Skip to main content
Hauptrubriken
CME Facharzt-Training Webinare Zeitschriften Bücher e.Medpedia Podcast
Service
Jobbörse Info & Hilfe
Fachgebiete
Anästhesiologie Allgemeinmedizin Arbeitsmedizin Augenheilkunde Chirurgie Dermatologie Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe HNO Innere Medizin Kardiologie Neurologie Onkologie und Hämatologie Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie Pädiatrie Pathologie Psychiatrie Radiologie Rechtsmedizin Urologie Zahnmedizin
Themen
Klimawandel und Gesundheit Neues aus dem Markt COVID-19 Praxis und Beruf Seltene Erkrankungen GOÄ & EBM Panorama
Sammlungen
Kasuistiken Algorithmen & Infografiken Blickdiagnosen Arthropedia FlapFinder (für Dermatochirurgen) Videos Kongressberichterstattung Medizin für Apothekerinnen und Apotheker Für Ärztinnen und Ärzte in Weiterbildung Für Medizinstudierende
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery
Erschienen in: European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery 5/2022

23.06.2020 | Review Article

Diagnostic options for blunt abdominal trauma

verfasst von: Gerhard Achatz, Kerstin Schwabe, Sebastian Brill, Christoph Zischek, Roland Schmidt, Benedikt Friemert, Christian Beltzer

Erschienen in: European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery | Ausgabe 5/2022

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

Physical examination, laboratory tests, ultrasound, conventional radiography, multislice computed tomography (MSCT), and diagnostic laparoscopy are used for diagnosing blunt abdominal trauma. In this article, we investigate and evaluate the usefulness and limitations of various diagnostic modalities on the basis of a comprehensive review of the literature.

Methods

We searched commonly used databases in order to obtain information about the aforementioned diagnostic modalities. Relevant articles were included in the literature review. On the basis of the results of our comprehensive analysis of the literature and a current case, we offer a diagnostic algorithm.

Results

A total of 86 studies were included in the review. Ecchymosis of the abdominal wall (seat belt sign) is a clinical sign that has a high predictive value. Laboratory values such as those for haematocrit, haemoglobin, base excess or deficit, and international normalised ratio (INR) are prognostic parameters that are useful in guiding therapy. Extended focused assessment with sonography for trauma (eFAST) has become a well established component of the trauma room algorithm but is of limited usefulness in the diagnosis of blunt abdominal trauma. Compared with all other diagnostic modalities, MSCT has the highest sensitivity and specificity. Diagnostic laparoscopy is an invasive technique that may also serve as a therapeutic tool and is particularly suited for haemodynamically stable patients with suspected hollow viscus injuries.

