Skip to main content
Erschienen in: International Urology and Nephrology 8/2017

05.05.2017 | Urology - Original Paper

Diagnostic value of MRI-based PSA density in predicting transperineal sector-guided prostate biopsy outcomes

verfasst von: Findlay MacAskill, Su-Min Lee, David Eldred-Evans, Wahyu Wulaningsih, Rick Popert, Konrad Wolfe, Mieke Van Hemelrijck, Giles Rottenberg, Sidath H. Liyanage, Peter Acher

Erschienen in: International Urology and Nephrology | Ausgabe 8/2017

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) density (PSAD) has potential to increase the diagnostic utility of PSA, yet has had poor uptake in clinical practice. We aimed to determine the diagnostic value of magnetic resonance imaging-derived PSAD (MR-PSAD) in predicting transperineal sector-guided prostate biopsy (TPSB) outcomes.

Materials and methods

Men presenting for primary TPSB from 2007 to 2014 were considered. Histological outcomes were assessed and defined as: presence of any cancer or significant cancer defined as presence of Gleason 4 and/or maximum tumour core length (MCCL) ≥ 4 mm (G4); or Gleason 4 and/or MCCL ≥ 6 mm (G6). Sensitivity, specificity and positive and negative predictive values were calculated, and receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves were generated to compare MR-PSAD and PSA.

Results

Six hundred fifty-nine men were evaluated with mean age 62.5 ± 9 years, median PSA 6.7 ng/ml (range 0.5–40.0), prostate volume 40 cc (range 7–187) and MR-PSAD 0.15 ng/ml/cc (range 0.019–1.3). ROC area under the curve (95% CI) was significantly better for MR-PSAD than PSA for all cancer definitions (p < 0.001): 0.73 (0.70–0.76) versus 0.61 (0.57–0.64) for any cancer; 0.75 (0.71–0.78) versus 0.66 (0.62–0.69) for G4; and 0.77 (0.74–0.80) versus 0.68 (0.64–0.71) for G6. Sensitivities for MR-PSAD < 0.1 ng/ml/cc were 85.0, 89.9 and 91.9% for any, G4 and G6 cancer, respectively.

