Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy 11/2018

07.09.2018

Development of a technical checklist for the assessment of suturing in robotic surgery

verfasst von: Ahmad Guni, Nicholas Raison, Ben Challacombe, Shamim Khan, Prokar Dasgupta, Kamran Ahmed

Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy | Ausgabe 11/2018

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

With the increased use of simulation for surgical training, there is a need for objective forms of assessment to evaluate trainees. The Global Evaluative Assessment of Robotic Skills (GEARS) is widely used for assessing skills in robotic surgery, but there are no recognised checklist scoring systems. This study aimed to develop a checklist for suturing in robotic surgery.

Methods

A suturing checklist for needle driving and knot tying was constructed following evaluation of participants performing urethrovesical anastomoses. Key procedural steps were identified from expert videos, while assessing novice videos allowed identification of common technical errors. 22 novice and 13 expert videos were marked on needle driving, while 18 novices and 10 experts were assessed on knot tying. Validation of the finalised checklist was performed with the assessment of 39 separate novices by an expert surgeon and compared to GEARS scoring.

Results

The internal consistency of the preliminary checklist was high (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.870 for needle driving items; 0.736 for knot tying items), and after removal of poorly correlating items, the final checklist contained 23 steps. Both the needle driving and knot tying categories discriminated between novices and experts, p < 0.005. While the GEARS score demonstrated construct validity for needle driving, it could not significantly differentiate between novices and experts for knot tying, p = 0.286. The needle driving category significantly correlated with the corresponding GEARS scores (rs = 0.613, p < 0.005), but the correlation for knot tying was insignificant (rs = 0.296, p = 0.127). The pilot data indicates the checklist significantly correlated with the GEARS score (p < 0.005).

