Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of Cancer Education 4/2017

02.04.2016

Development of Plain Language Supplemental Materials for the Biobank Informed Consent Process

verfasst von: Bettina F. Drake, Katherine M. Brown, Sarah Gehlert, Leslie E. Wolf, Joann Seo, Hannah Perkins, Melody S. Goodman, Kimberly A. Kaphingst

Erschienen in: Journal of Cancer Education | Ausgabe 4/2017

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

The US Department of Health and Human Services addresses clear communication in the informed consent process as part of the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking for revisions to the Common Rule. However, prior research has shown that participants may not fully comprehend research studies despite completion of an informed consent process. Our main goal was to provide plain language information about donation processes to a cancer biobank to supplement an informed consent form. We developed and conducted cognitive testing with supplemental brochures that clearly communicated information about three different models for consent (notice, broad and study-specific) to future use of biospecimens. During the brochure development process, we conducted qualitative, semi-structured, individual, in-person cognitive interviews among 14 women to examine participants’ perceptions of the brochures. Each participant provided feedback regarding the understandability, graphics and layout, and cultural appropriateness of the brochures. Our findings demonstrate that these methods may be used to tailor consent form brochures, such as the ones developed here, to other populations. This study therefore adds to our understanding of how best to present content to help women from two different racial groups make informed decisions about participation in a cancer biobank.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Servies', U.D.o.H.a.H. (2011) Human subjects research protection: enhancing protections for research subjects and reducing burden, delay and ambiguity for investigators Servies', U.D.o.H.a.H. (2011) Human subjects research protection: enhancing protections for research subjects and reducing burden, delay and ambiguity for investigators
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Cambon-Thomsen A (2004) The social and ethical issues of post-genomic human biobanks. Nat Rev Genet 5(11):866–873CrossRefPubMed Cambon-Thomsen A (2004) The social and ethical issues of post-genomic human biobanks. Nat Rev Genet 5(11):866–873CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Hansson MG et al (2006) Should donors be allowed to give broad consent to future biobank research? Lancet Oncol 7(3):266–269CrossRefPubMed Hansson MG et al (2006) Should donors be allowed to give broad consent to future biobank research? Lancet Oncol 7(3):266–269CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Services', U.D.o.H.a.H. (2015) Federal policy for the protection of human subjects. Docket Number: HHS-OPHS-2015-0008. Federal Register. 80(173) Services', U.D.o.H.a.H. (2015) Federal policy for the protection of human subjects. Docket Number: HHS-OPHS-2015-0008. Federal Register. 80(173)
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Falagas ME et al (2009) Informed consent: how much and what do patients understand? Am J Surg 198(3):420–435CrossRefPubMed Falagas ME et al (2009) Informed consent: how much and what do patients understand? Am J Surg 198(3):420–435CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Paasche-Orlow MK, Taylor HA, Brancati FL (2003) Readability standards for informed-consent forms as compared with actual readability. N Engl J Med 348(8):721–726CrossRefPubMed Paasche-Orlow MK, Taylor HA, Brancati FL (2003) Readability standards for informed-consent forms as compared with actual readability. N Engl J Med 348(8):721–726CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Davis TC et al (1998) Informed consent for clinical trials: a comparative study of standard versus simplified forms. J Natl Cancer Inst 90(9):668–674CrossRefPubMed Davis TC et al (1998) Informed consent for clinical trials: a comparative study of standard versus simplified forms. J Natl Cancer Inst 90(9):668–674CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Sheridan SL et al (2011) Interventions for individuals with low health literacy: a systematic review. J Health Commun 16(Suppl 3):30–54CrossRefPubMed Sheridan SL et al (2011) Interventions for individuals with low health literacy: a systematic review. J Health Commun 16(Suppl 3):30–54CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Nielsen-Bohlman L, Panzer A, Kindig D (eds) (2004) Health literacy: a prescription to end confusion. National Academies Press, Washington, DC Nielsen-Bohlman L, Panzer A, Kindig D (eds) (2004) Health literacy: a prescription to end confusion. National Academies Press, Washington, DC