Conclusion

MR-PSAD may be better than total PSA in determining risk of positive biopsy outcome. Its use may improve risk stratification and reduce unnecessary biopsies.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Draisma G, Boer R, Otto SJ, van der Cruijsen IW, Damhuis RA, Schroder FH, de Koning HJ (2003) Lead times and overdetection due to prostate-specific antigen screening: estimates from the European randomized study of screening for prostate cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 95:868–878CrossRefPubMed Draisma G, Boer R, Otto SJ, van der Cruijsen IW, Damhuis RA, Schroder FH, de Koning HJ (2003) Lead times and overdetection due to prostate-specific antigen screening: estimates from the European randomized study of screening for prostate cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 95:868–878CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Loeb S, Vellekoop A, Ahmed HU, Catto J, Emberton M, Nam R, Rosario DJ, Scattoni V, Lotan Y (2013) Systematic review of complications of prostate biopsy. Eur Urol 64:876–892CrossRefPubMed Loeb S, Vellekoop A, Ahmed HU, Catto J, Emberton M, Nam R, Rosario DJ, Scattoni V, Lotan Y (2013) Systematic review of complications of prostate biopsy. Eur Urol 64:876–892CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Benson MC, Whang IS, Pantuck A, Ring K, Kaplan SA, Olsson CA, Cooner WH (1992) Prostate specific antigen density: a means of distinguishing benign prostatic hypertrophy and prostate cancer. J Urol 147:815–816CrossRefPubMed Benson MC, Whang IS, Pantuck A, Ring K, Kaplan SA, Olsson CA, Cooner WH (1992) Prostate specific antigen density: a means of distinguishing benign prostatic hypertrophy and prostate cancer. J Urol 147:815–816CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Nathan MS, Seenivasagam K, Mei Q, Wickham JE, Miller RA (1996) Transrectal ultrasonography: why are estimates of prostate volume and dimension so inaccurate? Br J Urol 77:401–407CrossRefPubMed Nathan MS, Seenivasagam K, Mei Q, Wickham JE, Miller RA (1996) Transrectal ultrasonography: why are estimates of prostate volume and dimension so inaccurate? Br J Urol 77:401–407CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Tong S, Cardinal HN, McLoughlin RF, Downey DB, Fenster A (1998) Intra- and inter-observer variability and reliability of prostate volume measurement via two-dimensional and three-dimensional ultrasound imaging. Ultrasound Med Biol 24:673–681CrossRefPubMed Tong S, Cardinal HN, McLoughlin RF, Downey DB, Fenster A (1998) Intra- and inter-observer variability and reliability of prostate volume measurement via two-dimensional and three-dimensional ultrasound imaging. Ultrasound Med Biol 24:673–681CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Pinsky PF, Kramer BS, Crawford ED, Grubb RL, Urban DA, Andriole GL, Chia D, Levin DL, Gohagan JK (2006) Prostate volume and prostate-specific antigen levels in men enrolled in a large screening trial. Urology 68:352–356CrossRefPubMed Pinsky PF, Kramer BS, Crawford ED, Grubb RL, Urban DA, Andriole GL, Chia D, Levin DL, Gohagan JK (2006) Prostate volume and prostate-specific antigen levels in men enrolled in a large screening trial. Urology 68:352–356CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Catalona WJ, Richie JP, deKernion JB, Ahmann FR, Ratliff TL, Dalkin BL, Kavoussi LR, MacFarlane MT, Southwick PC (1994) Comparison of prostate specific antigen concentration versus prostate specific antigen density in the early detection of prostate cancer: receiver operating characteristic curves. J Urol 152:2031–2036CrossRefPubMed Catalona WJ, Richie JP, deKernion JB, Ahmann FR, Ratliff TL, Dalkin BL, Kavoussi LR, MacFarlane MT, Southwick PC (1994) Comparison of prostate specific antigen concentration versus prostate specific antigen density in the early detection of prostate cancer: receiver operating characteristic curves. J Urol 152:2031–2036CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Elliott CS, Shinghal R, Presti JC Jr (2008) The