Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Aesthetic Plastic Surgery 5/2016

07.07.2016 | Original Article

Diagnosis and Prevalence of Prominent Lobules in Otoplasty: Analysis of 120 Patients with Prominent Ears

verfasst von: Luís Fernando Ungarelli, Camila Zirlis Naif de Andrade, Evelyne Gabriela Schmaltz Chaves Marques, João Luís Gil Jorge, Bruno Francisco Müller Neto, Guilherme Augusto Magalhães de Andrade, Renan Victor Kumpel Schmidt Lima, Altacílio Aparecido Nunes, Jayme Adriano Farina

Erschienen in: Aesthetic Plastic Surgery | Ausgabe 5/2016

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

The prominence of the ear lobule is considered an anomaly of secondary importance and receives correspondingly less attention in literature. We reviewed a case series of otoplasty patients and analyzed the prevalence of lobule prominence.

Methods

Records of otoplasties between 2007 and 2013 were reviewed. Inclusion criteria were: (1) primary otoplasties; (2) prominence of both ears; and (3) otoplasties conducted by the main author. Patients were divided into two groups: (1) A general group (GG) containing all the patients, and (2) a lobule correction group (LG)—a subgroup of GG containing only the patients who needed lobule correction.

Results

From a total of 291 patients, 120 patients were included in GG and 27 patients in LG. There was no statistical difference between groups GG and LG in terms of age and gender. Preoperative diagnosis of lobule prominence was correctly established in 14 patients; 13 patients were diagnosed during surgery.

Conclusions

Lobule prominence should not be underestimated since its diagnosis may be missed in the preoperative period—nearly 50 % in our case. Also its prevalence (22.5 %) is not as infrequent as some may think. Knowledge of lobule correction techniques before surgery is important to avoid less than optimal results in otoplasty.

Level of Evidence V

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.​springer.​com/​00266
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Kelley P, Hollier L, Stal S (2003) Otoplasty: evaluation, technique, and review. J Craniofac Surg 14:643e–653eCrossRef Kelley P, Hollier L, Stal S (2003) Otoplasty: evaluation, technique, and review. J Craniofac Surg 14:643e–653eCrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Hunter AGW, Yotsuyanagi T (2005) The external ear: more attention to detail may aid syndrome diagnosis and contribute answers to embryological questions. Am J Med Genet 135A:237–250CrossRef Hunter AGW, Yotsuyanagi T (2005) The external ear: more attention to detail may aid syndrome diagnosis and contribute answers to embryological questions. Am J Med Genet 135A:237–250CrossRef
3.
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Limandjaja GC, Breugem CC, Molen ABM, Kon M (2009) Complications of otoplasty: a literature review. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 62:19–27CrossRefPubMed Limandjaja GC, Breugem CC, Molen ABM, Kon M (2009) Complications of otoplasty: a literature review. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 62:19–27CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Caouette-Laberge L, Guay N, Bortoluzzi P, Belleville C (2000) Otoplasty: anterior scoring technique and results in 500 cases. Plast Reconstr Surg 105:504–515CrossRefPubMed Caouette-Laberge L, Guay N, Bortoluzzi P, Belleville C (2000) Otoplasty: anterior scoring technique and results in 500 cases. Plast Reconstr Surg 105:504–515CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Gosain AK, Resinos RF (2003) A novel approach to correction of the prominent lobule during otoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 112:575–583CrossRefPubMed Gosain AK, Resinos RF (2003) A novel approach to correction of the prominent lobule during otoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 112:575–583CrossRefPubMed
8.
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Furnas DW (2002) Otoplasty for prominent ears. Clin Plastic Surg 29:273–288CrossRef Furnas DW (2002) Otoplasty for prominent ears. Clin Plastic Surg 29:273–288CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Mustardé JC (1967) The treatment of prominent ears by buried mattress sutures: a ten year survey. Plast Reconstr Surg 39:382–386CrossRefPubMed Mustardé JC (1967) The treatment of prominent ears by buried mattress sutures: a ten year survey. Plast Reconstr Surg 39:382–386CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Furnas DW (1968) Correction of prominent ears by concha-mastoid sutures. Plast Reconstr Surg 42:189–193CrossRefPubMed Furnas DW (1968) Correction of prominent ears by concha-mastoid sutures. Plast Reconstr Surg 42:189–193CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Converse JM, Wood-Smith D (1963) Technical details in the surgical correction of the lop ear deformity. Plast Reconstr Surg 31:118–128CrossRefPubMed Converse JM, Wood-Smith D (1963) Technical details in the surgical correction of the lop ear deformity. Plast Reconstr Surg 31:118–128CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Webster GV (1969) The tail of the helix as a key to otoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 44:455–460CrossRefPubMed Webster GV (1969) The tail of the helix as a key to otoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 44:455–460CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Nuara MJ, Mobley SR (2006) Nuances of otoplasty: a comprehensive review of the past 20 years. Facial Plast Surg Clin N Am 14:89–102CrossRef Nuara MJ, Mobley SR (2006) Nuances of otoplasty: a comprehensive review of the past 20 years. Facial Plast Surg Clin N Am 14:89–102CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Georgiade GS, Riefkohl R, Georgiade NG (1995) Prominent ears and their correction: a forty-year experience. Aesthetic Plast Surg 19:439–443CrossRefPubMed Georgiade GS, Riefkohl R, Georgiade NG (1995) Prominent ears and their correction: a forty-year experience. Aesthetic Plast Surg 19:439–443CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Spira M, McCrea R, Gerow FJ, Hardy FB (1969) Correction of the principal deformities causing protruding ears. Plast Reconstr Surg 44:150–154CrossRefPubMed Spira M, McCrea R, Gerow FJ, Hardy FB (1969) Correction of the principal deformities causing protruding ears. Plast Reconstr Surg 44:150–154CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Sadove M, Eppley BL (1997) Lobule repositioning in aesthetic otoplasty. Op Techn Plast Reconstr Surg 4:129–133CrossRef Sadove M, Eppley BL (1997) Lobule repositioning in aesthetic otoplasty. Op Techn Plast Reconstr Surg 4:129–133CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Diagnosis and Prevalence of Prominent Lobules in Otoplasty: Analysis of 120 Patients with Prominent Ears
verfasst von
Luís Fernando Ungarelli
Camila Zirlis Naif de Andrade
Evelyne Gabriela Schmaltz Chaves Marques
João Luís Gil Jorge
Bruno Francisco Müller Neto
Guilherme Augusto Magalhães de Andrade
Renan Victor Kumpel Schmidt Lima
Altacílio Aparecido Nunes
Jayme Adriano Farina
Publikationsdatum
07.07.2016
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery / Ausgabe 5/2016
Print ISSN: 0364-216X
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-5241
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-016-0678-x

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2016

Aesthetic Plastic Surgery 5/2016 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

CME: 2 Punkte

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht, PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske Das Webinar S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“ beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.