nach oben

Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery

Erschienen in:

19.05.2018 | Arthroscopy and Sports Medicine

Differences between traumatic and non-traumatic causes of ACL revision surgery

verfasst von: Vera Jaecker, Tabea Zapf, Jan-Hendrik Naendrup, Ajay C. Kanakamedala, Thomas Pfeiffer, Sven Shafizadeh

Erschienen in: Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery | Ausgabe 9/2018

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to evaluate and classify causes for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction failure. It was hypothesized that specific technical and biological reconstruction aspects would differ when comparing traumatic and non-traumatic ACL reconstruction failures.

Materials and methods

One hundred and forty-seven consecutive patients who experienced ACL reconstruction failure and underwent revision between 2009 and 2014 were analyzed. Based on a systematic failure analysis, including evaluation of technical information on primary ACL reconstruction and radiological assessment of tunnel positions, causes were classified into traumatic and non-traumatic mechanisms of failure; non-traumatic mechanisms were further sub-divided into technical and biologic causes. Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient and chi-squared tests were performed to determine differences between groups based on various factors including graft choice, fixation technique, technique of femoral tunnel positioning, tunnel malpositioning, and time to revision.

Results

Non-traumatic, i.e., technical, and traumatic mechanisms of ACL reconstruction failure were found in 64.5 and 29.1% of patients, respectively. Biological failure was found only in 6.4% of patients. Non-anatomical femoral tunnel positioning was found the most common cause (83.1%) for technical reconstruction failure followed by non-anatomical tibial tunnel positioning (45.1%). There were strong correlations between non-traumatic technical failure and femoral tunnel malpositioning, transtibial femoral tunnel drilling techniques, femoral transfixation techniques as well as earlier graft failure (p < 0.05).

Conclusions

Technical causes, particularly tunnel malpositioning, were significantly correlated with increased incidence of non-traumatic ACL reconstruction failure. Transtibial femoral tunnel positioning techniques and femoral transfixation techniques, showed an increased incidence of non-traumatic, earlier graft failure.

Kamath GV, Redfern JC, Greis PE, Burks RT (2011) Revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 39(1):199–217. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546510370929 CrossRefPubMed

Wiggins AJ, Grandhi RK, Schneider DK, Stanfield D, Webster KE, Myer GD (2016) Risk of secondary injury in younger athletes after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Sports Med. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546515621554 PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

Chen JL, Allen CR, Stephens TE, Haas AK, Huston LJ, Wright RW, Feeley BT, Multicenter ACLRSG. (2013) Differences in mechanisms of failure, intraoperative findings, and surgical characteristics between single- and multiple-revision ACL reconstructions: a MARS cohort study. Am J Sports Med 41(7):1571–1578. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546513487980 CrossRefPubMed

Spindler KP (2007) The Multicenter ACL Revision Study (MARS): a prospective longitudinal cohort to define outcomes and independent predictors of outcomes for revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. J Knee Surg 20(4):303–307CrossRefPubMed

Jarvela T (2007) Double-bundle versus single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a prospective, randomize clinical study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 15(5):500–507. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-006-0254-z CrossRefPubMed

Salmon L, Russell V, Musgrove T, Pinczewski L, Refshauge K (2005) Incidence and risk factors for graft rupture and contralateral rupture after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 21(8):948–957. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2005.04.110 CrossRefPubMed

Snow M, Campbell G, Adlington J, Stanish WD (2010) Two to five year results of primary ACL reconstruction using doubled tibialis anterior allograft. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 18(10):1374–1378. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-009-0997-4 CrossRefPubMed

Shah AA, McCulloch PC, Lowe WR (2010) Failure rate of Achilles tendon allograft in primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 26(5):667–674. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2010.02.031 CrossRefPubMed

Brophy RH, Haas AK, Huston LJ, Nwosu SK, Group M, Wright RW (2015) Association of meniscal status, lower extremity alignment, and body mass index with chondrosis at revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 43(7):1616–1622. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546515578838 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

10.