Conclusions

MSCT is the gold standard diagnostic modality for blunt abdominal trauma because of its high sensitivity and specificity in detecting relevant intra-abdominal injuries. In many cases, however, clinical, laboratory and imaging findings must be interpreted jointly for an adequate evaluation of a patient’s injuries and for treatment planning since these data supplement and complement one another. Patients with blunt abdominal trauma should be admitted for clinical observation over a minimum period of 24 h since there is no investigation that can reliably rule out intra-abdominal injuries.
Literatur
1.
Iaselli F, et al. Bowel and mesenteric injuries from blunt abdominal trauma: a review. Radiol Med. 2015;120(1):21–322.PubMedCrossRef
2.
Norcross ED, et al. Application of American College of Surgeons’ field triage guidelines by pre-hospital personnel. J Am Coll Surg. 1995;181(6):539–44.PubMed
3.
Rossaint R, et al. The European guideline on management of major bleeding and coagulopathy following trauma: fourth edition. Crit Care. 2016;20(1):100.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
4.
5.
6.
Chandler CF, Lane JS, Waxman KS. Seatbelt sign following blunt trauma is associated with increased incidence of abdominal injury. Am Surg. 1997;63(10):885–8.PubMed
7.
Jones EL, et al. Intra-abdominal injury following blunt trauma becomes clinically apparent within 9 hours. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2014;76(4):1020–3.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
8.
Allgower M, Burri C. “Shock index”. Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 1967;92(43):1947–50.PubMed
9.
Liu N, et al. An intelligent scoring system and its application to cardiac arrest prediction. IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed. 2012;16(6):1324–31.PubMedCrossRef
10.
Mitra B, et al. Trauma patients with the ‘triad of death’. Emerg Med J. 2012;29(8):622–5.PubMedCrossRef
11.
Wang SY, et al. An outcome prediction model for exsanguinating patients with blunt abdominal trauma after damage control laparotomy: a retrospective study. BMC Surg. 2014;14:24.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
12.
Ibrahim I, et al. Is arterial base deficit still a useful prognostic marker in trauma? A systematic review. Am J Emerg Med. 2016;34(3):626–35.PubMedCrossRef
13.
Davis JW, Kaups KL. Base deficit in the elderly: a marker of severe injury and death. J Trauma. 1998;45(5):873–7.PubMedCrossRef
14.
Mutschler M, et al. Renaissance of base deficit for the initial assessment of trauma patients: a base deficit-based classification for hypovolemic shock developed on data from 16,305 patients derived from the TraumaRegister DGU(R). Crit Care. 2013;17(2):R42.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
15.
16.
Brohi K, Cohen MJ, Davenport RA. Acute coagulopathy of trauma: mechanism, identification and effect. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2007;13(6):680–5.PubMedCrossRef
17.
Hunt H, et al. (2015) Thromboelastography (TEG) and rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM) for trauma induced coagulopathy in adult trauma patients with bleeding. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;2:CD010438.
18.
Greenfield RH, Bessen HA, Henneman PL. Effect of crystalloid infusion on hematocrit and intravascular volume in healthy, nonbleeding subjects. Ann Emerg Med. 1989;18(1):51–5.PubMedCrossRef
19.
Stamler KD. Effect of crystalloid infusion on hematocrit in nonbleeding patients, with applications to clinical traumatology. Ann Emerg Med. 1989;18(7):747–9.PubMedCrossRef
20.
Genoa Update on Colorectal Polyp. Proceedings of the advanced course in coloproctology: the colorectal polyps, from genetics to surgery. Genoa, Italy, 11–12 March 2004. Tech Coloproctol, 2004. 8 Suppl 2: p. s239–314.
21.
Thorson CM, et al. Admission hematocrit and transfusion requirements after trauma. J Am Coll Surg. 2013;216(1):65–73.PubMedCrossRef
22.
Mahajan A, et al. Utility of serum pancreatic enzyme levels in diagnosing blunt trauma to the pancreas: a prospective study with systematic review. Injury. 2014;45(9):1384–93.PubMedCrossRef
23.
Sabzghabaei A, et al. The accuracy of urinalysis in predicting intra-abdominal injury following blunt traumas. Emerg (Tehran). 2016;4(1):11–5.
24.
Scalea TM, et al. Focused assessment with sonography for trauma (FAST): results from an international consensus conference. J Trauma. 1999;46(3):466–72.PubMedCrossRef
25.
26.
Montoya J, et al. From FAST to E-FAST: an overview of the evolution of ultrasound-based traumatic injury assessment. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2016;42(2):119–26.PubMedCrossRef
27.
Surgeons, A.C.o., Advanced Trauma Life Support. Vol. 9. 2014: Urban and Fischer Verlag/Elsevier.
28.
