Skip to main content
Erschienen in: European Radiology 7/2019

04.02.2019 | Magnetic Resonance

Diagnostic performance of [18F]FDG-PET/MRI for liver metastasis in patients with primary malignancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

verfasst von: Seung Baek Hong, Sang Hyun Choi, Kyung Won Kim, Seong Ho Park, So Yeon Kim, So Jung Lee, Seung Soo Lee, Jae Ho Byun, Moon-Gyu Lee

Erschienen in: European Radiology | Ausgabe 7/2019

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Objectives

To systematically determine the diagnostic accuracy of 18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging ([18F]FDG-PET/MRI) for the detection of liver metastases and evaluate the sources of heterogeneity in the reported results.

Methods

PubMed and EMBASE databases were searched up until December 31, 2017, to identify original research studies reporting the diagnostic performance (Se and Sp) of PET/MRI for liver metastases, in comparison with PET/CT. Study quality was assessed using QUADAS-2. The summary Se and Sp of the studies were estimated using hierarchical modeling methods. To determine causes of study heterogeneity, the presence of a threshold effect was analyzed, and meta-regression analysis was performed.

Results

Of 546 articles screened, eight suitable articles were identified, with seven for per-lesion analysis, and four for per-patient analysis. The meta-analytic summary Se and Sp for per-patient-based analysis were 99.2% (95% CI, 31.4–100.0%, I2 = 89.4%) and 98.6% (95% CI, 84.0–99.9%, I2 = 0.0%), respectively, while for per-lesion-based analysis they were 95.4% (95% CI, 78.3–99.2%, I2 = 99.7%) and 99.3% (95% CI, 93.8–99.9%, I2 = 96.5%). PET/MRI showed higher Se (95.4% vs. 68.3%) and Sp (99.3% vs. 95.8%) than PET/CT. Meta-regression analysis showed five significant factors affecting study heterogeneity: study subject characteristics, study design, MRI technique (DWI, HBP after injection of liver-specific contrast media), imaging review method, and reference standard.

Conclusion

The diagnostic accuracy of [18F]FDG-PET/MRI for liver metastasis was high overall, but substantial heterogeneity was found. Further randomized controlled studies or prospective studies are needed to investigate the role of PET/MRI in liver metastasis in comparison with PET/CT.

