Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of General Internal Medicine 6/2020

10.03.2020 | Original Research

Differences in the Complexity of Office Visits by Physician Specialty: NAMCS 2013–2016

verfasst von: John D. Goodson, M.D., Sara Shahbazi, Ph.D., Karthik Rao, M.D., Zirui Song, M.D., Ph.D.

Erschienen in: Journal of General Internal Medicine | Ausgabe 6/2020

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

ABSTRACT

Background

Specialty-to-specialty variation in use of outpatient evaluation and management service codes could lead to important differences in reimbursement among specialties.

Objective

To compare the complexity of visits to physicians whose incomes are largely dependent on evaluation and management services to the complexity of visits to physicians whose incomes are largely dependent on procedures.

Design, Setting, and Participants

We analyzed 53,670 established patient outpatient visits reported by physicians in the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NAMCS) from 2013 to 2016. We defined high complexity visits as those with an above average number of diagnoses (> 2) and/or medications (> 3) listed We based our comparison on time intervals corresponding to typical outpatient evaluation and management times as defined by the Current Procedural Terminology Manual and specialty utilization of evaluation and management codes based on 2015 Medicare payments.

Main Outcome and Measures

Proportion of complex visits by specialty category.

Key Results

We found significant differences in the content of similar-length office visits provided by different specialties. For level 4 established outpatient visits (99214), the percentage involving high diagnostic complexity ranged from 62% for internal medicine, 52% for family medicine/general practice, and 41% for neurology (specialties whose incomes are largely dependent on evaluation and management codes), to 34% for dermatology, 42% for ophthalmology, and 25% for orthopedic surgery (specialties whose incomes are more dependent on procedure codes) (p value of the difference < 0.001). High medication complexity was found in the following proportions of visits: internal medicine 56%, family medicine/general practice 49%, and neurology 43%, as compared with dermatology 33%, ophthalmology 30%, and orthopedic surgery 30% (p value of the difference < 0.001).