Unfallchirurgie, D.G.f., S3—Leitlinie Polytrauma und Schwerverletztenversorgung. 2016: AWMF.
29.
30.
Wilkerson RG, Stone MB. Sensitivity of bedside ultrasound and supine anteroposterior chest radiographs for the identification of pneumothorax after blunt trauma. Acad Emerg Med. 2010;17(1):11–7.PubMedCrossRef
31.
Nandipati KC, et al. Extended focused assessment with sonography for trauma (EFAST) in the diagnosis of pneumothorax: experience at a community based level I trauma center. Injury. 2011;42(5):511–4.PubMedCrossRef
32.
Wherrett LJ, et al. Hypotension after blunt abdominal trauma: the role of emergent abdominal sonography in surgical triage. J Trauma. 1996;41(5):815–20.PubMedCrossRef
33.
Hoffmann R, et al. Blunt abdominal trauma in cases of multiple trauma evaluated by ultrasonography: a prospective analysis of 291 patients. J Trauma. 1992;32(4):452–8.PubMedCrossRef
34.
Jehle D, Guarino J, Karamanoukian H. Emergency department ultrasound in the evaluation of blunt abdominal trauma. Am J Emerg Med. 1993;11(4):342–6.PubMedCrossRef
35.
Branney SW, et al. Quantitative sensitivity of ultrasound in detecting free intraperitoneal fluid. J Trauma. 1995;39(2):375–80.PubMedCrossRef
36.
37.
Soyuncu S, et al. Accuracy of physical and ultrasonographic examinations by emergency physicians for the early diagnosis of intraabdominal haemorrhage in blunt abdominal trauma. Injury. 2007;38(5):564–9.PubMedCrossRef
38.
Healey MA, et al. A prospective evaluation of abdominal ultrasound in blunt trauma: is it useful? J Trauma. 1996;40(6):875–83.PubMedCrossRef
39.
McGahan JP, Richards J, Gillen M. The focused abdominal sonography for trauma scan: pearls and pitfalls. J Ultrasound Med. 2002;21(7):789–800.PubMedCrossRef
40.
Carter JW, et al. Do we really rely on fast for decision-making in the management of blunt abdominal trauma? Injury. 2015;46(5):817–21.PubMedCrossRef
41.
Blackstock U, Munson J, Szyld D. Bedside ultrasound curriculum for medical students: report of a blended learning curriculum implementation and validation. J Clin Ultrasound. 2015;43(3):139–44.PubMedCrossRef
42.
Dubois L, Leslie K, Parry N. FACTS survey: focused assessment with sonography in trauma use among Canadian residents training in general surgery. J Trauma. 2010;69(4):765–9.PubMed
43.
Ma OJ, et al. Operative versus nonoperative management of blunt abdominal trauma: Role of ultrasound-measured intraperitoneal fluid levels. Am J Emerg Med. 2001;19(4):284–6.PubMedCrossRef
44.
Ollerton JE, et al. Prospective study to evaluate the influence of FAST on trauma patient management. J Trauma. 2006;60(4):785–91.PubMedCrossRef
45.
Wydo SM, et al. Portable ultrasound in disaster triage: a focused review. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2016;42(2):151–9.PubMedCrossRef
46.
Stengel D, et al. (2015) Emergency ultrasound-based algorithms for diagnosing blunt abdominal trauma. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;9:CD004446.
47.
48.
Zhang Z, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of contrast enhanced ultrasound in patients with blunt abdominal trauma presenting to the emergency department: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):4446.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
49.
Sessa B, et al. Blunt abdominal trauma: role of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in the detection and staging of abdominal traumatic lesions compared to US and CE-MDCT. Radiol Med. 2015;120(2):180–9.PubMedCrossRef
50.
Valentino M, et al. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound for blunt abdominal trauma. Semin Ultrasound CT MR. 2007;28(2):130–40.PubMedCrossRef
51.
Pinto F, et al. The use of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in blunt abdominal trauma: advantages and limitations. Acta Radiol. 2014;55(7):776–84.PubMedCrossRef
52.
53.
Pinto F, et al. The role of CEUS in the assessment of haemodynamically stable patients with blunt abdominal trauma. Radiol Med. 2015;120(1):3–11.PubMedCrossRef
54.
Deunk J, et al. Predictors for the selection of patients for abdominal CT after blunt trauma: a proposal for a diagnostic algorithm. Ann Surg. 2010;251(3):512–20.PubMedCrossRef
55.
Kokabi N, et al. Specific radiological findings of traumatic gastrointestinal tract injuries in patients with blunt chest and abdominal trauma. Can Assoc Radiol J. 2015;66(2):158–63.PubMedCrossRef
56.
Corwin MT, et al. Utilization of a clinical prediction rule for abdominal-pelvic CT scans in patients with blunt abdominal trauma. Emerg Radiol. 2014;21(6):571–6.PubMedCrossRef
57.
Soto JA, Anderson SW. Multidetector CT of blunt abdominal trauma. Radiology. 2012;265(3):678–93.PubMedCrossRef
58.
Marek AP, et al. CT scan-detected pneumoperitoneum: an unreliable predictor of intra-abdominal injury in blunt trauma. Injury. 2014;45(1):116–21.PubMedCrossRef