Key Points

• [ 18 F]FDG-PET/MRI has high meta-analytic Se and Sp for the diagnosis of liver metastasis.
• PET/MRI using DWI and HBP images significantly increased diagnostic accuracy.
• Study heterogeneity was associated with subject characteristics, study design, MRI technique, image review method, and reference standard.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Kokudo N, Tada K, Seki M et al (2001) Anatomical major resection versus nonanatomical limited resection for liver metastases from colorectal carcinoma. Am J Surg 181:153–159CrossRefPubMed Kokudo N, Tada K, Seki M et al (2001) Anatomical major resection versus nonanatomical limited resection for liver metastases from colorectal carcinoma. Am J Surg 181:153–159CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Qian J (2011) Interventional therapies of unresectable liver metastases. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 137:1763–1772CrossRefPubMed Qian J (2011) Interventional therapies of unresectable liver metastases. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 137:1763–1772CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Frankel TL, Gian RK, Jarnagin WR (2012) Preoperative imaging for hepatic resection of colorectal cancer metastasis. J Gastrointest Oncol 3:11–18PubMedPubMedCentral Frankel TL, Gian RK, Jarnagin WR (2012) Preoperative imaging for hepatic resection of colorectal cancer metastasis. J Gastrointest Oncol 3:11–18PubMedPubMedCentral
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Smith TJ, Korngold E, Orloff SL (2014) Preoperative imaging in colorectal liver metastases: current practices. Curr Surg Rep 2:39CrossRef Smith TJ, Korngold E, Orloff SL (2014) Preoperative imaging in colorectal liver metastases: current practices. Curr Surg Rep 2:39CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Schulz A, Viktil E, Godt JC et al (2016) Diagnostic performance of CT, MRI and PET/CT in patients with suspected colorectal liver metastases: the superiority of MRI. Acta Radiol 57:1040–1048CrossRefPubMed Schulz A, Viktil E, Godt JC et al (2016) Diagnostic performance of CT, MRI and PET/CT in patients with suspected colorectal liver metastases: the superiority of MRI. Acta Radiol 57:1040–1048CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Choi SH, Kim SY, Park SH et al (2018) Diagnostic performance of CT, gadoxetate disodium-enhanced MRI, and PET/CT for the diagnosis of colorectal liver metastasis: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Magn Reson Imaging 47:1237–1250CrossRefPubMed Choi SH, Kim SY, Park SH et al (2018) Diagnostic performance of CT, gadoxetate disodium-enhanced MRI, and PET/CT for the diagnosis of colorectal liver metastasis: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Magn Reson Imaging 47:1237–1250CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Niekel MC, Bipat S, Stoker J (2010) Diagnostic imaging of colorectal liver metastases with CT, MR imaging, FDG PET, and/or FDG PET/CT: a meta-analysis of prospective studies including patients who have not previously undergone treatment. Radiology 257:674–684CrossRefPubMed Niekel MC, Bipat S, Stoker J (2010) Diagnostic imaging of colorectal liver metastases with CT, MR imaging, FDG PET, and/or FDG PET/CT: a meta-analysis of prospective studies including patients who have not previously undergone treatment. Radiology 257:674–684CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Chua SC, Groves AM, Kayani I et al (2007) The impact of 18F-FDG PET/CT in patients with liver metastases. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 34:1906–1914CrossRefPubMed Chua SC, Groves AM, Kayani I et al (2007) The impact of 18F-FDG PET/CT in patients with liver metastases. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 34:1906–1914CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Torigian DA, Zaidi H, Kwee TC et al (2013) PET/MR imaging: technical aspects and potential clinical applications. Radiology 267:26–44CrossRefPubMed Torigian DA, Zaidi H, Kwee TC et al (2013) PET/MR imaging: technical aspects and potential clinical applications. Radiology 267:26–44CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Donati OF, Hany TF, Reiner CS et al (2010) Value of retrospective fusion of PET and MR images in detection of hepatic metastases: comparison with 18F-FDG PET/CT and Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI. J Nucl Med 51:692–699CrossRefPubMed Donati OF, Hany TF, Reiner CS et al (2010) Value of retrospective fusion of PET and MR images in detection of hepatic metastases: comparison with 18F-FDG PET/CT and Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI. J Nucl Med 51:692–699CrossRefPubMed
12.
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Lee DH, Lee JM, Hur BY et al (2016) Colorectal cancer liver metastases: diagnostic performance and prognostic value of PET/MR imaging. Radiology 280:782–792CrossRefPubMed Lee DH, Lee JM, Hur BY et al (2016) Colorectal cancer liver metastases: diagnostic performance and prognostic value of PET/MR imaging. Radiology 280:782–792CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Reiner CS, Stolzmann P, Husmann L et al (2014) Protocol requirements and diagnostic value of PET/MR imaging for liver metastasis detection. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 41:649–658CrossRefPubMed Reiner CS, Stolzmann P, Husmann L et al (2014) Protocol requirements and diagnostic value of PET/MR imaging for liver metastasis detection. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 41:649–658CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Brendle C, Schwenzer NF, Rempp H et al (2016) Assessment of metastatic colorectal cancer with hybrid imaging: comparison of reading performance using different combinations of anatomical and functional imaging techniques in PET/MRI and PET/CT in a short case series. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 43:123–132CrossRefPubMed Brendle C, Schwenzer NF, Rempp H et al (2016) Assessment of metastatic colorectal cancer with hybrid imaging: comparison of reading performance using different combinations of anatomical and functional imaging techniques in PET/MRI and PET/CT in a short case series. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 43:123–132CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Heusner TA, Mikat C, Hahn S et al (2012) FDG-PET/MRI fused data sets for the detection of liver metastases in patients undergoing systemic anticancer treatment. Iran J Radiat Res 9(4):209–219CrossRef Heusner TA, Mikat C, Hahn S et al (2012) FDG-PET/MRI fused data sets for the detection of liver metastases in patients undergoing systemic anticancer treatment. Iran J Radiat Res 9(4):209–219CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Kirchner J, Sawicki LM, Deuschl C et al (2017) 18 F-FDG PET/MR imaging in patients with suspected liver lesions: value of liver-specific contrast agent Gadobenate dimeglumine. PLoS One 12:e0180349CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Kirchner J, Sawicki LM, Deuschl C et al (2017) 18 F-FDG PET/MR imaging in patients with suspected liver lesions: value of liver-specific contrast agent Gadobenate dimeglumine. PLoS One 12:e0180349CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Melsaether AN, Raad RA, Pujara AC et al (2016) Comparison of whole-body (18)F FDG PET/MR imaging and whole-body (18)F FDG PET/CT in terms of lesion detection and radiation dose in patients with breast cancer. Radiology 281:193–202CrossRefPubMed Melsaether AN, Raad RA, Pujara AC et al (2016) Comparison of whole-body (18)F FDG PET/MR imaging and whole-body (18)F FDG PET/CT in terms of lesion detection and radiation dose in patients with breast cancer. Radiology 281:193–202CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Trikalinos TA, Balion CM, Coleman CI et al (2012) Meta-analysis of test performance when there is a “gold standard”. In: Chang SM, Matchar DB, Smetana GW, Umscheid CA (eds) Methods Guide for Medical Test Reviews, Rockville (MD) Trikalinos TA, Balion CM, Coleman CI et al (2012) Meta-analysis of test performance when there is a “gold standard”. In: Chang SM, Matchar DB, Smetana GW, Umscheid CA (eds) Methods Guide for Medical Test Reviews, Rockville (MD)
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Bruegel M, Gaa J, Waldt S et al (2008) Diagnosis of hepatic metastasis: comparison of respiration-triggered diffusion-weighted echo-planar MRI and five t2-weighted turbo spin-echo sequences. AJR Am J Roentgenol 191:1421–1429CrossRefPubMed Bruegel M, Gaa J, Waldt S et al (2008) Diagnosis of hepatic metastasis: comparison of respiration-triggered diffusion-weighted echo-planar MRI and five t2-weighted turbo spin-echo sequences. AJR Am J Roentgenol 191:1421–1429CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Lee KH, Lee JM, Park JH et al (2013) MR imaging in patients with suspected liver metastases: value of liver-specific contrast agent gadoxetic acid. Korean J Radiol 14:894–904CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Lee KH, Lee JM, Park JH et al (2013) MR imaging in patients with suspected liver metastases: value of liver-specific contrast agent gadoxetic acid. Korean J Radiol 14:894–904CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Yu MH, Lee JM, Hur BY et al (2015) Gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI and diffusion-weighted imaging for the detection of colorectal liver metastases after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Eur Radiol 25:2428–2436CrossRefPubMed Yu MH, Lee JM, Hur BY et al (2015) Gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI and diffusion-weighted imaging for the detection of colorectal liver metastases after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Eur Radiol 25:2428–2436CrossRefPubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Coenegrachts K, Delanote J, Ter Beek L et al (2007) Improved focal liver lesion detection: comparison of single-shot diffusion-weighted echoplanar and single-shot T2 weighted turbo spin echo techniques. Br J Radiol 80:524–531CrossRefPubMed Coenegrachts K, Delanote J, Ter Beek L et al (2007) Improved focal liver lesion detection: comparison of single-shot diffusion-weighted echoplanar and single-shot T2 weighted turbo spin echo techniques. Br J Radiol 80:524–531CrossRefPubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Schreiter NF, Nogami M, Steffen I et al (2012) Evaluation of the potential of PET-MRI fusion for detection of liver metastases in patients with neuroendocrine tumours. Eur Radiol 22:458–467CrossRefPubMed Schreiter NF, Nogami M, Steffen I et al (2012) Evaluation of the potential of PET-MRI fusion for detection of liver metastases in patients with neuroendocrine tumours. Eur Radiol 22:458–467CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Diagnostic performance of [18F]FDG-PET/MRI for liver metastasis in patients with primary malignancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
verfasst von
Seung Baek Hong
Sang Hyun Choi
Kyung Won Kim
Seong Ho Park
So Yeon Kim
So Jung Lee
Seung Soo Lee
Jae Ho Byun
Moon-Gyu Lee
Publikationsdatum
04.02.2019
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
European Radiology / Ausgabe 7/2019
Print ISSN: 0938-7994
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-1084
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-018-5909-x

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 7/2019

European Radiology 7/2019 Zur Ausgabe

Update Radiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.