Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy 4/2018

21.12.2017

Diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in assessing the therapeutic response to radio frequency ablation for liver tumors: systematic review and meta-analysis

verfasst von: Min Xuan, Fengsheng Zhou, Yan Ding, Qiaoying Zhu, Ji Dong, Hao Zhou, Jun Cheng, Xiao Jiang, Pengxi Wu

Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy | Ausgabe 4/2018

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

To review the diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) used to detect residual or recurrent liver tumors after radiofrequency ablation (RFA). This technique uses contrast-enhanced computer tomography or/and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging as the gold standard of investigation.

Methods

MEDLINE, EMBASE, and COCHRANE were systematically searched for all potentially eligible studies comparing CEUS with the reference standard that follows RFA. Risk of bias and applicability concerns were addressed by adopting the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS-2) tool. Pooled point estimates for sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative likelihood ratios, and diagnostic odds ratios (DOR) with 95% CI were computed before plotting the sROC (summary receiver operating characteristic) curve. Meta-regression and subgroup analysis were used to identify the source of the heterogeneity that was detected. Publication bias was evaluated using Deeks’ funnel plot asymmetry test.

Results

Ten eligible studies on 1162 lesions that occurred between 2001 and 2016 were included in the final analysis. The quality of the included studies assessed by the QUADAS-2 tool was considered reasonable. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of CEUS in detecting residual or recurrent liver tumors had the following values: 0.90 (95% CI 0.85–0.94) and 1.00 (95% CI 0.99–1.00), respectively. Overall DOR was 420.10 (95% CI 142.30–1240.20). The sources of heterogeneity could not be precisely identified by meta-regression or subgroup analysis. No evidence of publication bias was found.