Conclusion

This study reports the development of a valid assessment tool for suturing in robotic surgery. Given that checklists are simple to use, there is significant scope for this checklist to be used in surgical training.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Bric J, Lumbard D, Frelich M, Gould J (2015) Current state of virtual reality simulation in robotic surgery training: a review. Surg Endosc 30(6):2169–2178CrossRef Bric J, Lumbard D, Frelich M, Gould J (2015) Current state of virtual reality simulation in robotic surgery training: a review. Surg Endosc 30(6):2169–2178CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Scott DJ, Dunnington GL (2008) The new ACS/APDS skills curriculum: moving the learning curve out of the operating room. J Gastrointest Surg 12(2):213–221CrossRef Scott DJ, Dunnington GL (2008) The new ACS/APDS skills curriculum: moving the learning curve out of the operating room. J Gastrointest Surg 12(2):213–221CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Moorthy K, Munz Y, Sarker S, Darzi A (2003) Objective assessment of technical skills in surgery. BMJ 327(7422):1032–1037CrossRef Moorthy K, Munz Y, Sarker S, Darzi A (2003) Objective assessment of technical skills in surgery. BMJ 327(7422):1032–1037CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Goh A, Goldfarb D, Sander J, Miles B, Dunkin B (2012) Global evaluative assessment of robotic skills: validation of a clinical assessment tool to measure robotic surgical skills. J Urol 187(1):247–252CrossRef Goh A, Goldfarb D, Sander J, Miles B, Dunkin B (2012) Global evaluative assessment of robotic skills: validation of a clinical assessment tool to measure robotic surgical skills. J Urol 187(1):247–252CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Hussein A, Ghani K, Peabody J, Sarle R, Abaza R, Eun D, Hu J, Fumo M, Lane B, Montgomery JS, Hinata N, Rooney D, Comstock B, Chan HK, Mane SS, Mohler JL, Wilding G, Miller D, Guru KA (2017) Development and validation of an objective scoring tool for robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: prostatectomy assessment and competency evaluation. J Urol 197(5):1237–1244CrossRef Hussein A, Ghani K, Peabody J, Sarle R, Abaza R, Eun D, Hu J, Fumo M, Lane B, Montgomery JS, Hinata N, Rooney D, Comstock B, Chan HK, Mane SS, Mohler JL, Wilding G, Miller D, Guru KA (2017) Development and validation of an objective scoring tool for robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: prostatectomy assessment and competency evaluation. J Urol 197(5):1237–1244CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Martin J, Regehr G, Reznick RK, Macrae H, Murnaghan J, Hutchison C, Brown M (1997) Objective structured assessment of technical skill (OSATS) for surgical residents. Br J Surg 84(2):273–278CrossRef Martin J, Regehr G, Reznick RK, Macrae H, Murnaghan J, Hutchison C, Brown M (1997) Objective structured assessment of technical skill (OSATS) for surgical residents. Br J Surg 84(2):273–278CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Torkington J, Smith S, Rees B, Darzi A (2001) Skill transfer from virtual reality to a real laparoscopic task. Surg Endosc 15(10):1076–1079CrossRef Torkington J, Smith S, Rees B, Darzi A (2001) Skill transfer from virtual reality to a real laparoscopic task. Surg Endosc 15(10):1076–1079CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Eubanks T, Clements R, Pohl D, Williams N, Schaad D, Horgan S, Pellegrini C (1999) An objective scoring system for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Am Coll Surg 189(6):566–574CrossRef Eubanks T, Clements R, Pohl D, Williams N, Schaad D, Horgan S, Pellegrini C (1999) An objective scoring system for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Am Coll Surg 189(6):566–574CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Anastakis D, Regehr G, Reznick R, Cusimano M, Murnaghan J, Brown M, Hutchinson C (1999) Assessment of technical skills transfer from the bench training model to the human model. Am J Surg 177(2):167–170CrossRef Anastakis D, Regehr G, Reznick R, Cusimano M, Murnaghan J, Brown M, Hutchinson C (1999) Assessment of technical skills transfer from the bench training model to the human model. Am J Surg 177(2):167–170CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Moorthy K, Munz Y, Dosis A, Bello F, Chang A, Darzi A (2004) Bimodal assessment of laparoscopic suturing skills: construct and concurrent validity. Surg Endosc 18(11):1608–1612PubMed Moorthy K, Munz Y, Dosis A, Bello F, Chang A, Darzi A (2004) Bimodal assessment of laparoscopic suturing skills: construct and concurrent validity. Surg Endosc 18(11):1608–1612PubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Bland J, Altman D (1997) Statistics notes: Cronbach’s alpha. BMJ 314(7080):572–572CrossRef Bland J, Altman D (1997) Statistics notes: Cronbach’s alpha. BMJ 314(7080):572–572CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Vassiliou MC, Feldman LS, Andrew CG, Bergman S, Leffondré K, Stanbridge D, Fried GM (2005) A global assessment tool for evaluation of intraoperative laparoscopic skills. Am J Surg 190(1):107–113CrossRef Vassiliou MC, Feldman LS, Andrew CG, Bergman S, Leffondré K, Stanbridge D, Fried GM (2005) A global assessment tool for evaluation of intraoperative laparoscopic skills. Am J Surg 190(1):107–113CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Regehr G, MacRae H, Reznick RK, Szalay D (1998) Comparing the psychometric properties of checklists and global rating scales for assessing performance on an OSCE-format examination. Acad Med 73(9):993–997CrossRef Regehr G, MacRae H, Reznick RK, Szalay D (1998) Comparing the psychometric properties of checklists and global rating scales for assessing performance on an OSCE-format examination. Acad Med 73(9):993–997CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Hung AJ, Bottyan T, Clifford TG, Serang S, Nakhoda ZK, Shah SH, Yokoi H, Aron M, Gill IS (2017) Structured learning for robotic surgery utilizing a proficiency score: a pilot study. World J Urol 35(1):27–34CrossRef Hung AJ, Bottyan T, Clifford TG, Serang S, Nakhoda ZK, Shah SH, Yokoi H, Aron M, Gill IS (2017) Structured learning for robotic surgery utilizing a proficiency score: a pilot study. World J Urol 35(1):27–34CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Sánchez R, Rodríguez O, Rosciano J, Vegas L, Bond V, Sanchez-Ismayel A (2016) Robotic surgery training: construct validity of Global Evaluative Assessment of Robotic Skills (GEARS). J Robot Surg 10(3):227–231CrossRef Sánchez R, Rodríguez O, Rosciano J, Vegas L, Bond V, Sanchez-Ismayel A (2016) Robotic surgery training: construct validity of Global Evaluative Assessment of Robotic Skills (GEARS). J Robot Surg 10(3):227–231CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Kopta JA (1971) An approach to the evaluation of operative skills. Surgery 70:297–303PubMed Kopta JA (1971) An approach to the evaluation of operative skills. Surgery 70:297–303PubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Ilgen JS, Ma IW, Hatala R, Cook DA (2015) A systematic review of validity evidence for checklists versus global rating scales in simulation-based assessment. Med Educ 49(2):161–173CrossRef Ilgen JS, Ma IW, Hatala R, Cook DA (2015) A systematic review of validity evidence for checklists versus global rating scales in simulation-based assessment. Med Educ 49(2):161–173CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat McHugh M (2012) Interrater reliability: the kappa statistic. Biochem Med 22(3):276–282CrossRef McHugh M (2012) Interrater reliability: the kappa statistic. Biochem Med 22(3):276–282CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Development of a technical checklist for the assessment of suturing in robotic surgery
verfasst von
Ahmad Guni
Nicholas Raison
Ben Challacombe
Shamim Khan
Prokar Dasgupta
Kamran Ahmed
Publikationsdatum
07.09.2018
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Surgical Endoscopy / Ausgabe 11/2018
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-018-6407-6

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 11/2018

Surgical Endoscopy 11/2018 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

CME: 2 Punkte

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht, PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske Das Webinar S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“ beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.