Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 2/2017

18.11.2016 | Epidemiology

Differences in mammographic density between Asian and Caucasian populations: a comparative analysis

verfasst von: Nadia Rajaram, Shivaani Mariapun, Mikael Eriksson, Jose Tapia, Pui Yoke Kwan, Weang Kee Ho, Faizah Harun, Kartini Rahmat, Kamila Czene, Nur Aishah Mohd Taib, Per Hall, Soo Hwang Teo

Erschienen in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment | Ausgabe 2/2017

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

Mammographic density is a measurable and modifiable biomarker that is strongly and independently associated with breast cancer risk. Paradoxically, although Asian women have lower risk of breast cancer, studies of minority Asian women in predominantly Caucasian populations have found that Asian women have higher percent density. In this cross-sectional study, we compared the distribution of mammographic density for a matched cohort of Asian women from Malaysia and Caucasian women from Sweden, and determined if variations in mammographic density could be attributed to population differences in breast cancer risk factors.

Methods

Volumetric mammographic density was compared for 1501 Malaysian and 4501 Swedish healthy women, matched on age and body mass index. We used multivariable log-linear regression to determine the risk factors associated with mammographic density and mediation analysis to identify factors that account for differences in mammographic density between the two cohorts.

Results

Compared to Caucasian women, percent density was 2.0% higher among Asian women (p < 0.001), and dense volume was 5.7 cm3 higher among pre-menopausal Asian women (p < 0.001). Dense volume was 3.0 cm3 lower among post-menopausal Asian women (p = 0.009) compared to post-menopausal Caucasian women, and this difference was attributed to population differences in height, weight, and parity (p < 0.001).

