Skip to main content
Hauptrubriken
CME Facharzt-Training Webinare Zeitschriften Bücher e.Medpedia Podcast
Service
Jobbörse Info & Hilfe
Fachgebiete
Anästhesiologie Allgemeinmedizin Arbeitsmedizin Augenheilkunde Chirurgie Dermatologie Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe HNO Innere Medizin Kardiologie Neurologie Onkologie und Hämatologie Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie Pädiatrie Pathologie Psychiatrie Radiologie Rechtsmedizin Urologie Zahnmedizin
Themen
Typ-2-Diabetes und Adipositas Klimawandel und Gesundheit Neues aus dem Markt Praxis und Beruf Seltene Erkrankungen GOÄ & EBM
Sammlungen
Kasuistiken Algorithmen & Infografiken Blickdiagnosen Arthropedia FlapFinder (für Dermatochirurgen) Videos Kongressberichterstattung Medizin für Apothekerinnen und Apotheker Fachpsychotherapie Für Ärztinnen und Ärzte in Weiterbildung Für Medizinstudierende Patientenratgeber
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Current Treatment Options in Pediatrics
Erschienen in:

01.12.2023 | Cardiology/CT Surgery (K Gist, Section Editor)

Device Innovations in Pediatric Heart Failure

verfasst von: Tanya Perry, DO, Chet Villa, MD

Erschienen in: Current Treatment Options in Pediatrics | Ausgabe 4/2023

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose of Review

This review will discuss the evolving epidemiology of heart failure in children and young adults and the innovations/changes in mechanical circulatory support (MCS) over the last 2 decades.

Recent Findings

Maturation of pediatric MCS programs in conjunction with improvement in patient management have led to serial improvements in clinical outcomes for children requiring MCS. These improvements, in conjunction with the increasing burden of heart failure, have driven rapid evolution in the use of mechanical circulatory support for children and young adults with heart failure.

