nach oben

Erschienen in:

01.06.2014 | Übersichten

Diagnostik und operative Therapie der Postprostatektomie-Belastungsinkontinenz

Empfehlungen des Arbeitskreises Urologische Funktionsdiagnostik und Urologie der Frau

verfasst von: PD Dr. R.M. Bauer, C. Hampel, A. Haferkamp, K. Höfner, W. Hübner, Für den Arbeitskreis „Urologische Funktionsdiagnostik und Urologie der Frau“ der Akademie der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Urologie

Erschienen in: Die Urologie | Ausgabe 6/2014

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Zusammenfassung

Für die operative Behandlung der Postprostatektomie-Belastungsinkontinenz stehen heute diverse Therapieoptionen zur Verfügung. Hierzu zählen adjustierbare und funktionelle Schlingensysteme, der künstliche Schließmuskel, „bulking agents“ und Ballonsysteme. Allerdings existiert keine im Alltag praktisch anwendbare Entscheidungshilfe für die gezielte Diagnostik und die nachfolgende Entscheidung zur differenzierten operativen Therapie der männlichen Belastungsinkontinenz. Ziel unserer Arbeit ist es Empfehlungen zu Diagnostik und operativen Therapie der Postprostatektomie-Belastungsinkontinenz zu geben, die im klinischen Alltag bei der Wahl der Therapie eine Unterstützung bieten. Dabei sollte die Auswahl der Methode in erster Linie nach den Kontraindikationen erfolgen. Allerdings zeigen die einzelnen Methoden breite Überschneidungen.

Yucel S, Baskin LS (2004) An anatomical description of the male and female urethral sphincter complex. J Urol 171(5):1890–1897PubMedCrossRef

Soljanik I, Bauer RM, Becker AJ et al (2013) Morphology and dynamics of the male pelvic floor before and after retrourethral transobturator sling placement: first insight using MRI. World J Urol 31(3):629–638PubMedCrossRef

Hocaoglu Y, Roosen A, Herrmann K et al (2012) Real-time magnetic resonance imaging (MRI): anatomical changes during physiological voiding in men. BJU Int 109(2):234–239PubMedCrossRef

Bodman C von, Matsushita K, Savage C et al (2012) Recovery of urinary function after radical prostatectomy: predictors of urinary function on preoperative prostate magnetic resonance imaging. J Urol 187(3):945–950CrossRef

Giannantoni A, Mearini E, Di Stasi SM et al (2008) Bladder and urethral sphincter function after radical retropubic prostatectomy: a prospective long-term study. Eur Urol 54(3):657–664PubMedCrossRef

Porena M, Mearini E, Mearini L et al (2007) Voiding dysfunction after radical retropubic prostatectomy: more than external urethral sphincter deficiency. Eur Urol 52(1):38–45PubMedCrossRef

Coakley FV, Eberhardt S, Kattan MW et al (2002) Urinary continence after radical retropubic prostatectomy: relationship with membranous urethral length on preoperative endorectal magnetic resonance imaging. J Urol 168(3):1032–1035PubMedCrossRef

Strasser H, Frauscher F, Helweg G et al (1998) Transurethral ultrasound: evaluation of anatomy and function of the rhabdosphincter of the male urethra. J Urol 159(1):100–105PubMedCrossRef

Lucas MG, Bosch RJ, Burkhard FC et al (2012) EAU guidelines on surgical treatment of urinary incontinence. Eur Urol 62(6):1118–1129PubMedCrossRef

10.

Gousse AE, Madjar S, Lambert MM et al (2001) Artificial urinary sphincter for post-radical prostatectomy urinary incontinence: long-term subjective results. J Urol 166:1755–1758PubMedCrossRef

11.

Kim SP, Sarmast Z, Daignault S et al (2008) Long-term durability and functional outcomes among patients with artificial urinary sphincters: a 10-year retrospective review from the University of Michigan. J Urol 179:1912–1916PubMedCrossRef

12.

Haab F, Trockman BA, Zimmern PE et al (1997) Quality of life and continence assessment of the artificial urinary sphincter in men with minimum 3.5 years of followup. J Urol 158:435–439PubMedCrossRef

13.

Fulford SC, Sutton C, Bales G et al (1997) The fate of the ‚modern‘ artificial urinary sphincter with a follow-up of more than 10 years. Br J Urol 79:713–716PubMedCrossRef

14.

Venn SN, Greenwell TJ, Mundy AR (2000) The long-term outcome of artificial urinary sphincters. J Urol 164:702–706PubMedCrossRef

15.