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Chen DT et al (2005) Research with stored biological samples: what do research participants want? Arch Intern Med 165(6):652–655CrossRefPubMed Chen DT et al (2005) Research with stored biological samples: what do research participants want? Arch Intern Med 165(6):652–655CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Helft PR et al (2007) Cancer patients’ attitudes toward future research uses of stored human biological materials. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics 2(3):15–22CrossRefPubMed Helft PR et al (2007) Cancer patients’ attitudes toward future research uses of stored human biological materials. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics 2(3):15–22CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Huber J et al (2013) Two decades’ experience with a prospective biobank for urologic oncology: research, clinical care, and the patients’ view. Urol Oncol 31(7):990–996CrossRefPubMed Huber J et al (2013) Two decades’ experience with a prospective biobank for urologic oncology: research, clinical care, and the patients’ view. Urol Oncol 31(7):990–996CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Pentz RD, Billot L, Wendler D (2006) Research on stored biological samples: views of African American and White American cancer patients. Am J Med Genet A 140(7):733–739CrossRefPubMed Pentz RD, Billot L, Wendler D (2006) Research on stored biological samples: views of African American and White American cancer patients. Am J Med Genet A 140(7):733–739CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Donovan-Kicken E et al (2012) Health literacy, self-efficacy, and patients’ assessment of medical disclosure and consent documentation. Health Commun 27(6):581–590CrossRefPubMed Donovan-Kicken E et al (2012) Health literacy, self-efficacy, and patients’ assessment of medical disclosure and consent documentation. Health Commun 27(6):581–590CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Jefford M, Moore R (2008) Improvement of informed consent and the quality of consent documents. Lancet Oncol 9(5):485–493CrossRefPubMed Jefford M, Moore R (2008) Improvement of informed consent and the quality of consent documents. Lancet Oncol 9(5):485–493CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Ridpath JR, Wiese CJ, Greene SM (2009) Looking at research consent forms through a participant-centered lens: the PRISM readability toolkit. Am J Health Promot 23(6):371–375CrossRefPubMed Ridpath JR, Wiese CJ, Greene SM (2009) Looking at research consent forms through a participant-centered lens: the PRISM readability toolkit. Am J Health Promot 23(6):371–375CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Schnitzer A, Rosenzweig M, Harris B (2011) Health literacy: a survey of the issues and solutions. Journal of Consumer Health on the Internet 15(2):164–179CrossRef Schnitzer A, Rosenzweig M, Harris B (2011) Health literacy: a survey of the issues and solutions. Journal of Consumer Health on the Internet 15(2):164–179CrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Walters K, Hamrell M (2008) Consent forms, lower reading levels, and using Flesch-Kincaid readability software. Drug Inf J 42(4):385–394CrossRef Walters K, Hamrell M (2008) Consent forms, lower reading levels, and using Flesch-Kincaid readability software. Drug Inf J 42(4):385–394CrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Tait A et al (2013) Informing the uninformed: optimizing the consent message using a fractional factorial design. JAMA pediatrics 167(7):640–646CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Tait A et al (2013) Informing the uninformed: optimizing the consent message using a fractional factorial design. JAMA pediatrics 167(7):640–646CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Enama ME et al (2012) Randomization to standard and concise informed consent forms: development of evidence-based consent practices. Contemp Clin Trials 33(5):895–902CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Enama ME et al (2012) Randomization to standard and concise informed consent forms: development of evidence-based consent practices. Contemp Clin Trials 33(5):895–902CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Coyne CA et al (2003) Randomized, controlled trial of an easy-to-read informed consent statement for clinical trial participation: a study of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group. J Clin Oncol 21(5):836–842CrossRefPubMed Coyne CA et al (2003) Randomized, controlled trial of an easy-to-read informed consent statement for clinical trial participation: a study of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group. J Clin Oncol 21(5):836–842CrossRefPubMed