performance of prostate specific antigen, prostate specific antigen density and transition zone density in the era of extended biopsy schemes. J Urol 179:1756–1761 (discussion 1761) CrossRefPubMed Elliott CS, Shinghal R, Presti JC Jr (2008) The performance of prostate specific antigen, prostate specific antigen density and transition zone density in the era of extended biopsy schemes. J Urol 179:1756–1761 (discussion 1761) CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Rais-Bahrami S, Siddiqui MM, Vourganti S, Turkbey B, Rastinehad AR, Stamatakis L, Truong H, Walton-Diaz A, Hoang AN, Nix JW, Merino MJ, Wood BJ, Simon RM, Choyke PL, Pinto PA (2015) Diagnostic value of biparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as an adjunct to prostate-specific antigen (PSA)-based detection of prostate cancer in men without prior biopsies. BJU Int 115:381–388CrossRefPubMed Rais-Bahrami S, Siddiqui MM, Vourganti S, Turkbey B, Rastinehad AR, Stamatakis L, Truong H, Walton-Diaz A, Hoang AN, Nix JW, Merino MJ, Wood BJ, Simon RM, Choyke PL, Pinto PA (2015) Diagnostic value of biparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as an adjunct to prostate-specific antigen (PSA)-based detection of prostate cancer in men without prior biopsies. BJU Int 115:381–388CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Ayres BE, Montgomery BS, Barber NJ, Pereira N, Langley SE, Denham P, Bott SR (2012) The role of transperineal template prostate biopsies in restaging men with prostate cancer managed by active surveillance. BJU Int 109:1170–1176CrossRefPubMed Ayres BE, Montgomery BS, Barber NJ, Pereira N, Langley SE, Denham P, Bott SR (2012) The role of transperineal template prostate biopsies in restaging men with prostate cancer managed by active surveillance. BJU Int 109:1170–1176CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Vyas L, Acher P, Kinsella J, Challacombe B, Chang RT, Sturch P, Cahill D, Chandra A, Popert R (2014) Indications, results and safety profile of transperineal sector biopsies (TPSB) of the prostate: a single centre experience of 634 cases. BJU Int 114:32–37CrossRefPubMed Vyas L, Acher P, Kinsella J, Challacombe B, Chang RT, Sturch P, Cahill D, Chandra A, Popert R (2014) Indications, results and safety profile of transperineal sector biopsies (TPSB) of the prostate: a single centre experience of 634 cases. BJU Int 114:32–37CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Koppie TM, Bianco FJ Jr, Kuroiwa K, Reuter VE, Guillonneau B, Eastham JA, Scardino PT (2006) The clinical features of anterior prostate cancers. BJU Int 98:1167–1171CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Koppie TM, Bianco FJ Jr, Kuroiwa K, Reuter VE, Guillonneau B, Eastham JA, Scardino PT (2006) The clinical features of anterior prostate cancers. BJU Int 98:1167–1171CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Sazuka T, Imamoto T, Namekawa T, Utsumi T, Yanagisawa M, Kawamura K, Kamiya N, Suzuki H, Ueda T, Ota S, Nakatani Y, Ichikawa T (2013) Analysis of preoperative detection for apex prostate cancer by transrectal biopsy. Prostate Cancer 2013:705865CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Sazuka T, Imamoto T, Namekawa T, Utsumi T, Yanagisawa M, Kawamura K, Kamiya N, Suzuki H, Ueda T, Ota S, Nakatani Y, Ichikawa T (2013) Analysis of preoperative detection for apex prostate cancer by transrectal biopsy. Prostate Cancer 2013:705865CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Mabjeesh NJ, Lidawi G, Chen J, German L, Matzkin H (2012) High detection rate of significant prostate tumours in anterior zones using transperineal ultrasound-guided template saturation biopsy. BJU Int 110:993–997CrossRefPubMed Mabjeesh NJ, Lidawi G, Chen J, German L, Matzkin H (2012) High detection rate of significant prostate tumours in anterior zones using transperineal ultrasound-guided template saturation biopsy. BJU Int 110:993–997CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Rouse P, Shaw G, Ahmed HU, Freeman A, Allen C, Emberton M (2011) Multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging to rule-in and rule-out clinically important prostate cancer in men at risk: a cohort study. Urol Int 87:49–53CrossRefPubMed Rouse P, Shaw G, Ahmed HU, Freeman A, Allen C, Emberton M (2011) Multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging to rule-in and rule-out clinically important prostate cancer in men at risk: a cohort study. Urol Int 87:49–53CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Grey AD, Chana MS, Popert R, Wolfe K, Liyanage SH, Acher PL (2015) Diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) prostate imaging reporting and data system (PI-RADS) scoring in a transperineal prostate biopsy setting. BJU Int 115:728–735CrossRefPubMed Grey AD, Chana MS, Popert R, Wolfe K, Liyanage SH, Acher PL (2015) Diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) prostate imaging reporting and data system (PI-RADS) scoring in a transperineal prostate biopsy setting. BJU Int 115:728–735CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat London Cancer Alliance (2015) LCA best practice prostate pathway. London Cancer Alliance NHS, London London Cancer Alliance (2015) LCA best practice prostate pathway. London Cancer Alliance NHS, London
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Ahmed HU, El-Shater Bosaily A, Brown LC, Gabe R, Kaplan R, Parmar MK, Collaco-Moraes Y, Ward K, Hindley RG, Freeman A, Kirkham AP, Oldroyd R, Parker C, Emberton M (2017) Diagnostic accuracy of multi-parametric MRI and TRUS biopsy in prostate cancer (PROMIS): a paired validating confirmatory study. Lancet 389:815–822CrossRefPubMed Ahmed HU, El-Shater Bosaily A, Brown LC, Gabe R, Kaplan R, Parmar MK, Collaco-Moraes Y, Ward K, Hindley RG, Freeman A, Kirkham AP, Oldroyd R, Parker C, Emberton M (2017) Diagnostic accuracy of multi-parametric MRI and TRUS biopsy in prostate cancer (PROMIS): a paired validating confirmatory study. Lancet 389:815–822CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Choi YJ, Kim JK, Kim HJ, Cho KS (2009) Interobserver variability of transrectal ultrasound for prostate volume measurement according to volume and observer experience. AJR Am J Roentgenol 192:444–449CrossRefPubMed Choi YJ, Kim JK, Kim HJ, Cho KS (2009) Interobserver variability of transrectal ultrasound for prostate volume measurement according to volume and observer experience. AJR Am J Roentgenol 192:444–449CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Lee JS, Chung BH (2007) Transrectal ultrasound versus magnetic resonance imaging in the estimation of prostate volume as compared with radical prostatectomy specimens. Urol Int 78:323–327CrossRefPubMed Lee JS, Chung BH (2007) Transrectal ultrasound versus magnetic resonance imaging in the estimation of prostate volume as compared with radical prostatectomy specimens. Urol Int 78:323–327CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Abd-Alazeez M, Ahmed HU, Arya M, Charman SC, Anastasiadis E, Freeman A, Emberton M, Kirkham A (2014) The accuracy of multiparametric MRI in men with negative biopsy and elevated PSA level—can it rule out clinically significant prostate cancer? Urol Oncol 32(45):e17–e22 Abd-Alazeez M, Ahmed HU, Arya M, Charman SC, Anastasiadis E, Freeman A, Emberton M, Kirkham A (2014) The accuracy of multiparametric MRI in men with negative biopsy and elevated PSA level—can it rule out clinically significant prostate cancer? Urol Oncol 32(45):e17–e22
