Skip to main content
Hauptrubriken
CME Facharzt-Training Webinare Zeitschriften Bücher e.Medpedia Podcast
Service
Jobbörse Info & Hilfe
Fachgebiete
Anästhesiologie Allgemeinmedizin Arbeitsmedizin Augenheilkunde Chirurgie Dermatologie Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe HNO Innere Medizin Kardiologie Neurologie Onkologie und Hämatologie Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie Pädiatrie Pathologie Psychiatrie Radiologie Rechtsmedizin Urologie Zahnmedizin
Themen
Typ-2-Diabetes und Adipositas Klimawandel und Gesundheit Neues aus dem Markt Praxis und Beruf Seltene Erkrankungen GOÄ & EBM Panorama
Sammlungen
Kasuistiken Algorithmen & Infografiken Blickdiagnosen Arthropedia FlapFinder (für Dermatochirurgen) Videos Kongressberichterstattung Medizin für Apothekerinnen und Apotheker Fachpsychotherapie Für Ärztinnen und Ärzte in Weiterbildung Für Medizinstudierende Patientenratgeber
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
European Journal of Pediatrics
Erschienen in:

17.07.2017 | Original Article

Diagnosing developmental dysplasia of the hip using the Graf ultrasound method: risk and protective factor analysis in 11,820 universally screened newborns