O’Connor RC, Nanigian DK, Patel BN et al (2007) Artificial urinary sphincter placement in elderly men. Urology 69:126–128CrossRef

16.

Wilson S, Delk J 2nd, Henry GD et al (2003) New surgical technique for sphincter urinary control system using upper transverse scrotal incision. J Urol 169:261–264PubMedCrossRef

17.

Henry GD, Graham SM, Cornell RJ et al (2009) A multicenter study on the perineal versus penoscrotal approach for implantation of an artificial urinary sphincter: cuff size and control of male stress urinary incontinence. J Urol 182:2404–2409PubMedCrossRef

18.

Raj GV, Peterson AC, Toh KL et al (2005) Outcomes following revisions and secondary implantation of the artificial urinary sphincter. J Urol 173:1242–1245PubMedCrossRef

19.

Elliott DS, Barrett DM (1998) Mayo Clinic long-term analysis of the functional durability of the AMS 800 artificial urinary sphincter: a review of 323 cases. J Urol 159:1206–1208PubMedCrossRef

20.

Lai HH, Hsu EI, Teh BS et al (2007) 13 years of experience with artificial urinary sphincter implantation at Baylor College of Medicine. J Urol 177:1021–1025PubMedCrossRef

21.

Gomha MA, Boone TB (2002) Artificial urinary sphincter for post-prostatectomy incontinence in men who had prior radiotherapy: a risk and outcome analysis. J Urol 167:591–596PubMedCrossRef

22.

Manunta A, Guillé F, Patard JJ et al (2000) Artificial sphincter insertion after radiotherapy: is it worthwhile? BJU Int 85:490–492PubMedCrossRef

23.

Clemens JQ, Schuster TG, Konnak JW et al (2001) Revision rate after artificial urinary sphincter implantation for incontinence after radical prostatectomy: actuarial analysis. J Urol 166:1372–1375PubMedCrossRef

24.

O’Connor RC, Lyon MB, Guralnick ML et al (2008) Long-term follow-up of single versus double cuff artificial urinary sphincter insertion for the treatment of severe postprostatectomy stress urinary incontinence. Urology 71:90–93CrossRef

25.

Trigo Rocha F, Gomes CM, Mitre AI et al (2008) A prospective study evaluating the efficacy of the artificial sphincter AMS 800 for the treatment of postradical prostatectomy urinary incontinence and the correlation between preoperative urodynamic and surgical outcomes. Urology 71:85–89CrossRef

26.

Staerman F, G-Llorens C, Leon P, Leclerc Y (2013) ZSI 375 artificial urinary sphincter for male urinary incontinence: a preliminary study. BJU Int 111:E202–E206PubMedCrossRef

27.

Kuznetsov DD, Kim HL, Patel RV et al (2000) Comparison of artificial urinary sphincter and collagen for the treatment of postprostatectomy incontinence. Urology 56:600–603PubMedCrossRef

28.

Imamoglu MA, Tuygun C, Bakirtas H et al (2005) The comparison of artificial urinary sphincter implantation and endourethral macroplastique injection for the treatment of postprostatectomy incontinence. Eur Urol 47:209–213PubMedCrossRef

29.

Kylmala T, Tainio H, Raitanen M, Tammela TL (2003) Treatment of postoperative male urinary incontinence using transurethral macroplastique injections. J Endourol 17:113–115PubMedCrossRef

30.

Alloussi S (2005) Prelinimary results of non-animal stabilised hyaluronic acid/dextranomer gel for postprostatectomy incontinence. Eur Urol Suppl 4:76CrossRef

31.

Secin FP, Martinez-Salamanca JI, Eilber KS (2005) Limited efficacy of permanent injectable agents in the treatment of stress urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy. Arch Esp Urol 58:431–436PubMedCrossRef

32.

Lightner D, Calvosa C, Andersen R et al (2001) A new injectable bulking agent for treatment of stress urinary incontinence: results of a multicenter, randomized, controlled, double-blind study of Durasphere. Urology 58:12–15PubMedCrossRef

33.

Gomes CM, Broderick GA, Sanchez-Ortiz RF et al (2000) Artificial urinary sphincter for post-prostatectomy incontinence: impact of prior collagen injection on cost and clinical outcome. J Urol 163:87–90PubMedCrossRef

34.

Romano SV, Metrebian SE, Vaz F et al (2006) An adjustable male sling for treating urinary incontinence after prostatectomy: a phase III multicentre trial. BJU Int 97:533–539PubMedCrossRef

35.