27.
Zurück zum Zitat McGraw S et al (2012) Clarity and appeal of a multimedia informed consent tool for biobanking. IRB: A Review of Human Subjects Reserach 34(1):9–19 McGraw S et al (2012) Clarity and appeal of a multimedia informed consent tool for biobanking. IRB: A Review of Human Subjects Reserach 34(1):9–19
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Campbell H et al (2008) Impact of a clinical trials information handbook on patient knowledge, perceptions, and likelihood of participation. IRB: Ethics & Human Research 30:6–14 Campbell H et al (2008) Impact of a clinical trials information handbook on patient knowledge, perceptions, and likelihood of participation. IRB: Ethics & Human Research 30:6–14
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Juraskova I et al (2008) Improving informed consent: pilot of a decision aid for women invited to participate in a breast cancer prevention trial (IBIS-II DCIS). Health Expect 11(3):252–262CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Juraskova I et al (2008) Improving informed consent: pilot of a decision aid for women invited to participate in a breast cancer prevention trial (IBIS-II DCIS). Health Expect 11(3):252–262CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Kass NE et al (2015) A pilot study of simple interventions to improve informed consent in clinical research: feasibility, approach, and results. Clin Trials 12(1):54–66CrossRefPubMed Kass NE et al (2015) A pilot study of simple interventions to improve informed consent in clinical research: feasibility, approach, and results. Clin Trials 12(1):54–66CrossRefPubMed
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Mancini J et al (2011) Consent for biobanking: assessing the understanding and views of cancer patients. J Natl Cancer Inst 103(2):154–157CrossRefPubMed Mancini J et al (2011) Consent for biobanking: assessing the understanding and views of cancer patients. J Natl Cancer Inst 103(2):154–157CrossRefPubMed
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Robinson JO et al (2013) Participants’ recall and understanding of genomic research and large-scale data sharing. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics 8(4):42–52CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Robinson JO et al (2013) Participants’ recall and understanding of genomic research and large-scale data sharing. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics 8(4):42–52CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Ormond KE et al (2009) Assessing the understanding of biobank participants. Am J Med Genet A 149A(2):188–198CrossRefPubMed Ormond KE et al (2009) Assessing the understanding of biobank participants. Am J Med Genet A 149A(2):188–198CrossRefPubMed
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Klima J et al (2014) Understanding of informed consent by parents of children enrolled in a genetic biobank. Genet Med 16(2):141–148CrossRefPubMed Klima J et al (2014) Understanding of informed consent by parents of children enrolled in a genetic biobank. Genet Med 16(2):141–148CrossRefPubMed
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Mello MM, Wolf LE (2010) The Havasupai Indian tribe case—lessons for research involving stored biologic samples. N Engl J Med 363(3):204–207CrossRefPubMed Mello MM, Wolf LE (2010) The Havasupai Indian tribe case—lessons for research involving stored biologic samples. N Engl J Med 363(3):204–207CrossRefPubMed
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Brown KM et al (2015) Differences in preferences for models of consent for biobanks between Black and White women. J Community Genet Brown KM et al (2015) Differences in preferences for models of consent for biobanks between Black and White women. J Community Genet
39.
Zurück zum Zitat Doak CC, Doak LG, Root JH (1996) Teaching patients with low literacy skills, 2nd edn. J.B. Lippincott Company, Philadelphia Doak CC, Doak LG, Root JH (1996) Teaching patients with low literacy skills, 2nd edn. J.B. Lippincott Company, Philadelphia