Conclusions

Our analysis suggests that among post-menopausal women, population differences in mammographic density and risk to breast cancer may be accounted for by height, weight, and parity. Given that pre-menopausal Asian and Caucasian women have similar population risk to breast cancer but different dense volume, development of more appropriate biomarkers of risk in pre-menopausal women is required.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Chia KS, Reilly M, Tan CS et al (2005) Profound changes in breast cancer incidence may reflect changes into a Westernized lifestyle: a comparative population-based study in Singapore and Sweden. Int J Cancer 113(2):302–306. doi:10.1002/ijc.20561 CrossRefPubMed Chia KS, Reilly M, Tan CS et al (2005) Profound changes in breast cancer incidence may reflect changes into a Westernized lifestyle: a comparative population-based study in Singapore and Sweden. Int J Cancer 113(2):302–306. doi:10.​1002/​ijc.​20561 CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Sung H, Rosenberg PS, Chen WQ et al (2015) Female breast cancer incidence among Asian and Western populations: more similar than expected. J Natl Cancer Inst. doi:10.1093/jnci/djv107 Sung H, Rosenberg PS, Chen WQ et al (2015) Female breast cancer incidence among Asian and Western populations: more similar than expected. J Natl Cancer Inst. doi:10.​1093/​jnci/​djv107
4.
Zurück zum Zitat van den Brandt PA, Spiegelman D, Yaun SS et al (2000) Pooled analysis of prospective cohort studies on height, weight, and breast cancer risk. Am J Epidemiol 152(6):514–527CrossRefPubMed van den Brandt PA, Spiegelman D, Yaun SS et al (2000) Pooled analysis of prospective cohort studies on height, weight, and breast cancer risk. Am J Epidemiol 152(6):514–527CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Chlebowski RT, Hendrix SL, Langer RD et al (2003) Influence of estrogen plus progestin on breast cancer and mammography in healthy postmenopausal women: the Women’s Health Initiative Randomized Trial. JAMA 289(24):3243–3253. doi:10.1001/jama.289.24.3243 CrossRefPubMed Chlebowski RT, Hendrix SL, Langer RD et al (2003) Influence of estrogen plus progestin on breast cancer and mammography in healthy postmenopausal women: the Women’s Health Initiative Randomized Trial. JAMA 289(24):3243–3253. doi:10.​1001/​jama.​289.​24.​3243 CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Boyd NF, Byng JW, Jong RA et al (1995) Quantitative classification of mammographic densities and breast cancer risk: results from the Canadian National Breast Screening Study. J Natl Cancer Inst 87(9):670–675CrossRefPubMed Boyd NF, Byng JW, Jong RA et al (1995) Quantitative classification of mammographic densities and breast cancer risk: results from the Canadian National Breast Screening Study. J Natl Cancer Inst 87(9):670–675CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Ursin GQS (2009) Mammographic density—a useful biomarker for breast cancer risk in epidemiologic studies. Norsk Epidemiol 19(1):59–68CrossRef Ursin GQS (2009) Mammographic density—a useful biomarker for breast cancer risk in epidemiologic studies. Norsk Epidemiol 19(1):59–68CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Boyd NF, Lockwood GA, Martin LJ et al (2001) Mammographic density as a marker of susceptibility to breast cancer: a hypothesis. IARC Sci Publ 154:163–169PubMed Boyd NF, Lockwood GA, Martin LJ et al (2001) Mammographic density as a marker of susceptibility to breast cancer: a hypothesis. IARC Sci Publ 154:163–169PubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Maskarinec G, Meng L, Ursin G (2001) Ethnic differences in mammographic densities. Int J Epidemiol 30(5):959–965CrossRefPubMed Maskarinec G, Meng L, Ursin G (2001) Ethnic differences in mammographic densities. Int J Epidemiol 30(5):959–965CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Chen Z, Wu AH, Gauderman WJ et al (2004) Does mammographic density reflect ethnic differences in breast cancer incidence rates? Am J Epidemiol 159(2):140–147CrossRefPubMed Chen Z, Wu AH, Gauderman WJ et al (2004) Does mammographic density reflect ethnic differences in breast cancer incidence rates? Am J Epidemiol 159(2):140–147CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Ursin G, Ma H, Wu AH et al (2003) Mammographic density and breast cancer in three ethnic groups. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev 12(4):332–338 Ursin G, Ma H, Wu AH et al (2003) Mammographic density and breast cancer in three ethnic groups. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev 12(4):332–338
18.
19.
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Kerlikowske K, Grady D, Barclay J et al (1998) Variability and accuracy in mammographic interpretation using the American College of Radiology Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System. J Natl Cancer Inst 90(23):1801–1809CrossRefPubMed Kerlikowske K, Grady D, Barclay J et al (1998) Variability and accuracy in mammographic interpretation using the American College of Radiology Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System. J Natl Cancer Inst 90(23):1801–1809CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Stunkard AJ, Sorensen T, Schulsinger F (1983) Use of the Danish Adoption Register for the study of obesity and thinness. Res Publ Assoc Res Nerv Ment Dis 60:115–120PubMed Stunkard AJ, Sorensen T, Schulsinger F (1983) Use of the Danish Adoption Register for the study of obesity and thinness. Res Publ Assoc Res Nerv Ment Dis 60:115–120PubMed
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Highnam R, Brady M, Yaffe MJ et al (2010) Robust breast composition measurement—Volpara (TM). Dig Mammogr 6136:342–349CrossRef Highnam R, Brady M, Yaffe MJ et al (2010) Robust breast composition measurement—Volpara (TM). Dig Mammogr 6136:342–349CrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Brand JS, Czene K, Shepherd JA et al (2014) Automated measurement of volumetric mammographic density: a tool for widespread breast cancer risk assessment. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev 23(9):1764–1772. doi:10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-13-1219 CrossRef Brand JS, Czene K, Shepherd JA et al (2014) Automated measurement of volumetric mammographic density: a tool for widespread breast cancer risk assessment. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev 23(9):1764–1772. doi:10.​1158/​1055-9965.​EPI-13-1219 CrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Baron RM, Kenny DA (1986) The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J Pers Soc Psychol 51(6):1173–1182CrossRefPubMed Baron RM, Kenny DA (1986) The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J Pers Soc Psychol 51(6):1173–1182CrossRefPubMed
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Preacher KJ, Hayes AF (2004) SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behav Res Methods Instrum Comp 36(4):717–731CrossRef Preacher KJ, Hayes AF (2004) SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behav Res Methods Instrum Comp 36(4):717–731CrossRef
30.
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Kelsey JL, Gammon MD (1991) The epidemiology of breast cancer. CA Cancer J Clin 41(3):146–165CrossRefPubMed Kelsey JL, Gammon MD (1991) The epidemiology of breast cancer. CA Cancer J Clin 41(3):146–165CrossRefPubMed
32.
Zurück zum Zitat World Population Data Sheet (2014). Population Reference Bureau, Washington World Population Data Sheet (2014). Population Reference Bureau, Washington
36.
Zurück zum Zitat McCarthy AM, Keller BM, Pantalone LM et al (2016) Racial differences in quantitative measures of area and volumetric breast density. J Natl Cancer Inst. doi:10.1093/jnci/djw104 McCarthy AM, Keller BM, Pantalone LM et al (2016) Racial differences in quantitative measures of area and volumetric breast density. J Natl Cancer Inst. doi:10.​1093/​jnci/​djw104
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Zhang B, Shu XO, Delahanty RJ et al (2015) Height and breast cancer risk: evidence from prospective studies and mendelian randomization. J Natl Cancer Inst. doi:10.1093/jnci/djv219 Zhang B, Shu XO, Delahanty RJ et al (2015) Height and breast cancer risk: evidence from prospective studies and mendelian randomization. J Natl Cancer Inst. doi:10.​1093/​jnci/​djv219
38.
40.
41.
Zurück zum Zitat Boyd N, Martin L, Stone J et al (2002) A longitudinal study of the effects of menopause on mammographic features. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev 11(10 Pt 1):1048–1053 Boyd N, Martin L, Stone J et al (2002) A longitudinal study of the effects of menopause on mammographic features. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev 11(10 Pt 1):1048–1053
42.
Zurück zum Zitat Nguyen TL, Aung YK, Evans CF et al (2015) Mammographic density defined by higher than conventional brightness threshold better predicts breast cancer risk for full-field digital mammograms. Breast Cancer Res BCR 17:142. doi:10.1186/s13058-015-0654-4 CrossRefPubMed Nguyen TL, Aung YK, Evans CF et al (2015) Mammographic density defined by higher than conventional brightness threshold better predicts breast cancer risk for full-field digital mammograms. Breast Cancer Res BCR 17:142. doi:10.​1186/​s13058-015-0654-4 CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Differences in mammographic density between Asian and Caucasian populations: a comparative analysis
verfasst von
Nadia Rajaram
Shivaani Mariapun
Mikael Eriksson
Jose Tapia
Pui Yoke Kwan
Weang Kee Ho
Faizah Harun
Kartini Rahmat
Kamila Czene
Nur Aishah Mohd Taib
Per Hall
Soo Hwang Teo
Publikationsdatum
18.11.2016
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment / Ausgabe 2/2017
Print ISSN: 0167-6806
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-7217
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-016-4054-y

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2017

Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 2/2017 Zur Ausgabe

Update Onkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.