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Bossuyt PM, Reitsma JB, Bruns DE, Gatsonis CA, Glasziou PP, Irwig L, Lijmer JG, Moher D, Rennie D, de Vet HC, Kressel HY, Rifai N, Golub RM, Altman DG, Hooft L, Korevaar DA, Cohen JF (2015) STARD 2015: an updated list of essential items for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies. BMJ 351:h5527CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Bossuyt PM, Reitsma JB, Bruns DE, Gatsonis CA, Glasziou PP, Irwig L, Lijmer JG, Moher D, Rennie D, de Vet HC, Kressel HY, Rifai N, Golub RM, Altman DG, Hooft L, Korevaar DA, Cohen JF (2015) STARD 2015: an updated list of essential items for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies. BMJ 351:h5527CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Littrup PJ, Williams CR, Egglin TK, Kane RA (1991) Determination of prostate volume with transrectal US for cancer screening. Part II. Accuracy of in vitro and in vivo techniques. Radiology 179:49–53CrossRefPubMed Littrup PJ, Williams CR, Egglin TK, Kane RA (1991) Determination of prostate volume with transrectal US for cancer screening. Part II. Accuracy of in vitro and in vivo techniques. Radiology 179:49–53CrossRefPubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Ahmed HU, Hu Y, Carter T, Arumainayagam N, Lecornet E, Freeman A, Hawkes D, Barratt DC, Emberton M (2011) Characterizing clinically significant prostate cancer using template prostate mapping biopsy. J Urol 186:458–464CrossRefPubMed Ahmed HU, Hu Y, Carter T, Arumainayagam N, Lecornet E, Freeman A, Hawkes D, Barratt DC, Emberton M (2011) Characterizing clinically significant prostate cancer using template prostate mapping biopsy. J Urol 186:458–464CrossRefPubMed
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Stephan C, Stroebel G, Heinau M, Lenz A, Roemer A, Lein M, Schnorr D, Loening SA, Jung K (2005) The ratio of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) to prostate volume (PSA density) as a parameter to improve the detection of prostate carcinoma in PSA values in the range of <4 ng/mL. Cancer 104:993–1003CrossRefPubMed Stephan C, Stroebel G, Heinau M, Lenz A, Roemer A, Lein M, Schnorr D, Loening SA, Jung K (2005) The ratio of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) to prostate volume (PSA density) as a parameter to improve the detection of prostate carcinoma in PSA values in the range of <4 ng/mL. Cancer 104:993–1003CrossRefPubMed
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Hoshii T, Nishiyama T, Toyabe S, Akazawa K, Komatsu S, Kaneko M, Hara N, Takahashi K (2007) Evaluation of magnetic resonance imaging-based prostate-specific antigen density of the prostate in the diagnosis of prostate cancer. Int J Urol 14:305–310CrossRefPubMed Hoshii T, Nishiyama T, Toyabe S, Akazawa K, Komatsu S, Kaneko M, Hara N, Takahashi K (2007) Evaluation of magnetic resonance imaging-based prostate-specific antigen density of the prostate in the diagnosis of prostate cancer. Int J Urol 14:305–310CrossRefPubMed
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Kubota Y, Kamei S, Nakano M, Ehara H, Deguchi T, Tanaka O (2008) The potential role of prebiopsy magnetic resonance imaging combined with prostate-specific antigen density in the detection of prostate cancer. Int J Urol 15:322–326 (discussion 327) CrossRefPubMed Kubota Y, Kamei S, Nakano M, Ehara H, Deguchi T, Tanaka O (2008) The potential role of prebiopsy magnetic resonance imaging combined with prostate-specific antigen density in the detection of prostate cancer. Int J Urol 15:322–326 (discussion 327) CrossRefPubMed
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Mueller-Lisse UG, Mueller-Lisse UL, Haller S, Schneede P, Scheidler JE, Schmeller N, Hofstetter AG, Reiser MF (2002) Likelihood of prostate cancer based on prostate-specific antigen density by MRI: retrospective analysis. J Comput Assist Tomogr 26:432–437CrossRefPubMed Mueller-Lisse UG, Mueller-Lisse UL, Haller S, Schneede P, Scheidler JE, Schmeller N, Hofstetter AG, Reiser MF (2002) Likelihood of prostate cancer based on prostate-specific antigen density by MRI: retrospective analysis. J Comput Assist Tomogr 26:432–437CrossRefPubMed
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Peng Y, Shen D, Liao S, Turkbey B, Rais-Bahrami S, Wood B, Karademir I, Antic T, Yousef A, Jiang Y, Pinto PA, Choyke PL, Oto A (2015) MRI-based prostate volume-adjusted prostate-specific antigen in the diagnosis of prostate cancer. J Magn Reson Imaging 42:1733–1739CrossRefPubMed Peng Y, Shen D, Liao S, Turkbey B, Rais-Bahrami S, Wood B, Karademir I, Antic T, Yousef A, Jiang Y, Pinto PA, Choyke PL, Oto A (2015) MRI-based prostate volume-adjusted prostate-specific antigen in the diagnosis of prostate cancer. J Magn Reson Imaging 42:1733–1739CrossRefPubMed