40.
Zurück zum Zitat Institute', N.C. (2003) Clear & simple: developing effective print materials for low-literate readers Institute', N.C. (2003) Clear & simple: developing effective print materials for low-literate readers
42.
Zurück zum Zitat Strauss A, C. J (1998) Basics of qualitative research: Second edition: techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Sage Publications, Inc Strauss A, C. J (1998) Basics of qualitative research: Second edition: techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Sage Publications, Inc
43.
Zurück zum Zitat Schillinger D et al (2003) Closing the loop: physician communication with diabetic patients who have low health literacy. Arch Intern Med 163(1):83–90CrossRefPubMed Schillinger D et al (2003) Closing the loop: physician communication with diabetic patients who have low health literacy. Arch Intern Med 163(1):83–90CrossRefPubMed
44.
Zurück zum Zitat Delp C, Jones J (1996) Communicating information to patients: the use of cartoon illustrations to improve comprehension of instructions. Acad Emerg Med 3(3):264–270CrossRefPubMed Delp C, Jones J (1996) Communicating information to patients: the use of cartoon illustrations to improve comprehension of instructions. Acad Emerg Med 3(3):264–270CrossRefPubMed
45.
Zurück zum Zitat Houts PS et al (2006) The role of pictures in improving health communication: a review of research on attention, comprehension, recall, and adherence. Patient Educ Couns 61(2):173–190CrossRefPubMed Houts PS et al (2006) The role of pictures in improving health communication: a review of research on attention, comprehension, recall, and adherence. Patient Educ Couns 61(2):173–190CrossRefPubMed
46.
Zurück zum Zitat Mansoor LE, Dowse R (2003) Effect of pictograms on readability of patient information materials. Ann Pharmacother 37(7–8):1003–1009CrossRefPubMed Mansoor LE, Dowse R (2003) Effect of pictograms on readability of patient information materials. Ann Pharmacother 37(7–8):1003–1009CrossRefPubMed
47.
Zurück zum Zitat Pentz RD, Theriault RL (2001) Research ethics: clinical trial abuse and the public trust. Breast diseases: A year book quarterly 12:141–144CrossRef Pentz RD, Theriault RL (2001) Research ethics: clinical trial abuse and the public trust. Breast diseases: A year book quarterly 12:141–144CrossRef
48.
Zurück zum Zitat Randall V (1995) Slavery, segregation and racism: trusting the health care system ain’t always easy—an African American perspective on bioethics. St Louis University Public Law Review 15:191 Randall V (1995) Slavery, segregation and racism: trusting the health care system ain’t always easy—an African American perspective on bioethics. St Louis University Public Law Review 15:191
49.
Zurück zum Zitat Branson RD, Davis K Jr, Butler KL (2007) African Americans’ participation in clinical research: importance, barriers, and solutions. Am J Surg 193(1):32–39, discussion 40CrossRefPubMed Branson RD, Davis K Jr, Butler KL (2007) African Americans’ participation in clinical research: importance, barriers, and solutions. Am J Surg 193(1):32–39, discussion 40CrossRefPubMed
50.
Zurück zum Zitat Field LA et al (2012) Identification of differentially expressed genes in breast tumors from African American compared with Caucasian women. Cancer 118(5):1334–1344CrossRefPubMed Field LA et al (2012) Identification of differentially expressed genes in breast tumors from African American compared with Caucasian women. Cancer 118(5):1334–1344CrossRefPubMed
52.
Zurück zum Zitat Platt J et al (2014) Public preferences regarding informed consent models for participation in population-based genomic research. Genet Med 16(1):11–18CrossRefPubMed Platt J et al (2014) Public preferences regarding informed consent models for participation in population-based genomic research. Genet Med 16(1):11–18CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Development of Plain Language Supplemental Materials for the Biobank Informed Consent Process
verfasst von
Bettina F. Drake
Katherine M. Brown
Sarah Gehlert
Leslie E. Wolf
Joann Seo
Hannah Perkins
Melody S. Goodman
Kimberly A. Kaphingst
Publikationsdatum
02.04.2016
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Journal of Cancer Education / Ausgabe 4/2017
Print ISSN: 0885-8195
Elektronische ISSN: 1543-0154
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-016-1029-y

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2017

Journal of Cancer Education 4/2017 Zur Ausgabe

Update Onkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.