Summary

The number of children and young adults supported with MCS has increased significantly over the last 2 decades. This has been driven by increased willingness (and ability) to provide effective ventricular assist device (VAD) support in young children and patients with congenital heart disease. The increasing burden of disease, in conjunction with longer heart transplant wait times, has underscored the need for further innovation. In particular, there is a need for smaller, durable VAD options for pediatric patients who are not candidates for implantable, continuous flow VADs.
Literatur
1.
Blume ED, et al. Outcomes of children bridged to heart transplantation with ventricular assist devices: a multi-institutional study. Circulation. 2006;113(19):2313–9.PubMedCrossRef
2.
Almond CS, et al. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for bridge to heart transplantation among children in the United States: analysis of data from the Organ Procurement and Transplant Network and Extracorporeal Life Support Organization Registry. Circulation. 2011;123(25):2975–84.PubMedCrossRef
3.
Burstein DS, et al. Significant mortality, morbidity and resource utilization associated with advanced heart failure in congenital heart disease in children and young adults. Am Heart J. 2019;209:9–19.PubMedCrossRef
4.
5.
Williams RJ, et al. Pediatric heart transplant waiting times in the United States since the 2016 allocation policy change. Am J Transplant. 2022;22(3):833–42.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
6.
7.
8.
Rossano JW, et al. The International Thoracic Organ Transplant Registry of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation: twenty-second pediatric heart transplantation report - 2019; Focus theme: donor and recipient size match. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2019;38(10):1028–41.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
9.
Edelson JB, et al. The influence of mechanical circulatory support on post-transplant outcomes in pediatric patients: a multicenter study from the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation (ISHLT) Registry. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2021;40(11):1443–53.PubMedCrossRef
10.
Davies RR, et al. The use of mechanical circulatory support as a bridge to transplantation in pediatric patients: an analysis of the United Network for Organ Sharing database. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2008;135(2):421-427.e1.PubMedCrossRef
11.
Alghanem F, Balasubramanian S, Zampi JD. Impact of left atrial decompression on patient outcomes during pediatric venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: a case-control study. Pediatr Cardiol. 2019;40(6):1266–74.PubMedCrossRef
12.
Amancherla K, et al. Limited balloon atrial septostomy for left ventricular unloading in Peripheral extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. J Card Fail. 2021;27(4):501–4.PubMedCrossRef
13.
Delmas C, et al. Use of percutaneous atrioseptotosmy for left heart decompression during veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support: an observational study. J Am Heart Assoc. 2022;11(17):e024642.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
14.
Mlcek M, et al. Atrial septostomy for left ventricular unloading during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for cardiogenic shock: animal model. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2021;14(24):2698–707.PubMedCrossRef
15.
Russo JJ, et al. Left ventricular unloading during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in patients with cardiogenic shock. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019;73(6):654–62.PubMedCrossRef
16.
• Sperotto F, et al. Left atrial decompression in pediatric patients supported with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for failure to wean from cardiopulmonary bypass: a propensity-weighted analysis. J Am Heart Assoc. 2022;11(23):e023963. This article describes the potential utility of left atrial decompression in pediatric patients on ECMO.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
17.
Yarlagadda VV, et al. Temporary circulatory support in U.S. children awaiting heart transplantation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017;70(18):2250–60.PubMedCrossRef
18.
Lorts A, et al. Outcomes of children supported with devices labeled as “temporary” or short term: a report from the Pediatric Interagency Registry for Mechanical Circulatory Support. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2018;37(1):54–60.PubMedCrossRef
19.
Almond CS, et al. Berlin Heart EXCOR pediatric ventricular assist device for bridge to heart transplantation in US children. Circulation. 2013;127(16):1702–11.PubMedCrossRef
20.
Weinstein S, et al. The use of the Berlin Heart EXCOR in patients with functional single ventricle. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014;147(2):697–704 (discussion 704-5).PubMedCrossRef
21.
• Zafar F, et al. Berlin Heart EXCOR and ACTION post-approval surveillance study report. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2021;40(4):251–9. This article describes evolving outcomes on the Berlin, noting the relationship to evolving use of bivalirudin.PubMedCrossRef
22.
Lorts A, et al. ISHLT consensus statement for the selection and management of pediatric and congenital heart disease patients on ventricular assist devices endorsed by the American Heart Association. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2021;40(8):709–32.PubMedCrossRef
23.
Ricci M, et al. Initial experience with the TandemHeart circulatory support system in children. ASAIO J (Am Soc Artif Intern Organs: 1992). 2008;54(5):542–5.CrossRef
24.
Dimas VV, et al. A multicenter study of the impella device for mechanical support of the systemic circulation in pediatric and adolescent patients. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2017;90(1):124–9.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
25.
26.
Fraser CD Jr, et al. Prospective trial of a pediatric ventricular assist device. N Engl J Med. 2012;367(6):532–41.PubMedCrossRef
27.
Eghtesady P, et al. Post-transplant outcomes of children bridged to transplant with the Berlin Heart EXCOR Pediatric ventricular assist device. Circulation. 2013;128(11 Suppl 1):S24-31.PubMed
28.
O’Connor MJ, et al. Early experience with the HeartMate 3 continuous-flow ventricular assist device in pediatric patients and patients with congenital heart disease: a multicenter registry analysis. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2020;39(6):573–9.PubMedCrossRef
29.
Rossano JW, et al. Outcomes of pediatric patients supported with continuous-flow ventricular assist devices: a report from the Pediatric Interagency Registry for Mechanical Circulatory Support (PediMACS). J Heart Lung Transplant. 2016;35(5):585–90.PubMedCrossRef
30.
Jordan LC, et al. Neurological complications and outcomes in the Berlin Heart EXCOR(R) pediatric investigational device exemption trial. J Am Heart Assoc. 2015;4(1):e001429.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
31.
Rosenthal DN, et al. Impact of a modified anti-thrombotic guideline on stroke in children supported with a pediatric ventricular assist device. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2017;36(11):1250–7.PubMedCrossRef
32.
Hetzer R, et al. Improvement in survival after mechanical circulatory support with pneumatic pulsatile ventricular assist devices in pediatric patients. Ann Thorac Surg. 2006;82(3):917–24 (discussion 924-5).PubMedCrossRef
33.
Byrnes JW, et al. Incremental reduction in the incidence of stroke in children supported with the Berlin EXCOR ventricular assist device. Ann Thorac Surg. 2013;96(5):1727–33.PubMedCrossRef
34.
Villa CR, VanderPluym CJ, Investigators* A. ABCs of stroke prevention: improving stroke outcomes in children supported with a ventricular assist device in a quality improvement network. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2020;13(12):e006663.
35.
Niebler RA, et al. Stroke in pediatric ventricular assist device patients-a pedimacs registry analysis. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2021;40(7):662–70.PubMedCrossRef
36.
• Rottermann K, et al. Mobility and freedom of movement: a novel out-of-hospital treatment for pediatric patients with terminal cardiac insufficiency and a ventricular assist device. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022;9:1055228. This article describes the potential for discharge on the Berlin Heart with a portable driver.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
37.
Birks EJ, et al. A prospective multicentre study of myocardial recovery using left ventricular assist devices (RESTAGE-HF [Remission from Stage D Heart Failure]): Medium-Term and Primary End Point Results. Circulation 2020;142(21):2016–2028.
38.
Javier Delmo EM, et al. Heart failure in the young: Insights into myocardial recovery with ventricular assist device support. Cardiovasc Diagn Ther. 2021;11(1):148–63.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
39.
Miera O, et al. Pump size of Berlin Heart EXCOR pediatric device influences clinical outcome in children. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2014;33(8):816–21.PubMedCrossRef
40.
Philip J, et al. Hybrid procedure with pulsatile ventricular assist device for hypoplastic left heart syndrome awaiting transplantation. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2019;158(2):e59–61.PubMedCrossRef
41.
Auerbach SR, Simpson KE, Action Learning Network I. HVAD usage and outcomes in the current pediatric ventricular assist device field: an advanced cardiac therapies improving outcomes network (ACTION) analysis. ASAIO J. 2021;67(6):675–680.
42.
Burstein DS, et al. Variation in cardiac rehabilitation for pediatric ventricular assist device recipients across North America. ASAIO J. 2021;67(9):1045–50.PubMedCrossRef
43.
Riggs KW, et al. Optimizing postcardiac transplantation outcomes in children with ventricular assist devices: how long should the bridge be? ASAIO J. 2020;66(7):787–95.PubMedCrossRef
44.
Butto A, et al. Relationship of ventricular assist device support duration with pediatric heart transplant outcomes. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2022;41(1):61–9.PubMedCrossRef
45.
Cedars A, et al. Systemic ventricular assist device support in Fontan patients: a report by ACTION. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2021;40(5):368–76.PubMedCrossRef
46.
Bedzra EKS, et al. Systemic ventricular assist device support of the Fontan circulation yields promising outcomes: an analysis of The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Pedimacs and Intermacs Databases. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2022;164(2):353–64.PubMedCrossRef
47.
Rossano JW, et al. Fifth annual pediatric interagency registry for mechanical circulatory support (Pedimacs) report. Ann Thorac Surg. 2021;112(6):1763–74.PubMedCrossRef
48.
49.
Moore RA, et al. Virtual implantation evaluation of the total artificial heart and compatibility: beyond standard fit criteria. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2014;33(11):1180–3.PubMedCrossRef
50.
Moore RA, et al. Virtual implantation of the 50cc SynCardia total artificial heart. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2016;35(6):824–7.PubMedCrossRef
51.
Morales DLS, et al. Third annual pediatric interagency registry for mechanical circulatory support (Pedimacs) report: preimplant characteristics and outcomes. Ann Thorac Surg. 2019;107(4):993–1004.PubMedCrossRef
52.
Arabia FA, et al. Interagency registry for mechanically assisted circulatory support report on the total artificial heart. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2018;37(11):1304–12.PubMedCrossRef
53.
Metadaten
Titel
Device Innovations in Pediatric Heart Failure
verfasst von
Tanya Perry, DO
Chet Villa, MD
Publikationsdatum
01.12.2023
Verlag
Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in
Current Treatment Options in Pediatrics / Ausgabe 4/2023
Elektronische ISSN: 2198-6088
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40746-023-00276-z