verfasst von: Mohammad Schams, Rob Labruyère, Anne Zuse, Mikolaj Walensi

Erschienen in: European Journal of Pediatrics | Ausgabe 9/2017

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

The essential role of ultrasound examinations in diagnosis and treatment of developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) is widely accepted while the weighting and correlation of protective factors and perinatal risk for DDH still give rise to debate. Our aim was to investigate the impact of single and twofold combined risk and protective factors on the newborns' hip maturity, assessed with the Graf ultrasound method. Therefore, data sets of 11,820 universally screened newborns were analyzed. Univariate and logistic regression analyses were performed to correlate risk and protective factors with mature or immature but appropriate for age and pathologic hip types. Thereby, female gender (OR 4.07 (95% CI 3.01–5.51), p < 0.001), breech presentation (4.98 (3.71–6.71), p < 0.001), and positive family anamnesis (5.05 (3.49–7.31), p < 0.001) as well as the combination of female gender with high birth weight (3.51 (2.45–5.03), p < 0.001) could be identified as independent predictive risk factors. Only low birth weight (0.27 (0.11–0.66), p = 0.004) could be identified as a single protective factor, while no combination of protective factors was significant.
Conclusion: The significance and the informative value of risk and protective factor combinations, e.g., for selective ultrasound surveys, are limited. Early universal ultrasound screening using the Graf method is advised to timely detect hip immaturity and pathologies and to provide the optimal approach for mature or immature but appropriate for age and pathologic hips.
What is Known:
• Ultrasound screening is essential for diagnosis and treatment of DDH in time while the weighting and correlation of protective factors and perinatal risk and their role for the ultrasound screening protocol still give rise to debate.
What is New:
• The effects of single risk and protective factors for DDH do not cumulate or counteract, resulting in a limited value of a selective screening protocol based on risk and protective factors.
• A universal screening protocol using the Graf ultrasound method is recommended.
Literatur
1.
Arti H, Mehdinasab SA, Arti S (2013) Comparing results of clinical versus ultrasonographic examination in developmental dysplasia of hip. J Res Med Sci 18:1051–1055PubMedPubMedCentral
2.
Bache CE, Clegg J, Herron M (2002) Risk factors for developmental dysplasia of the hip: ultrasonographic findings in the neonatal period. J Pediatr Orthop B 11:212–218PubMed
3.
Chan A, McCaul KA, Cundy PJ, Haan EA, Byron-Scott R (1997) Perinatal risk factors for developmental dysplasia of the hip. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 76:F94–100CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
4.
Clarke NM, Harcke HT, McHugh P, Lee MS, Borns PF, MacEwen GD (1985) Real-time ultrasound in the diagnosis of congenital dislocation and dysplasia of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Br 67:406–412PubMed
5.
Clarke NM, Clegg J, Al-Chalabi AN (1989) Ultrasound screening of hips at risk for CDH. Failure to reduce the incidence of late cases. J Bone Joint Surg Br 71:9–12PubMed
6.
Clegg J, Bache CE, Raut VV (1999) Financial justification for routine ultrasound screening of the neonatal hip. J Bone Joint Surg Br 81:852–857CrossRefPubMed
7.
Czubak J, Mazela JL, Majda W, Woźniak W (2003) Is twin pregnancy a risk factor for devolopmental dysplasia of the hip - retrospective analysis using ultrasonography. Orthop Traumatol Rehabil 5:712–716
8.
De Pellegrin M, Moharamzadeh D (2010) Developmental dysplasia of the hip in twins: the importance of mechanical factors in the etiology of DDH. J Pediatr Orthop 30:774–778CrossRefPubMed
9.
Dogruel H, Atalar H, Yavuz OY, Sayli U (2008) Clinical examination versus ultrasonography in detecting developmental dysplasia of the hip. Int Orthop 32:415–419CrossRefPubMed
10.
11.
Falliner A, Hahne HJ, Hassenpflug J (1999) Sonographic hip screening and early management of developmental dysplasia of the hip. J Pediatr Orthop B 8:112–117PubMed
12.
Graf R (1980) The diagnosis of congenital hip-joint dislocation by the ultrasonic Combound treatment. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 97:117–133CrossRefPubMed
13.
Graf R (1981) The ultrasonic image of the acetabular rim in infants. An experimental and clinical investigation. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 99:35–41CrossRefPubMed
14.
Graf R (1983) New possibilities for the diagnosis of congenital hip joint dislocation by ultrasonography. J Pediatr Orthop 3:354–359CrossRefPubMed
15.
Graf R (1997) Hip ultrasonography. Basic principles and current aspects. Orthopade 26:14–24PubMed
16.
Graf R (2006) Hip sonography—diagnosis and management of infant hip Dysplasia, 2nd edn. Springer Verlag, Berlin
17.
Graf R, Mohajer M, Plattner F (2013) Hip sonography update. Quality-management, catastrophes—tips and tricks. Med Ultrason 15:299–303CrossRefPubMed
18.
Gray A, Elbourne D, Dezateux C, King A, Quinn A, Gardner F (2005) Economic evaluation of ultrasonography in the diagnosis and management of developmental hip dysplasia in the United Kingdom and Ireland. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87:2472–2479PubMed
19.
Grill F, Müller D (1997) Results of hip ultrasonographic screening in Austria. Orthopade 26:25–32PubMed
20.
Gulati V, Eseonu K, Sayani J, Ismail N, Uzoigwe C, Choudhury MZ, Gulati P, Aqil A, Tibrewal S (2013) Developmental dysplasia of the hip in the newborn: a systematic review. World J Orthop 4:32–41CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
21.
Harcke HT, Clarke NM, Lee MS, Borns PF, MacEwen GD (1981) Examination of the infant hip with real-time ultrasonography. J Ultrasound Med 3:131–137CrossRef
22.
Holen KJ, Tegnander A, Bredland T, Johansen OJ, Saether OD, Eik-Nes SH, Terjesen T (2002) Universal or selective screening of the neonatal hip using ultrasound? A prospective, randomised trial of 15,529 newborn infants. J Bone Joint Surg Br 84:886–890CrossRefPubMed
23.
Imrie M, Scott V, Stearns P, Bastrom T, Mubarak SJ (2010) Is ultrasound screening for DDH in babies born breech sufficient? J Child Orthop 4:3–8CrossRefPubMed
24.
Kamath S, Mehdi A, Wilson N, Duncan R (2007) The lack of evidence of the effect of selective ultrasound screening on the incidence of late developmental dysplasia of the hip in the Greater Glasgow Region. J Pediatr Orthop B 16:189–191CrossRefPubMed
25.
Kohler G, Hell AK (2003) Experiences in diagnosis and treatment of hip dislocation and dysplasia in populations screened by the ultrasound method of Graf. Swiss Med Wkly 133:484–487PubMed
26.
Kokavec M, Bialik V (2007) Developmental dysplasia of the hip. Prevention and real incidence. Bratisl Lek Listy 108:251–254PubMed
27.
Kolb A, Schweiger N, Mailath-Pokorny M, Kaider A, Hobusch G, Chiari C, Windhager R (2013) Low incidence of early developmental dysplasia of the hip in universal ultrasonographic screening of newborns: analysis and evaluation of risk factors. Int Orthop 40:123–127CrossRef
28.
Koşar P, Ergun E, Unlübay D, Koşar U (2009) Comparison of morphologic and dynamic US methods in examination of the newborn hip. Diagn Interv Radiol 15:284–289PubMed
29.
Köse N, Omeroğlu H, Ozyurt B, Akçar N, Ozçelik A, Inan U, Seber S (2006) Our three-year experience with an ultrasonographic hip screening program conducted in infants at 3 to 4 weeks of age. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc 40:285–290PubMed
