Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy 12/2016

28.06.2016

Diagnostic yield of endoscopic ultrasonography-guided single-incision needle knife biopsy for gastric subepithelial tumors: comparison with resected specimens

verfasst von: Joon Sung Kim, Byung-Wook Kim, Gi Jun Kim, Young Wook Kim, Seung Ji Ryu, Sung Min Park, Jeong-Seon Ji, Sun Young Jun

Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy | Ausgabe 12/2016

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Several techniques are recommended for the histologic diagnosis of gastric subepithelial tumors (SETs). The purpose of our study was to evaluate the diagnostic yield and safety of endoscopic ultrasonography-guided single-incision needle knife (SINK) biopsy for the diagnosis of gastric SETs.

Methods

A retrospective review of patients who received biopsy for gastric SETs from August 2012 to May 2015 was conducted. Patients who received endoscopic ultrasonography and were found to have a SET originating from the muscularis propria of the stomach were included in the study. The aim of our study was to investigate the safety and diagnostic yield of SINK biopsy for gastric SETs.

Results

A total of 31 patients received SINK biopsy for SETs. The diagnostic yield of SINK biopsy was 87 % (95 % CI 75–100 %), and the diagnostic accuracy was 89 % (95 % CI 74–105 %). The sensitivity of SINK biopsy to identify gastrointestinal stromal tumors was 83 % (95 % CI 52–98 %); the specificity was 100 % (95 % CI 59–100 %); the positive predictive value was 100 % (95 % CI 69–100 %); and the negative predictive value was 78 % (95 % CI 40–97 %). There were no procedure-related adverse events during and after procedure.