Romano SV, Metrebian SE, Vaz F et al (2009) Long-term results of a phase III multicentre trial of the adjustable male sling for eating urinary incontinence after prostatectomy: minimum 3 years. Actas Urol Esp 33:309–314PubMedCrossRef

36.

Hubner WA, Gallistl H, Rutkowski M et al (2011) Adjustable bulbourethral male sling: experience after 101 cases of moderate-to-severe male stress urinary incontinence. BJU Int 107:777–782PubMedCrossRef

37.

Campos-Fernandes JL, Timsit MO, Paparel P et al (2006) REMEEX: a possible treatment option in selected cases of sphincter incompetence. Prog Urol 16:184–191PubMed

38.

Sousa-Escandon A, Cabrera J, Mantovani F et al (2007) Adjustable suburethral sling (male remeex system) in the treatment of male stress urinary incontinence: a multicentric European study. Eur Urol 52:1473–1479PubMedCrossRef

39.

Sousa-Escandon A, Rodriguez Gomez JI, Uribarri Gonzalez C et al (2004) Externally readjustable sling for treatment of male stress urinary incontinence: points of technique and preliminary results. J Endourol 18:113–118PubMedCrossRef

40.

Seweryn J, Bauer W, Ponholzer A et al (2012) Initial experience and results with a new adjustable transobturator male system for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence. J Urol 187:956–961PubMedCrossRef

41.

Hoda MR, Primus G, Fischereder K et al (2012) Early results of a European multicentre experience with a new self-anchoring adjustable transobturator system for treatment of stress urinary incontinence in men. BJU Int 111:296–303PubMedCrossRef

42.

Gilling PJ, Bell DF, Wilson LC et al (2008) An adjustable continence therapy device for treating incontinence after prostatectomy: a minimum 2-year follow-up. BJU Int 102:1426–1430PubMed

43.

Lebret T, Cour F, Benchetrit J et al (2008) Treatment of postprostatectomy stress urinary incontinence using a minimally invasive adjustable continence balloon device, ProACT: results of a preliminary, multicenter, pilot study. Urology 71:256–260PubMedCrossRef

44.

Hubner WA, Schlarp OM (2005) Treatment of incontinence after prostatectomy using a new minimally invasive device: adjustable continence therapy. BJU Int 96:587–594PubMedCrossRef

45.

Hubner WA, Schlarp OM (2007) Adjustable continence therapy (ProACT): evolution of the surgical technique and comparison of the original 50 patients with the most recent 50 patients at a single centre. Eur Urol 52:680–686PubMedCrossRef

46.

Kocjancic E, Crivellaro S, Ranzoni S et al (2007) Adjustable Continence Therapy for the treatment of male stress urinary incontinence: a single-centre study. Scand J Urol Nephrol 41:324–328PubMedCrossRef

47.

Fassi-Fehri H, Badet L, Cherass A et al (2007) Efficacy of the InVance male sling in men with stress urinary incontinence. Eur Urol 51:498–503PubMedCrossRef

48.

Giberti C, Gallo F, Schenone M et al (2009) The bone anchor suburethral synthetic sling for iatrogenic male incontinence: critical evaluation at a mean 3-year followup. J Urol 181:2204–2208PubMedCrossRef

49.

Giberti C, Gallo F, Schenone M et al (2008) The bone-anchor sub-urethral sling for the treatment of iatrogenic male incontinence: subjective and objective assessment after 41 months of mean follow-up. World J Urol 26:173–178PubMedCrossRef

50.

Guimaraes M, Oliveira R, Pinto R et al (2009) Intermediate-term results, up to 4 years, of a bone-anchored male perineal sling for treating male stress urinary incontinence after prostate surgery. BJU Int 103:500–504PubMedCrossRef

51.

Comiter CV (2005) The male perineal sling: intermediate-term results. Neurourol Urodyn 24:648–653PubMedCrossRef

52.

Carmel M, Hage B, Hanna S et al (2010) Long-term efficacy of the bone-anchored male sling for moderate and severe stress urinary incontinence. BJU Int 106:1012–1016PubMedCrossRef

53.

Fisher MB, Aggarwal N, Vuruskan H et al (2007) Efficacy of artificial urinary sphincter implantation after failed bone-anchored male sling for postprostatectomy incontinence. Urology 70:942–944PubMedCrossRef

54.

Rehder P, Freiin von Gleissenthall G, Pichler R et al (2009) The treatment of postprostatectomy incontinence with the retroluminal transobturator repositioning sling (Advance): lessons learnt from accumulative experience. Arch Esp Urol 62:860–870PubMedCrossRef

55.

