Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Abdominal Radiology 3/2021

15.09.2020 | Review

Diagnostic performance of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) for differentiating endometrial carcinoma from benign lesions: a systematic review and meta-analysis

verfasst von: Yashar Moharamzad, Amir H. Davarpanah, Ali Yaghobi Joybari, Fatemeh Shahbazi, Leila Esmaeilian Toosi, Melika Kooshkiforooshani, Ali Ansari, Morteza Sanei Taheri

Erschienen in: Abdominal Radiology | Ausgabe 3/2021

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

To determine the diagnostic performance of mean ADC values in the characterization of endometrial carcinoma (EC) from benign lesions by systematic review of the literature and performing meta-analysis. A systematic search of major electronic bibliographic databases was performed to find studies that used ADC values for differentiating EC from benign lesions. Two reviewers independently screened the titles and abstracts of the search results and then by reading the full texts selected the pertinent studies for final analyses. A bivariate random-effects model with pooled sensitivity and specificity values with 95% CI (confidence interval) was used. Summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve and area under curve (AUC) were created. Between-study heterogeneity was measured using I squared (I2) index. Eleven studies including 269 ECs and 208 benign lesions were analyzed. Pooled average (95% CI) ADC in EC and benign lesions groups were, respectively, 0.82 (0.77–0.87) × 10–3 mm2/s and 1.41 (1.29–1.52) × 10–3 mm2/s. The combined (95% CI) sensitivity and specificity of mean ADC values for differentiating EC from benign lesions were 93% (87–96%; I2 = 41.19%) and 94% (88–97%; I2 = 46.91%), respectively. The AUC (95% CI) of the SROC curve was 98% (96–99%). ADC values had good diagnostic accuracy for differentiating EC from benign lesions. In order to recommend ADC measurement for detecting endometrial lesions in routine clinical practice, more primary studies, especially trials and comparative studies including hysteroscopically-guided biopsy method, with larger sample sizes are still required.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Deeks JJ (2001) Systematic reviews of evaluations of diagnostic and screening tests. In: Egger M, Davey-Smith G, Altman D (ed) Systematic Reviews in Healt Care: Meta analysis in Context, 2nd edn. BMJ Puublishing Group, Londonn, pp 248-282.CrossRef Deeks JJ (2001) Systematic reviews of evaluations of diagnostic and screening tests. In: Egger M, Davey-Smith G, Altman D (ed) Systematic Reviews in Healt Care: Meta analysis in Context, 2nd edn. BMJ Puublishing Group, Londonn, pp 248-282.CrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Chen Y, Cheng J, Bai J, Zhang Y, Xue K, Zhang C (2017) DWI and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in differential diagnosis of stage-I a endometrial carcinomas and endometrial polyps. Chin J Med Imaging Technol 33:70-74 Chen Y, Cheng J, Bai J, Zhang Y, Xue K, Zhang C (2017) DWI and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in differential diagnosis of stage-I a endometrial carcinomas and endometrial polyps. Chin J Med Imaging Technol 33:70-74
31.
39.
Zurück zum Zitat Cartayrade N, Lacombe S, Daures J-P, Chiavassa H, Viala-Trentini M (2018) Discriminant value of MRI for the diagnosis of benign and malignant endometrium in postmenopausal women with uterine bleeding or asymptomatic endometrium thickening: prospective prestudy. Imagerie de la Femme 28:196-207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.femme.2018.07.004CrossRef Cartayrade N, Lacombe S, Daures J-P, Chiavassa H, Viala-Trentini M (2018) Discriminant value of MRI for the diagnosis of benign and malignant endometrium in postmenopausal women with uterine bleeding or asymptomatic endometrium thickening: prospective prestudy. Imagerie de la Femme 28:196-207. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/​j.​femme.​2018.​07.​004CrossRef
41.
Zurück zum Zitat Cao K, Zhang XP, Tang J, Li J (2008) Clinical application of diffusion-weighted MRI in uterine tumors-evaluation of signal intensity and ADC values. Chin J Med Imaging Technol 8: 1231-1235. Cao K, Zhang XP, Tang J, Li J (2008) Clinical application of diffusion-weighted MRI in uterine tumors-evaluation of signal intensity and ADC values. Chin J Med Imaging Technol 8: 1231-1235.
47.
Zurück zum Zitat Page MJ, Higgins JPT, Sterne JAC (2019) Assessing risk of bias due to missing results in a synthesis. In: Higgins JPT, Thomas J, Chandler J, Cumpston M, Li T, Page MJ, Welch VA (ed) Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. 2nd edn. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester (UK), pp 349-374.CrossRef Page MJ, Higgins JPT, Sterne JAC (2019) Assessing risk of bias due to missing results in a synthesis. In: Higgins JPT, Thomas J, Chandler J, Cumpston M, Li T, Page MJ, Welch VA (ed) Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. 2nd edn. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester (UK), pp 349-374.CrossRef
61.
Zurück zum Zitat Lin G, Yang LY, Huang YT et al (2016) Comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced MRI and diffusion-weighted MRI in the differentiation between uterine leiomyosarcoma/smooth muscle tumor with uncertain malignant potential and benign leiomyoma. J Magn Reson Imaging 43:333-342. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.24998CrossRefPubMed Lin G, Yang LY, Huang YT et al (2016) Comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced MRI and diffusion-weighted MRI in the differentiation between uterine leiomyosarcoma/smooth muscle tumor with uncertain malignant potential and benign leiomyoma. J Magn Reson Imaging 43:333-342. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1002/​jmri.​24998CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Diagnostic performance of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) for differentiating endometrial carcinoma from benign lesions: a systematic review and meta-analysis
verfasst von
Yashar Moharamzad
Amir H. Davarpanah
Ali Yaghobi Joybari
Fatemeh Shahbazi
Leila Esmaeilian Toosi
Melika Kooshkiforooshani
Ali Ansari
Morteza Sanei Taheri
Publikationsdatum
15.09.2020
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Abdominal Radiology / Ausgabe 3/2021
Print ISSN: 2366-004X
Elektronische ISSN: 2366-0058
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-020-02734-w

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2021

Abdominal Radiology 3/2021 Zur Ausgabe

Classics in Abdominal Radiology

Spalding sign

Update Radiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.