30.
von Kries R, Ihme N, Oberle D, Lorani A, Stark R, Altenhofen L, Niethard FU (2003) Effect of ultrasound screening on the rate of first operative procedures for developmental hip dysplasia in Germany. Lancet 362:1883–1887CrossRef
31.
Lee J (2008) Developmental dysplasia of the hip: universal or selective ultrasound screening? Ann Acad Med Singap 37:101–103PubMed
32.
Lewis K, Jones DA, Powell N (1999) Ultrasound and neonatal hip screening: the five-year results of a prospective study in high-risk babies. J Pediatr Orthop 19:760–762PubMed
33.
Lubchenco LO, Hansman C, Dressler M, Boyd E (1963) Intrauterine growth as estimated from liveborn birth-weight data at 24 to 42 weeks of gestation. Pediatrics 32:793–800PubMed
34.
Mahan ST, Katz JN, Kim YJ (2009) To screen or not to screen? A decision analysis of the utility of screening for developmental dysplasia of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Am 91:1705–1719CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
35.
Marks DS, Clegg J, al-Chalabi AN (1994) Routine ultrasound screening for neonatal hip instability. Can it abolish late-presenting congenital dislocation of the hip? J Bone Joint Surg Br 76:534–538PubMed
36.
37.
Paton RW, Hossain S, Eccles K (2002) Eight-year prospective targeted ultrasound screening program for instability and at-risk hip joints in developmental dysplasia of the hip. J Pediatr Orthop 22:338–341PubMed
38.
Paton RW, Hinduja K, Thomas CD (2005) The significance of at-risk factors in ultrasound surveillance of developmental dysplasia of the hip. A ten-year prospective study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 87:1264–1266CrossRefPubMed
39.
Riccabona M, Schweintzger G, Grill F, Graf R (2013) Screening for developmental hip dysplasia (DDH)-clinically or sonographically? Comments to the current discussion and proposals. Pediatr Radiol 43:637–640CrossRefPubMed
40.
Rosendahl K, Toma P (2007) Ultrasound in the diagnosis of developmental dysplasia of the hip in newborns. The European approach. A review of methods, accuracy and clinical validity. Eur Radiol 7:1960–1967CrossRef
41.
Rosendahl K, Markestad T, Lie RT, Sudmann E, Geitung JT (1995) Cost-effectiveness of alternative screening strategies for developmental dysplasia of the hip. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 149:643–648CrossRefPubMed
42.
Rühmann O, Konermann W, Lazović D, Vitek L, Bouklas P (1998) Ultrasound neonatal screening: the effect of anamnestic risk factors on hip dysplasia. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb 136:492–500CrossRefPubMed
43.
Rühmann O, Lazović D, Bouklas P, Rössig S (1998) Ultrasound hip joint screening in newborn infants. Is twin pregnancy a risk factor for dysplasia? Ultraschall Med 19:64–69CrossRefPubMed
44.
Rühmann O, Lazović D, Bouklas P, Gossé F, Franke J (1999) Ultrasound hip joint screening in newborn infants. Correlation of anamnestic risk factors and hip dysplasia. Klin Padiatr 211:141–148CrossRefPubMed
45.
Schwend RM, Schoenecker P, Richards BS, Flynn JM, Vitale M (2007) Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America. Screening the newborn for developmental dysplasia of the hip: now what do we do? J Pediatr Orthop 27:607–610CrossRefPubMed
46.
47.
Sezer C, Unlu S, Demirkale I, Altay M, Kapicioglu S, Bozkurt M (2013) Prevalence of developmental dysplasia of the hip in preterm infants with maternal risk factors. J Child Orthop 7:257–261CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
48.
Simon EA, Saur F, Buerge M, Glaab R, Roos M, Kohler G (2004) Inter-observer agreement of ultrasonographic measurement of alpha and beta angles and the final type classification based on the Graf method. Swiss Med Wkly 134:671–677PubMed
49.
Sionek A, Czubak J, Kornacka M, Grabowski B (2008) Evaluation of risk factors in developmental dysplasia of the hip in children from multiple pregnancies: results of hip ultrasonography using Graf's method. Orthop Traumatol Rehabil 10:115–130
50.
Suzuki S, Awaya G, Wakita S, Maekawa M, Ikeda T (1987) Diagnosis by ultrasound of congenital dislocation of the hip joint. Clin Orthop Relat Res 217:171–178
51.
Suzuki S, Kasahara Y, Futami T, Ushikubo S, Tsuchiya T (1991) Ultrasonography in congenital dislocation of the hip. Simultaneous imaging of both hips from in front. J Bone Joint Surg Br 73:879–883PubMed
52.
Synder M, Harcke HT, Domzalski M (2006) Role of ultrasound in the diagnosis and management of developmental dysplasia of the hip: an international perspective. Orthop Clin N Am 37:141–147CrossRef
53.
Terjesen T, Bredland T, Eik-Nes SH (1988) Ultrasonic examination of hip joints in newborn infants. Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen 108:2359–2363PubMed
54.
Terjesen T, Bredland T, Berg V (1989) Ultrasound for hip assessment in the newborn. J Bone Joint Surg Br 71:767–773PubMed
55.
Terjesen T, Rundén TO, Tangerud A (1989) Ultrasonography and radiography of the hip in infants. Acta Orthop Scand 60:651–660CrossRefPubMed
56.
Thaler M, Biedermann R, Lair J, Krismer M, Landauer F (2011) Cost-effectiveness of universal ultrasound screening compared with clinical examination alone in the diagnosis and treatment of neonatal hip dysplasia in Austria. J Bone Joint Surg Br 93:1126–1130CrossRefPubMed
57.
Thallinger C, Pospischill R, Ganger R, Radler C, Krall C, Grill F (2014) Long-term results of a nationwide general ultrasound screening system for developmental disorders of the hip: the Austrian hip screening program. J Child Orthop 8:3–10CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
58.
Tönnis D, Storch K, Ulbrich H (1990) Results of newborn screening for CDH with and without sonography and correlation of risk factors. J Pediatr Orthop 10:145–152CrossRefPubMed
59.
Treiber M, Tomazic T, Tekauc-Golob A, Zolger J, Korpar B, Burja S, Takac I, Sikosek A (2008) Ultrasound screening for developmental dysplasia of the hip in the newborn: a population-based study in the Maribor region, 1997-2005. Wien Klin Wochenschr 120:31–36CrossRefPubMed
60.
Tschauner C, Fürntrath F, Saba Y, Berghold A, Radl R (2011) Developmental dysplasia of the hip: impact of sonographic newborn hip screening on the outcome of early treated decentered hip joints-a single center retrospective comparative cohort study based on Graf's method of hip ultrasonography. J Child Orthop 5:415–424CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
61.
Vasilescu D, Cosma D, Vasilescu DE, Botar Jid C, Gersak M, Lenghel M, Dudea SM (2015) A new sign in the standard hip ultrasound image of the Graf method. Med Ultrason 17:206–210CrossRefPubMed
62.
Voigt M, Schneider KT, Jährig K (1996) Analysis of a 1992 birth sample in Germany. 1: new percentile values of the body weight of newborn infants. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 56:550–558CrossRefPubMed
63.
Yiv BC, Saidin R, Cundy PJ, Tgetgel JD, Aguilar J, McCaul KA, Keane RJ, Chan A, Scott H (1997) Developmental dysplasia of the hip in South Australia in 1991: prevalence and risk factors. J Paediatr Child Health 33:151–156CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Diagnosing developmental dysplasia of the hip using the Graf ultrasound method: risk and protective factor analysis in 11,820 universally screened newborns
verfasst von
Mohammad Schams
Rob Labruyère
Anne Zuse
Mikolaj Walensi
Publikationsdatum
17.07.2017
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
European Journal of Pediatrics / Ausgabe 9/2017
Print ISSN: 0340-6199
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-1076
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00431-017-2959-z

