Background
Gastric cancer (GC) is categorized into three types based on Lauren’s pathological classification: diffuse type, intestinal type, and mixed type [
1]. Diffuse-type gastric cancer (DGC) is associated with more advanced disease stage and poorer survival than intestinal-type gastric cancer (IGC) [
2,
3]. It is well known that protein or gene overexpression of receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs) correlates with tumor progression and poor survival in GC [
4,
5]. The immunohistochemical overexpression of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), one of the RTKs, was detected more frequently in IGC than in DGC [
6]. Comprehensive genomic analyses performed in The Genomic Cancer Atlas (TGCA) project revealed different genomic alterations of RTKs between DGC and IGC [
7]. Therefore, the impact of RTK overexpression on clinical outcomes might differ between DGC and IGC.
The fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) family comprises one type of RTK that regulates fundamental developmental pathways by interacting with fibroblast growth factors (FGFs). FGF signaling participates in several biological functions in the adult organism, including regulation of angiogenesis and wound repair. FGFRs are expressed on a number of different cell types and regulate key cell activities, such as proliferation, survival, migration, and differentiation [
8].
FGFR2 gene amplification was initially found in a GC cell line originating from DGC with the poorest prognosis [
9]. Gene amplification or protein overexpression of
FGFR2 has been reported in GC, leading to poor outcomes [
10]. Moreover, GC cell lines presenting with
FGFR2 amplification are highly sensitive to inhibition of FGFR signaling by tyrosine kinase inhibitors and monoclonal antibodies in preclinical models [
11,
12]. FGFR2 has thus attracted considerable attention as a novel therapeutic candidate for the development of targeted anticancer agents [
13].
We previously reported the relations of the immunohistochemical expressions of FGFR1–4 to tumor progression or poor survival in GC. However, tumors were classified into differentiated and undifferentiated types based on the World Health Organization pathological classification in the previous study and were not classified according to Lauren’s classification [
14]. The present study was designed to reevaluate the clinical significance of FGFR1–4 expression separately in DGC and IGC diagnosed according to Lauren’s classification, excluding mixed-type GC.
Discussion
Our results suggested that the clinical significance of the immunohistochemical expression of FGFRs might differ between DGC and IGC. High FGFR4 expression was frequently found in DGC and even in IGC and was significantly related to tumor progression and metastasis in both types of GC. Previous studies showed that overexpression of FGFR4 protein or
FGFR4 mRNA correlated with shorter survival in GC [
16,
17]. However, FGFR4 protein was not significantly associated with clinicopathological factors such as tumor depth or lymph-node metastasis [
16,
18]. FGFR4 protein overexpression was shown to be an independent prognostic factor in non-small cell lung cancer [
19] and colorectal cancer [
20]. In addition, the FGFR4 Arg388 allele, leading to high FGFR protein expression, correlated with shorter survival in GC [
21]. In an in vitro study, FGFR4 showed different intracellular sorting patterns from those of FGFR1–3. FGFR4 and its bound ligand were sorted mainly to the recycling compartment and could prolong signaling, whereas FGFR1, 2, and 3 with their ligands were sorted mainly to degradation in lysosomes [
22]. Colorectal cancer cell lines cocultured with tumor-associated fibroblasts (TAF) induced significant overexpression of FGFR4, but not of other FGFRs [
23]. In addition, FGFR4 plays crucial roles in TAF-induced epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition [
23]. Thus, FGFR4 might play a different role from other FGFRs in malignant tumors.
In the present study, high FGFR2 expression significantly correlated with tumor progression and survival in only DGC, and such expression was likely to be associated with peritoneal dissemination. On the basis of whole-genome sequence data, many IGCs were classified as chromosomally unstable tumors, in which RTK-RAS signal transduction pathway is often activated [
7]. Moreover, FGFR2 amplification was mutually exclusive from the amplification of other RTKs [
4]. The overexpression of HER2 or c-MET was observed more frequently in IGC than in DGC [
6,
24], suggesting that a signaling pathway activated by these RTKs might have a critical role in the progression and prognosis of IGC. HER2 overexpression was often found in IGC without significant association of FGFRs in this study, and our results might support those of another study reporting exclusive RTK expression [
5]. In a previous review, FGFR2 protein overexpression on immunohistochemical analysis was found more frequently in undifferentiated GC than in differentiated GC [
10]. Another study reported that GC tumors with FGFR2 protein overexpression were significantly more common in DGC than in IGC [
25]. A further study showed that FGFR2 protein overexpression was significantly associated with poor survival and peritoneal dissemination in GC [
5]. These findings suggest that FGFR2 can contribute to the development of DGC or undifferentiated GC, often in association with peritoneal dissemination. However, FGFR2 overexpression was similarly observed in differentiated GC and undifferentiated GC in a study of 950 Japanese patients [
5].
FGFR2 gene amplification was initially detected in a scirrhous-type GC cell line [
26]. Similar presences of
FGFR2 amplification in DGC and IGC or in undifferentiated GC and differentiated GC have been reported by some studies; however, such amplification was not often found in GC (1.8 to 9.3%) [
4,
27‐
32].
FGFR2 gene amplification was significantly related to poor survival in GC [
27‐
31]. A meta-analysis including various types of cancers showed that
FGFR2 amplification significantly correlated with poor survival [
33]. FGFR2 inhibitors are being studied as anticancer agents against
FGFR2-amplified GC in ongoing clinical trials [
10].
High FGFR1 protein expression was significantly associated with poor survival and the presence of peritoneal dissemination in only DGC in the present study. To our knowledge, no previous study has assessed the clinical significance of FGFR1 protein expression in DGC. Amplification of the
FGFR1 gene was a rare but noticeable event that was found in 2% (6 of 293) of GCs and was associated with distant metastasis and poor survival in another study, although tumors with
FGFR1 amplification were found in IGC, DGC, and mixed-type GC [
34]. FGFR1 protein expression of ≥1% in tumors was associated with poor survival in patients with breast cancer [
35].
FGFR1 amplification was also associated with poor survival in esophageal cancer [
36], breast cancer [
37], and squamous-cell lung cancer [
38]. In a study of colorectal cancer, the copy number gain of
FGFR1 significantly correlated with worse outcomes [
39]. The clinical significance of FGFR3 protein expression differs somewhat among tumor types. FGFR3 protein expression was not associated with any clinicopathological feature in the present study, although few studies of FGFR3 expression in gastrointestinal cancers have been reported. No relation was found between FGFR3 protein expression and clinicopathological features in breast cancer [
40]. FGFR3 protein expression did not correlate with survival in urothelial carcinoma of the bladder [
41]. In contrast, FGFR3 protein expression was significantly associated with shorter survival in multiple myeloma [
42].
In our study, FGFRs were expressed mainly in the cytoplasm and partially even in the nucleus. FGFR2 and 4 were mainly found in the cytoplasm of GC cells in other studies [
5,
17], which was supported by our results. Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) or HER2 was expressed mainly in the membrane on immunohistochemical analysis, although other RTKs, such as HER3 or cMET, were found not only in the membrane but also in the cytoplasm or nucleus of GC cells [
43,
44]. EGFR was also transported in the nucleus, and nuclear localized EGFR is strongly associated with disease progression and worse overall survival in numerous cancers [
45]. The status of
Helicobacter pylori infection was not investigated in this study. However, infection with CagA-positive strains of
Helicobacter pylori was significantly associated with the presence of GC in both IGC and DGC [
46].
Acknowledgements
The authors deeply thank Yoko Takagi and Junko Inoue for her exceptional technical assistance with the immunohistochemical staining in the present study.