Skip to main content
Erschienen in: European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery 2/2021

24.04.2019 | Original Article

Different approaches towards geriatric trauma care for hip fracture patients: an inter-hospital comparison

verfasst von: Jip Kusen, Puck van der Vet, Frans-Jasper Wijdicks, Marijn Houwert, Marcel Dijkgraaf, Marije Hamaker, Olivia Geraghty, Egbert-Jan Verleisdonk, Detlef van der Velde

Erschienen in: European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery | Ausgabe 2/2021

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

Hip fractures in geriatric patients have high morbidity and mortality rates. The implementation of a multidisciplinary geriatric care pathway (GCP) may improve treatment for this patient population. This study focusses on two level II hospitals with a different treatment protocols. A comparison was made between a multidisciplinary GCP and extensive standard care with a focus on geriatric hip fracture patients to assess if a multidisciplinary GCP leads to lower mortality and morbidity.

Methods

This retrospective cohort study included patients aged 70 years or older with a unilateral proximal hip fracture who underwent surgery between January 2014 and December 2015. The primary outcome measures complications and 30-day mortality. Secondary outcome measures were time to surgery, hospital length of stay (HLOS) and secondary surgical interventions.

Results

This study included a total of 898 patients. No differences were found between major postoperative complications, 30-day mortality, HLOS or the amount of secondary surgical interventions.

Conclusions

Mortality, major complications, HLOS and the amount of secondary surgical interventions showed no differences between both hospitals. This inter-hospital comparison of two types of geriatric care models showed no outcome that favours one specific geriatric care model over another. This provides opportunities for future studies to get a better understanding of what specific factors of geriatric care models contribute most to an improvement in the treatment of this patient population and decide which approach is most cost effective.
Literatur
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Cumming RG, Nevitt MC, Cummings SR. Epidemiology of hip fractures. Epidemiol Rev. 1997;19(2):244–57.CrossRef Cumming RG, Nevitt MC, Cummings SR. Epidemiology of hip fractures. Epidemiol Rev. 1997;19(2):244–57.CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Rubenstein LZ, Stuck AE, Siu AL, Wieland D. Impacts of geriatric evaluation and management programs on defined outcomes: overview of the evidence. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1991;39(9 Pt 2):8S–16S (discussion 7S–8S).CrossRef Rubenstein LZ, Stuck AE, Siu AL, Wieland D. Impacts of geriatric evaluation and management programs on defined outcomes: overview of the evidence. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1991;39(9 Pt 2):8S–16S (discussion 7S–8S).CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Different approaches towards geriatric trauma care for hip fracture patients: an inter-hospital comparison
verfasst von
Jip Kusen
Puck van der Vet
Frans-Jasper Wijdicks
Marijn Houwert
Marcel Dijkgraaf
Marije Hamaker
Olivia Geraghty
Egbert-Jan Verleisdonk
Detlef van der Velde
Publikationsdatum
24.04.2019
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery / Ausgabe 2/2021
Print ISSN: 1863-9933
Elektronische ISSN: 1863-9941
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-019-01129-x

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2021

European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery 2/2021 Zur Ausgabe

Arthropedia

Grundlagenwissen der Arthroskopie und Gelenkchirurgie. Erweitert durch Fallbeispiele, Videos und Abbildungen. 
» Jetzt entdecken

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.