Hashemi J, Chandrashekar N, Mansouri H, Gill B, Slauterbeck JR, Schutt RC Jr, Dabezies E, Beynnon BD (2010) Shallow medial tibial plateau and steep medial and lateral tibial slopes: new risk factors for anterior cruciate ligament injuries. Am J Sports Med 38(1):54–62. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546509349055 CrossRefPubMed

11.

Hudek R, Fuchs B, Regenfelder F, Koch PP (2011) Is noncontact ACL injury associated with the posterior tibial and meniscal slope? Clin Orthop Relat Res 469(8):2377–2384. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-011-1802-5 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

12.

Ireland ML, Ballantyne BT, Little K, McClay IS (2001) A radiographic analysis of the relationship between the size and shape of the intercondylar notch and anterior cruciate ligament injury. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 9(4):200–205. https://doi.org/10.1007/s001670100197 CrossRefPubMed

13.

MARS GROUP (2014) Effect of graft choice on the outcome of revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in the Multicenter ACL Revision Study (MARS) Cohort. Am J Sports Med 42(10):2301–2310. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546514549005 CrossRef

14.

Group M, Wright RW, Huston LJ, Spindler KP, Dunn WR, Haas AK, Allen CR, Cooper DE, DeBerardino TM, Lantz BB, Mann BJ, Stuart MJ (2010) Descriptive epidemiology of the Multicenter ACL Revision Study (MARS) cohort. Am J Sports Med 38(10):1979–1986. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546510378645 CrossRef

15.

Matava MJ, Arciero RA, Baumgarten KM, Carey JL, DeBerardino TM, Hame SL, Hannafin JA, Miller BS, Nissen CW, Taft TN, Wolf BR, Wright RW, Group M (2015) Multirater agreement of the causes of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction failure: a radiographic and video analysis of the MARS cohort. Am J Sports Med 43(2):310–319. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546514560880 CrossRefPubMed

16.

Dejour D, Ntagiopoulos PG, Saggin PR, Panisset JC (2013) The diagnostic value of clinical tests, magnetic resonance imaging, and instrumented laxity in the differentiation of complete versus partial anterior cruciate ligament tears. Arthroscopy 29(3):491–499. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2012.10.013 CrossRefPubMed

17.

Irrgang JJ, Ho H, Harner CD, Fu FH (1998) Use of the international knee documentation committee guidelines to assess outcome following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 6(2):107–114. https://doi.org/10.1007/s001670050082 CrossRefPubMed

18.

Irrgang JJ, Anderson AF, Boland AL, Harner CD, Kurosaka M, Neyret P, Richmond JC, Shelborne KD (2001) Development and validation of the international knee documentation committee subjective knee form. Am J Sports Med 29(5):600–613CrossRefPubMed

19.

Bernard M, Hertel P, Hornung H, Cierpinski T (1997) Femoral insertion of the ACL. Radiographic quadrant method. Am J Knee Surg 10(1):14–21 (discussion 21–12) PubMed

20.

Staubli HU, Rauschning W (1994) Tibial attachment area of the anterior cruciate ligament in the extended knee position. Anatomy and cryosections in vitro complemented by magnetic resonance arthrography in vivo. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2(3):138–146CrossRefPubMed

21.

Zantop T, Wellmann M, Fu FH, Petersen W (2008) Tunnel positioning of anteromedial and posterolateral bundles in anatomic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: anatomic and radiographic findings. Am J Sports Med 36(1):65–72. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546507308361 CrossRefPubMed

22.

Sullivan JP, Matava MJ, Flanigan DC, Gao Y, Britton CL, Amendola A, Group M, Wolf BR (2012) Reliability of tunnel measurements and the quadrant method using fluoroscopic radiographs after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 40(10):2236–2241. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546512458086 CrossRefPubMed

23.

Carson EW, Anisko EM, Restrepo C, Panariello RA, O’Brien SJ, Warren RF (2004) Revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: etiology of failures and clinical results. J Knee Surg 17(3):127–132CrossRefPubMed

24.

