Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Quality of Life Research 5/2022

07.01.2022

Development of an observer-reported outcome measure to capture the signs and impact of fever distress symptoms in infants and young children

verfasst von: Adam B. Smith, Evi Tselenti, Dipak Kanabar, Lisa Miles

Erschienen in: Quality of Life Research | Ausgabe 5/2022

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

This qualitative study aimed to construct an observer-reported outcome measure (ObsRO) to evaluate fever distress in young children.

Methods

A literature review was conducted to identify fever-related concepts. Clinical experts were interviewed for feedback on these concepts. Parents of young children were interviewed to identify behaviours the child exhibited during a recent fever episode. Fever sign and behaviour concepts endorsed by ≥ 20% parents were used to create items for the draft ObsRO. Parents of young children who recently had fever completed the ObsRO and gave feedback during two successive rounds of cognitive interviews.

Results

Twenty-five parents participated in the concept elicitation. Mean child age was 2.7 years (range: 0.6–5.8 years). Fever sign and behaviour concepts endorsed by ≥ 20% participants were high temperature (80%), skin hot to touch (32%), skin redness/flushing (32%), reduced appetite/drink (96%), needy/clingy/irritable (48–92%), less active/interactive (68–84%) and lethargic (64–88%). Eighteen items, four in the Fever Signs Module and 14 in the Fever Behaviours Module, were developed for the draft ObsRO. Chosen recall period was 24 h. Thirty participants (Round 1: n = 17; Round 2: n = 13), participated in cognitive interviews. Mean child age was 2.4 years (range 0.3–5.8). Round 1 feedback resulted in two Fever Signs items being combined. Three Fever Behaviour items were deleted, six revised and four unchanged. No changes were made following Round 2 feedback. Most participants understood all aspects of the ObsRO and found it user-friendly.

Conclusion

The ObsRO will undergo further development in validation studies testing measurement properties of each item.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Schmitt, B. D. (1980). Fever phobia: Misconceptions of parents about fevers. American Journal of Diseases of Children, 134, 176–181.CrossRef Schmitt, B. D. (1980). Fever phobia: Misconceptions of parents about fevers. American Journal of Diseases of Children, 134, 176–181.CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Foster, H., Moffat, K. R., Burns, N., Gannon, M. G., Macdonald, S., & O’Donnell, C. A. (2020). What do we know about demand, use and outcomes in primary care out-of-hours services? A systematic scoping review of international literature. British Medical Journal Open, 10(1), e033481. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033481CrossRef Foster, H., Moffat, K. R., Burns, N., Gannon, M. G., Macdonald, S., & O’Donnell, C. A. (2020). What do we know about demand, use and outcomes in primary care out-of-hours services? A systematic scoping review of international literature. British Medical Journal Open, 10(1), e033481. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1136/​bmjopen-2019-033481CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Food and Drug Administration (FDA). (2009). Guidance for industry on patient-reported outcome measures: Use in medical product development to support labeling claims. Fed Regis, 74(235), 65132–65133. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). (2009). Guidance for industry on patient-reported outcome measures: Use in medical product development to support labeling claims. Fed Regis, 74(235), 65132–65133.
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Patrick, D. L., Burke, L. B., Gwaltney, C. J., et al. (2011). Content validity–establishing and reporting the evidence in newly developed patient-reported outcomes (PRO) instruments for medical product evaluation: ISPOR PRO good research practices task force report: Part II—assessing respondent understanding. Value Health, 14(8), 978–988. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2011.06.013CrossRefPubMed Patrick, D. L., Burke, L. B., Gwaltney, C. J., et al. (2011). Content validity–establishing and reporting the evidence in newly developed patient-reported outcomes (PRO) instruments for medical product evaluation: ISPOR PRO good research practices task force report: Part II—assessing respondent understanding. Value Health, 14(8), 978–988. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/​j.​jval.​2011.​06.​013CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Patrick, D. L., Burke, L. B., Gwaltney, C. J., et al. (2011). Content validity–establishing and reporting the evidence in newly developed patient-reported outcomes (PRO) instruments for medical product evaluation: ISPOR PRO good research practices task force report: Part I—eliciting concepts for a new PRO instrument. Value Health, 14(8), 967–977. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2011.06.014CrossRefPubMed Patrick, D. L., Burke, L. B., Gwaltney, C. J., et al. (2011). Content validity–establishing and reporting the evidence in newly developed patient-reported outcomes (PRO) instruments for medical product evaluation: ISPOR PRO good research practices task force report: Part I—eliciting concepts for a new PRO instrument. Value Health, 14(8), 967–977. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/​j.​jval.​2011.​06.​014CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Friese, S., & Ringmayr, T. (2013). ATLAS.ti 7 User Guide and Reference. Berlin; ATLAS.ti Scientific Software Development GmBH. Friese, S., & Ringmayr, T. (2013). ATLAS.ti 7 User Guide and Reference. Berlin; ATLAS.ti Scientific Software Development GmBH.
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Baker, M. D., Monroe, K. W., King, W. D., Sorrentino, A., & Glaeser, P. W. (2009). Effectiveness of fever education in a pediatric emergency department. Pediatric Emergency Care, 25, 565–568.CrossRef Baker, M. D., Monroe, K. W., King, W. D., Sorrentino, A., & Glaeser, P. W. (2009). Effectiveness of fever education in a pediatric emergency department. Pediatric Emergency Care, 25, 565–568.CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Berry, A., Brousseau, D., Brotanek, J. M., Tomany-Korman, S., & Flores, G. (2008). Why do parents bring children to the emergency department for nonurgent conditions? A qualitative study. Ambulatory Pediatrics, 8, 360–371.CrossRef Berry, A., Brousseau, D., Brotanek, J. M., Tomany-Korman, S., & Flores, G. (2008). Why do parents bring children to the emergency department for nonurgent conditions? A qualitative study. Ambulatory Pediatrics, 8, 360–371.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Development of an observer-reported outcome measure to capture the signs and impact of fever distress symptoms in infants and young children
verfasst von
Adam B. Smith
Evi Tselenti
Dipak Kanabar
Lisa Miles
Publikationsdatum
07.01.2022
Verlag
Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in
Quality of Life Research / Ausgabe 5/2022
Print ISSN: 0962-9343
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-2649
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-021-03049-z

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2022

Quality of Life Research 5/2022 Zur Ausgabe