59.
Hefny AF, et al. Usefulness of free intraperitoneal air detected by CT scan in diagnosing bowel perforation in blunt trauma: experience from a community-based hospital. Injury. 2015;46(1):100–4.PubMedCrossRef
60.
Gonser-Hafertepen LN, et al. Isolated free fluid on abdominal computed tomography in blunt trauma: watch and wait or operate? J Am Coll Surg. 2014;219(4):599–605.PubMedCrossRef
61.
Park MH, Shin BS, Namgung H. Diagnostic performance of 64-MDCT for blunt small bowel perforation. Clin Imaging. 2013;37(5):884–8.PubMedCrossRef
62.
Yu J, et al. Blunt bowel and mesenteric injury: MDCT diagnosis. Abdom Imaging. 2011;36(1):50–61.PubMedCrossRef
63.
Fu CJ, et al. Computed tomography arterial portography for assessment of portal vein injury after blunt hepatic trauma. Diagn Interv Radiol. 2015;21(5):361–7.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
64.
Wallace GW, et al. Imaging the pregnant patient with abdominal pain. Abdom Imaging. 2012;37(5):849–60.PubMedCrossRef
65.
Pearce MS, et al. Radiation exposure from CT scans in childhood and subsequent risk of leukaemia and brain tumours: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet. 2012;380(9840):499–505.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
66.
Arnold M, Moore SW. Paediatric blunt abdominal trauma - are we doing too many computed tomography scans? S Afr J Surg. 2013;51(1):26–31.PubMed
67.
Panda A, et al. Evaluation of diagnostic utility of multidetector computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in blunt pancreatic trauma: a prospective study. Acta Radiol. 2015;56(4):387–96.PubMedCrossRef
68.
Tharakan SJ, et al. Laparoscopy in Pediatric Abdominal Trauma: A 13-Year Experience. Eur J Pediatr Surg. 2016;26(5):443–8.PubMed
69.
Johnson JJ, et al. The use of laparoscopy in the diagnosis and treatment of blunt and penetrating abdominal injuries: 10-year experience at a level 1 trauma center. Am J Surg. 2013;205(3):317–20.PubMedCrossRef
70.
Sitnikov V, et al. The role of video-assisted laparoscopy in management of patients with small bowel injuries in abdominal trauma. Surg Endosc. 2009;23(1):125–9.PubMedCrossRef
71.
Nicolau AE, et al. Small bowel perforation caused by compound pelvic fracture found in diagnostic laparoscopy. Chirurgia (Bucur). 2006;101(4):423–8.
72.
Uranus S, Dorr K. Laparoscopy in Abdominal Trauma. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2010;36(1):19–24.PubMedCrossRef
73.
74.
Becker HP, Willms A, Schwab R. Laparoscopy for abdominal trauma. Chirurg. 2006;77(11):1007–133.PubMedCrossRef
75.
Khubutiya M, et al. Laparoscopy in blunt and penetrating abdominal trauma. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2013;23(6):507–12.PubMedCrossRef
76.
Nicolau AE. Is laparoscopy still needed in blunt abdominal trauma? Chirurgia (Bucur). 2011;106(1):59–66.
77.
Lee PC, et al. Laparoscopy decreases the laparotomy rate in hemodynamically stable patients with blunt abdominal trauma. Surg Innov. 2014;21(2):155–65.PubMedCrossRef
78.
Kaban GK, et al. Use of laparoscopy in evaluation and treatment of penetrating and blunt abdominal injuries. Surg Innov. 2008;15(1):26–31.PubMedCrossRef
79.
Gaines BA, Rutkoski JD. The role of laparoscopy in pediatric trauma. Semin Pediatr Surg. 2010;19(4):300–3.PubMedCrossRef
80.
Gregoric PD, et al. Laparoscopy in the evaluation of blunt abdominal trauma. Acta Chir Iugosl. 2010;57(4):33–8.PubMedCrossRef
81.
Addeo P, Calabrese DP. Diagnostic and therapeutic value of laparoscopy for small bowel blunt injuries: A case report. Int J Surg Case Rep. 2011;2(8):316–8.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
82.
Fuentes S, et al. Laparoscopy as diagnostic-therapeutic method in abdominal traumatism in the pediatric age. Cir Pediatr. 2011;24(2):115–7.PubMed
83.
Van Kerschaver O, et al. An unusual case of blunt abdominal trauma: A bleeding and ruptured gall-bladder managed by laparoscopy. Acta Chir Belg. 2006;106(4):417–9.PubMedCrossRef
84.
Kovachev S, et al. Open laparoscopy–a modified Hasson technique. Akush Ginekol (Sofiia). 2015;54(4):52–6.
85.
Marwan A, et al. Use of laparoscopy in the management of pediatric abdominal trauma. J Trauma. 2010;69(4):761–4.PubMed
86.
Lin HF, et al. Value of diagnostic and therapeutic laparoscopy for patients with blunt abdominal trauma: A 10-year medical center experience. PLoS ONE. 2018;13(2):e0193379.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Diagnostic options for blunt abdominal trauma
verfasst von
Gerhard Achatz
Kerstin Schwabe
Sebastian Brill
Christoph Zischek
Roland Schmidt
Benedikt Friemert
Christian Beltzer
Publikationsdatum
23.06.2020
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery / Ausgabe 5/2022
Print ISSN: 1863-9933
Elektronische ISSN: 1863-9941
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-020-01405-1