Conclusion

The use of SINK biopsy technique in patients with SETs is a good diagnostic tool with high diagnostic yield and accuracy. The method is simple, safe, and associated with few complications.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Hedenbro JL, Ekelund M, Wetterberg P (1991) Endoscopic diagnosis of submucosal gastric lesions. The results after routine endoscopy. Surg Endosc 5(1):20–23CrossRefPubMed Hedenbro JL, Ekelund M, Wetterberg P (1991) Endoscopic diagnosis of submucosal gastric lesions. The results after routine endoscopy. Surg Endosc 5(1):20–23CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Lim YJ, Son HJ, Lee JS, Byun YH, Suh HJ, Rhee PL, Kim JJ, Rhee JC (2010) Clinical course of subepithelial lesions detected on upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. World J Gastroenterol 16(4):439–444CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Lim YJ, Son HJ, Lee JS, Byun YH, Suh HJ, Rhee PL, Kim JJ, Rhee JC (2010) Clinical course of subepithelial lesions detected on upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. World J Gastroenterol 16(4):439–444CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Min YW, Park HN, Min BH, Choi D, Kim KM, Kim S (2015) Preoperative predictive factors for gastrointestinal stromal tumors: analysis of 375 surgically resected gastric subepithelial tumors. J Gastrointest Surg 19(4):631–638CrossRefPubMed Min YW, Park HN, Min BH, Choi D, Kim KM, Kim S (2015) Preoperative predictive factors for gastrointestinal stromal tumors: analysis of 375 surgically resected gastric subepithelial tumors. J Gastrointest Surg 19(4):631–638CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Wiech T, Walch A, Werner M (2005) Histopathological classification of nonneoplastic and neoplastic gastrointestinal submucosal lesions. Endoscopy 37(7):630–634CrossRefPubMed Wiech T, Walch A, Werner M (2005) Histopathological classification of nonneoplastic and neoplastic gastrointestinal submucosal lesions. Endoscopy 37(7):630–634CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Ji F, Wang ZW, Wang LJ, Ning JW, Xu GQ (2008) Clinicopathological characteristics of gastrointestinal mesenchymal tumors and diagnostic value of endoscopic ultrasonography. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 23:e318–e324CrossRefPubMed Ji F, Wang ZW, Wang LJ, Ning JW, Xu GQ (2008) Clinicopathological characteristics of gastrointestinal mesenchymal tumors and diagnostic value of endoscopic ultrasonography. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 23:e318–e324CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Chen TH, Hsu CM, Chu YY, Wu CH, Chen TC, Hsu JT, Yeh TS, Lin CJ, Chiu CT (2016) Association of endoscopic ultrasonographic parameters and gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs): can endoscopic ultrasonography be used to screen gastric GISTs for potential malignancy? Scand J Gastroenterol 51(3):374–377 Epub 2015 Oct 22 CrossRefPubMed Chen TH, Hsu CM, Chu YY, Wu CH, Chen TC, Hsu JT, Yeh TS, Lin CJ, Chiu CT (2016) Association of endoscopic ultrasonographic parameters and gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs): can endoscopic ultrasonography be used to screen gastric GISTs for potential malignancy? Scand J Gastroenterol 51(3):374–377 Epub 2015 Oct 22 CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Ji JS, Lee BI, Choi KY, Kim BW, Choi H, Huh M, Chung WC, Chae HS, Chung IS (2009) Diagnostic yield of tissue sampling using a bite-on-bite technique for incidental subepithelial lesions. Korean J Intern Med 24(2):101–105CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Ji JS, Lee BI, Choi KY, Kim BW, Choi H, Huh M, Chung WC, Chae HS, Chung IS (2009) Diagnostic yield of tissue sampling using a bite-on-bite technique for incidental subepithelial lesions. Korean J Intern Med 24(2):101–105CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Fernandez-Esparrach G, Sendino O, Sole M, Pellise M, Colomo L, Pardo A, Martinez-Palli G, Arguello L, Bordas JM, Llach J, Gines A (2010) Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration and trucut biopsy in the diagnosis of gastric stromal tumors: a randomized crossover study. Endoscopy 42(4):292–299CrossRefPubMed Fernandez-Esparrach G, Sendino O, Sole M, Pellise M, Colomo L, Pardo A, Martinez-Palli G, Arguello L, Bordas JM, Llach J, Gines A (2010) Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration and trucut biopsy in the diagnosis of gastric stromal tumors: a randomized crossover study. Endoscopy 42(4):292–299CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Sepe PS, Moparty B, Pitman MB, Saltzman JR, Brugge WR (2009) EUS-guided FNA for the diagnosis of GI stromal cell tumors: sensitivity and cytologic yield. Gastrointest Endosc 70(2):254–261CrossRefPubMed Sepe PS, Moparty B, Pitman MB, Saltzman JR, Brugge WR (2009) EUS-guided FNA for the diagnosis of GI stromal cell tumors: sensitivity and cytologic yield. Gastrointest Endosc 70(2):254–261CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat de la Serna-Higuera C, Perez-Miranda M, Diez-Redondo P, Gil-Simon P, Herranz T, Perez-Martin E, Ochoa C, Caro-Paton A (2011) EUS-guided single-incision needle-knife biopsy: description and results of a new method for tissue sampling of subepithelial GI tumors (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 74(3):672–676CrossRefPubMed de la Serna-Higuera C, Perez-Miranda M, Diez-Redondo P, Gil-Simon P, Herranz T, Perez-Martin E, Ochoa C, Caro-Paton A (2011) EUS-guided single-incision needle-knife biopsy: description and results of a new method for tissue sampling of subepithelial GI tumors (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 74(3):672–676CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Song JH, Kim SG, Chung SJ, Kang HY, Yang SY, Kim YS (2015) Risk of progression for incidental small subepithelial tumors in the upper gastrointestinal tract. Endoscopy 47(8):675–679CrossRefPubMed Song JH, Kim SG, Chung SJ, Kang HY, Yang SY, Kim YS (2015) Risk of progression for incidental small subepithelial tumors in the upper gastrointestinal tract. Endoscopy 47(8):675–679CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Nishida T, Hirota S, Yanagisawa A, Sugino Y, Minami M, Yamamura Y, Otani Y, Shimada Y, Takahashi F, Kubota T (2008) Clinical practice guidelines for gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) in Japan: English version. Int J Clin Oncol 13(5):416–430CrossRefPubMed Nishida T, Hirota S, Yanagisawa A, Sugino Y, Minami M, Yamamura Y, Otani Y, Shimada Y, Takahashi F, Kubota T (2008) Clinical practice guidelines for gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) in Japan: English version. Int J Clin Oncol 13(5):416–430CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Philipper M, Hollerbach S, Gabbert HE, Heikaus S, Bocking A, Pomjanski N, Neuhaus H, Frieling T, Schumacher B (2010) Prospective comparison of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration and surgical histology in upper gastrointestinal submucosal tumors. Endoscopy 42(4):300–305CrossRefPubMed Philipper M, Hollerbach S, Gabbert HE, Heikaus S, Bocking A, Pomjanski N, Neuhaus H, Frieling T, Schumacher B (2010) Prospective comparison of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration and surgical histology in upper gastrointestinal submucosal tumors. Endoscopy 42(4):300–305CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Tae HJ, Lee HL, Lee KN, Jun DW, Lee OY, Han DS, Yoon BC, Choi HS, Hahm JS (2014) Deep biopsy via endoscopic submucosal dissection in upper gastrointestinal subepithelial tumors: a prospective study. Endoscopy 46(10):845–850CrossRefPubMed Tae HJ, Lee HL, Lee KN, Jun DW, Lee OY, Han DS, Yoon BC, Choi HS, Hahm JS (2014) Deep biopsy via endoscopic submucosal dissection in upper gastrointestinal subepithelial tumors: a prospective study. Endoscopy 46(10):845–850CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Kim JH, Chung JW, Ha M, Rim MY, Lee JJ, An J, Kim YJ, Kim KO, Kwon KA, Park DK, Kim YS, Choi DJ (2013) A feasible modified biopsy method for tissue diagnosis of gastric subepithelial tumors. World J Gastroenterol 19(29):4752–4757CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Kim JH, Chung JW, Ha M, Rim MY, Lee JJ, An J, Kim YJ, Kim KO, Kwon KA, Park DK, Kim YS, Choi DJ (2013) A feasible modified biopsy method for tissue diagnosis of gastric subepithelial tumors. World J Gastroenterol 19(29):4752–4757CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Eckardt AJ, Adler A, Gomes EM, Jenssen C, Siebert C, Gottschalk U, Koch M, Rocken C, Rosch T (2012) Endosonographic large-bore biopsy of gastric subepithelial tumors: a prospective multicenter study. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 24(10):1135–1144CrossRefPubMed Eckardt AJ, Adler A, Gomes EM, Jenssen C, Siebert C, Gottschalk U, Koch M, Rocken C, Rosch T (2012) Endosonographic large-bore biopsy of gastric subepithelial tumors: a prospective multicenter study. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 24(10):1135–1144CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Hoda KM, Rodriguez SA, Faigel DO (2009) EUS-guided sampling of suspected GI stromal tumors. Gastrointest Endosc 69(7):1218–1223CrossRefPubMed Hoda KM, Rodriguez SA, Faigel DO (2009) EUS-guided sampling of suspected GI stromal tumors. Gastrointest Endosc 69(7):1218–1223CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Storch I, Jorda M, Thurer R, Raez L, Rocha-Lima C, Vernon S, Ribeiro A (2006) Advantage of EUS Trucut biopsy combined with fine-needle aspiration without immediate on-site cytopathologic examination. Gastrointest Endosc 64(4):505–511CrossRefPubMed Storch I, Jorda M, Thurer R, Raez L, Rocha-Lima C, Vernon S, Ribeiro A (2006) Advantage of EUS Trucut biopsy combined with fine-needle aspiration without immediate on-site cytopathologic examination. Gastrointest Endosc 64(4):505–511CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Lee JH, Choi KD, Kim MY, Choi KS, do Kim H, Park YS, Kim KC, Song HJ, Lee GH, Jung HY, Yook JH, Kim BS, Kang YK, Kim JH (2011) Clinical impact of EUS-guided Trucut biopsy results on decision making for patients with gastric subepithelial tumors ≥2 cm in diameter. Gastrointest Endosc 74(5):1010–1018CrossRefPubMed Lee JH, Choi KD, Kim MY, Choi KS, do Kim H, Park YS, Kim KC, Song HJ, Lee GH, Jung HY, Yook JH, Kim BS, Kang YK, Kim JH (2011) Clinical impact of EUS-guided Trucut biopsy results on decision making for patients with gastric subepithelial tumors ≥2 cm in diameter. Gastrointest Endosc 74(5):1010–1018CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Iglesias-Garcia J, Poley JW, Larghi A, Giovannini M, Petrone MC, Abdulkader I, Monges G, Costamagna G, Arcidiacono P, Biermann K, Rindi G, Bories E, Dogloni C, Bruno M, Dominguez-Munoz JE (2011) Feasibility and yield of a new EUS histology needle: results from a multicenter, pooled, cohort study. Gastrointest Endosc 73(6):1189–1196CrossRefPubMed Iglesias-Garcia J, Poley JW, Larghi A, Giovannini M, Petrone MC, Abdulkader I, Monges G, Costamagna G, Arcidiacono P, Biermann K, Rindi G, Bories E, Dogloni C, Bruno M, Dominguez-Munoz JE (2011) Feasibility and yield of a new EUS histology needle: results from a multicenter, pooled, cohort study. Gastrointest Endosc 73(6):1189–1196CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Polkowski M, Gerke W, Jarosz D, Nasierowska-Guttmejer A, Rutkowski P, Nowecki ZI, Ruka W, Regula J, Butruk E (2009) Diagnostic yield and safety of endoscopic ultrasound-guided trucut biopsy in patients with gastric submucosal tumors: a prospective study. Endoscopy 41(4):329–334CrossRefPubMed Polkowski M, Gerke W, Jarosz D, Nasierowska-Guttmejer A, Rutkowski P, Nowecki ZI, Ruka W, Regula J, Butruk E (2009) Diagnostic yield and safety of endoscopic ultrasound-guided trucut biopsy in patients with gastric submucosal tumors: a prospective study. Endoscopy 41(4):329–334CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Diagnostic yield of endoscopic ultrasonography-guided single-incision needle knife biopsy for gastric subepithelial tumors: comparison with resected specimens
verfasst von
Joon Sung Kim
Byung-Wook Kim
Gi Jun Kim
Young Wook Kim
Seung Ji Ryu
Sung Min Park
Jeong-Seon Ji
Sun Young Jun
Publikationsdatum
28.06.2016
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Surgical Endoscopy / Ausgabe 12/2016
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-016-4880-3

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 12/2016

Surgical Endoscopy 12/2016 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.