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Washino S, Okochi T, Saito K, Konishi T, Hirai M, Kobayashi Y, Miyagawa T (2016) Combination of PI-RADS score and PSA density predicts biopsy outcome in biopsy naive patients. BJU Int 119:225–233CrossRefPubMed Washino S, Okochi T, Saito K, Konishi T, Hirai M, Kobayashi Y, Miyagawa T (2016) Combination of PI-RADS score and PSA density predicts biopsy outcome in biopsy naive patients. BJU Int 119:225–233CrossRefPubMed
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Barentsz JO, Richenberg J, Clements R, Choyke P, Verma S, Villeirs G, Rouviere O, Logager V, Futterer JJ (2012) ESUR prostate MR guidelines 2012. Eur Radiol 22:746–757CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Barentsz JO, Richenberg J, Clements R, Choyke P, Verma S, Villeirs G, Rouviere O, Logager V, Futterer JJ (2012) ESUR prostate MR guidelines 2012. Eur Radiol 22:746–757CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Futterer JJ, Briganti A, De Visschere P, Emberton M, Giannarini G, Kirkham A, Taneja SS, Thoeny H, Villeirs G, Villers A (2015) Can clinically significant prostate cancer be detected with multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging? A systematic review of the literature. Eur Urol 68:1045–1053CrossRefPubMed Futterer JJ, Briganti A, De Visschere P, Emberton M, Giannarini G, Kirkham A, Taneja SS, Thoeny H, Villeirs G, Villers A (2015) Can clinically significant prostate cancer be detected with multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging? A systematic review of the literature. Eur Urol 68:1045–1053CrossRefPubMed
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Busch J, Hamborg K, Meyer HA, Buckendahl J, Magheli A, Lein M, Jung K, Miller K, Stephan C (2012) Value of prostate specific antigen density and percent free prostate specific antigen for prostate cancer prognosis. J Urol 188:2165–2170CrossRefPubMed Busch J, Hamborg K, Meyer HA, Buckendahl J, Magheli A, Lein M, Jung K, Miller K, Stephan C (2012) Value of prostate specific antigen density and percent free prostate specific antigen for prostate cancer prognosis. J Urol 188:2165–2170CrossRefPubMed
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Koie T, Mitsuzuka K, Yoneyama T, Narita S, Kawamura S, Kaiho Y, Tsuchiya N, Tochigi T, Habuchi T, Arai Y, Ohyama C, Tobisawa Y (2015) Prostate-specific antigen density predicts extracapsular extension and increased risk of biochemical recurrence in patients with high-risk prostate cancer who underwent radical prostatectomy. Int J Clin Oncol 20:176–181CrossRefPubMed Koie T, Mitsuzuka K, Yoneyama T, Narita S, Kawamura S, Kaiho Y, Tsuchiya N, Tochigi T, Habuchi T, Arai Y, Ohyama C, Tobisawa Y (2015) Prostate-specific antigen density predicts extracapsular extension and increased risk of biochemical recurrence in patients with high-risk prostate cancer who underwent radical prostatectomy. Int J Clin Oncol 20:176–181CrossRefPubMed
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Hansen NL, Barrett T, Koo B, Doble A, Gnanapragasam V, Warren A, Kastner C, Bratt O (2016) The influence of prostate-specific antigen density on positive and negative predictive values of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging to detect Gleason score 7–10 prostate cancer in a repeat biopsy setting. BJU Int 119:724–730CrossRefPubMed Hansen NL, Barrett T, Koo B, Doble A, Gnanapragasam V, Warren A, Kastner C, Bratt O (2016) The influence of prostate-specific antigen density on positive and negative predictive values of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging to detect Gleason score 7–10 prostate cancer in a repeat biopsy setting. BJU Int 119:724–730CrossRefPubMed