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2023

Update on Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring in Children

  • Pediatric Nephrology (BP Dixon and E Nehus, Section Editors)

Intrauterine Drug Exposure—What the Pediatrician Needs to Know. Part 1: General Overview, Transplacental Drug Transfer, Teratogenicity, and Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorder

  • Pediatric Neonatology (T Thorkelsson, Section Editor)

Update on Management of Pediatric Renal Neoplasms

  • Pediatric Urology (BA VanderBrink and RP Pramod, Section Editors)

Medication-Induced Kidney Injury for the Primary Care Pediatrician

  • Pediatric Nephrology (BP Dixon and E Nehus, Section Editors)

Kidney Manifestations of Rheumatological Diseases in Children

  • Open Access
  • Pediatric Nephrology (BP Dixon and E Nehus, Section Editors)

Non-invasive Cardiac Output Monitoring in Congenital Heart Disease

  • Open Access
  • Cardiology/CT Surgery (K Gist, Section Editor)

Kompaktes Leitlinien-Wissen Pädiatrie (Link öffnet in neuem Fenster)

Mit medbee Pocketcards schnell und sicher entscheiden.
Leitlinien-Wissen kostenlos und immer griffbereit auf ihrem Desktop, Handy oder Tablet.

Kostenlos registrieren

Neu im Fachgebiet Pädiatrie

Weniger Bargeld, weniger Erstickungsnotfälle?

Dadurch, dass immer seltener mit Bargeld gezahlt wird, könnte die Rate an Erstickungsnotfällen bei Kindern zurückgehen. Dieser Hypothese ist ein britisches Forschungsteam in Klinikdaten aus den letzten zweieinhalb Jahrzehnten nachgegangen.

Pneumonie ausschließen: Auf das Röntgenbild ist offenbar Verlass

Das Thoraxröntgen ist gemäß Daten aus den USA eine zuverlässige Methode, um bei Kindern in der Notaufnahme rasch eine Lungenentzündung auszuschließen. Zur Vorsicht rät das Ärzteteam jedoch bei bestimmten klinischen Symptomen.

Kawasaki-Syndrom: Kein ASS mehr in der Akutphase?

Um Kinder mit Kawasaki-Syndrom vor entzündlich bedingten Veränderungen der Koronarien zu bewahren, werden sie in der Akutphase mit intravenösen Immunglobulinen und hochdosierter Acetylsalicylsäure (ASS) behandelt. Neuesten Daten zufolge könnte womöglich auf ASS verzichtet werden.

Neurologische Entwicklung von Kindern: Welchen Einfluss hat Stillen?

Stillen bringt zahlreiche gesundheitliche Vorteile mit sich. Ob dazu auch ein niedrigeres Risiko für Entwicklungsverzögerungen und -störungen gehört, hat nun eine israelische Studie untersucht.

Update Pädiatrie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen
Bildnachweise