Salmon LJ, Pinczewski LA, Russell VJ, Refshauge K (2006) Revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with hamstring tendon autograft: 5- to 9-year follow-up. Am J Sports Med 34(10):1604–1614. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546506288015 CrossRefPubMed

25.

Noyes FR, Barber-Westin SD (2006) Anterior cruciate ligament revision reconstruction: results using a quadriceps tendon-patellar bone autograft. Am J Sports Med 34(4):553–564. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546505281812 CrossRefPubMed

26.

Wright R, Spindler K, Huston L, Amendola A, Andrish J, Brophy R, Carey J, Cox C, Flanigan D, Jones M, Kaeding C, Marx R, Matava M, McCarty E, Parker R, Vidal A, Wolcott M, Wolf B, Dunn W (2011) Revision ACL reconstruction outcomes: MOON cohort. J Knee Surg 24(4):289–294CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

27.

Diamantopoulos AP, Lorbach O, Paessler HH (2008) Anterior cruciate ligament revision reconstruction: results in 107 patients. Am J Sports Med 36(5):851–860. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546507312381 CrossRefPubMed

28.

Morgan JA, Dahm D, Levy B, Stuart MJ, Group MS (2012) Femoral tunnel malposition in ACL revision reconstruction. J Knee Surg 25(5):361–368. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0031-1299662 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

29.

Garofalo R, Djahangiri A, Siegrist O (2006) Revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with quadriceps tendon-patellar bone autograft. Arthroscopy 22(2):205–214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2005.08.045 CrossRefPubMed

30.

Duffee A, Magnussen RA, Pedroza AD, Flanigan DC, Group M, Kaeding CC (2013) Transtibial ACL femoral tunnel preparation increases odds of repeat ipsilateral knee surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Am Vol 95(22):2035–2042. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.M.00187 CrossRef

31.

Johnson DL, Swenson TM, Irrgang JJ, Fu FH, Harner CD (1996) Revision anterior cruciate ligament surgery: experience from Pittsburgh. Clin Orthop Relat Res 325(325):100–109CrossRef

32.

Arno S, Bell CP, Alaia MJ, Singh BC, Jazrawi LM, Walker PS, Bansal A, Garofolo G, Sherman OH (2016) Does anteromedial portal drilling improve footprint placement in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction? Clin Orthop Relat Res. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-016-4847-7 PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

33.

Chen Y, Chua KH, Singh A, Tan JH, Chen X, Tan SH, Tai BC, Lingaraj K (2015) Outcome of single-bundle hamstring anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using the anteromedial versus the transtibial technique: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arthroscopy 31(9):1784–1794. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2015.06.001 CrossRefPubMed

34.

Thein R, Spitzer E, Doyle J, Khamaisy S, Nawabi DH, Chawla H, Lipman JD, Pearle AD (2016) The ACL graft has different cross-sectional dimensions compared with the native ACL: implications for graft impingement. Am J Sports Med. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546516645531 PubMedCrossRef

35.

Ahn JH, Lee YS, Jeong HJ, Park JH, Cho Y, Kim KJ, Ko TS (2017) Comparison of transtibial and retrograde outside-in techniques of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in terms of graft nature and clinical outcomes: a case control study using 3T MRI. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 137(3):357–365. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-016-2606-6 CrossRefPubMed

36.

Rahr-Wagner L, Thillemann TM, Pedersen AB, Lind MC (2013) Increased risk of revision after anteromedial compared with transtibial drilling of the femoral tunnel during primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: results from the Danish Knee Ligament Reconstruction Register. Arthroscopy 29(1):98–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2012.09.009 CrossRefPubMed

37.

Jaecker V, Zapf T, Naendrup JH, Pfeiffer T, Kanakamedala AC, Wafaisade A, Shafizadeh S (2017) High non-anatomic tunnel position rates in ACL reconstruction failure using both transtibial and anteromedial tunnel drilling techniques. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 137(9):1293–1299. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-017-2738-3 CrossRefPubMed

38.