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Klemann N, Roder MA, Helgstrand JT, Brasso K, Toft BG, Vainer B, Iversen P (2017) Risk of prostate cancer diagnosis and mortality in men with a benign initial transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy set: a population-based study. Lancet Oncol 18:221–229CrossRefPubMed Klemann N, Roder MA, Helgstrand JT, Brasso K, Toft BG, Vainer B, Iversen P (2017) Risk of prostate cancer diagnosis and mortality in men with a benign initial transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy set: a population-based study. Lancet Oncol 18:221–229CrossRefPubMed
38.
Zurück zum Zitat McConnell JD, Bruskewitz R, Walsh P, Andriole G, Lieber M, Holtgrewe HL, Albertsen P, Roehrborn CG, Nickel JC, Wang DZ, Taylor AM, Waldstreicher J (1998) The effect of finasteride on the risk of acute urinary retention and the need for surgical treatment among men with benign prostatic hyperplasia. Finasteride Long-Term Efficacy and Safety Study Group. N Engl J Med 338:557–563CrossRefPubMed McConnell JD, Bruskewitz R, Walsh P, Andriole G, Lieber M, Holtgrewe HL, Albertsen P, Roehrborn CG, Nickel JC, Wang DZ, Taylor AM, Waldstreicher J (1998) The effect of finasteride on the risk of acute urinary retention and the need for surgical treatment among men with benign prostatic hyperplasia. Finasteride Long-Term Efficacy and Safety Study Group. N Engl J Med 338:557–563CrossRefPubMed
39.
Zurück zum Zitat Kim JH, Doo SW, Yang WJ, Lee KW, Lee CH, Song YS, Jeon YS, Kim ME, Kwon SS (2014) Impact of obesity on the predictive accuracy of prostate-specific antigen density and prostate-specific antigen in native Korean men undergoing prostate biopsy. Int J Urol 21:987–990CrossRefPubMed Kim JH, Doo SW, Yang WJ, Lee KW, Lee CH, Song YS, Jeon YS, Kim ME, Kwon SS (2014) Impact of obesity on the predictive accuracy of prostate-specific antigen density and prostate-specific antigen in native Korean men undergoing prostate biopsy. Int J Urol 21:987–990CrossRefPubMed
40.
Zurück zum Zitat Turkbey B, Fotin SV, Huang RJ, Yin Y, Daar D, Aras O, Bernardo M, Garvey BE, Weaver J, Haldankar H, Muradyan N, Merino MJ, Pinto PA, Periaswamy S, Choyke PL (2013) Fully automated prostate segmentation on MRI: comparison with manual segmentation methods and specimen volumes. AJR Am J Roentgenol 201:W720–W729CrossRefPubMed Turkbey B, Fotin SV, Huang RJ, Yin Y, Daar D, Aras O, Bernardo M, Garvey BE, Weaver J, Haldankar H, Muradyan N, Merino MJ, Pinto PA, Periaswamy S, Choyke PL (2013) Fully automated prostate segmentation on MRI: comparison with manual segmentation methods and specimen volumes. AJR Am J Roentgenol 201:W720–W729CrossRefPubMed
41.
Zurück zum Zitat Dall’Era MA, Cooperberg MR, Chan JM, Davies BJ, Albertsen PC, Klotz LH, Warlick CA, Holmberg L, Bailey DE Jr, Wallace ME, Kantoff PW, Carroll PR (2008) Active surveillance for early-stage prostate cancer: review of the current literature. Cancer 112:1650–1659CrossRefPubMed Dall’Era MA, Cooperberg MR, Chan JM, Davies BJ, Albertsen PC, Klotz LH, Warlick CA, Holmberg L, Bailey DE Jr, Wallace ME, Kantoff PW, Carroll PR (2008) Active surveillance for early-stage prostate cancer: review of the current literature. Cancer 112:1650–1659CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Diagnostic value of MRI-based PSA density in predicting transperineal sector-guided prostate biopsy outcomes
verfasst von
Findlay MacAskill
Su-Min Lee
David Eldred-Evans
Wahyu Wulaningsih
Rick Popert
Konrad Wolfe
Mieke Van Hemelrijck
Giles Rottenberg
Sidath H. Liyanage
Peter Acher
Publikationsdatum
05.05.2017
Verlag
Springer Netherlands
Erschienen in
International Urology and Nephrology / Ausgabe 8/2017
Print ISSN: 0301-1623
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-2584
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-017-1609-8

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 8/2017

International Urology and Nephrology 8/2017 Zur Ausgabe

Leitlinien kompakt für die Innere Medizin

Mit medbee Pocketcards sicher entscheiden.

Seit 2022 gehört die medbee GmbH zum Springer Medizin Verlag

Update Innere Medizin

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.