Conclusion

This study confirmed that CEUS exhibits high sensitivity and specificity in assessing therapeutic responses to RFA for liver tumors.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Usatoff V, Habib N (2000) Hepatic malignancy: challenges and opportunities for the surgeon. J R Coll Surg Edinb 45 99–109PubMed Usatoff V, Habib N (2000) Hepatic malignancy: challenges and opportunities for the surgeon. J R Coll Surg Edinb 45 99–109PubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Ahmed M, Solbiati L, Brace CL et al (2014) Image-guided tumor ablation: standardization of terminology and reporting criteria—a 10-year update. J Vasc Interv Radiol 25:1691–1705CrossRefPubMed Ahmed M, Solbiati L, Brace CL et al (2014) Image-guided tumor ablation: standardization of terminology and reporting criteria—a 10-year update. J Vasc Interv Radiol 25:1691–1705CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Mcgahan JP, Browning PD, Brock JM, Tesluk H (1990) Hepatic ablation using radiofrequency electrocautery. Invest Radiol 25:267–270CrossRefPubMed Mcgahan JP, Browning PD, Brock JM, Tesluk H (1990) Hepatic ablation using radiofrequency electrocautery. Invest Radiol 25:267–270CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Wood TF, Rose DM, Chung M, Allegra DP, Foshag LJ, Bilchik AJ (2000) Radiofrequency ablation of 231 unresectable hepatic tumors: indications, limitations, and complications. Ann Surg Oncol 7:593–600CrossRefPubMed Wood TF, Rose DM, Chung M, Allegra DP, Foshag LJ, Bilchik AJ (2000) Radiofrequency ablation of 231 unresectable hepatic tumors: indications, limitations, and complications. Ann Surg Oncol 7:593–600CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Shiina S, Tateishi R, Arano T et al (2012) Radiofrequency ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma: 10-year outcome and prognostic factors. Am J Gastroenterol 107:569–577CrossRefPubMed Shiina S, Tateishi R, Arano T et al (2012) Radiofrequency ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma: 10-year outcome and prognostic factors. Am J Gastroenterol 107:569–577CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Pulvirenti A, Garbagnati F, Regalia E et al (2001) Experience with radiofrequency ablation of small hepatocellular carcinomas before liver transplantation. Transplant Proc 33:1516-1517CrossRef Pulvirenti A, Garbagnati F, Regalia E et al (2001) Experience with radiofrequency ablation of small hepatocellular carcinomas before liver transplantation. Transplant Proc 33:1516-1517CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Crocetti L, De Baere T, Lencioni R (2010) Quality improvement guidelines for radiofrequency ablation of liver tumours. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 33:11–17CrossRefPubMed Crocetti L, De Baere T, Lencioni R (2010) Quality improvement guidelines for radiofrequency ablation of liver tumours. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 33:11–17CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Albrecht T, Blomley M, Bolondi L et al (2004) Guidelines for the use of contrast agents in ultrasound. Ultraschall Med 25:249–256CrossRefPubMed Albrecht T, Blomley M, Bolondi L et al (2004) Guidelines for the use of contrast agents in ultrasound. Ultraschall Med 25:249–256CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Kitajima K, Maeda T, Watanabe S, Sugimura K (2011) Recent issues in contrast-induced nephropathy. Int J Urol 18:686–690CrossRefPubMed Kitajima K, Maeda T, Watanabe S, Sugimura K (2011) Recent issues in contrast-induced nephropathy. Int J Urol 18:686–690CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Vilana R, Bianchi L, Varela M et al (2006) Is microbubble-enhanced ultrasonography sufficient for assessment of response to percutaneous treatment in patients with early hepatocellular carcinoma? Eur Radiol 16:2454–2462CrossRefPubMed Vilana R, Bianchi L, Varela M et al (2006) Is microbubble-enhanced ultrasonography sufficient for assessment of response to percutaneous treatment in patients with early hepatocellular carcinoma? Eur Radiol 16:2454–2462CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Claudon M, Dietrich CF, Choi BI et al (2013) Guidelines and good clinical practice recommendations for contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in the liver–update 2012. Ultraschall Med 34:11–29PubMed Claudon M, Dietrich CF, Choi BI et al (2013) Guidelines and good clinical practice recommendations for contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in the liver–update 2012. Ultraschall Med 34:11–29PubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Shiozawa K, Watanabe M, Takayama R et al (2010) Evaluation of local recurrence after treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma by contrast-enhanced ultrasonography using Sonazoid: Comparison with dynamic computed tomography. J Clin Ultrasound 38:182–189PubMed Shiozawa K, Watanabe M, Takayama R et al (2010) Evaluation of local recurrence after treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma by contrast-enhanced ultrasonography using Sonazoid: Comparison with dynamic computed tomography. J Clin Ultrasound 38:182–189PubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Shimizu M, Iijima H, Horibe T et al (2004) Usefulness of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography with a new contrast mode, agent detection imaging, in evaluating therapeutic response in hepatocellular carcinoma treated with radio-frequency ablation therapy. Hepatol Res 29:235–242CrossRefPubMed Shimizu M, Iijima H, Horibe T et al (2004) Usefulness of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography with a new contrast mode, agent detection imaging, in evaluating therapeutic response in hepatocellular carcinoma treated with radio-frequency ablation therapy. Hepatol Res 29:235–242CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Numata K, Fukuda H, Morimoto M et al (2012) Use of fusion imaging combining contrast-enhanced ultrasonography with a perflubutane-based contrast agent and contrast-enhanced computed