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 9/2017

Systematic review: probiotics for functional constipation in children

  • Open Access
  • Review

An infant with acute gastroenteritis caused by a secondary infection with a Rotarix-derived strain

  • Short Communication

Assessment of hepatitis B virus antibody titers in childhood cancer survivors

  • Short Communication

Comparing video and direct laryngoscopes for pediatric intubation

  • Correspondence

Renal function in neonates with twin-twin transfusion syndrome treated with or without fetoscopic laser surgery

  • Open Access
  • Original Article

Early motor delays as diagnostic clues in autism spectrum disorder

  • Short Communication

Neu im Fachgebiet Pädiatrie

Bildschirmzeit und Myopie: Auf die Dosis kommt es an

  • 20.03.2025
  • Myopie
  • Nachrichten

Mit jeder zusätzlichen Stunde Bildschirmzeit pro Tag steigt das Risiko für Kurzsichtigkeit signifikant an – am stärksten bei Kindern zwischen zwei und sieben Jahren. Aber es könnte eine „sichere“ Nutzungsdauer geben.

Eosinophile Ösophagitis: Doppelte Dosis PPI wirkt besser

Protonenpumpenhemmer führen bei eosinophiler Ösophagitis nur in etwa jedem zweiten Fall zu einer klinischen bzw. histologischen Remission, so das Ergebnis einer Metaanalyse. Verbessern lässt sich die Quote möglicherweise mit einer Dosisverdopplung und der Aufteilung der Tagesdosis.

Mit Probiotika schneller fieberfrei?

Kinder mit fieberhaften Infektionen der oberen Atemwege profitieren möglicherweise von einer unterstützenden Behandlung mit Probiotika. Laut einer Studie aus Mailand steckt dahinter mehr als ein Placeboeffekt.

Hyperpronation beim „Kindermädchen-Ellenbogen“ wohl überlegen

Bei Kindern mit Radiusköpfchen-Subluxation ist die Hyperpronation wohl der klassischen Supinations-Flexionstechnik überlegen, möglicherweise auch im Hinblick auf Schmerzen. Darauf deuten die Ergebnisse einer aktuellen Metaanalyse hin.

Update Pädiatrie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen
Bildnachweise