Conclusion

Within the same duration visits, specialties whose incomes depend more on evaluation and management codes on average addressed more clinical issues and managed more medications than specialties whose incomes are more dependent on procedures.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Kumetz EA, Goodson JD. The Undervaluation of Evaluation and Management Professional Services: The Lasting Impact of Current Procedural Terminology Code Deficiencies on Physician Payment. Chest. 2013;144(3):740–745.CrossRef Kumetz EA, Goodson JD. The Undervaluation of Evaluation and Management Professional Services: The Lasting Impact of Current Procedural Terminology Code Deficiencies on Physician Payment. Chest. 2013;144(3):740–745.CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Landon BE. A Step toward Protecting Payments for Primary Care. N Engl J Med. 2019;380(6):507–510.CrossRef Landon BE. A Step toward Protecting Payments for Primary Care. N Engl J Med. 2019;380(6):507–510.CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Abbo ED, Zhang Q, Zelder M, et al. The increasing number of clinical items addressed during the time of adult primary care visits. J Gen Intern Med. 2008;23(12):2058–2065.CrossRef Abbo ED, Zhang Q, Zelder M, et al. The increasing number of clinical items addressed during the time of adult primary care visits. J Gen Intern Med. 2008;23(12):2058–2065.CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Katerndahl D, Wood R, Jaen CR. Complexity of ambulatory care across disciplines. Healthc (Amst). 2015;3(2):89–96.CrossRef Katerndahl D, Wood R, Jaen CR. Complexity of ambulatory care across disciplines. Healthc (Amst). 2015;3(2):89–96.CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Horner RD, Matthews G, Yi MS. A conceptual model of physician work intensity: guidance for evaluating policies and practices to improve health care delivery. Med Care. 2012;50(8):654–661.CrossRef Horner RD, Matthews G, Yi MS. A conceptual model of physician work intensity: guidance for evaluating policies and practices to improve health care delivery. Med Care. 2012;50(8):654–661.CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Katerndahl DA, Wood R, Jaen CR. A method for estimating relative complexity of ambulatory care. Ann Fam Med. 2010;8(4):341–347.CrossRef Katerndahl DA, Wood R, Jaen CR. A method for estimating relative complexity of ambulatory care. Ann Fam Med. 2010;8(4):341–347.CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Horner RD, Szaflarski JP, Jacobson CJ, et al. Clinical work intensity among physician specialties: how might we assess it? What do we find? Med Care. 2011;49(1):108–113.CrossRef Horner RD, Szaflarski JP, Jacobson CJ, et al. Clinical work intensity among physician specialties: how might we assess it? What do we find? Med Care. 2011;49(1):108–113.CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat George J, Phun YT, Bailey MJ, Kong DC, Stewart K. Development and validation of the medication regimen complexity index. Ann Pharmacother. 2004;38(9):1369–1376.CrossRef George J, Phun YT, Bailey MJ, Kong DC, Stewart K. Development and validation of the medication regimen complexity index. Ann Pharmacother. 2004;38(9):1369–1376.CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Goodson JD, Song Z, Shahbazi S. Physician Payment Disparities and Access to Services—A Look Across Specialties. J Gen Intern Med. 2019. Accepted for publication. Goodson JD, Song Z, Shahbazi S. Physician Payment Disparities and Access to Services—A Look Across Specialties. J Gen Intern Med. 2019. Accepted for publication.
11.
Zurück zum Zitat National Center for Health Statistics. 2016 National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NAMCS) micro-data file documentation. Hyattsville, MD. . National Center for Health Statistics. 2016 National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NAMCS) micro-data file documentation. Hyattsville, MD. .
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Muir AJ, Sanders LL, Wilkinson WE, Schmader K. Reducing medication regimen complexity: a controlled trial. J Gen Intern Med. 2001;16(2):77–82.CrossRef Muir AJ, Sanders LL, Wilkinson WE, Schmader K. Reducing medication regimen complexity: a controlled trial. J Gen Intern Med. 2001;16(2):77–82.CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Linnebur, SA, Vande Griend, J, Metz, K. Patient-level medication regimen complexity in older adults with depression. Clin Ther. 2014; 36(11): 1538–1546.CrossRef Linnebur, SA, Vande Griend, J, Metz, K. Patient-level medication regimen complexity in older adults with depression. Clin Ther. 2014; 36(11): 1538–1546.CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Bazargan M, Smith J, Yazdanshenas H, Movassaghi M, Martins D, Orum G. Non-adherence to medication regimens among older African-American adults. BMC Geriatrics. 2017;17(1):163.CrossRef Bazargan M, Smith J, Yazdanshenas H, Movassaghi M, Martins D, Orum G. Non-adherence to medication regimens among older African-American adults. BMC Geriatrics. 2017;17(1):163.CrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Berenson RA, Goodson JD. Finding Value in Unexpected Places--Fixing the Medicare Physician Fee Schedule. N Engl J Med. 2016;374(14):1306–1309.CrossRef Berenson RA, Goodson JD. Finding Value in Unexpected Places--Fixing the Medicare Physician Fee Schedule. N Engl J Med. 2016;374(14):1306–1309.CrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Berenson RA, Ginsburg PB. Improving The Medicare Physician Fee Schedule: Make It Part Of Value-Based Payment. Health Aff (Millwood). 2019;38(2):246–252.CrossRef Berenson RA, Ginsburg PB. Improving The Medicare Physician Fee Schedule: Make It Part Of Value-Based Payment. Health Aff (Millwood). 2019;38(2):246–252.CrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Chan DC, Huynh J, Studdert DM. Accuracy of Valuations of Surgical Procedures in the Medicare Fee Schedule. N Engl J Med. 2019;380(16):1546–1554.CrossRef Chan DC, Huynh J, Studdert DM. Accuracy of Valuations of Surgical Procedures in the Medicare Fee Schedule. N Engl J Med. 2019;380(16):1546–1554.CrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat McCall N, Cromwell J, Braun P. Validation of physician survey estimates of surgical time using operating room logs. Med Care Res Rev. 2006;63(6):764–777.CrossRef McCall N, Cromwell J, Braun P. Validation of physician survey estimates of surgical time using operating room logs. Med Care Res Rev. 2006;63(6):764–777.CrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Goodson JD. Unintended consequences of resource-based relative value scale reimbursement. JAMA. 2007;298(19):2308–2310.CrossRef Goodson JD. Unintended consequences of resource-based relative value scale reimbursement. JAMA. 2007;298(19):2308–2310.CrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Berenson RA, Basch P, Sussex A. Revisiting E&M visit guidelines--a missing piece of payment reform. N Engl J Med. 2011;364(20):1892–1895.CrossRef Berenson RA, Basch P, Sussex A. Revisiting E&M visit guidelines--a missing piece of payment reform. N Engl J Med. 2011;364(20):1892–1895.CrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Schroeder SA, Frist W. Phasing out fee-for-service payment. N Engl J Med. 2013;368(21):2029–2032.CrossRef Schroeder SA, Frist W. Phasing out fee-for-service payment. N Engl J Med. 2013;368(21):2029–2032.CrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Katz S, Melmed G. How Relative Value Units Undervalue the Cognitive Physician Visit: A Focus on Inflammatory Bowel Disease. Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y). 2016;12(4):240–244. Katz S, Melmed G. How Relative Value Units Undervalue the Cognitive Physician Visit: A Focus on Inflammatory Bowel Disease. Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y). 2016;12(4):240–244.
Metadaten
Titel
Differences in the Complexity of Office Visits by Physician Specialty: NAMCS 2013–2016
verfasst von
John D. Goodson, M.D.
Sara Shahbazi, Ph.D.
Karthik Rao, M.D.
Zirui Song, M.D., Ph.D.
Publikationsdatum
10.03.2020
Verlag
Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in
Journal of General Internal Medicine / Ausgabe 6/2020
Print ISSN: 0884-8734
Elektronische ISSN: 1525-1497
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-019-05624-0

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 6/2020

Journal of General Internal Medicine 6/2020 Zur Ausgabe

Leitlinien kompakt für die Innere Medizin

Mit medbee Pocketcards sicher entscheiden.

Seit 2022 gehört die medbee GmbH zum Springer Medizin Verlag

Neu im Fachgebiet Innere Medizin

22.04.2024 | DGIM 2024 | Kongressbericht | Nachrichten

Krebspatienten impfen: Was? Wen? Und wann nicht?

22.04.2024 | DGIM 2024 | Kongressbericht | Nachrichten

Nierenultraschall: Tipps vom Profi

22.04.2024 | DGIM 2024 | Kongressbericht | Nachrichten

„KI sieht, was wir nicht sehen“

Update Innere Medizin

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.