tomography for the evaluation of percutaneous radiofrequency ablation of hypervascular hepatocellular carcinoma. Eur J Radiol 81:2746–2753CrossRefPubMed Numata K, Fukuda H, Morimoto M et al (2012) Use of fusion imaging combining contrast-enhanced ultrasonography with a perflubutane-based contrast agent and contrast-enhanced computed tomography for the evaluation of percutaneous radiofrequency ablation of hypervascular hepatocellular carcinoma. Eur J Radiol 81:2746–2753CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Vilana R, Llovet JM, Bianchi L et al (2003) Contrast-enhanced power doppler sonography and helical computed tomography for assessment of vascularity of small hepatocellular carcinomas before and after percutaneous ablation. J Clin Ultrasound 31:119 –128CrossRefPubMed Vilana R, Llovet JM, Bianchi L et al (2003) Contrast-enhanced power doppler sonography and helical computed tomography for assessment of vascularity of small hepatocellular carcinomas before and after percutaneous ablation. J Clin Ultrasound 31:119 –128CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Luo W, Numata K, Morimoto M et al (2010) Role of Sonazoid-enhanced three-dimensional ultrasonography in the evaluation of percutaneous radiofrequency ablation of hepatocellular carcinoma. Eur J Radiol 75:91–97CrossRefPubMed Luo W, Numata K, Morimoto M et al (2010) Role of Sonazoid-enhanced three-dimensional ultrasonography in the evaluation of percutaneous radiofrequency ablation of hepatocellular carcinoma. Eur J Radiol 75:91–97CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Glas AS, Lijmer JG, Prins MH, Bonsel GJ, Bossuyt PM (2003) The diagnostic odds ratio: a single indicator of test performance. J Clin Epidemiol 56:1129–1135CrossRefPubMed Glas AS, Lijmer JG, Prins MH, Bonsel GJ, Bossuyt PM (2003) The diagnostic odds ratio: a single indicator of test performance. J Clin Epidemiol 56:1129–1135CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Bruce N, Pope D, Stanistreet D (2008) Quantitative methods for health research: a practical interactive guide to epidemiology and statistics. Wiley, ChichesterCrossRef Bruce N, Pope D, Stanistreet D (2008) Quantitative methods for health research: a practical interactive guide to epidemiology and statistics. Wiley, ChichesterCrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Whiting PF, Rutjes AW, Westwood ME et al (2011) QUADAS-2: a revised tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies. Ann Intern Med 155:529–536CrossRefPubMed Whiting PF, Rutjes AW, Westwood ME et al (2011) QUADAS-2: a revised tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies. Ann Intern Med 155:529–536CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Deeks JJ, Macaskill P, Irwig L (2005) The performance of tests of publication bias and other sample size effects in systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy was assessed. J Clin Epidemiol 58:882–893CrossRefPubMed Deeks JJ, Macaskill P, Irwig L (2005) The performance of tests of publication bias and other sample size effects in systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy was assessed. J Clin Epidemiol 58:882–893CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Salvaggio G, Campisi A, Lo Greco V, Cannella I, Meloni MF, Caruso G (2010) Evaluation of posttreatment response of hepatocellular carcinoma: Comparison of ultrasonography with second-generation ultrasound contrast agent and multidetector CT. Abdom Imaging 35:447–453CrossRefPubMed Salvaggio G, Campisi A, Lo Greco V, Cannella I, Meloni MF, Caruso G (2010) Evaluation of posttreatment response of hepatocellular carcinoma: Comparison of ultrasonography with second-generation ultrasound contrast agent and multidetector CT. Abdom Imaging 35:447–453CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Du J, Li HL, Zhai B, Chang S, Li FH (2015) Radiofrequency ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma: utility of conventional ultrasound and contrast-enhanced ultrasound in guiding and assessing early therapeutic response and short-term follow-up results. Ultrasound Med Biol 41:2400–2411CrossRefPubMed Du J, Li HL, Zhai B, Chang S, Li FH (2015) Radiofrequency ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma: utility of conventional ultrasound and contrast-enhanced ultrasound in guiding and assessing early therapeutic response and short-term follow-up results. Ultrasound Med Biol 41:2400–2411CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Wiggermann P, Zuber-Jerger I, Zausig Y et al (2011) Contrast-enhanced ultrasound improves real-time imaging of ablation region during radiofrequency ablation: preliminary results. Clin Hemorheol Microcirc 49:43–54PubMed Wiggermann P, Zuber-Jerger I, Zausig Y et al (2011) Contrast-enhanced ultrasound improves real-time imaging of ablation region during radiofrequency ablation: preliminary results. Clin Hemorheol Microcirc 49:43–54PubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Ricci P, Cantisani V, Drudi F et al. (2009) Is contrast-enhanced US alternative to spiral CT in the assessment of treatment outcome of radiofrequency ablation in hepatocellular carcinoma?. Ultraschall Med 30:252–258CrossRefPubMed Ricci P, Cantisani V, Drudi F et al. (2009) Is contrast-enhanced US alternative to spiral CT in the assessment of treatment outcome of radiofrequency ablation in hepatocellular carcinoma?. Ultraschall Med 30:252–258CrossRefPubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Gallotti A, D’Onofrio M, Ruzzenente A et al (2009) Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS) immediately after percutaneous ablation of hepatocellular carcinoma. Radiol Med 114:1094–1105CrossRefPubMed Gallotti A, D’Onofrio M, Ruzzenente A et al (2009) Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS) immediately after percutaneous ablation of hepatocellular carcinoma. Radiol Med 114:1094–1105CrossRefPubMed