Bauer RM, Gozzi C, Roosen A et al (2013) Impact of the ‚repositioning test‘ on postoperative outcome of retroluminar transobturator male sling implantation. Urol Int 90:334–338PubMedCrossRef

56.

Rehder P, Gozzi C (2007) Transobturator sling suspension for male urinary incontinence including post-radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 52:860–866PubMedCrossRef

57.

Rehder P, Mitterberger MJ, Pichler R et al (2010) The 1 year outcome of the transobturator retroluminal repositioning sling in the treatment of male stress urinary incontinence. BJU Int 106:1668–1672PubMedCrossRef

58.

Bauer RM, Mayer ME, Gratzke C et al (2009) Prospective evaluation of the functional sling suspension for male postprostatectomy stress urinary incontinence: results after 1 year. Eur Urol 56:928–933PubMedCrossRef

59.

Cornu JN, Sèbe P, Ciofu C et al (2009) The AdVance transobturator male sling for postprostatectomy incontinence: clinical results of a prospective evaluation after a minimum follow-up of 6 months. Eur Urol 56:923–927PubMedCrossRef

60.

Cornel EB, Elzevier HW, Putter H (2010) Can advance transobturator sling suspension cure male urinary postoperative stress incontinence? J Urol 183:1459–1463PubMedCrossRef

61.

Bauer RM, Mayer ME, May F et al (2010) Complications of the AdVance transobturator male sling in the treatment of male stress urinary incontinence. Urology 75:1494–1498PubMedCrossRef

62.

Rehder P, Haab F, Cornu JN et al (2012) Treatment of postprostatectomy male urinary incontinence with the transobturator retroluminal repositioning sling suspension: 3-year follow-up. Eur Urol 62:140–145PubMedCrossRef

63.

Cornu JN, Sèbe P, Ciofu C et al (2010) Mid-term evaluation of the transobturator male sling for post-prostatectomy incontinence: focus on prognostic factors. BJU Int 108:236–240PubMedCrossRef

64.

Bauer RM, Soljanik I, Füllhase C et al (2011) Results of the AdVance transobturator male sling after radical prostatectomy and adjuvant radiotherapy. Urology 77:474–479PubMedCrossRef

65.

Soljanik I, Gozzi C, Becker AJ et al (2011) Risk factors of treatment failure after retrourethral transobturator male sling. World J Urol 30:201–206PubMedCrossRef

66.

Collado Serra A, Resel Folkersma L, Domínguez-Escrig JL et al (2013) AdVance/AdVance XP transobturator male slings: preoperative degree of incontinence as predictor of surgical outcome. Urology 81:1034–1039CrossRef

Titel: Diagnostik und operative Therapie der Postprostatektomie-Belastungsinkontinenz
Empfehlungen des Arbeitskreises Urologische Funktionsdiagnostik und Urologie der Frau
verfasst von: PD Dr. R.M. Bauer
C. Hampel
A. Haferkamp
K. Höfner
W. Hübner
Für den Arbeitskreis „Urologische Funktionsdiagnostik und Urologie der Frau“ der Akademie der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Urologie
Publikationsdatum: 01.06.2014
Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in: Die Urologie / Ausgabe 6/2014
Print ISSN: 2731-7064
Elektronische ISSN: 2731-7072
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00120-014-3531-3

Neu im Fachgebiet Urologie

17.04.2024 | Postoperative nausea and vomiting | Nachrichten

Update Urologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Springer Medizin

Diagnostik und operative Therapie der Postprostatektomie-Belastungsinkontinenz

Empfehlungen des Arbeitskreises Urologische Funktionsdiagnostik und Urologie der Frau

Zusammenfassung

Neu im Fachgebiet Urologie

Hochrisiko-Eingriffe für postoperative Übelkeit

Einladung zum PSA-Screening senkt die Krebssterblichkeit

Wie toxische Männlichkeit der Gesundheit von Männern schadet

TURP hat Vorteile im Vergleich mit der Embolisation

Update Urologie

Springer Medizin

Zusammenfassung

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 6/2014

URO-Telegramm

PSA-Screening 2013

Wie entwickeln sich Metastasen urologischer Tumoren?

Berufspolitik BDU

Termine

Entfernung des Primärtumors bei hämatogen metastasierter Tumorerkrankung

Neu im Fachgebiet Urologie

Hochrisiko-Eingriffe für postoperative Übelkeit

Einladung zum PSA-Screening senkt die Krebssterblichkeit

Wie toxische Männlichkeit der Gesundheit von Männern schadet

TURP hat Vorteile im Vergleich mit der Embolisation

Update Urologie