Skip to main content
main-content

04.11.2017 | Orthopaedic Surgery | Ausgabe 2/2018

Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery 2/2018

Diagnostic accuracy of synovial fluid, blood markers, and microbiological testing in chronic knee prosthetic infections

Zeitschrift:
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery > Ausgabe 2/2018
Autoren:
Giovanni Balato, Vincenzo Franceschini, Tiziana Ascione, Alfredo Lamberti, Fiamma Balboni, Andrea Baldini

Abstract

Introduction

This retrospective study was undertaken to define cut-off values for synovial fluid (SF) leukocyte count and neutrophil percentage for differentiating aseptic failure and periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) and to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of blood inflammatory markers, and microbiological testing according to the criteria proposed by the International Consensus Meeting (ICM) of Philadelphia.

Methods

All patients who underwent revision total knee arthroplasty from January 2010 to July 2015 were included: we identified and classified 31 PJIs and 136 aseptic joints. The diagnostic performance of single test was assessed by receiver operating characteristic curve analyses. The sensitivity and specificity were calculated for each of the cut-off values and the area under the curve (AUC) was calculated.

Results

The median SF leukocyte count as well as the neutrophil percentage and inflammatory markers were significantly higher in patients with PJI than in those with aseptic failure (p < 0.001). A leukocyte count of > 2.8 × 103/μL had a sensitivity of 83.8% and a specificity of 89.7% whereas a neutrophil percentage of > 72% yielded a marginally higher sensitivity of 84% and a specificity of 91%. Applying the ICM criteria we found a significant correlation between all these diagnostic measures and PJI (p < 0.001) except for a single positive culture. The most accurate criterion of the ICM was the synovial neutrophil differential (AUC = 0.89; 95% CI 0.81–0.97), followed by SF leukocyte count (AUC = 0.86; 95% CI 0.78–0.94), increased inflammatory markers (AUC = 0.85; 95% CI 0.76–0.93), and two positive periprosthetic cultures (AUC = 0.84; 95% CI 0.73–0.94). The presence of sinus tract communicating with the joint and a single positive culture showed unfavourable diagnostic accuracy (AUC = 0.60, 95% CI 0.47–0.72; AUC = 0.49, 95% CI 0.38–0.61, respectively)

Conclusions

The present study highlights the adequate ability of fluid cell count and neutrophil differential to distinguish between PJI and aseptic loosening. The clinical utility of fluid analysis in diagnosing infection can be improved by evaluation of other diagnostic criteria.

Level of evidence

Level I Diagnostic Study.

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

★ PREMIUM-INHALT
e.Med Interdisziplinär

Mit e.Med Interdisziplinär erhalten Sie Zugang zu allen CME-Fortbildungen und Fachzeitschriften auf SpringerMedizin.de. Zusätzlich können Sie eine Zeitschrift Ihrer Wahl in gedruckter Form beziehen – ohne Aufpreis.

Weitere Produktempfehlungen anzeigen
Literatur
Über diesen Artikel

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2018

Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery 2/2018 Zur Ausgabe
  1. Sie können e.Med Orthopädie & Unfallchirurgie 14 Tage kostenlos testen (keine Print-Zeitschrift enthalten). Der Test läuft automatisch und formlos aus. Es kann nur einmal getestet werden.

Neu im Fachgebiet Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Mail Icon II Newsletter

Bestellen Sie unseren kostenlosen Newsletter Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.

Bildnachweise