K, Sakai K, Tokiguchi S (2000) Diffusion-weighted echo-planar MR imaging in differentiation diagnosis of brain tumors and tumor-like conditions. Eur Radiol 10:1342–1350CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Koh DM, Collins DJ (2007) Diffusion-weighted MRI in the body: applications and challenges in oncology. AJR 188:1622–1635CrossRef Koh DM, Collins DJ (2007) Diffusion-weighted MRI in the body: applications and challenges in oncology. AJR 188:1622–1635CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Kolff-Gart AS, Pouwels PJW, Noji DP et al (2015) Diffusion-weighted imaging of the head and neck in healthy subjects: reproducibility of ADC values in different MRI systems and repeat sessions. AJNR 36:384–390CrossRef Kolff-Gart AS, Pouwels PJW, Noji DP et al (2015) Diffusion-weighted imaging of the head and neck in healthy subjects: reproducibility of ADC values in different MRI systems and repeat sessions. AJNR 36:384–390CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Braithwaite AC, Dale BM, Boll DT, Merkle EM (2009) Short- and midterm reproducibility of apparent diffusion coefficient measurements at 3.0-T diffusion-weighted imaging of the abdomen. Radiology 250:459–465 Braithwaite AC, Dale BM, Boll DT, Merkle EM (2009) Short- and midterm reproducibility of apparent diffusion coefficient measurements at 3.0-T diffusion-weighted imaging of the abdomen. Radiology 250:459–465
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Kivrak AS, Paksoy Y, Erol C, Koplay M, Ozbek S, Kara F (2013) Comparison of apparent diffusion coefficient values among different MRI platforms: a multicenter phantom study. Diagn interv Radiol 19:433–437PubMed Kivrak AS, Paksoy Y, Erol C, Koplay M, Ozbek S, Kara F (2013) Comparison of apparent diffusion coefficient values among different MRI platforms: a multicenter phantom study. Diagn interv Radiol 19:433–437PubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Sasaki M, Yamada K, Watanabe Y et al (2008) Variability in absolute apparent diffusion coefficient values across different platforms may be substantial: a multivendor, multi-institutional comparison study. Radiology 249:624–630CrossRef Sasaki M, Yamada K, Watanabe Y et al (2008) Variability in absolute apparent diffusion coefficient values across different platforms may be substantial: a multivendor, multi-institutional comparison study. Radiology 249:624–630CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Malyarenko DI, Newitt D, Wilmes LJ et al (2016) Demonstration of nonlinearity bias in the measurement of the apparent diffusion coefficient in multicenter trials. Magn Reson Med 75:1312–1323CrossRef Malyarenko DI, Newitt D, Wilmes LJ et al (2016) Demonstration of nonlinearity bias in the measurement of the apparent diffusion coefficient in multicenter trials. Magn Reson Med 75:1312–1323CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Lavdas I, Behan KC, Papadaki A, McRobbie DW, Aboagye EO (2013) A phantom for diffusion-weighted MRI (DW-MRI). J Magn Reson Imaging 38:173–179CrossRef Lavdas I, Behan KC, Papadaki A, McRobbie DW, Aboagye EO (2013) A phantom for diffusion-weighted MRI (DW-MRI). J Magn Reson Imaging 38:173–179CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Matsuya R, Kuroda M, Matsumoto Y et al (2009) A new phantom using polyethylene glycol as an apparent diffusion coefficient standard for MR imaging. Int J Oncol 35:893–900PubMed Matsuya R, Kuroda M, Matsumoto Y et al (2009) A new phantom using polyethylene glycol as an apparent diffusion coefficient standard for MR imaging. Int J Oncol 35:893–900PubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Gatidis S, Schmidt H, Martirosian P, Schwenzer NF (2014) Development of an MRI phantom for diffusion-weighted imaging with independent adjustment of apparent diffusion coefficient values and T2 relaxation times. Magn Reson Med 72:459–463CrossRef Gatidis S, Schmidt H, Martirosian P, Schwenzer NF (2014) Development of an MRI phantom for diffusion-weighted imaging with independent adjustment of apparent diffusion coefficient values and T2 relaxation times. Magn Reson Med 72:459–463CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Chenevert TL, Galban CJ, Ivancevic MK et al (2011) Diffusion coefficient measurement using a temperature-controlled fluid for quality control in multicenter studies. J Magn Reson Imaging 34:983–987CrossRef Chenevert TL, Galban CJ, Ivancevic MK et al (2011) Diffusion coefficient measurement using a temperature-controlled fluid for quality control in multicenter studies. J Magn Reson Imaging 34:983–987CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Malyarenko D, Galban CJ, Londy FJ et al (2013) Multi-system repeatability and reproducibility of apparent diffusion coefficient measurement using an ice-water phantom. J Magn Reson Imaging 37:1238–1246CrossRef Malyarenko D, Galban CJ, Londy FJ et al (2013) Multi-system repeatability and reproducibility of apparent diffusion coefficient measurement using an ice-water phantom. J Magn Reson Imaging 37:1238–1246CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Jerome NP, Papoutsaki MV, Orton MR et al (2016) Development of a temperature-controlled phantom for magnetic resonance quality assurance of diffusion, dynamic, and relaxometry measurements. Med Phys 43:2998–3007CrossRef Jerome NP, Papoutsaki MV, Orton MR et al (2016) Development of a temperature-controlled phantom for magnetic resonance quality assurance of diffusion, dynamic, and relaxometry measurements. Med Phys 43:2998–3007CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Lee CY, Bennett KM, Debbins JP (2013) Sensitivities of statistical distribution model and diffusion kurtosis model in varying microstructural environments: a Monte Carlo study. J Magn Reson 320:19–26CrossRef Lee CY, Bennett KM, Debbins JP (2013) Sensitivities of statistical distribution model and diffusion kurtosis model in varying microstructural environments: a Monte Carlo study. J Magn Reson 320:19–26CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Ogura A, Hayakawa K, Miyati T, Maeda F (2011) Imaging parameter effects in apparent diffusion coefficient determination of magnetic resonance imaging. Eur J Radiol 77:185–188CrossRef Ogura A, Hayakawa K, Miyati T, Maeda F (2011) Imaging parameter effects in apparent diffusion coefficient determination of magnetic resonance imaging. Eur J Radiol 77:185–188CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Lyng H, Haraldseth O, Rofstad EK (2000) Measurement of cell density and necrotic fraction in human melanoma xenografts by diffusion weighted magnetic resonance imaging. Magn Reson Med 43:828–836CrossRef Lyng H, Haraldseth O, Rofstad EK (2000) Measurement of cell density and necrotic fraction in human melanoma xenografts by diffusion weighted magnetic resonance imaging. Magn Reson Med 43:828–836CrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Szafer A, Jianhui Z et al (1995) Theoretical model for water diffusion in tissues. Magn Reson Med 33:697–712CrossRef Szafer A, Jianhui Z et al (1995) Theoretical model for water diffusion in tissues. Magn Reson Med 33:697–712CrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Le Bihan D, Breton E, Lallemand D, Aubin ML, Vignaud J, Lavel-Jeantet M (1988) Separation of diffusion and perfusion in intravoxel incoherent motion MR imaging. Radiology 168:497–505CrossRef Le Bihan D, Breton E, Lallemand D, Aubin ML, Vignaud J, Lavel-Jeantet M (1988) Separation of diffusion and perfusion in intravoxel incoherent motion MR imaging. Radiology 168:497–505CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Development of a new phantom simulating extracellular space of tumor cell growth and cell edema for diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging
verfasst von
Ryoji Mikayama
Hidetake Yabuuchi
Ryoji Matsumoto
Koji Kobayashi
Yasuo Yamashita
Mitsuhiro Kimura
Takeshi Kamitani
Koji Sagiyama
Yuzo Yamasaki
Publikationsdatum
03.01.2020
Verlag
Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in
Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine / Ausgabe 4/2020
Print ISSN: 0968-5243
Elektronische ISSN: 1352-8661
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10334-019-00823-6

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2020

Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine 4/2020 Zur Ausgabe

Update Radiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.