Zhu M, Li S, Su Z, Zhou X, Peng P, Li J, Wang J, Lin L (2018) Tibial tunnel placement in anatomic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a comparison study of outcomes between patient-specific drill template versus conventional arthroscopic techniques. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 138(4):515–525. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-018-2880-6 CrossRefPubMed

39.

Anderson MJ, Browning WM 3rd, Urband CE, Kluczynski MA, Bisson LJ (2016) A systematic summary of systematic reviews on the topic of the anterior cruciate ligament. Orthop J Sports Med 4(3):2325967116634074. https://doi.org/10.1177/2325967116634074 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

40.

Gifstad T, Foss OA, Engebretsen L, Lind M, Forssblad M, Albrektsen G, Drogset JO (2014) Lower risk of revision with patellar tendon autografts compared with hamstring autografts: a registry study based on 45,998 primary ACL reconstructions in Scandinavia. Am J Sports Med 42(10):2319–2328. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546514548164 CrossRefPubMed

41.

Jaureguito JW, Paulos LE (1996) Why grafts fail. Clin Orthop Relat Res (325):25–41

42.

Eitzen I, Holm I, Risberg MA (2009) Preoperative quadriceps strength is a significant predictor of knee function two years after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Br J Sports Med 43(5):371–376. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsm.2008.057059 CrossRefPubMed

43.

Shelbourne KD, Gray T, Haro M (2009) Incidence of subsequent injury to either knee within 5 years after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with patellar tendon autograft. Am J Sports Med 37(2):246–251. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546508325665 CrossRefPubMed

Titel: Differences between traumatic and non-traumatic causes of ACL revision surgery
verfasst von: Vera Jaecker
Tabea Zapf
Jan-Hendrik Naendrup
Ajay C. Kanakamedala
Thomas Pfeiffer
Sven Shafizadeh
Publikationsdatum: 19.05.2018
Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in: Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery / Ausgabe 9/2018
Print ISSN: 0936-8051
Elektronische ISSN: 1434-3916
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-018-2954-5

Arthropedia

Grundlagenwissen der Arthroskopie und Gelenkchirurgie. Erweitert durch Fallbeispiele, Videos und Abbildungen.
» Jetzt entdecken

Neu im Fachgebiet Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

25.04.2024 | Hypertonie | Nachrichten

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Springer Medizin

Differences between traumatic and non-traumatic causes of ACL revision surgery

Abstract

Purpose

Materials and methods

Results

Conclusions

Arthropedia

Neu im Fachgebiet Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Therapiestart mit Blutdrucksenkern erhöht Frakturrisiko

Ärztliche Empathie hilft gegen Rückenschmerzen

Stereotaktische Radiatio schlägt konventionelle Bestrahlung

Vorsicht mit hohen NSAR-Dosen bei ankylosierender Spondylitis!

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Purpose

Materials and methods

Results

Conclusions

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 9/2018

Force distribution of a cylindrical grip differs between dominant and nondominant hand in healthy subjects

Outcomes are equivalent for two-column acetabular fractures either with or without posterior-wall fractures

No difference in the graft shift between a round and a rounded rectangular femoral tunnel for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: an experimental study

An often-unrecognized entity as cause of recurrent infection after successfully treated two-stage exchange arthroplasty: hematogenous infection

Intraoperative periprosthetic femur fracture during bipolar hemiarthroplasty for displaced femoral neck fractures

Arthroscopic debridement for septic arthritis of the shoulder joint: post-infectious arthritis is an inevitable consequence?

Arthropedia

Neu im Fachgebiet Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Therapiestart mit Blutdrucksenkern erhöht Frakturrisiko

Ärztliche Empathie hilft gegen Rückenschmerzen

Stereotaktische Radiatio schlägt konventionelle Bestrahlung

Vorsicht mit hohen NSAR-Dosen bei ankylosierender Spondylitis!

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie