Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie 6/2018

20.02.2018 | Reports of Original Investigations

Dexmedetomidine versus propofol-opioid for sedation in transcatheter aortic valve implantation patients: a retrospective analysis of periprocedural gas exchange and hemodynamic support

verfasst von: N. Patrick Mayr, MD, Gunther Wiesner, MD, Pieter van der Starre, MD, PhD, Alexander Hapfelmeier, PhD, Gertrud Goppel, MD, Albert Markus Kasel, MD, Christian Hengstenberg, MD, Oliver Husser, MD, PhD, Heribert Schunkert, MD, Peter Tassani-Prell, MD

Erschienen in: Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie | Ausgabe 6/2018

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

Different sedation regimens have been described for use during transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation (tf-TAVI) for treatment in patients with severe aortic stenosis. The purpose of this study was to compare dexmedetomidine (DEX) with a combination of propofol-opioid (PO) with respect to periprocedural gas exchange and hemodynamic support.

Methods

Data from a cohort of patients sedated with either DEX or PO for tf-TAVI were retrospectively analyzed from a prospectively maintained TAVI registry. Operative risk was determined from comorbidities and risk scores. Periprocedural partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PaCO2) was chosen as the primary endpoint. Other differences in gas exchange, need for catecholamine therapy, the frequency of conversion to general anesthesia, and need for sedative “rescue therapy” (in DEX patients) were secondary endpoints. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was used for analysis to minimize any selection bias.

Results

Of the 297 patients (140 PO, 157 DEX) included, the median [interquartile range] periprocedural PaCO2 values of DEX patients were significantly lower than in PO patients (40 [36-45] mmHg vs 44 [40-49] mmHg, respectively; median difference −4 mmHg; 95% confidence interval, −5 to −3 mmHg; P < 0.001). Hypercapnia (PaCO2 > 45 mmHg) was significantly less frequent in DEX patients compared with the PO group (25% vs 42%, respectively; P = 0.005). Vasopressor support was more frequent in the PO group compared with DEX (68% vs 25%, respectively; P < 0.001). Conversion to general anesthesia was not different between groups (9%, PO vs 3%, DEX; P = 0.051). Additional sedatives/opioids were required in 25 (16%) of the DEX patients.

Conclusions

In sedated TAVI patients, DEX was associated with lower PaCO2 values and reduced requirements for vasopressor support, making it a promising alternative to PO for sedation during TAVI.

Trial registration

www.​ClinicalTrials.​gov (NCT01390675). Registered 11 July 2011.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Barbanti M, Webb JG, Gilard M, Capodanno D, Tamburino C. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation in 2017: state of the art. EuroIntervention 2017; 13(AA): AA11-21. Barbanti M, Webb JG, Gilard M, Capodanno D, Tamburino C. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation in 2017: state of the art. EuroIntervention 2017; 13(AA): AA11-21.
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Osnabrugge RL, Mylotte D, Head SJ, et al. Aortic stenosis in the elderly: disease prevalence and number of candidates for transcatheter aortic valve replacement: a meta-analysis and modeling study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2013; 62: 1002-12.CrossRefPubMed Osnabrugge RL, Mylotte D, Head SJ, et al. Aortic stenosis in the elderly: disease prevalence and number of candidates for transcatheter aortic valve replacement: a meta-analysis and modeling study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2013; 62: 1002-12.CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Mayr NP, Michel J, Bleiziffer S, Tassani P, Martin K. Sedation or general anesthesia for transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). J Thorac Dis 2015; 7: 1518-26.PubMedPubMedCentral Mayr NP, Michel J, Bleiziffer S, Tassani P, Martin K. Sedation or general anesthesia for transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). J Thorac Dis 2015; 7: 1518-26.PubMedPubMedCentral
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Maas EH, Pieters BM, Van de Velde M, Rex S. General or local anesthesia for TAVI? A systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis. Curr Pharmacol Des 2016; 22: 1868-78.CrossRef Maas EH, Pieters BM, Van de Velde M, Rex S. General or local anesthesia for TAVI? A systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis. Curr Pharmacol Des 2016; 22: 1868-78.CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Mayr NP, Hapfelmeier A, Martin K, et al. Comparison of sedation and general anaesthesia for transcatheter aortic valve implantation on cerebral oxygen saturation and neurocognitive outcome. Br J Anaesth 2016; 116: 90-9.CrossRefPubMed Mayr NP, Hapfelmeier A, Martin K, et al. Comparison of sedation and general anaesthesia for transcatheter aortic valve implantation on cerebral oxygen saturation and neurocognitive outcome. Br J Anaesth 2016; 116: 90-9.CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Oguri A, Yamamoto M, Mouillet G, et al. Clinical outcomes and safety of transfemoral aortic valve implantation under general versus local anesthesia: subanalysis of the French Aortic National CoreValve and Edwards 2 registry. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2014; 7: 602-10.CrossRefPubMed Oguri A, Yamamoto M, Mouillet G, et al. Clinical outcomes and safety of transfemoral aortic valve implantation under general versus local anesthesia: subanalysis of the French Aortic National CoreValve and Edwards 2 registry. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2014; 7: 602-10.CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Husser O, Pellegrini C, Kessler T, et al. Outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve replacement using a novel balloon-expandable transcatheter heart valve: a single-center experience. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2015; 8: 1809-16.CrossRefPubMed Husser O, Pellegrini C, Kessler T, et al. Outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve replacement using a novel balloon-expandable transcatheter heart valve: a single-center experience. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2015; 8: 1809-16.CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Lavi S, Jolly SS, Bainbridge D, Manji F, Randhawa V, Lavi R. Sedation, analgesia, and anaesthesia variability in laboratory-based cardiac procedures: an international survey. Can J Cardiol 2014; 30: 627-33.CrossRefPubMed Lavi S, Jolly SS, Bainbridge D, Manji F, Randhawa V, Lavi R. Sedation, analgesia, and anaesthesia variability in laboratory-based cardiac procedures: an international survey. Can J Cardiol 2014; 30: 627-33.CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Boer F, Ros P, Bovill JG, van Brummelen P, van der Krogt J. Effect of propofol on peripheral vascular resistance during cardiopulmonary bypass. Br J Anaesth 1990; 65: 184-9.CrossRefPubMed Boer F, Ros P, Bovill JG, van Brummelen P, van der Krogt J. Effect of propofol on peripheral vascular resistance during cardiopulmonary bypass. Br J Anaesth 1990; 65: 184-9.CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Hammaren E, Hynynen M. Haemodynamic effects of propofol infusion for sedation after coronary artery surgery. Br J Anaesth 1995; 75: 47-50.CrossRefPubMed Hammaren E, Hynynen M. Haemodynamic effects of propofol infusion for sedation after coronary artery surgery. Br J Anaesth 1995; 75: 47-50.CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Heuss LT, Froehlich F, Beglinger C. Nonanesthesiologist-administered propofol sedation: from the exception to standard practice. Sedation and monitoring trends over 20 years. Endoscopy 2012; 44: 504-11.CrossRefPubMed Heuss LT, Froehlich F, Beglinger C. Nonanesthesiologist-administered propofol sedation: from the exception to standard practice. Sedation and monitoring trends over 20 years. Endoscopy 2012; 44: 504-11.CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Weaver CS, Terrell KM, Bassett R, et al. ED procedural sedation of elderly patients: is it safe? Am J Emerg Med 2011; 29: 541-4.CrossRefPubMed Weaver CS, Terrell KM, Bassett R, et al. ED procedural sedation of elderly patients: is it safe? Am J Emerg Med 2011; 29: 541-4.CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Kallio A, Scheinin M, Koulu M, et al. Effects of dexmedetomidine, a selective alpha 2-adrenoceptor agonist, on hemodynamic control mechanisms. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1989; 46: 33-42.CrossRefPubMed Kallio A, Scheinin M, Koulu M, et al. Effects of dexmedetomidine, a selective alpha 2-adrenoceptor agonist, on hemodynamic control mechanisms. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1989; 46: 33-42.CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Chen S, Hua F, Lu J, et al. Effect of dexmedetomidine on myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury. Int J Clin Exp Med 2015; 8: 21166-72.PubMedPubMedCentral Chen S, Hua F, Lu J, et al. Effect of dexmedetomidine on myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury. Int J Clin Exp Med 2015; 8: 21166-72.PubMedPubMedCentral
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Weerink MA, Struys MM, Hannivoort LN, Barends CR, Absalom AR, Colin P. Clinical pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of dexmedetomidine. Clin Pharmacokinet 2017; 56: 893-913.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Weerink MA, Struys MM, Hannivoort LN, Barends CR, Absalom AR, Colin P. Clinical pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of dexmedetomidine. Clin Pharmacokinet 2017; 56: 893-913.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Rodes-Cabau J. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation: current and future approaches. Nat Rev Cardiol 2012; 9: 15-29.CrossRef Rodes-Cabau J. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation: current and future approaches. Nat Rev Cardiol 2012; 9: 15-29.CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Dobson G, Chong M, Chow L, et al. Guidelines to the practice of anesthesia - revised edition 2018. Can J Anesth 2018; 65: 76-104. Dobson G, Chong M, Chow L, et al. Guidelines to the practice of anesthesia - revised edition 2018. Can J Anesth 2018; 65: 76-104.
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Minai OA, Yared JP, Kaw R, Subramaniam K, Hill NS. Perioperative risk and management in patients with pulmonary hypertension. Chest 2013; 144: 329-40.CrossRefPubMed Minai OA, Yared JP, Kaw R, Subramaniam K, Hill NS. Perioperative risk and management in patients with pulmonary hypertension. Chest 2013; 144: 329-40.CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Lumb AB, Slinger P. Hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction: physiology and anesthetic implications. Anesthesiology 2015; 122: 932-46.CrossRefPubMed Lumb AB, Slinger P. Hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction: physiology and anesthetic implications. Anesthesiology 2015; 122: 932-46.CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Noble WH, Kay JC, Fisher JA. The effect of PCO2 on hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction. Can Anaesth Soc J 1981; 28: 422-30.CrossRefPubMed Noble WH, Kay JC, Fisher JA. The effect of PCO2 on hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction. Can Anaesth Soc J 1981; 28: 422-30.CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Rivers E, Nguyen B, Havstad S, et al. Early goal-directed therapy in the treatment of severe sepsis and septic shock. N Engl J Med 2001; 345: 1368-77.CrossRefPubMed Rivers E, Nguyen B, Havstad S, et al. Early goal-directed therapy in the treatment of severe sepsis and septic shock. N Engl J Med 2001; 345: 1368-77.CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Kappetein AP, Head SJ, Genereux P, et al. Updated standardized endpoint definitions for transcatheter aortic valve implantation: the Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 consensus document. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2013; 145: 6-23.CrossRefPubMed Kappetein AP, Head SJ, Genereux P, et al. Updated standardized endpoint definitions for transcatheter aortic valve implantation: the Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 consensus document. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2013; 145: 6-23.CrossRefPubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Austin PC, Stuart EA. Moving towards best practice when using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) using the propensity score to estimate causal treatment effects in observational studies. Stat Med 2015; 34: 3661-79.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Austin PC, Stuart EA. Moving towards best practice when using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) using the propensity score to estimate causal treatment effects in observational studies. Stat Med 2015; 34: 3661-79.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Strobl C, Boulesteix AL, Zeileis A, Hothorn T. Bias in random forest variable importance measures: illustrations, sources and a solution. BMC Bioinformatics 2007; 8: 25.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Strobl C, Boulesteix AL, Zeileis A, Hothorn T. Bias in random forest variable importance measures: illustrations, sources and a solution. BMC Bioinformatics 2007; 8: 25.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Venables WN, Ripley BD. Modern Applied Statistics with S. 4th ed. NY: Springer-Verlag; 2002 .CrossRef Venables WN, Ripley BD. Modern Applied Statistics with S. 4th ed. NY: Springer-Verlag; 2002 .CrossRef
29.
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Kotani Y, Shimazawa M, Yoshimura S, Iwama T, Hara H. The experimental and clinical pharmacology of propofol, an anesthetic agent with neuroprotective properties. CNS Neurosci Ther 2008; 14: 95-106.CrossRefPubMed Kotani Y, Shimazawa M, Yoshimura S, Iwama T, Hara H. The experimental and clinical pharmacology of propofol, an anesthetic agent with neuroprotective properties. CNS Neurosci Ther 2008; 14: 95-106.CrossRefPubMed
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Ehsan Z, Mahmoud M, Shott SR, Amin RS, Ishman SL. The effects of anesthesia and opioids on the upper airway: a systematic review. Laryngoscope 2016; 126: 270-84.CrossRefPubMed Ehsan Z, Mahmoud M, Shott SR, Amin RS, Ishman SL. The effects of anesthesia and opioids on the upper airway: a systematic review. Laryngoscope 2016; 126: 270-84.CrossRefPubMed
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Goyal R, Hasnain S, Mittal S, Shreevastava S. A randomized, controlled trial to compare the efficacy and safety profile of a dexmedetomidine-ketamine combination with a propofol-fentanyl combination for ERCP. Gastrointest Endosc 2016; 83: 928-33.CrossRefPubMed Goyal R, Hasnain S, Mittal S, Shreevastava S. A randomized, controlled trial to compare the efficacy and safety profile of a dexmedetomidine-ketamine combination with a propofol-fentanyl combination for ERCP. Gastrointest Endosc 2016; 83: 928-33.CrossRefPubMed
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Goettel N, Bharadwaj S, Venkatraghavan L, Mehta J, Bernstein M, Manninen PH. Dexmedetomidine vs propofol-remifentanil conscious sedation for awake craniotomy: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Br J Anaesth 2016; 116: 811-21.CrossRefPubMed Goettel N, Bharadwaj S, Venkatraghavan L, Mehta J, Bernstein M, Manninen PH. Dexmedetomidine vs propofol-remifentanil conscious sedation for awake craniotomy: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Br J Anaesth 2016; 116: 811-21.CrossRefPubMed
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Lee JM, Lee SK, Lee SJ, Hwang WS, Jang SW, Park EY. Comparison of remifentanil with dexmedetomidine for monitored anaesthesia care in elderly patients during vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty. J Int Med Res 2016; 44: 307-16.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Lee JM, Lee SK, Lee SJ, Hwang WS, Jang SW, Park EY. Comparison of remifentanil with dexmedetomidine for monitored anaesthesia care in elderly patients during vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty. J Int Med Res 2016; 44: 307-16.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Robinson BJ, Ebert TJ, O’Brien TJ, Colinco MD, Muzi M. Mechanisms whereby propofol mediates peripheral vasodilation in humans. Sympathoinhibition or direct vascular relaxation? Anesthesiology 1997; 86: 64-72.CrossRefPubMed Robinson BJ, Ebert TJ, O’Brien TJ, Colinco MD, Muzi M. Mechanisms whereby propofol mediates peripheral vasodilation in humans. Sympathoinhibition or direct vascular relaxation? Anesthesiology 1997; 86: 64-72.CrossRefPubMed
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Khalil M, Al-Agaty A, Asaad O, et al. A comparative study between propofol and dexmedetomidine as sedative agents during performing transcatheter aortic valve implantation. J Clin Anesth 2016; 32: 242-7.CrossRefPubMed Khalil M, Al-Agaty A, Asaad O, et al. A comparative study between propofol and dexmedetomidine as sedative agents during performing transcatheter aortic valve implantation. J Clin Anesth 2016; 32: 242-7.CrossRefPubMed
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Zhang X, Wang R, Lu J, et al. Effects of different doses of dexmedetomidine on heart rate and blood pressure in intensive care unit patients. Exp Ther Med 2016; 11: 360-6.CrossRefPubMed Zhang X, Wang R, Lu J, et al. Effects of different doses of dexmedetomidine on heart rate and blood pressure in intensive care unit patients. Exp Ther Med 2016; 11: 360-6.CrossRefPubMed
39.
Zurück zum Zitat Banik S, Rath GP, Huygen FJ. Dexmedetomidine infusion may cause agitation during procedural sedation. Pain Pract 2016; 16: E89.CrossRefPubMed Banik S, Rath GP, Huygen FJ. Dexmedetomidine infusion may cause agitation during procedural sedation. Pain Pract 2016; 16: E89.CrossRefPubMed
40.
Zurück zum Zitat Greif M, Lange P, Nabauer M, et al. Transcutaneous aortic valve replacement with the Edwards SAPIEN XT and Medtronic CoreValve prosthesis under fluoroscopic guidance and local anaesthesia only. Heart 2014; 100: 691-5.CrossRefPubMed Greif M, Lange P, Nabauer M, et al. Transcutaneous aortic valve replacement with the Edwards SAPIEN XT and Medtronic CoreValve prosthesis under fluoroscopic guidance and local anaesthesia only. Heart 2014; 100: 691-5.CrossRefPubMed
41.
Zurück zum Zitat Kurnik D, Muszkat M, Sofowora GG, et al. Ethnic and genetic determinants of cardiovascular response to the selective alpha 2-adrenoceptor agonist dexmedetomidine. Hypertension 2008; 51: 406-11.CrossRefPubMed Kurnik D, Muszkat M, Sofowora GG, et al. Ethnic and genetic determinants of cardiovascular response to the selective alpha 2-adrenoceptor agonist dexmedetomidine. Hypertension 2008; 51: 406-11.CrossRefPubMed
42.
Zurück zum Zitat Rathmell JP, Rosow C. Stoelting’s Pharmacology and Physiology in Anesthetic Practice, 5th ed: Wolters Kluwer Health; 2015. Rathmell JP, Rosow C. Stoelting’s Pharmacology and Physiology in Anesthetic Practice, 5th ed: Wolters Kluwer Health; 2015.
44.
Zurück zum Zitat Austin PC. An introduction to propensity score methods for reducing the effects of confounding in observational studies. Multivariate Behav Res 2011; 46: 399-424.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Austin PC. An introduction to propensity score methods for reducing the effects of confounding in observational studies. Multivariate Behav Res 2011; 46: 399-424.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadaten
Titel
Dexmedetomidine versus propofol-opioid for sedation in transcatheter aortic valve implantation patients: a retrospective analysis of periprocedural gas exchange and hemodynamic support
verfasst von
N. Patrick Mayr, MD
Gunther Wiesner, MD
Pieter van der Starre, MD, PhD
Alexander Hapfelmeier, PhD
Gertrud Goppel, MD
Albert Markus Kasel, MD
Christian Hengstenberg, MD
Oliver Husser, MD, PhD
Heribert Schunkert, MD
Peter Tassani-Prell, MD
Publikationsdatum
20.02.2018
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie / Ausgabe 6/2018
Print ISSN: 0832-610X
Elektronische ISSN: 1496-8975
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12630-018-1092-4

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 6/2018

Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie 6/2018 Zur Ausgabe

Update AINS

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.