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Mauri G, Porazzi E, Cova L et al (2014) Intraprocedural contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in liver percutaneous radiofrequency ablation: clinical impact and health technology assessment. Insights Imaging 5:209–216CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Mauri G, Porazzi E, Cova L et al (2014) Intraprocedural contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in liver percutaneous radiofrequency ablation: clinical impact and health technology assessment. Insights Imaging 5:209–216CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Dill-Macky MJ, Asch M, Burns P, Wilson S (2006) Radiofrequency ablation of hepatocellular carcinoma: predicting success using contrast-enhanced sonography. Am J Roentgenol 186:S287-S95CrossRef Dill-Macky MJ, Asch M, Burns P, Wilson S (2006) Radiofrequency ablation of hepatocellular carcinoma: predicting success using contrast-enhanced sonography. Am J Roentgenol 186:S287-S95CrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Meloni MF, Goldberg SN, Livraghi T et al (2001) Hepatocellular carcinoma treated with radiofrequency ablation: comparison of pulse inversion contrast-enhanced harmonic sonography, contrast-enhanced power Doppler sonography, and helical CT. Am J Roentgenol 177:375–380CrossRef Meloni MF, Goldberg SN, Livraghi T et al (2001) Hepatocellular carcinoma treated with radiofrequency ablation: comparison of pulse inversion contrast-enhanced harmonic sonography, contrast-enhanced power Doppler sonography, and helical CT. Am J Roentgenol 177:375–380CrossRef
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Wen YL, Kudo M, Zheng RQ et al (2003) Radiofrequency ablation of hepatocellular carcinoma: therapeutic response using contrast-enhanced coded phase-inversion harmonic sonography. Am J Roentgenol 181:57–63CrossRef Wen YL, Kudo M, Zheng RQ et al (2003) Radiofrequency ablation of hepatocellular carcinoma: therapeutic response using contrast-enhanced coded phase-inversion harmonic sonography. Am J Roentgenol 181:57–63CrossRef
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Kim CK, Choi D, Lim HK et al (2005) Therapeutic response assessment of percutaneous radiofrequency ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma: utility of contrast-enhanced agent detection imaging. Eur J Radiol 56:66–73CrossRefPubMed Kim CK, Choi D, Lim HK et al (2005) Therapeutic response assessment of percutaneous radiofrequency ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma: utility of contrast-enhanced agent detection imaging. Eur J Radiol 56:66–73CrossRefPubMed
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Zintzaras E, Ioannidis J (2005) Heterogeneity testing in meta-analysis of genome searches. Genet Epidemiol 28:123–137CrossRefPubMed Zintzaras E, Ioannidis J (2005) Heterogeneity testing in meta-analysis of genome searches. Genet Epidemiol 28:123–137CrossRefPubMed
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Bipat S, van Leeuwen MS, Comans EF et al. (2005) Colorectal liver metastases: CT, MR imaging, and PET for diagnosis—meta-analysis. Radiology 237:123–131CrossRefPubMed Bipat S, van Leeuwen MS, Comans EF et al. (2005) Colorectal liver metastases: CT, MR imaging, and PET for diagnosis—meta-analysis. Radiology 237:123–131CrossRefPubMed
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Hohmann J, Albrecht T, Hoffmann C, Wolf K-J (2003) Ultrasonographic detection of focal liver lesions: increased sensitivity and specificity with microbubble contrast agents. Eur J Radiol 46:147–159CrossRefPubMed Hohmann J, Albrecht T, Hoffmann C, Wolf K-J (2003) Ultrasonographic detection of focal liver lesions: increased sensitivity and specificity with microbubble contrast agents. Eur J Radiol 46:147–159CrossRefPubMed
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Konopke R, Bunk A, Kersting S (2007) The role of contrast-enhanced ultrasound for focal liver lesion detection: an overview. Ultrasound Med Biol 33:1515–1526CrossRefPubMed Konopke R, Bunk A, Kersting S (2007) The role of contrast-enhanced ultrasound for focal liver lesion detection: an overview. Ultrasound Med Biol 33:1515–1526CrossRefPubMed
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Meuwly J-Y, Schnyder P, Gudinchet F, Denys AL (2003) Pulse-inversion harmonic imaging improves lesion conspicuity during US-guided biopsy. J Vasc Interv Radiol 14:335–341CrossRefPubMed Meuwly J-Y, Schnyder P, Gudinchet F, Denys AL (2003) Pulse-inversion harmonic imaging improves lesion conspicuity during US-guided biopsy. J Vasc Interv Radiol 14:335–341CrossRefPubMed
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Yanagisawa K, Moriyasu F, Miyahara T, Yuki M, Iijima H (2007) Phagocytosis of ultrasound contrast agent microbubbles by Kupffer cells. Ultrasound Med Biol 33:318–325CrossRefPubMed Yanagisawa K, Moriyasu F, Miyahara T, Yuki M, Iijima H (2007) Phagocytosis of ultrasound contrast agent microbubbles by Kupffer cells. Ultrasound Med Biol 33:318–325CrossRefPubMed
38.
Zurück zum Zitat Berry JD, Sidhu PS (2006) Microbubble contrast-enhanced ultrasound features of common focal liver lesions: a guide for the novice. Ultrasound 14:190–201CrossRef Berry JD, Sidhu PS (2006) Microbubble contrast-enhanced ultrasound features of common focal liver lesions: a guide for the novice. Ultrasound 14:190–201CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in assessing the therapeutic response to radio frequency ablation for liver tumors: systematic review and meta-analysis
verfasst von
Min Xuan
Fengsheng Zhou
Yan Ding
Qiaoying Zhu
Ji Dong
Hao Zhou
Jun Cheng
Xiao Jiang
Pengxi Wu
Publikationsdatum
21.12.2017
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Surgical Endoscopy / Ausgabe 4/2018
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-017-5903-4

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2018

Surgical Endoscopy 4/2018 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

CME: 2 Punkte

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht, PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske Das Webinar S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“ beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.