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2022

European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery 5/2022 Zur Ausgabe

Original Article

Plate fixation of the anterior pelvic ring in patients with fragility fractures of the pelvis

Original Article

How to strengthen the management of acute diverticulitis: the utility of the WSES classification—a prospective single-center observational study

Review Article

Biomechanical analysis of fixation methods in acetabular fractures: a systematic review of test setups

Original Article

Fibular fixation improves ankle functional outcomes and alignment in the intramedullary nailing of distal third tibiofibular diaphyseal fractures

Original Article

Tibial plateau fracture: does fracture classification influence the choice of surgical approach? A retrospective multicenter analysis

Original Article

Gunshot and stab wounds in France: descriptive study from a national trauma registry

Arthropedia

Grundlagenwissen der Arthroskopie und Gelenkchirurgie. Erweitert durch Fallbeispiele, Videos und Abbildungen. 
» Jetzt entdecken

Neu im Fachgebiet Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

23.04.2024 | Leitsymptom Rückenschmerzen | Nachrichten

Ärztliche Empathie hilft gegen Rückenschmerzen

18.04.2024 | Wirbelsäulenmetastase | Nachrichten

Stereotaktische Radiatio schlägt konventionelle Bestrahlung

16.04.2024 | Spondylitis ankylosans | Nachrichten

Vorsicht mit hohen NSAR-Dosen bei ankylosierender Spondylitis!

15.04.2024 | Knie-TEP | Nachrichten

Brustkrebs in der Vorgeschichte macht Gelenkersatz komplikationsträchtiger
weitere anzeigen

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen
Bildnachweise